Improving accuracy of burn referrals through the use of an internet-based burns chart

Does Referral Distance Deteriorates the Burn Patients Outcome? Results From an Academic Tertiary Hospital in a Developing Country

Every year millions of people are burned and many of them are transported to specialized burn centers. One of the most important challenges in the face of burn patients in urban areas is deciding about referring patients to specialized burn centers. In this study, correlation between referral distance and mortality rate is investigated. Our cross-sectional analytic study included admission data of 7248 burn patients from Imam Reza Burn Center (Mashhad, Iran) over 9 years. The outcomes of interest were mortality, length of hospital stay, and the Abbreviated Burn Severity Index (ABSI). Also, we measured the distance between the patient referral location to Mashhad. SPSS version 16 was used for data analysis. Overall, 52.7% of admitted patients were referred from hospitals in other cities. The referred group had more severe burn injury (P < .001), higher mortality rate (P < .001), and longer length of hospital stay (P < .001). The referred distance was associated with an increased risk of death (Odds ratio = 1.68, 95% CI, 1.47-1.92), but after controlling the severity of burns, only ABSI was the statistically significant predictor of mortality (Odds ration = 2.17, 95% CI, 2.05-2.28). Therefore, increasing the distance from urban areas to specialized burn center did not increase the mortality rate. After adjusting for ABSI, the mortality rate in referred patients was not related to referral distance. By observing referral points based on available guidelines, distance from a referral burn center does not affect mortality rate independently. Therefore, equipping the existing burn centers instead of building new ones and focusing on improving referral system can be a good strategy in low- and middle-income countries with limited resources.

Applications, opportunities, and challenges in using Telehealth for burn injury management: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Burns are global public health devastating and life-threatening injuries. Telehealth can be an appropriate answer for the effective utilization of health care resources, prevention referrals and reduce socio-economic burden of burns injuries. Thus, this study aimed to systematically evaluate the applications, opportunities, and challenges of using telehealth in burn injuries management.

METHODS

A structured search was conducted according to PRISMA statement guidelines in the Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and Science Direct as well as the Google Scholar for studies published until June 28, 2022. Of the total 2301 yielded studies, 36 articles were included in the final review. Quality appraisal was done according to the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018. Thematic analysis was applied for data analysis.

RESULTS

Patient triage, transfer, and referral (38.9%) follow-up (22%), care (22%), consultation (9%), education (3%), and rehabilitation (3%) were the most prevalent application of telehealth, respectively. Our findings identified 72 unique concepts, eight initial themes, and two clinical and administrative final themes for opportunities of using telehealth in burn injury management. Furthermore, we identified 27 unique concepts, three initial themes, and two clinical and administrative final themes for remaining challenges.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite providing pivotal opportunities such as improving burn injury diagnosis and quality of care, increasing patient and provider satisfaction, and cost containment using telehealth in burn injuries management, the concept faces challenges such as the impossibility of the physical examination of patients and technological difficulties. Our findings provide valuable information for policymakers and decision-makers infield of burn injuries and effective planning for using telehealth technology.

Comparison of traditional burn wound mapping with a computerized program

Accurate burn estimation affects the use of burn resuscitation formulas and treatment strategies, and thus can affect patient outcomes. The objective of this process-improvement project was to compare the accuracy of a computer-based burn mapping program, WoundFlow (WF), with the widely used hand-mapped Lund-Browder (LB) diagram. Manikins with various burn representations (from 1% to more than 60% TBSA) were used for comparison of the WF system and LB diagrams. Burns were depicted on the manikins using red vinyl adhesive. Healthcare providers responsible for mapping of burn patients were asked to perform burn mapping of the manikins. Providers were randomized to either an LB or a WF group. Differences in the total map area between groups were analyzed. Also, direct measurements of the burn representations were taken and compared with LB and WF results. The results of 100 samples, compared using Bland-Altman analysis, showed no difference between the two methods. WF was as accurate as LB mapping for all burn surface areas. WF may be additionally beneficial in that it can track daily progress until complete wound closure, and can automatically calculate burn size, thus decreasing the chances of mathematical errors.