Comparison between nylon and PDS suture for maintaining and stabilizing tip projection and rotation after rhinoplasty using tongue-in-groove technique

A Modified Technique in Rhinoplasty: A Septal Extension Graft Complex Using Septal Cartilage, Ethmoid Bone, and Auricular Cartilage

BACKGROUND

Due to the small and weak septal cartilage of Asians, it is a challenge to obtain ideal tip projection and nose lengthening in this population by performing septal extension grafts with only septal cartilage.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to introduce a septal extension graft complex incorporating nasal septal cartilage, the perpendicular plate of the ethmoid bone, and bilateral auricular cartilage, and to examine its effectiveness in terms of morphological and mechanical support.

METHODS

Septal cartilage was harvested under an endoscope according to standard techniques. Two pieces of the perpendicular plate of the ethmoid bone, placed on either side of the "L" strut, served as 2 spreader grafts. A double layer of auricular cartilage was fixed as columellar strut grafts. Three-dimensional facial scanning was used to examine the change of 3 parameters. Nasal tip resistance was evaluated by a digital Newton meter.

RESULTS

In total, 25 patients were followed up postoperatively for a mean of 25.9 months. The analysis showed significant differences in both contour parameters and nasal resistance: nasal length (mean [standard deviation], 41.4 [4.0] vs 46.2 [3.4] mm, P < 0.05) and nasal tip projection (21.3 [3.2] vs 24.4 [2.7] mm, P < 0.05) appeared to increase postoperatively, whereas nasolabial angle (117.6° [5.9°] vs 109.5° [5.3°], P < 0.05) showed a significant decrease after surgery. The resistance of the nasal tip also increased significantly (P < 0.05) at displacements of 1, 2, and 3 mm. All patients were satisfied with the aesthetic results, and no serious complications occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

This kind of modified septal extension graft technique can effectively adjust nasal morphology for short-nose East Asians.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Analysis of Study Designs and Primary Outcome Measures in Clinical Trials of Investigational Suture Materials

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials are a prerequisite for any investigational suture materials before a market approval application. The appropriate study designs and primary outcome measures are key to the validity and reliability of clinical trial results. This study aimed to characterize the study designs and primary outcome measures being applied in clinical trials of investigational suture materials.

METHODS

The systematic searches on PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Sciences, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were conducted to gather relevant studies published between January-2019 and May-2021. Data on general characteristics, suture intervention, study design, and primary outcome measures were extracted and analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 46 included studies, the majority of them were conducted with a randomized-controlled (93.5%), single-blind (50.0%), two-arm (84.8%), and parallel (76.1%) design with a 1:1 allocation ratio (95.7%). Through correlation network and heatmap analysis, the moderate-to-very strong correlations between some types of investigational suture materials and primary outcome measures were found including barbed vs non-barbed suture and suturing time, antibacterial-coated vs non-coated suture and wound infection, mono- vs multi-filament suture and wound healing index/markers, and different sizes of suture materials and scar assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis provides guidance, with several key considerations, for designing a clinical trial evaluating investigational suture materials.