Closure of infected sternal wounds with a unilateral rectus abdominis muscle flap in addition to bilateral pectoralis major myocutaneous advancement flaps

The use of flaps for management of deep sternal wound complications: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Many options are available for reconstruction after deep sternal wound infections. However, these options have not been critically appraised. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the existing evidence on sternal rewiring versus flap reconstruction and pectoralis major muscle flaps (PMFs) versus greater omental flaps (GOFs).

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched. Outcomes of interest included mortality, treatment failure and length of hospital stay (LOS).

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were included. Nine studies compared flaps to rewiring, reporting on 618 patients. Patients treated with flaps had significantly lower mortality compared with patient treated with rewiring (Risk ratio [RR] 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.23-0.77, P < 0.01). Flap patients had significantly lower treatment failure compared with those who were treated with rewiring (RR 0.22, 95% CI: 0.14-0.37, P < 0.01). No statistically significant differences were observed in LOS between patients treated with flaps compared those treated with rewiring (standard mean difference -0.84, 95% CI: -1.91 to 0.24, P = 0.13). Five studies compared PMF with GOF, reporting on 599 patients. No statistically significant differences were found in mortality (RR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.24-1.68, P = 0.36), LOS (standard mean difference -14.52, 95% CI: -42.00 to 12.96, P = 0.30) or treatment failure (RR 1.37, 95% CI: 0.31-6.07, P = 0.68) in patients treated with PMF compared with patients treated with GOF.

CONCLUSIONS

Flap-based reconstruction demonstrated improved mortality and treatment outcomes compared to sternal rewiring. However, no significant differences were observed in outcomes between the PMF- and GOF-based reconstructions.

[Treatment regimen for deep sternal wound infections after cardiac surgical interventions in an interdisciplinary approach]

The aim of this article is to present the importance of a structured and situation-adapted approach based on the diagnostic and therapeutic strategy in the interdisciplinary treatment of 54 patients with deep sternal wound infections (DSWI) after cardiac surgical interventions and the results achieved. The patients were 41 men and 13 women with an average age of 65.1 years, who developed a DSWI after a cardiac surgical intervention during the period 2003-2016. The treatment strategy included a thorough debridement including the removal of indwelling foreign material, the reconstruction with a stable re-osteosynthesis after overcoming the infection and if necessary, situation-related surgical flaps for a defect coverage with a good blood supply and mandatory avoidance of dead spaces. A total of 146 operations were necessary (average 2.7 operations/patient, range 1-7 operations). In 24.1 % of the cases a one-stage approach could be carried out. In 41 patients negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) with programmed sponge changing was used for wound conditioning (mean 5 changes, standard deviation, SD± 5.6 changes over 22 days, SD± 23.9 days, change interval every 3-4 days in 40.7% of the cases). In 33 patients a bilateral myocutaneous pectoralis major flap was used, in 4 patients a vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap and in 7 patients both were carried out. A total of 43 osteosynthesis procedures were carried out on the sternum with fixed-angle titanium plates. Of the patients 7 died during intensive care unit treatment (total mortality 13 %, n = 5, 9.3 % ≤ 30 days) or in the later course. Of the patients 47 (87.1 %) could be discharged with a cleansed infection. In 2 patients the implant was removed after 2 years due to loosening.

Single-stage repair of the anterior chest wall following sternal destruction complicated by mediastinitis

PURPOSE

Although various techniques have been described, the ideal reconstructive procedure for treating massive sternal fragmentation and necrosis is still a matter of debate. Sometimes, reconstruction is so challenging that repetitive operations are required, particularly when complicated by mediastinitis and sternal osteomyelitis.

METHODS

Five patients (three males, two females, median age 66) with severe osteomyelitis and sternal destruction after receiving myocardial revascularization underwent partial or radical sternal resection, omental flap transposition, titanium mesh implantation and rectus abdominis muscle flap transposition. The final procedure involved single-stage closure.

RESULTS

One patient died 9 days after the final procedure due to pneumonia and septicemia. The other patients received antibiotics for at least 6 weeks postoperatively. The mean hospital stay was 36 days. Optimal wound healing was observed, with acceptable cosmetic disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

Although lateral sternal support is the first-line surgical treatment for sternal dehiscence, performing primary closure of complicated defects is often impossible. Aggressive treatment modalities are required in such cases for anterior chest wall defects. This technique provides the ability to perform rigid and stable sternal closure in complicated cases.