Mitral Valve Surgery in the First Year of Life

Midterm Outcomes After Surgical Management for Mitral Valve Regurgitation in Infancy

Background

Mitral valve repair is preferred for pediatric mitral valve disease. However, it is technically difficult because of complex lesions, poor surgical exposure, and tissue fragility, especially in infants. We investigated the midterm outcomes of mitral valve surgery for mitral regurgitation in infancy.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 18 patients (aged <12 months old) undergoing mitral valve surgery for mitral regurgitation at our institution between October 2005 and March 2019. The patients had 10 acquired and 8 congenital valve lesions as follows: torn chordae ( n = 6), leaflet prolapse ( n = 4), posterior leaflet hypoplasia ( n = 3), anterior leaflet cleft ( n = 2), infective endocarditis ( n = 1), papillary muscle rupture ( n = 1), and hammock valve ( n = 1).

Results

All patients initially underwent mitral valve repair. There was no operative mortality, and 1 case of late death. The median follow-up period was 7 years and 9 months. Reoperation was performed in 3 patients, re-repair (twice) in 1 patient with a hammock valve, and mitral valve replacement in 2 patients. Fifteen patients had at most mild mitral regurgitation at the last follow-up. A transmitral mean pressure gradient of over 5 mm Hg was observed in 3 cases, including the patient with a hammock valve. Postoperative mitral annular diameter increased within the normal range in all patients. Survival and reoperation-free rates at 5 and 10 years were 94.4% and 83.0%, respectively.

Conclusions

Mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation in infancy is safe and feasible with satisfactory midterm outcomes, even under serious preoperative conditions.

Replacement of the Mitral Valve Under One Year of Age: Size Matters

Surgical management of mitral valve disease in neonates and infants is challenging. When repair is no longer feasible, replacement may become inevitable, but should only be considered as an option of last resort due to the remarkably high rate of associated morbidity and mortality. Mechanical valves are the preferred choice in large annuli, while stented conduits seem promising in smaller ones. In patients with a preoperative mitral valve annulus equal or larger than 15-16 mm, an intra-annular placement of the smallest mechanical valve available should be attempted. In patients with smaller annuli, the placement of a stented valved conduit seems to display a lower mortality risk. Supra-annular implantation of prostheses should be reserved for exceptional cases and to those familiar with this technique because of the high rate of associated complications.