Three Decades of Follow-up After Surgical Closure of Subarterial Ventricular Septal Defect

Progression of aortic regurgitation following transcatheter closure of intracristal ventricular septal defects in children: a mid- to long-term follow-up study

Background

Early surgical closure is warranted to prevent aortic valve lesion and aortic regurgitation (AR) in intracristal ventricular septal defects (icVSDs). Experiences for transcatheter device closure of icVSDs are still limited. Our objectives are to investigate AR progression following transcatheter closure of icVSDs in children and to explore the risk factors for AR progression.

Methods and results

From January 2007 to December 2017, 50 children with icVSD who had successfully undergone transcatheter closure were enrolled. With 4.0 (interquartile range: 3.0-6.2) years of follow-up, AR progression was observed in 20% (10/50) of patients after icVSD occlusion, among which 16% (8/50) remained in mild level and 4% (2/50) evolved to moderate. None progressed to severe AR. Freedom from AR progression was 84.0%, 79.5%, and 79.5% at 1, 5, and 10 years of follow-up. A multivariate Cox proportional-hazards model revealed that x-ray exposure time [hazard ratio (HR): 1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04-1.18, P = 0.001] and the ratio of pulmonary to systemic blood flows (HR: 3.38, 95% CI: 1.11-10.29, P = 0.032) were independent predictors for AR progression.

Conclusions

Our study suggested that transcatheter closure of icVSD in children is safe and feasible in mid- to long-term follow-up. No serious AR progression occurred after icVSD device closure. Greater left-to-right shunting and longer x-ray exposure time were both risk factors for AR progression.

Managing uncertainty in decision-making of common congenital cardiac defects

Decision-making in congenital cardiac care, although sometimes appearing simple, may prove challenging due to lack of data, uncertainty about outcomes, underlying heuristics, and potential biases in how we reach decisions. We report on the decision-making complexities and uncertainty in management of five commonly encountered congenital cardiac problems: indications for and timing of treatment of subaortic stenosis, closure or observation of small ventricular septal defects, management of new-onset aortic regurgitation in ventricular septal defect, management of anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery in an asymptomatic patient, and indications for operating on a single anomalously draining pulmonary vein. The strategy underpinning each lesion and the indications for and against intervention are outlined. Areas of uncertainty are clearly delineated. Even in the presence of "simple" congenital cardiac lesions, uncertainty exists in decision-making. Awareness and acceptance of uncertainty is first required to facilitate efforts at mitigation. Strategies to circumvent uncertainty in these scenarios include greater availability of evidence-based medicine, larger datasets, standardised clinical assessment and management protocols, and potentially the incorporation of artificial intelligence into the decision-making process.