Multiple thoracic vertebral compression fractures caused by non-accidental injury: case report with radiological-pathological correlation

Mimics of child abuse: Can choking explain abusive head trauma?

Choking is one of the alternative explanations of abusive head trauma in children that have been offered in courtroom testimony and in the media. Most of these explanations - including choking - are not scientifically supported. This article highlights four points. (1) The origins of choking as an explanation for intracranial and retinal hemorrhages are speculative. (2) Choking has been used in high profile court testimony as an explanation for the death of a child thought to have been abused. (3) A case report that proposes choking as an alternative explanation for the death of a child diagnosed with abusive head trauma includes omissions and misrepresentations of facts. (4) There was a decision by the editor of the journal that published the case report that it was not necessary to include all the facts of the case; moreover, the editor indicated that facts are not required when presenting an alternative explanation. The use of scientifically unsupported alternative explanations for abusive head trauma based on inaccurate and biased information constitutes further victimization of the abused child and represents a travesty of justice.

Prevalence and relevance of pediatric spinal fractures in suspected child abuse

BACKGROUND

Spinal fractures are uncommon manifestations of child abuse and elimination of the lateral views of the spine from the initial skeletal survey protocol has been recommended.

OBJECTIVE

To establish the prevalence of spinal fractures detected on skeletal surveys performed for suspected child abuse and their association with intracranial injury (ICI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The ACR standardized skeletal surveys and neuroimaging studies of 751 children (ages 0-4 years) were reviewed. A positive skeletal survey was defined as having one or more clinically unsuspected fractures.

RESULTS

Fourteen children had a total of 22 definite spinal fractures. This constituted 1.9% (14/751) of the total cohort, and 9.7% (14/145) of children with a positive skeletal survey. Advanced imaging confirmed the fractures in 13 of the 14 children and demonstrated 12 additional spinal fractures. In five cases, spinal fractures were the only positive skeletal findings. In 71% (10/14) of the children, the spinal fractures were accompanied by ICI. Children with spinal fractures were at significantly greater risk for ICI than those without spinal injury (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Spinal fractures are not rare in children with positive skeletal surveys performed for suspected abuse and they may be the only indication of skeletal trauma. There is an association between spinal fractures and ICI.

Circumferential fixation with craniofacial miniplates for a cervical spine injury in a child

Unstable pediatric cervical spine injuries present significant challenges in terms of fixation. Given the smaller cervical vertebral bodies in the preschool-aged population, commercially available pediatric cervical fixation instrumentation may be unsuitable because of the inappropriately large size of the screws and plates. The authors describe a 2-year-old girl who sustained an unstable C6-7 distraction injury during a motor vehicle accident. Because of the small size of her vertebral bodies, standard cervical spine instrumentation was not feasible, and posterior wiring alone was believed to be insufficient because of the complete distraction of all 3 spinal columns. The patient was taken to the operating room where craniofacial plates with an inherent locking mechanism were used to circumferentially stabilize the cervical spine. Follow-up examination 6 months postoperatively demonstrated stable cervical spine alignment and fusion with no evidence of the failure of either the anterior or posterior hardware. The use of craniofacial miniplates with an intrinsic locking mechanism represents a superior alternative for both anterior and posterior cervical fixations when spinal instrumentation is needed in the pediatric age group.

Pediatric nonaccidental trauma thoracolumbar fracture-dislocation: posterior spinal fusion with pedicle screw fixation in an 8-month-old boy

STUDY DESIGN

Case report of pedicle screw fixation in an infant with nonaccidental spine trauma.

OBJECTIVE

To ensure awareness of nonaccidental pediatric spine trauma and describe a safe and effective method of treating a complex problem of thoracolumbar fracture-dislocation in an infant.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Nonaccidental pediatric spine trauma is rare, accounting for <1% of abuse. No previous cases of pedicle screw fixation have been described in a patient younger than 1 year of age. Prior treatment of this clinical entity has been treated with casts or wire-fixation.

METHODS

An 8-month-old boy had a nonaccidental (also known as child abuse) traumatic T12-L1 fracture-dislocation. This was subsequently surgically corrected with posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation with pedicle screws.

RESULTS

After surgery, the patient is doing well with no adverse effects from surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Although child abuse is a rare cause of spinal trauma, clinicians should do a full skeletal survey to ensure no other injuries are overlooked. Pedicle screw fixation can be used in infants with unstable traumatic spinal injuries, allowing earlier rehabilitation and return to normal activity level.