1
|
Bayraktar EA, Li J, Cortese J, Bilgin C, Ueki Y, Kadirvel R, Brinjikji W, Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF. Optimizing the hemodynamics of hand injections in neuroangiography. Interv Neuroradiol 2024; 30:833-838. [PMID: 39311020 PMCID: PMC11733087 DOI: 10.1177/15910199241285944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2024] [Accepted: 08/29/2024] [Indexed: 12/06/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Optimizing the preparation of a 10 ml syringe for manual injection of contrast media can help operators obtain easier and faster injections. This study aims to compare the flow rates of different contrast media injection methods. METHODS Different contrast media solutions were compared: 100% contrast (10 ml contrast), mixed contrast solution (8:2 contrast/saline), and layered contrast below saline ("Parfait") in different volumes. Contrast media were injected at room temperature (20°C) and after heating (37°C). Four operators injected 10 ml syringes filled with different mediums through 5-French angiographic catheters. The average flow rate was used to compare different contrast injection mediums. The Kruskal-Wallis test with post-hoc pairwise comparisons using Bonferroni correction or Mann-Whitney U-tests were employed depending on the type of comparison. RESULTS Compared to the 100% contrast solution, every Parfait media and mixed contrast solution demonstrated significantly higher flow rates (p < 0.001). The 5 ml saline Parfait had the highest flow rate among the Parfait solutions. The 5 ml saline Parfait and the mixed solution had comparable flow rates (p = 0.237). Higher flow rates were observed upon heating both 100% contrast (p < 0.001) and mixed contrast solutions (p < 0.001) in comparison to their flow rates at room temperature. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates the capability of the Parfait and mixed contrast injections to achieve higher flow rates than the 100% contrast solutions. Heating the contrast media to 37°C also proves to be a viable strategy for further enhancing the flow rates for 100% and mixed contrast solutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jiahui Li
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA
- Stroke Research, Vall d’Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jonathan Cortese
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Interventional Neuroradiology (NEURI Vascular Center), Bicetre University-Hospital, Le Kremlin Bicetre, France
| | - Cem Bilgin
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Yasuhito Ueki
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Waleed Brinjikji
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Harry J Cloft
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Van Cauteren T, Van Gompel G, Tanaka K, Verdries DE, Belsack D, Nieboer KH, Willekens I, Evans P, Macholl S, Verfaillie G, Droogmans S, de Mey J, Buls N. The Impact of Combining a Low-Tube Voltage Acquisition with Iterative Reconstruction on Total Iodine Dose in Coronary CT Angiography. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2017; 2017:2476171. [PMID: 28620616 PMCID: PMC5460391 DOI: 10.1155/2017/2476171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2017] [Revised: 03/16/2017] [Accepted: 03/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the impact of combining low-tube voltage acquisition with iterative reconstruction (IR) techniques on the iodine dose in coronary CTA. METHODS Three minipigs underwent CCTA to compare a standard of care protocol with two alternative study protocols combining low-tube voltage and low iodine dose with IR. Image quality was evaluated objectively by the CT value, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in the main coronary arteries and aorta and subjectively by expert reading. Statistics were performed by Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-square analysis. RESULTS Despite reduced iodine dose, both study protocols maintained CT values, SNR, and CNR compared to the standard of care protocol. Expert readings confirmed these findings; all scans were perceived to be of at least diagnostically acceptable quality on all evaluated parameters allowing image interpretation. No statistical differences were observed (all p values > 0.11), except for streak artifacts (p = 0.02) which were considered to be more severe, although acceptable, with the 80 kVp protocol. CONCLUSIONS Reduced tube voltage in combination with IR allows a total iodine dose reduction between 37 and 50%, by using contrast media with low iodine concentrations of 200 and 160 mg I/mL, while maintaining image quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toon Van Cauteren
- Radiology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Gert Van Gompel
- Radiology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Kaoru Tanaka
- Radiology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Douwe E. Verdries
- Radiology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Dries Belsack
- Radiology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Koenraad H. Nieboer
- Radiology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Inneke Willekens
- Radiology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Paul Evans
- Imaging R&D, GE Healthcare Life Sciences, The Grove Centre, Amersham, Buckinghamshire, UK
| | - Sven Macholl
- Imaging R&D, GE Healthcare Life Sciences, The Grove Centre, Amersham, Buckinghamshire, UK
| | - Guy Verfaillie
- Radiology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Steven Droogmans
- Radiology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Johan de Mey
- Radiology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Nico Buls
- Radiology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|