Structurally modified bacteriorhodopsin as an efficient bio-sensitizer for solar cell applications

In Silico Study of a Bacteriorhodopsin/TiO2 Hybrid System at the Molecular Level

Bacteriorhodopsin (bR) is a light-harvesting membrane protein that represents a promising sensitizer of TiO2 for photovoltaic and photoelectrochemical devices. However, despite numerous experimental studies, the molecular-level understanding of the bR/TiO2 hybrid system is still unsatisfactory. In this contribution, we report the construction and analysis of an atomistic model of such a system. To do so, both steered molecular dynamics-molecular dynamics and quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics computations are applied to four different bR orientations on the anatase TiO2 surface. The resulting bR/TiO2 models are then used to compute the light absorption maxima changes relative to those of bR. We show that all four models reproduce the experimentally observed blue-shift value induced by bR binding on TiO2 and could be used to study the binding and binding-induced protein modifications. We conclude that the constructed models could provide a basis for future studies aiming to simulate the complex long-range electron transfer mechanism in bR/TiO2-based solar energy conversion devices as well as in engineering bR to achieve enhanced efficiencies.

A bacteriorhodopsin-based biohybrid solar cell using carbon-based electrolyte and cathode components

There is currently a high demand for energy production worldwide, mainly producing renewable and sustainable energy. Bio-sensitized solar cells (BSCs) are an excellent option in this field due to their optical and photoelectrical properties developed in recent years. One of the biosensitizers that shows promise in simplicity, stability and quantum efficiency is bacteriorhodopsin (bR), a photoactive, retinal-containing membrane protein. In the present work, we have utilized a mutant of bR, D96N, in a photoanode-sensitized TiO2 solar cell, integrating low-cost, carbon-based components, including a cathode composed of PEDOT (poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) functionalized with multi-walled carbon nanotubes (CNT) and a hydroquinone/benzoquinone (HQ/BQ) redox electrolyte. The photoanode and cathode were characterized morphologically and chemically (SEM, TEM, and Raman). The electrochemical performance of the bR-BSCs was investigated using linear sweep voltammetry (LSV), open circuit potential decay (VOC), and impedance spectroscopic analysis (EIS). The champion device yielded a current density (JSC) of 1.0 mA/cm2, VOC of -669 mV, a fill factor of ~24 %, and a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 0.16 %. This bR device is one of the first bio-based solar cells utilizing carbon-based alternatives for the photoanode, cathode, and electrolyte. This may decrease the cost and significantly improve the device's sustainability.

Alternative sources of natural pigments for dye-sensitized solar cells: Algae, cyanobacteria, bacteria, archaea and fungi

Dye-sensitized solar cells have been of great interest in photovoltaic technology due to their capacity to convert energy at a low cost. The use of natural pigments means replacing expensive chemical synthesis processes by easily extractable pigments that are non-toxic and environmentally friendly. Although most of the pigments used for this purpose are obtained from higher plants, there are potential alternative sources that have been underexploited and have shown encouraging results, since pigments can also be obtained from organisms like bacteria, cyanobacteria, microalgae, yeast, and molds, which have the potential of being cultivated in bioreactors or optimized by biotechnological processes. The aforementioned organisms are sources of diverse sensitizers like photosynthetic pigments, accessory pigments, and secondary metabolites such as chlorophylls, bacteriochlorophylls, carotenoids, and phycobiliproteins. Moreover, retinal proteins, photosystems, and reaction centers from these organisms can also act as sensitizers. In this review, the use of natural sensitizers extracted from algae, cyanobacteria, bacteria, archaea, and fungi is assessed. The reported photoconversion efficiencies vary from 0.001 % to 4.6 % for sensitizers extracted from algae and microalgae, 0.004 to 1.67 % for bacterial sensitizers, 0.07-0.23 % for cyanobacteria, 0.09 to 0.049 % for archaea and 0.26-2.3 % for pigments from fungi.