Comparison of dynamic ultrasound and stress radiology for assessment of inferior glenohumeral laxity in asymptomatic shoulders

Relationships among hip instability, iliofemoral ligament, and pain in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the relationships among hip instability, pain, and morphology of the iliofemoral ligament (ILFL) in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) using ultrasonography (US).

METHODS

We reviewed 86 patients (109 hips) with DDH (Group D), 40 patients (46 hips) with borderline hip dysplasia (BDDH) (Group B) and 20 patients (23 hips) without hip pain and bony abnormality (control group). Group D was classified into three subgroups-the severe (group SP), moderate (group MP), and none/mild (group NMP) hip pain groups-using the visual analogue scale (VAS). For evaluating hip instability and ILFL morphology, the distance between the anterior edge of the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) and the horizontal line to the femoral head, and ILFL thickness were measured using US. The difference between the distance in the neutral position and Patrick position was calculated and defined as the femoral head translation distance (FTD).

RESULTS

FTD and ILFL thickness in group D were significantly larger than those in the control group and group B (P < 0.05). There was a significant positive correlation between FTD and ILFL thickness in three groups (r = 0.57, P < 0.05; r = 0.55, P < 0.05; r = 0.62, P < 0.05, respectively). FTD and ILFL thickness in group SP were significantly larger than those in group NMP (P < 0.05). FTD and ILFL thickness in group D had significantly negative correlations with the lateral center edge (r = -0.54, P < 0.05; r = -0.40, P < 0.05, respectively) and vertical-center-anterior angle (r = -0.51, P < 0.05; r = -0.43, P < 0.05, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Acetabular bony deficiency, especially in the anterior and lateral region can result in antero-posterior hip instability, leading to thickened ILFL and hip pain, even in patients with BDDH. These findings may facilitate our understanding and treatment of patients with DDH. When hip instability is suspected, hip US examination may help confirm the diagnosis and assist in providing objective clinical diagnostic evidence.

Diagnostic value of measuring the talofibular space using stress sonography in chronic lateral ankle instability

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the diagnostic value of measuring the talofibular space using stress sonography for chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI).

MATERIALS & METHODS

We recruited patients who were clinically diagnosed with CLAI between October 2018 and December 2019 (CLAI group). A control group of healthy volunteers was also included for this study. Both groups underwent a preliminary stress sonographic examination. First, the ultrasonic characteristics of the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL), including length, thickness, relaxation, calcification, and rupture, were observed using conventional sonography. Second, the talofibular space at the passive neutral position (D1) and maximum varus position (D2) was measured (by stress sonographic images), and the difference (ΔD = D1-D2) between them was determined. Third, the parameters of the two groups were statistically compared. Finally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) analyses were performed for parameters with significant differences.

RESULTS

The CLAI group comprised 60 patients, yielding data on 60 ankles, whereas the control group comprised 35 participants, yielding data for 70 ankles. Differences in D1, D2, and ΔD of the talofibular space between the two groups were significant, with ΔD proving to be the best diagnostic indicator (P < 0.001). Its AUC, optimal cutoff value, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.922, 0.11 cm, 73 %, and 94 %, respectively, followed by D2 (0.850, 0.47 cm, 67 %, and 94 %, respectively; P < 0.001) and D1 (0.635, 0.47 cm, 67 %, and 94 %, respectively; P = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

Measurement of talofibular space in stress sonography is a valuable diagnostic indicator for CLAI, especially the ΔD between the neutral and stress position.

Dynamic ultrasound assessment of hip instability and anterior and posterior hip impingement

OBJECTIVE

In this technical report, we describe our protocol for the dynamic sonographic evaluation of the hip and assess reliability of the ultrasound assessment of hip microinstability.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our clinical experience with a standardized dynamic ultrasound of the hip performed in a series of 27 patients with imaging performed by an experienced musculoskeletal radiologist during physical examination by an orthopedic surgeon specializing in hip preservation is illustrated with clinical photographs and ultrasound images from volunteers and selected patients. Interrater reliability for the diagnosis of microinstability was calculated.

RESULTS

Dynamic ultrasound technique and findings of hip instability, femoroacetabular impingement, and ischiofemoral impingement with corresponding clinical photos showing the necessary physical examination maneuvers are described. Interrater agreement for the diagnosis of microinstability was substantial (κ 0.606 [0.221-0.991]).

CONCLUSION

At our institution, dynamic ultrasound of the hip during physical examination complements information gathered from static imaging by providing real-time correlation of symptoms with what is occurring anatomically.

Generalized Joint Laxity Is Associated With Dynamic Hip Ultrasonography Measures in Female Athlete Patients Who Are Not Hypermobile

OBJECTIVES

To investigate ultrasound (US) femoroacetabular translation measurements in female athlete patients.

METHODS

A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in female athlete patients <50 years. Demographic data, Beighton score/hypermobility status, and sport participation were collected. Hip dysplasia was determined using radiographic measurements (lateral center edge angle, anterior center edge angle, Tönnis angle); femoral version angles were measured with CT or MR. Femoroacetabular translation US measures included neutral (N), neutral flexed (NF), extension external rotation/apprehension (EER) positions. Maximal difference (delta) between US measures was calculated.

RESULTS

206/349 female hips were analyzed (median age 21.2 years [range, 12-49.5]). The primary sport group was performing arts (45%, 92/206). Mean Beighton score was 5.2 (SD, 2.5) with 61% (129/206) of hips exhibiting hypermobility (Beighton score ≥5). For each additional unit of Beighton score, N US measurement increased by 0.7 mm (β = 0.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.22-1.25; P < .001), NF by 1 mm ( β = 0.9; 95% CI = 0.3-1.43; P = .002) and EER by 0.8 mm ( β = 0.8; 95% CI = 0.27-1.37; P < .001) when adjusting for age and dysplasia status. A positive correlation was detected between NF (r = 0.19; 95% CI = 0.05-0.33; P = .007) and EER (r = 0.19; 95% CI = 0.05-0.32; P = .01) with Tönnis angle and a negative correlation between the delta and femoral version (r = -0.20; 95% CI = -0.35 to 0.03; P = .02). No difference in US measures was detected across sport groups (N [P = .24], NF [P = .51], EER [P = .20], delta [P = .07]).

CONCLUSION

Beighton score was independently associated with dynamic US measures in female athlete patients who are not hypermobile when controlling for other factors.

The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations for Musculoskeletal Ultrasound - Part II: Joint Pathologies, Pediatric Applications, and Guided Procedures

The second part of the Guidelines and Recommendations for Musculoskeletal Ultrasound (MSUS), produced under the auspices of EFSUMB, following the same methodology as for Part 1, provides information and recommendations on the use of this imaging modality for joint pathology, pediatric applications, and musculoskeletal ultrasound-guided procedures. Clinical application, practical points, limitations, and artifacts are described and discussed for every joint or procedure. The document is intended to guide clinical users in their daily practice.

The effect of shoulder position on inferior glenohumeral mobilization

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional clinical measurement study.

INTRODUCTION

Inferior mobilizations are used to treat patients with shoulder dysfunctions. Common positions recommended for promoting an inferior glide include: (1) an open-packed position (OPP) in which the shoulder is in 55° of abduction, 30° of horizontal adduction, and no rotation; (2) neutral position (NP) of the shoulder; and (3) position of 90° of shoulder abduction (ABDP). Studies comparing the impact of position on inferior mobilization are lacking.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

To determine the effect of shoulder position on humeral movement and mobilization force during inferior mobilizations.

METHODS

Twenty-three subjects were tested bilaterally. Subjects were placed in the OPP, and an ultrasound transducer placed over the superior glenohumeral joint. As inferior mobilization forces were applied through a dynamometer, ultrasound images were taken at rest and during 3 grades of inferior mobilization. This process was repeated in the NP and the ABDP.

RESULTS

In the NP, movements during grade 1, 2, and 3 mobilizations were 1.8, 3.8, and 4.5 mm, respectively. Movements measured in the OPP (1.0, 2.4, and 3.6 mm, respectively) and in the ABDP (1.0, 2.2, and 2.3 mm, respectively) were less. Forces were higher in the NP during grade 1, 2, and 3 mobilizations (51.8, 138.7, and 202.1 N, respectively) than in the OPP (37.2, 91.2, and 139.9 N, respectively) and the ABPD (42.5, 115.3, and 165.5 N, respectively).

DISCUSSION

Mobilization position altered the movement and force during inferior mobilizations.

CONCLUSIONS

Shoulder position should be considered when utilizing inferior mobilizations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA.

Can Dynamic Ultrasonography of the Hip Reliably Assess Anterior Femoral Head Translation?

BACKGROUND

Hip microinstability has gained attention recently as a potential cause of hip pain. Currently there is a lack of evidence-based objective diagnostic criteria surrounding this diagnosis. Previous studies have shown translation of the femoral head during extreme hip positions. However, reliable assessment of femoral head translation is lacking.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) How precise is musculoskeletal ultrasound for measuring anterior femoral head translation during the hip anterior apprehension test? (2) What is the intra- and interrater reliability of dynamic ultrasonography in assessing anterior femoral head translation?

METHODS

We recruited 10 study participants (20 hips) between the ages of 22 and 50 years with no history of hip pain or functional limitations. Test-retest methodology was used. Seven females and three males were enrolled. The mean age of study participants was 27 years (SD 8.7 years); mean body mass index was 22.6 kg/m (SD 2.2 kg/m). All study participants underwent dynamic hip ultrasonography by three different physicians 1 week apart. Each hip was visualized in two neutral positions (neutral and neutral with the contralateral hip flexed [NF]) and two dynamic positions, which sought to replicate the apprehension test, although notably study participants had no known hip pathology and therefore no apprehension. The first maintained the hip in extension and external rotation off to the side of the examination table (EER1), and the second held the hip off of the bottom of the examination table (EER2). One hundred twenty ultrasound scans (480 images) were performed. Mean and SD were calculated using absolute values of the difference in ultrasound measurements (mm) between positions NF and EER1 and NF and EER2 calculated for each physician as well as an average of all three physicians. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis was used to examine intra- and interrater reliability.

RESULTS

The mean absolute difference for NF and EER1 was 0.84 mm (SD 0.93 mm) and for NF and EER2 0.62 mm (SD 0.40 mm) on Study Day 1. Similarly, on Study Day 2, the mean absolute difference for NF and EER1 position was 0.90 mm (SD 0.74 mm) and for NF and EER2 1.03 mm (SD 1.18 mm). Cumulative values of ICC analysis indicated excellent intrarater reliability in all four positions: neutral 0.794 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.494-0.918), NF 0.927 (95% CI, 0.814-0.971), EER1 0.929 (95% CI, 0.825-0.972), and EER2 0.945 (95% CI, 0.864-0.978). Similarly, interrater ICC analysis cumulative values were excellent for NF, EER1, and EER2 and fair to good for the neutral position: neutral 0.725 (95% CI, 0.526-0.846), NF 0.846 (95% CI, 0.741-0.913), EER1 0.812 (95% CI, 0.674-0.895), and EER2 0.794 (95% CI, 0.652-0.884).

CONCLUSIONS

This study offers the first ultrasound protocol of which we are aware for measuring anterior femoral head translation. Hip dynamic ultrasound may assist in providing precise objective clinical-based diagnostic evidence when evaluating complex hip pain and suspected microinstability. Musculoskeletal ultrasound is a reliable office-based method of measuring anterior femoral head translation that can be utilized by physicians with varying experience levels. Future studies are needed to investigate ultrasound anterior femoral head translation taking into account sex, prior hip surgery, hip osseous morphology, and ligamentous laxity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study.

Three-dimensional kinematics of shoulder laxity examination and the relationship to clinical interpretation

Understanding clinical test kinematics improves utility of exam techniques. The purposes of this study were as follows: (1) determine inter-examiner repeatability of translation magnitude for the Anterior/Posterior Drawer and Sulcus shoulder laxity tests; (2) describe the relationships between glenohumeral joint translations and subjective grades for each laxity test; and (3) describe the relationship of overall glenohumeral joint laxity to a composite subjective score from the three laxity tests. Eleven subjects with shoulder symptomology were examined with three laxity tests. Motion was tracked with electromagnetic sensors affixed to the humerus and scapula via transcortical pins. ICCs were calculated to determine repeatability of translation magnitudes between two examiners for each test. Descriptive statistics and regression analyses were performed for comparisons of single laxity test grades with translation magnitudes and for composite subjective laxity scores and overall translation across all three tests. Inter-examiner ICCs regarding kinematic repeatability were 0.87 for Anterior Drawer, 0.84 for the Sulcus test, and not calculable for the Posterior Drawer. No linear relationships between subjective grades of individual tests and translation magnitudes were found. The relationship of overall translation with the composite subjective score from all laxity tests was r² = 0.75 (r = 0.86). Clinicians from different disciplines are capable of imparting similar translations during laxity tests. Single-test subjective laxity grades demonstrate large ranges of translation between subjects for the same grade. By combining results of three laxity tests, clinicians are capable of identifying the level of overall shoulder joint laxity in patients.

Ultrasonographic measurement of the acromiohumeral distance in spinal cord injury: Reliability and effects of shoulder positioning

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the reliability of ultrasonographic measurement of acromiohumeral distance (AHD) and the effects of shoulder positioning on AHD among manual wheelchair users (MWUs) with spinal cord injury (SCI) and an able-bodied control group.

METHODS

Ten MWUs with SCI and 10 able-bodied subjects participated in this study. The ultrasonographic measurements of AHD from each subject were obtained by two raters during passive and active scapular plane arm elevation in neutral, 45°, 90° with and without resistance and in a weight relief raise position. The measurements were recorded again by each rater using the same procedures after a 30-minute time interval. All raters were blinded to each other's measurements.

SETTING

University Laboratories and Veteran Affairs Healthcare System.

RESULTS

Intra-rater (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC > 0.83) and inter-rater (ICC > 0.78) reliability was excellent for both the MWUs with SCI and able-bodied groups across all arm positions except for the 45° position in the control group for one of the raters (intra-rater: ICC < 0.40 and inter-rater: ICC < 0.60). AHD significantly reduced when the shoulder was in the 90° arm elevated positions with or without resistance.

CONCLUSION

Findings from our study demonstrated that ultrasonography is a reliable means to evaluate AHD in both able bodied and individuals with SCI, who are known to have significant shoulder pathology. This technique could be used to develop reference measures and to identify changes in AHD caused by interventions.

Shoulder instability in professional rugby players-the significance of shoulder laxity

OBJECTIVE

Shoulder instability is a common cause of morbidity among professional rugby union players. This study explores whether the risk of shoulder dislocation is associated with innate shoulder laxity.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Clinical sports medicine research at professional rugby clubs.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred sixty-nine healthy rugby players (mean age 25.1 years) with no history of instability in either shoulder and 46 players (mean age 27.5 years) with shoulder instability in one shoulder (patient group).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Anterior, inferior, and posterior laxity was measured in both shoulders for healthy players and in the uninjured shoulder only for injured players using dynamic ultrasound.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the nondominant (anterior: mean 2.9 ± 1.2 mm; inferior: mean 3.1 ± 1.0 mm; posterior: mean 5.1 ± 1.7 mm) and dominant (anterior: mean 3.1 ± 1.1 mm; inferior: mean 2.9 ± 1.0 mm; posterior: mean 4.9 ± 1.7 mm) shoulders in healthy players (P > 0.05). The comparison between healthy shoulders (anterior: mean 3.0 ± 1.2 mm; inferior: mean 3.0 ± 1.0 mm; posterior: mean 5.0 ± 1.7 mm) and the uninjured shoulder (anterior: mean 4.2 ± 1.7 mm; inferior: mean 3.4 ± 1.2 mm; posterior: mean 6.2 ± 3.0 mm) from injured players identified that players with unstable shoulders have a significantly higher shoulder translation in their uninjured shoulder than healthy players (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Formal assessment of shoulder translation using dynamic ultrasound should enable sports medicine practitioners to identify players at greatest risk of subsequent shoulder instability for targeted prehabilitation programs.