Variability in the range of inter-anterior superior iliac spine distance and its correlation with femoral head centre. A prospective computed tomography study of 200 adults

Biomechanical and biological factors of sexual dimorphism in anterior knee pain: Current concepts

Female gender is one of the commonly mentioned risk factors for anterior knee pain (AKP), among a spectrum of other factors including anatomical, biomechanical, hormonal, behavioral and psychological elements contributing to its development. Despite the focus on individual risk factors, there's a notable gap in comprehending how gender influences and interacts with other risk factors. The objective of this review was to identify and emphasize the connections between these interactions, gender-related risk factors for AKP, and the potential mechanisms that explain their associations with other risk factors, aiming to aid in the creation of precise prevention and treatment approaches. Gender influences the majority of risk factors for AKP, including anatomical, biomechanical, hormonal, behavioral and psychological factors. Women have on average smaller patellae, higher patellofemoral cartilage stress and for AKP, disadvantageous trochlear morphology, ligament and muscle composition and unfavorable neuromuscular control pattern. In contrast, men show on average an increased ability to strengthen their hip external rotators, which are both protective against AKP. Particularly in kinetic and kinematic analysis, men have been shown to have a distinctly different risk factor profile than women. Sex hormones may also play a role in the risk of AKP, with estrogen potentially influencing ligamentous laxity, increasing midfoot loading and affecting neuromuscular control of the lower extremities and testosterone positively affecting muscle mass and strength. The higher incidence of AKP in women is likely due to a combination of slightly increased risk factors. Although all risk factors can be present in both men and women and the holistic evaluation of each individual's risk factor composition is imperative regardless of gender, knowing distinctive risk factors may help with focused evaluation, treatment and implementing preventive measures of AKP.

The usability of the ratio of bi-humerus breadth to maximum pelvic breadth in sex estimation

BACKGROUND

Although sex can be determined with high accuracy in forensic anthropology, additional parameters are still required.

AIM

To estimate with known simple statistical methods, the usability of the bi-humerus/maximum pelvic breadth ratio in sex estimation.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Bi-humerus breadth and maximum pelvic breadth were measured using the topogram images (196 males, 171 females), the ratio between them was calculated. We examined the usability of the ratio of the distance between the lateral edges of the right and left humeral heads to the maximum distance between the two most lateral parts of the iliac crests in sex estimation.

RESULTS

There was significant difference in the bi-humerus breadth and "bi-humerus breadth/maximum pelvic breadth" according to sex. The greatest breadth of the pelvis was higher in females, yet the difference was not statistically significant. The ratio yielded 80.6%-90.3% accuracy for females and 73.6%-74.7% for males, depending on arm position.

CONCLUSIONS

The obtained data may contribute to the development of formulas created with metric measurements used in sex estimation. This can be used as a parameter to help in estimating the sex of skeletal remains found as a whole or excavated without losing their integrity, and also in the reconstruction of body structure.

Intramedullary versus extramedullary alignment guides on total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis

AIM

A meta-analysis concentrated on the effect of intramedullary and extramedullary systems on total knee arthroplasty.

METHOD

Potential academic articles were identified from Cochrane Library, Medline, PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, CNKI, WanFang, VIP and other databases. The STATA version was used to analyze the pooled data.

RESULTS

There are obvious significant differences in drainage volume and transfusion rate. There was no significant difference in lower limb coronal alignment, coronal and sagittal alignment of the femoral component, operation time, postoperative knee score and complications.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis shows that the alignment of the extramedullary distal femur osteotomy is as accurate as intramedullary systems. Furthermore, extramedullary distal femur osteotomy without invading the femoral medullary cavity could reduce postoperative bleeding and the transfusion rate. Furthermore, research is required to test the robustness of our findings when more data is available and by undertaking both Bayesian and frequentist methods. When more data are available, the heterogeneity can be further explored through sensitivity analysis, and the available data can be combined to verify the hypothesis.

Extramedullary versus intramedullary femoral alignment technique in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus whether the use of the extramedullary femoral cutting guide takes advantage over the intramedullary one in total knee arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to compare the extramedullary femoral alignment guide system with the conventional intramedullary alignment guide system for lower limb alignment, blood loss, and operative time during total knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

The Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan Fang Chinese Periodical, Google, and reference lists of all the included studies were searched for randomized controlled trials. The following parameters were compared between the extramedullary technique and the intramedullary technique: (1) lower limb coronal alignment, (2) coronal alignment of femoral component, (3) sagittal alignment of femoral component, (4) blood loss, (5) and operation time.

RESULTS

Four randomized controlled trials consisting of 358 knees were included in our study. There was no significant difference between the extramedullary and intramedullary groups for the lower limb coronal alignment (RR = 1.20, 95%CI 0.28~5.21, n.s.), coronal alignment of femoral component (RR = 0.65, 95%CI 0.19~2.22, n.s.), and sagittal alignment of femoral component (RR = 0.73, 95%CI 0.38~1.41, n.s.). A reduced blood loss was associated with the use of the extramedullary guide (MD = -120.34, 95%CI -210.08~-30.59, P = 0.009). No significant difference in operation time was noted between the two groups (MD = 1.41, 95%CI -1.82~4.64, n.s.).

CONCLUSIONS

Neither extramedullary nor intramedullary femoral alignment is more accurate than the other in facilitating the femoral cut in total knee arthroplasty. Use of the extramedullary guide results in less blood loss and exhibits a similar operation time as compared with the intramedullary guide.

Influence of lower limbs discrepancy and pelvic coronal rotation on pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt and sacral slope

PURPOSE

Pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT) and sacral slope (SS) are important parameters in sagittal spine alignment evaluation. The measurements are a projection of the three-dimensional pelvis onto a two-dimensional radiograph and they may be influenced by orientation of the pelvis. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of pelvic rotation in the coronal plane (CPR) on radiographic accuracy of PI, PT, and SS measurements.

METHODS

Radiological evaluation of the CPR angel was performed on 1 radiological phantom. The radiographs were taken in 5° CPR increments over a range of 0°-45° (evaluated with a digital protractor). On each of the lateral radiograph, PI, PT, and SS were measured three times by three independent researchers. The lowest CPR that changed PI, PT, or SS by ≥6° (the highest reported error of measurement of these parameters) was considered as unacceptable. Next, CPR was calculated based on the distance between femoral heads (FHD). The agreement of the calculated and measured CPR was quantified by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the median error for a single measurement (SEM), with value 0.75 considered as excellent agreement.

RESULTS

PI, PT and SS could be measured with an acceptable error of 6° on radiographs with up to 20° pelvic rotation. From 20° CPR onwards the S1 endplate was distorted, that makes the measurements of PI, PT and SS questionable. There was an excellent agreement between CPR measured with a protractor and calculated based on FHD with ICC of 0.99 and SEM of 1.1°.

CONCLUSIONS

Rotation of the pelvis in the coronal plane during acquisition of radiographs influences PI, PT and SS measurements. Substantial error of PI, PT and SS measurements occurs with CPR of more than 20° which is equivalent to a lower limb discrepancy of 5.2 cm. CPR may be calculated while acquiring the radiograph. Further evaluation of the influence of CPR on spinopelvic parameters with a larger sample would be valuable.

Easy identification of mechanical axis during total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

We devised an intraoperatively identifiable mechanical axis (IIMA) as a reference of alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between February 2010 and January 2011, primary TKAs were consecutively performed on 672 patients (1007 knees) using an IIMA as a reference in the coronal plane.

RESULTS

The alignment of the lower extremity improved from a mean of 11.4±6.7° (-10.3-34.4°) of varus preop. to 0.7±3.5° (-5.2-8.6°) immediately after surgery. Mean alignment of the femoral component in the coronal plane was 89.3±2.3° (83.4-97.2°) postop. and mean alignment of the tibial component was 90.4±2.2° (85.1-94.2°) postop.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that IIMA could be of considerable value as a new guider of alignment that is easily accessible and highly effective during total knee arthroplasty.

The accuracy of the extramedullary and intramedullary femoral alignment system in total knee arthroplasty for varus osteoarthritic knee

PURPOSE

The intramedullary (IM) femoral alignment system does not alway guarantee accuracy of the component position in the total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In some cases, the extramedullary (EM) femoral alignment system in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a useful alternative surgical option to adjust femoral component alignment. In the EM technique, accuracy of the femoral head center location is mandatory. The purpose of this prospective randomized study was to compare the alignment after TKA using two different femoral alignment systems.

METHODS

From January 2009 to December 2009, 91 patients (106 knees) with osteoarthritis underwent TKA. The IM femoral alignment system was used in 50 TKAs, and the EM system was used in 56 TKAs. We measured the coronal, sagittal alignment of the femoral component, and overall alignment from full-length standing. Anteroposterior radiographs were taken 1 year after surgery.

RESULTS

The overall limb alignment was 0.2° ± 1.9° varus in the EM group and 1.1° ± 1.9° valgus in the IM group (p = 0.001). The coronal alignment of the femoral component was 90.0° ± 1.1° in the EM group and 90.3° ± 1.2° in the IM group, not statistically different (n.s.). The sagittal alignment of the femoral component was 2.3° ± 1.7° in the EM group and 2.5° ± 1.0° in the IM group (n.s.). Clinically acceptable overall limb alignment was achieved in 91.1 % of EM group and 84.0 % of IM group (n.s.).

CONCLUSION

The present study suggests that by applying our EM technique that uses a newly designed mechanical axis marker system, the alignment of the femoral component and overall limb alignment is reliable and at least as accurate as the standard IM technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

The position of the centre of the femoral head relative to the midline of the pelvis: a consistent landmark in total knee replacement surgery

BACKGROUND

Femoro-tibial malalignment in excess of 3° is a recognised contributor of early mechanical failure in total knee replacement (TKR). Knowledge of the location of the centre of the femoral head is a pre-requisite to identification of the mechanical axis of the femur and can facilitate optimal component orientation. We investigated variation in the location of the centre of the femoral head relative to the midline of the pelvis.

METHODS

We analysed the pelvic radiographs of 150 patients with unilateral total hip replacements. The perpendicular distance from the centre of the femoral head of the non-operated hip to the centre of pubic symphysis was measured.

RESULTS

The mean distance from the centre of the femoral head to the pubic symphysis was 89.2mm (standard deviation, 5.7 mm). Patient height strongly correlated with this distance (r=0.53, p<0.01), as did the diameter of the femoral head (r=0.59, p<0.01). The latter was significantly larger in men than in women (50.9 mm vs. 44.5mm, p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrate that the position of the centre of the femoral head has very little variability, irrespective of patient age or body-mass index. If the gender-specific mean femoral head to midline distance is used to estimate the location of the femoral head centre, a line from this point to the centre of the femoral condyles will deviate from the true mechanical axis by no more than 1.5°, in 98% of cases.

An alternative method to create extramedullary references in total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Historically, extramedullary techniques have focused on finding the femoral head center and referred mainly to the anterosuperior iliac spine (the FHC method) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate a new extramedullary alignment system that uses neutral overall limb mechanical alignment as an extramedullary reference (the MA method).

METHODS

A retrospective review of 1018 TKAs (508 FHC group, 510 MA group) was performed to compare the radiographic results obtained using these two methods. There were 75 male patients and 577 female patients with varus osteoarthritis of the knee. Limb and prosthesis alignments in the coronal plane were investigated at 2 months after surgery.

RESULTS

The accuracies of postoperative alignments of implanted prostheses were better in the MA group than in the FHC group, as assessed by (1) overall limb alignment (MA group, varus 1.4° ± 2.7°; FHC group, varus 2.2° ± 2.9°), and (2) femoral component coronal alignment (MA group, 89.4° ± 2.3°; FHC group, 88.0° ± 2.7°). Overall limb alignment was within 0° ± 5° of the mechanical axis in 96.1% of the MA group and in 86.6% of the FHC group. Mean femoral component medial angle was within 0° ± 5° in 98.4% of the MA group and in 92.5% of the FHC group.

CONCLUSION

The accuracies of the postoperative radiographic alignments of implanted prostheses were found to be improved when the mechanical axis of the overall lower limb was used as an extramedullary reference. This new reference system would help to achieve correct limb and prostheses alignments during TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

How precise is the identification of the center of the femoral head during total knee arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Identification of the center of the femoral head in the coronal plane is essential during total knee arthroplasty. We evaluated a new method for localization of the center of the hip, thereby detecting the neutral mechanical axis using inter-femoral head center distances (X) measured from a radiograph. Our proposed method was compared with 3 commonly used methods using landmarks that are estimated to be 2 finger-breaths medial to the anterosuperior iliac spine (method A), 2.5 cm perpendicular to the mid-inguinal point (method I), and 1.5 cm lateral to the femoral artery (method F).

METHODS

114 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty were prospectively enrolled in the study. Four landmarks were marked and conventional anterior-posterior pelvic radiographs were taken. On the radiograph, the distance between the estimated FHC and the neutral mechanical axis was measured.

RESULTS

The median value (mm) of the measured distance was 9 in A, 7 in I, 8.5 in F, and 5 in X. When an error of more than 3° from neutral alignment was defined as an outlier, 15% of measurements in A, 6% of measurements in I, 14% in F, and 2% in X would fall in the outlier zone.

INTERPRETATION

The method detecting the neutral mechanical axis using inter-femoral head center distances (X) showed the least variability and the lowest percentage of outliers.

Alignment of computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty in patients with altered hip center

This study aimed to determine limb and component alignment after computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty in 30 patients (32 limbs) with an altered hip center due to a prior hip implant or deformed femoral head. There were no outliers greater than ±3° in the postoperative coronal alignment of the limb and the femoral component in relation to the altered hip center. Two limbs (8%) were more than ±3° for coronal alignment of the femoral component in relation to the anatomical hip center and 96% of limbs had less than 2° deviation in relation to the altered hip center. Computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty results in accurate restoration of lower limb and component alignment in patients with prior hip implants or deformed femoral heads where accurate restoration of alignment may be challenging due to altered hip center.