Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic entheses--a systematic comparison between short tau inversion recovery (STIR) and T1-weighted, contrast-enhanced, fat-saturated sequences

[Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging : Pros and cons in axial spondyloarthritis]

The diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis depends on direct visualization of the sacroiliitis in addition to clinical assessment and determination of the histocompatibility antigen HLA-B27. While the value of conventional radiographic images has meanwhile been described in many studies as insufficient to diagnose the disease at an early stage, magnetic resonance imaging and also computed tomography now offer the possibility to visualize findings, such as bone marrow edema, erosion, fat metaplasia, backfill and ankylosis. Thus, it is necessary to decide which procedure should be used and when. Furthermore, both cross-sectional imaging techniques are currently undergoing major changes, and technical advancements are making great strides every year. This article provides an overview of which future technologies will be included in the rheumatological diagnostics of the sacroiliac joints. This overview also illustrates which standard methods are established in the diagnostics of axial spondyloarthritis and how they are used.

INVERSION RECOVERY GRADIENT ECHO PULSE SEQUENCE PROGRAM ON A 0.7 TESLA OPEN SUPERCONDUCTING MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING PLATFORM

The newly developed open superconducting magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system, which combines the advantages of the high magnetic fields of superconducting MRI systems and open characteristics of permanent MRI systems, has great potential in clinical and research applications. However, few pulse sequences are applicable to this system. In addition, further testing on this system is needed. Therefore, in this paper, an inversion recovery gradient echo (IR-GE) pulse sequence was developed based on the features of the 0.7 Tesla open superconducting MRI system. An MR Solutions spectrometer was used to control the IR-GE pulse sequence. The developed IR-GE pulse sequence was applied to a pure water phantom using different inversion recovery times (TI). The results of the theoretical analysis and experiments indicate that the developed IR-GE pulse sequence could be effectively applied to the 0.7 Tesla open superconducting MRI system.

Comparison of Clinical Examination versus Whole-body Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Enthesitis in Patients with Early Axial Spondyloarthritis during 3 Years of Continuous Etanercept Treatment

Objective.

To compare clinical examination versus whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) of enthesitis in patients with early axial spondyloarthritis during 3 years of continuous etanercept (ETN) treatment.

Methods.

Forty-one patients underwent clinical and WB-MRI examinations for enthesitis at baseline and after 2 and 3 years of treatment. Twenty-one sites were assessed in 4 anatomic regions — anterior chest wall, pelvis, knee, and foot.

Results.

Clinical examination at baseline detected enthesitis in 57% of the patients (85 lesions, mean 2.1 lesions, SD 2.9), most of them in the pelvis (42 lesions in 17 patients) and anterior chest wall (19 lesions in 10 patients). The proportion of patients with clinically detected enthesitis decreased to 19% at Year 2 (mean 0.5, SD 1.5) and 14% at Year 3 (mean 0.7, SD 1.8). WB-MRI detected enthesitis at baseline in 21% of patients (22 lesions, mean 0.5 lesions, SD 1.1), also most frequently in the pelvis (12 lesions) and anterior chest wall (7 lesions). MRI-positive enthesitis decreased to 13% at Year 2 (mean 0.2 lesions, SD 0.5) and 14% at Year 3 (mean 0.2 lesions, SD 0.5). There was positive correlation of clinical and MRI findings at baseline at the anterior chest wall (p = 0.001) and the pelvis (p = 0.0001). No correlation was found at the knee and foot at baseline and for all regions at followup.

Conclusion.

Both clinical examination and WB-MRI show a decrease in enthesitis after 2 and 3 years of ETN treatment, but correlation was limited to the pelvis and anterior chest wall at baseline.

[Enthesitis in connection with spondyloarthritides]

Enthesitis is a frequent manifestation in spondyloarthritis (SpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and can be found in up to 40% of patients with SpA. Because of the pathognomonic relevance the classification criteria for SpA and PsA use enthesitis as an entrance or secondary criterion. Enthesitis is most frequently localized at the heel but it can occur at any insertion of an enthesis into the bone. When diagnosing enthesitis differential diagnoses should be considered, mechanical-degenerative causes and fibromyalgia in particular should be excluded. The imaging techniques power Doppler ultrasound (PDUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are most helpful in making the diagnosis. The therapeutic options for enthesitis are limited. Nonsteroidal antirheumatic drugs (NSARD) and local injections of corticosteroids are recommended. In small clinical trials no efficacy of disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) could be demonstrated. In contrast, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) blockers were shown to be highly effective in randomized controlled trials for SpA and PsA but they are not currently approved for enthesitis only.

[Enthesitis in the context of spondyloarthritides]

Enthesitis is a frequent manifestation in spondyloarthritis (SpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and can be found in up to 40 % of patients with SpA. Because of the pathognomonic relevance the classification criteria for SpA and PsA use enthesitis as an entrance or secondary criterion. Enthesitis is most frequently localized at the heel but it can occur at any insertion of an enthesis into the bone. When diagnosing enthesitis differential diagnoses should be considered, mechanical-degenerative causes and fibromyalgia in particular should be excluded. The imaging techniques power Doppler ultrasound (PDUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are most helpful in making the diagnosis. The therapeutic options for enthesitis are limited. Nonsteroidal antirheumatic drugs (NSARD) and local injections of corticosteroids are recommended. In small clinical trials no efficacy of disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) could be demonstrated. In contrast, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) blockers were shown to be highly effective in randomized controlled trials for SpA and PsA but they are not currently approved for enthesitis only.