Value of multidetector computed tomography for the differentiation of delayed aseptic and septic complications after total hip arthroplasty

Evaluating Hip Periprosthetic Joint Infection with Metal-artifact-reduction MR Imaging

PURPOSE

To evaluate the significant findings of hip periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) using metal-artifact-reduction (MAR) MRI and to compare the MRI results to other clinical markers.

METHODS

The results of MRI, including two-dimensional fast-spin echo sequences with increased bandwidth and multi-acquisition variable-resonance image combination selective for hips with orthopedic implants at 1.5T (from April 2014 to November 2021), were retrospectively assessed for imaging findings and diagnostic impressions by two radiologists. Clinical data and courses were also investigated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the significant MRI findings in patients with hip PJI and those who underwent surgical intervention. The MRI impressions were compared with other clinical markers in diagnosing hip PJI.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven hip joints in 24 Asian patients (age = 73.9 ± 10.8 years; 18 females) were included. Twelve hip joints (32%) had PJI; seven underwent a surgical intervention. The significant findings for hip PJI included periosteal edema of the acetabulum, intermuscular edema, intramuscular fluid collection, and lymphadenopathy (P < 0.05). In the cases with surgical intervention, the significant findings included capsular distension, capsular thickening, an osteolysis-like pattern of the femur, subcutaneous fluid collection, and lymphadenopathy (P < 0.05). The MRI impressions had high diagnostic significance for both hip PJI cases and those with surgical intervention (P < 0.001). The MRI impression was more significant for hip PJI than the other clinical markers (P < 0.05), while the other clinical markers were more significant in the cases with surgical intervention (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The significant findings in the hip PJI cases included acetabular periosteal edema, intermuscular edema, intramuscular fluid collection, and lymphadenopathy. The significant findings in the cases with surgical intervention included capsular distention, capsular thickening, a femoral osteolysis-like pattern, subcutaneous fluid collection, and lymphadenopathy. The utilization of MAR MRI demonstrated great diagnostic significance for hip PJI.

Diagnostic and prognostic relevance of plain radiographs for periprosthetic joint infections of the hip: a literature review

Conventional radiography is regularly used to evaluate complications after total hip arthroplasty. In various recent consensus meetings, however, plain radiographs of a potentially infected hip joint have been judged as being only relevant to exclude diagnoses other than infection. Solid data on radiographic presentations of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) are scarce. As a result, the prognostic value of radiological features in low-grade PJI remains uncertain. The present review article aims to present an overview of the available literature and to develop ideas on future perspectives to define the diagnostic possibilities of radiography in PJIs of the hip. The primary outcome of interest of this systematic review was the radiologic presentation of periprosthetic joint infections of the hip. As secondary outcome of interest served the sensitivity and specificity of the radiologic presentation of periprosthetic joint infections. Of the included articles, 26 were reviews, essays, or case reports and only 18 were clinical studies. Typical radiologic abnormalities of PJI were a periosteal reaction, a wide band of radiolucency at the cement-bone or metal-bone interface, patchy osteolysis, implant loosening, bone resorption around the implant, and transcortical sinus tracts. The frequency of their occurrence is still inadequately defined. A deeper understanding of the underlying causes and the relation between microorganisms to radiologic abnormalities can probably help clinicians in the future to diagnose a PJI. This is why further research shall focus on the radiographic features of PJI.

Percutaneous cementoplasty of periprosthetic aseptic hip loosening

Progressive population aging and improved healthcare have led to a significant increase in patients with hip arthroplasty (HA). In this patient group, the proportion of those who require a new arthroplasty (prosthetic replacement or secondary revision of the hip), has also increased. For this subgroup of patients in whom surgical prosthetic replacement should be considered but is contraindicated, a new technique has been developed since 2010: percutaneous injection of periprosthetic cement under fluoroscopic or CT control ("femoroplasty; FMP") as an alternative and less invasive treatment compared to surgery to stabilize the HA without replacing it, with excellent results on patients' quality of life. In this brief communication, we describe our positive experience regarding FMP, which we have performed for the first time in Spain on four patients (age range between 74-83 years, 2 female and 2 male patients, 3 right HA and 1 left HA), without post-complications. We highlight both the relative simplicity of this technique, which can be incorporated into radiological intervention even in regional hospitals, and the significant clinical improvement observed in all patients. In conclusion, we hope that our experience can contribute to the increased adoption of this innovative technique within the scientific community.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Imaging After Total Hip Arthroplasty

This article reviews evidence for performing various imaging studies in patients with total hip prostheses. Routine follow-up is generally performed with radiography. Radiographs are also usually the initial imaging modality for patients with symptoms related to the prosthesis. Following acute injury with pain, noncontrast CT may add information to radiographic examination regarding the presence and location of a fracture, component stability, and bone stock. Image-guided joint aspiration, noncontrast MRI, and white blood cell scan and sulfur colloid scan of the hip, are usually appropriate studies for patients suspected of having periprosthetic infection. For evaluation of component loosening, wear, and/or osteolysis, noncontrast CT or MRI are usually appropriate studies. Noncontrast MRI is usually appropriate for identifying adverse reaction to metal debris related to metal-on-metal articulations. For assessing patients after hip arthroplasty, who have trochanteric pain and nondiagnostic radiographs, ultrasound, or MRI are usually appropriate studies. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Diagnostic Value of Advanced Metal Artifact Reduction Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Periprosthetic Joint Infection

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Magnetic resonance imaging around metal joint prostheses including multiacquisition variable-resonance image combination selective at 1.5 T (from April 2014 to August 2020) was retrospectively evaluated by 2 radiologists for detection of abnormal findings (joint effusion, capsular thickening, pericapsular edema, soft-tissue fluid collection, soft-tissue edema, bone marrow edema pattern around the implant [BME pattern], lymphadenopathy, and others) and overall image impression for PJI. Regarding the soft-tissue fluid collection, presence of communication to the joint or capsular-like structure was evaluated. Clinical assessments were recorded. Positive predictive values (PPVs), negative predictive values (NPVs), and odds ratios (ORs) for PJI were calculated for the abnormal findings. Overall image impression for PJI was evaluated. χ2, Fisher exact, t, and Mann-Whitney U tests and receiver operating characteristic analysis were used. Interobserver agreement was assessed with κ statistics.

RESULTS

Forty-three joints in 36 patients (mean ± SD age, 75.4 ± 8.8 years; 30 women; hip [n = 29], knee [n = 12], and elbow [n = 2]) were evaluated. Eighteen joints (42%) were clinically diagnosed as PJI. The findings suggesting PJI were capsular thickening (PPV, 70%; NPV, 90%; OR, 20.6), soft-tissue fluid collection (PPV, 81%; NPV, 81%; OR, 19.1), soft-tissue edema (PPV, 67%; NPV, 89%; OR, 17), pericapsular edema (PPV, 76%; NPV, 81%; OR, 13.7), and joint effusion (PPV, 55%; NPV, 100%; OR, 12). Soft-tissue fluid collection without capsular-like structure (PPV, 83%; NPV, 74%; OR, 14.4) or with communication to the joint (PPV, 75%; NPV, 71%; OR, 7.3) suggested PJI. The combinations of joint effusion, capsular thickening, pericapsular edema, soft-tissue fluid collection, and soft-tissue edema highly suggested PJI. Regarding the BME pattern, the combination with soft-tissue edema raised the possibility of PJI (PPV, 73%; NPV, 69%; OR, 5.9). Regarding the interobserver agreements for each abnormal finding, κ values were 0.60 to 0.77. Regarding the overall image impression, weighted κ value was 0.97 and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.949 (95% confidence interval, 0.893-1.005) and 0.926 (95% confidence interval, 0.860-0.991) with no significant difference (P = 0.534).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggesting PJI were capsular thickening, soft-tissue fluid collection, soft-tissue edema, pericapsular edema, and joint effusion. The combinations of them highly suggested PJI. Regarding the BME pattern, the combination with soft-tissue edema raised the possibility of PJI.

Bone and Joint Infections: The Role of Imaging in Tailoring Diagnosis to Improve Patients' Care

Imaging is needed for the diagnosis of bone and joint infections, determining the severity and extent of disease, planning biopsy, and monitoring the response to treatment. Some radiological features are pathognomonic of bone and joint infections for each modality used. However, imaging diagnosis of these infections is challenging because of several overlaps with non-infectious etiologies. Interventional radiology is generally needed to verify the diagnosis and to identify the microorganism involved in the infectious process through imaging-guided biopsy. This narrative review aims to summarize the radiological features of the commonest orthopedic infections, the indications and the limits of different modalities in the diagnostic strategy as well as to outline recent findings that may facilitate diagnosis.

Percutaneous cementoplasty of periprosthetic loosening: can interventional radiologists offer an alternative to revision surgery?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate feasibility and validate both safety and efficiency of radiological percutaneous periprosthetic bone cementoplasty (RPPBC) performed under local anesthesia as an alternative minimally invasive treatment of aseptic implant loosening.

METHODS

In this case series, seven patients (mean age 81 years, range 73 to 89 years, 2 men and 5 women) were enrolled between February 2011 and January 2020 with confirmed aseptic loosening of orthopedic implants. One patient presented with tibial component loosening of an unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, one with glenoid component loosening from a reverse shoulder arthroplasty, one femoral gamma nail, and four presented with pedicle screw loosening after staged posterior lumbar interbody fusion. All patients underwent clinical, biochemical, and imaging assessments to confirm the diagnosis of aseptic loosening. All benefited from RPPBC under dual CT and fluoroscopic guidance. All procedures were performed under local anesthesia by an experienced radiologist. Preprocedural, immediate and 6-month post-cementoplasty pain levels on a visual analogue scale (VAS), and functional outcomes were evaluated. Immediate and 6-month postprocedural CTs were performed to evaluate the treated region.

RESULTS

All RPPBC were well tolerated by patients throughout the procedure. None of the patients suffered from local or systemic infection post-RPPBC, or periprosthetic fractures. No recurrent implant loosening was observed. Six patients were pain free at 6 months. All patients expressed functional improvements during validated outcome score evaluations.

CONCLUSION

RPPBC appears to be an efficient and reliable treatment strategy for aseptic loosening of orthopedic implants in elderly patients deemed unfit for revision surgery.

KEY POINTS

• Radiological percutaneous periprosthetic bone cementoplasty offers immediate and long-lasting pain relief in elderly frail patients, or those deemed unfit for revision surgery despite presenting with symptomatic aseptic loosening of orthopedic implants. • Radiological percutaneous periprosthetic bone cementoplasty brings quick and long-lasting improvements in clinical functional outcomes and offer effective pain reduction, thereby improving the overall quality of life. • Radiological percutaneous periprosthetic bone cementoplasty is a safe, quick, reliable, and well-tolerated minimally invasive procedure which can be easily performed under simple locoregional anesthesia and requires short-term hospital stay.