Myeloma Response Assessment and Diagnosis System (MY-RADS): strategies for practice implementation

European Myeloma Network Group review and consensus statement on primary plasma cell leukemia

BACKGROUND

Primary plasma cell leukemia (PPCL) is the most aggressive disorder among plasma cell malignancies, with new diagnostic criteria recently established by the International Myeloma Working Group. Studies have shown that PPCL patients receiving a combination of novel agents, but not eligible for transplantation, may have a median survival up to 2 years, extended to 3 years or more in those undergoing transplant procedures. These findings remain unsatisfactory, particularly if compared with progresses obtained in multiple myeloma.

DESIGN

A European Myeloma Network (EMN) expert panel reviewed the most recent literature and selected the areas of major concern in the management of PPCL by generating and rank ordering key questions using the criterion of clinical relevance. Multistep procedures were utilized to achieve a consensus on recommendations. The Delphi questionnaire method was used and a consensus of at least 80% was reached for all final statements.

RESULTS

An extended overview of current biological, clinical, prognostic, and therapeutic aspects of PPCL, including ongoing and close to start clinical trials, is presented. Furthermore, updated guidelines for the management of PPCL and practical recommendations are provided, in the context of current knowledge about this disease, also looking at possible future perspectives to ameliorate the outcome of these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

PPCL still remains an unmet clinical need. Notwithstanding, some not negligible progresses have been recently achieved. The European Myeloma Network panel strongly support ongoing and planned clinical trials, as well as biological studies based on novel technologies, strategies, and treatment options that could represent breakthroughs we have been waiting for too long.

Role of Imaging in Multiple Myeloma: A Potential Opportunity for Quantitative Imaging and Radiomics?

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most prevalent hematologic malignancy, particularly affecting the elderly. The disease often begins with a premalignant phase known as monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), solitary plasmacytoma (SP) and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM). Multiple imaging modalities are employed throughout the disease continuum to assess bone lesions, prevent complications, detect intra- and extramedullary disease, and evaluate the risk of neurological complications. The implementation of advanced imaging analysis techniques, including artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics, holds great promise for enhancing our understanding of MM. The integration of advanced image analysis techniques which extract features from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), or positron emission tomography (PET) images has the potential to enhance the diagnostic accuracy for MM. This innovative approach may lead to the identification of imaging biomarkers that can predict disease prognosis and treatment outcomes. Further research and standardized evaluations are needed to define the role of radiomics in everyday clinical practice for patients with MM.

FDG PET-MRI evaluation of synchronous gallbladder adenocarcinoma and POEMS syndrome

POEMS syndrome is a rare paraneoplastic syndrome associated with a plasma cell proliferative disorder. Gallbladder adenocarcinoma is a rare malignancy, with no association with POEMS syndrome. The plasma cell dyscrasia is routinely evaluated with advanced hybrid imaging to assess both anatomic and functional components. We present a case of a 59-year-old female with a known diagnosis of POEMS syndrome who underwent a whole-body restaging evaluation with hybrid positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MR) to restage her plasma cell dyscrasia. She also had a prior diagnosis of gallbladder adenocarcinoma. Our case focuses on the value of PET/MR in this scenario as well as a rare case of osseous metastasis from gallbladder carcinoma.

Myeloma Spine and Bone Damage Score (MSBDS) on Whole-Body Computed Tomography (WBCT): Multiple Reader Agreement in a Multicenter Reliability Study

Objective: To assess the reliability of the myeloma spine and bone damage score (MSBDS) across multiple readers with different levels of expertise and from different institutions. Methods: A reliability exercise, including 104 data sets of static images and complete CT examinations of patients affected by multiple myeloma (MM), was performed. A complementary imaging atlas provided detailed examples of the MSBDS scores, including low-risk and high-risk lesions. A total of 15 readers testing the MSBDS were evaluated. ICC estimates and their 95% confidence intervals were calculated based on mean rating (k = 15), absolute agreement, a two-way random-effects model and Cronbach's alpha. Results: Overall, the ICC correlation coefficient was 0.87 (95% confidence interval: 0.79-0.92), and the Cronbach's alpha was 0.93 (95% confidence interval: 0.94-0.97). Global inter- and intra-observer agreement among the 15 readers with scores below or equal to 6 points and scores above 6 points were 0.81 (95% C.I.: 0.72-0.86) and 0.94 (95% C.I.:0.91-0.98), respectively. Conclusion: We present a consensus-based semiquantitative scoring systems for CT in MM with a complementary CT imaging atlas including detailed examples of relevant scoring techniques. We found substantial agreement among readers with different levels of experience, thereby supporting the role of the MSBDS for possible large-scale applications. Significance and Innovations • Based on previous work and definitions of the MSBDS, we present real-life reliability data for quantitative bone damage assessment in multiple myeloma (MM) patients on CT. • In this study, reliability for the MSBDS, which was tested on 15 readers with different levels of expertise and from different institutions, was shown to be moderate to excellent. • The complementary CT imaging atlas is expected to enhance unified interpretations of the MSBDS between different professionals dealing with MM patients in their routine clinical practice.