Ultrasound-guided percutaneous needle tenotomy using Tenex system for refractory lateral epicondylitis; short and long-term effectiveness and contributing factors

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes After Different Surgical Approaches for Lateral Epicondylitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

Lateral epicondylitis (LE) is one of the most common causes of lateral elbow pain. When nonoperative treatment fails, 1 of the 3 surgical approaches-open, percutaneous, or arthroscopic-is used. However, determining which approach has the superior clinical outcome remains controversial.

Purpose

To review the outcomes of different operative modalities for LE qualitatively and quantitatively.

Study Design

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

This review was performed and reported according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Studies published in PubMed, Medline (via EBSCO), and ScienceDirect databases that treated LE with open, percutaneous, or arthroscopic approaches with at least 12 months of follow-up were included. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies score. The primary outcome was the success rate of each operative treatment approach-open, percutaneous, and arthroscopic.

Results

From an initial search result of 603 studies, 43 studies (n = 1941 elbows) were ultimately included. The arthroscopic approach had the highest success rate (91.9% [95% CI, 89.2%-94.7%]) compared with the percutaneous (91% [95% CI, 87.3%-94.6%]) and open (82.7% [95% CI, 75.6%-89.8%]) approaches for LE surgery with changes in the mean visual analog scale pain score of 5.54, 4.90, and 3.63, respectively. According to the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, the functional outcome improved in the arthroscopic group (from 54.11 to 15.47), the percutaneous group (from 44.90 to 10.47), and the open group (from 53.55 to 16.13). The overall improvement was also found in the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, the arthroscopic group (from 55.12 to 90.97), the percutaneous group (from 56.31 to 87.65), and the open group (from 64 to 93.37).

Conclusion

Arthroscopic surgery had the highest rate of success and the best improvement in functional outcomes among the 3 approaches of LE surgery.

Retrospective Evaluation of Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Plantar Fasciotomy With and Without Platelet Rich Plasma

Plantar fasciitis is one of the most common foot conditions presenting to a foot and ankle specialist. Surgical treatment outcomes following plantar fasciotomy vary but short-term studies have reported excellent early pain relief and significant improvements in symptoms. This study evaluates patient reported pain scores collected pre- and post-op for patients who underwent percutaneous ultrasonic microtenotomy (PUT) plantar fasciotomy with PRP injection vs without the use of PRP. We compared pain visual analog scale (VAS) scores, for patients treated surgically by Orthopedic Surgery department of foot and ankle faculty members between December 2007 and December 2022. A total of 30 patients were identified that met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Our results showed that there was a significant decrease in pain VAS scores from pre-op visit (at least 1 month prior to operation) to post-op visit (at least 1 month following operation) for both groups, with a paired t test (p value <.0001). However, patients who received PRP had a statistically significant decrease in pain level compared to the group who did not receive PRP. Statistical analysis completed with a 2-sample t test (p-value <.0325). Our results found the mean time between the initial pre-op visit and last post-op follow-up visit was 19 months. The mean for time following surgical intervention was 10 months. The findings of our study suggest that the dual use of PUT and PRP to treat plantar fasciitis, could potentially lead to an improvement in pain reduction and longevity of pain relief.

Neurovascular structures to avoid during musculoskeletal ultrasound-guided intervention in the extremities

Ultrasound is a useful modality for guiding injections and other procedures in the extremities. Its portability and the ability to adjust the probe and needle in real time, as well as lack of radiation exposure make it preferable for many routine procedures. However, ultrasound is highly operator dependent and a firm understanding of regional anatomy is important, including neurovascular structures that are in close proximity during many of these procedures. Knowledge of the characteristic location and appearance of neurovascular structures in the extremities allows safe needle advancement and prevention of iatrogenic complications.

Percutaneous ultrasound-guided needle tenotomy for treatment of chronic tendinopathy and fasciopathy: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To systematically assess the efficacy of percutaneous ultrasound-guided needle tenotomy (PUNT) in the treatment of chronic tendinopathy and fasciopathy.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed with the following search terms: tendinopathy, tenotomy, needling, Tenex, fasciotomy, ultrasound-guided, and percutaneous. Inclusion criteria consisted of original studies evaluating pain or function improvement after PUNT. Meta-analyses investigating standard mean differences were performed to assess the pain and function improvement.

RESULTS

Thirty-five studies with 1674 participants (1876 tendons) were enrolled in this article. Of which 29 articles were included in meta-analysis and the remaining 9 articles without enough numeric data were included in descriptive analysis. PUNT significantly alleviated pain with the standard mean difference of 2.5 (95% CI: 2.0-3.0; p < 0.05), 2.2 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.8-2.7; p < 0.05), and 3.6 (95% CI: 2.8-4.5; p < 0.05) points in short-term, intermediate-term, and long-term follow-up intervals, respectively. It was also associated with marked improvement in function with 1.4 (95% CI: 1.1-1.8; p < 0.05), 1.8 (95% CI: 1.3-2.2; p < 0.05), and 2.1 (95% CI: 1.6-2.6; p < 0.05) points, respectively in short-term, intermediate-term, and long-term follow-ups.

CONCLUSION

PUNT improved pain and function at short-term intervals with persistent results on intermediate- and long-term follow-ups. PUNT can be considered an appropriate minimally invasive treatment for chronic tendinopathy with a low rate of complications and failures.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Tendinopathy and fasciopathy are two common musculoskeletal complaints that can cause prolonged pain and disability. PUNT as a treatment option could improve pain intensity and function.

KEY POINTS

• The best improvement in pain and function was achieved after the first 3 months following PUNT and was continued to the intermediate- and long-term follow-ups. • No significant difference was found between different tenotomy methods in terms of pain and function improvement. • PUNT is a minimally invasive procedure with promising results and low complication rates for treatments of chronic tendinopathy.

Current concepts of natural course and in management of medial epicondylitis: a clinical overview

Medial epicondylitis (ME), called "golfer's elbow", is not frequent or serious disease but can cause symptoms that are bothersome in everyday life. Therefore knowledge about this condition may improve diagnostic-therapeutic process. In this article detailed information concerning pathophysiology and symptomatology of ME was described. Great attention was paid to issues related to the diagnosis of the disease both in terms of differentiation with other elbow disorders as well as examination techniques. Finally, current therapeutic options were presented in detail and their efficacy was discussed based on the available data.

Efficacy of Ultrasonic Tenotomy and Debridement and Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections for Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy

Purpose

To determine the efficacy of treatment of lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET) with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection and ultrasonic tenotomy and debridement (USTD) as well as risk factors for treatment failure.

Methods

This was a retrospective study including patients treated for LET with PRP or USTD between January 2018 and December 2021. The efficacy of both procedures was assessed using pain-related patient-reported outcome measures at the 12-week follow-up. Baseline subject characteristics and diagnostic ultrasound findings were analyzed as risk factors for failure of treatment. Failure was classified as a surgical indication for LET within a year of the PRP or USTD.

Results

Ultrasonic tenotomy and debridement and PRP both led to significant improvement in patient pain within the 12-week follow-up period. There was no significant difference in efficacy between the two procedures. Common extensor tendon tearing on ultrasound and Worker's Compensation cases were found to be risk factors for failure of USTD. Lateral collateral ligament complex involvement and injection were found to be risk factors for failure of PRP.

Conclusions

Platelet-rich plasma and USTD are both effective interventions for LET. They have separate risk factors for failure that should be taken in consideration while deciding the treatment approach. These procedures are minimally invasive alternatives to some of the more invasive surgical options to treat LET.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic III.

Ultrasound-guided tenotomy for lateral epicondylitis with TenJet improves physical functional and decreased pain outcomes at 1 year: a case series review

Background

Common extensor tendinopathy is a common cause of lateral elbow pain. Ultrasound-guided minimally invasive tenotomy (MIT) has been utilized successfully as a treatment for several years, but the use of TenJet device has not been well described.

Purpose

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of MIT with TenJet who failed nonsurgical management of common extensor tendinopathy in an outpatient setting.

Methods

A total of 100 patients with common extensor tendinopathy who failed conservative treatment underwent ultrasound-guided MIT with TenJet device in the outpatient setting at a single institution. All 100 patients prior to MIT underwent diagnostic musculoskeletal ultrasound showing common extensor tendinosis. The findings were interpreted by a fellowship-trained and board-certified musculoskeletal radiologist. Patients were evaluated with the Oxford Elbow Score prior to the procedure and at 1-year follow-up. Exclusion criteria included prior corticosteroid injection within the past 6 weeks of the MIT intervention, active local or systemic infection, complete full thickness tear of the common extensor tendon, and pregnancy.

Results

Oxford Elbow Score had a statistically significant difference in baseline to 1 year (P < .001). No complications were reported and zero patients went on to require open surgical intervention.

Conclusion

MIT with TenJet is a safe, effective, and well-tolerated treatment for common extensor tendinopathy.