Hounsfield unit measurement method and related factors that most appropriately reflect bone mineral density on cervical spine computed tomography

Cervical vertebral Hounsfield units are a better predictor of Zero-P subsidence than the T-score of DXA in patients following single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with zero-profile anchored spacer

OBJECTIVES

To determine the predictive effect of Hounsfield unit (HU) values in the cervical vertebral body measured by computed tomography (CT) and T-scores measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) on Zero-P subsidence after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF)with Zero-P. In addition, we evaluated the most reliable measurement of cervical HU values.

METHODS

We reviewed 76 patients who underwent single-level Zero-P fusion for cervical spondylosis. HU values were measured on CT images according to previous studies. Univariate analysis was used to screen the influencing factors of Zero-P subsidence, and then, logistic regression was used to determine the independent risk factors. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the ability to predict Zero-P subsidence.

RESULTS

Twelve patients (15.8%) developed Zero-P subsidence. There were significant differences between subsidence group and non-subsidence group in terms of age, axial HU value, and HU value of midsagittal, midcoronal, and midaxial (MSCD), but there were no significant differences in lowest T-score and lowest BMD. The axial HU value (OR = 0.925) and HU value of MSCD (OR = 0.892) were independent risk factors for Zero-P subsidence, and the lowest T-score was not (OR = 1.186). The AUC of predicting Zero-P subsidence was 0.798 for axial HU value, 0.861 for HU value of MSCD, and 0.656 for T-score.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower cervical HU value indicates a higher risk of subsidence in patients following Zero-P fusion for single-level cervical spondylosis. HU values were better predictors of Zero-P subsidence than DXA T-scores. In addition, the measurement of HU value in the midsagittal, midcoronal, and midaxial planes of the cervical vertebral body provides an effective method for predicting Zero-P subsidence.

Characteristics and evaluation of C1 posterior arch variation for transpedicular screw placement between patients with and without basilar invagination

BACKGROUND

C1 transpedicular screw (C1TS) placement provided satisfactory pullout resistance and 3D stability, but its application might be limited in patients with basilar invagination (BI) due to the high incidences of the atlas anomaly and vertebral artery (VA) variation. However, no study has explored the classifications of C1 posterior arch variations and investigated their indications and ideal insertion trajectories for C1TS in BI.

PURPOSE

To investigate the bony and surrounding arterial characteristics of the atlas, classify posterior arch variations, identify indications for C1TS, evaluate ideal insertion trajectories for C1TS in BI patients without atlas occipitalization (AO), and compare them with those without BI and AO as control.

METHODS

A total of 130 non-AO patients with and without BI (52 patients and 78 patients, respectively) from two medical centers were included at a 1:1.5 ratio. The posterior arch variations were assessed using a modified C1 morphological classification. Comparisons regarding the bony and surrounding arterial characteristics, morphological classification distributions, and ideal insertion trajectories between BI and control groups were performed. The subgroup analyses based on different morphological classifications were also conducted. In addition, the factors possibly affecting the insertion parameters were investigated using multiple linear regression analyses.

RESULTS

The BI group was associated with significantly smaller lateral mass height and width, sagittal length of posterior arch, pedicle height, vertical height of posterior arch, and distance between VA and VA groove (VAG) than control group. Four types of posterior arch variations with indications for different screw placement techniques were classified; Classifications I and II were suitable for C1TS. The BI cohort showed a significantly lower rate of Classification I than the control cohort. In the BI group, the subgroup of Classification I had significantly larger distance between the insertion point (IP) and inferior aspect of the posterior arch. In addition, it had the narrowest width along ideal screw trajectory, but a significantly more lateral ideal mediolateral angle than the subgroup of Classification II. Multiple linear regression indicated that the cephalad angle was significantly associated with the diagnosis of BI (B = 3.708, P < 0.001) and sagittal diameter of C1 (B = 3.417, P = 0.027); the ideal mediolateral angle was significantly associated with BMI (B = 0.264, P = 0.031), sagittal diameter of C1 (B =  - 4.559, P = 0.002), and pedicle height (B =  - 2.317, P < 0.001); the distance between the IP and inferior aspects of posterior arch was significantly associated with age (B =  - 0.002, P = 0.035), BMI (B =  - 0.007, P = 0.028), sagittal length of posterior arch (B =  - 0.187, P = 0.032), pedicle height (B =  - 0.392, P < 0.001), and middle and lower parts of posterior arch (B = 0.862, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of posterior arch variation in BI patients without AO was remarkably higher than that in control patients. The insertion parameters of posterior screws were different between the morphological classification types in BI and control groups. The distance between VA V3 segments and VAG in BI cohort was substantially smaller than that in control cohort. Preoperative individual 3D computed tomography (CT), CT angiography and intraoperative navigation are recommended for BI patients receiving posterior screw placement.

Pedicle or lateral mass screws in Goel-Harms construct? A biomechanical analysis

BACKGROUND

The use of the posterior arch of C1 as pedicle has shown beneficial stability regarding screw loosening, however, the C1 pedicle screw placement is challenging. Therefore, the study aimed to analyse the bending forces of the Harms construct used in fixation of C1/C2 when using pedicle screws compared to lateral mass screws.

METHODS

Five cadaveric specimens with a mean age of 72 years at death and bone mineral density measuring for 512.4 Hounsfield Units (HU) on average were used. A custom-made biomechanical setup was used to test the specimens with a C1/C2 Harms construct each with the use of lateral mass screws and pedicle screws in sequence. Strain gauges were used to analyse the bending forces from C1 to C2 in cyclic axial compression (μm/m). All underwent cyclic biomechanical testing using 50, 75 and 100 N.

FINDINGS

In all specimens, placement of lateral mass screws and pedicle screws was feasible. All underwent cyclic biomechanical testing. For the lateral mass screw, a bending of 142.04 µm/m at 50 N, 166.56 µm/m at 75 N and 188.54 µm/m at 100 N was measured. For the pedicle screws, bending force was slightly elevated with 165.98 µm/m at 50 N, 190.58 µm/m at 75 N and 195.95 µm/m at 100 N. However, bending forces did not vary significantly. In all measurements, no statistical significance was found when comparing pedicle screws and lateral mass screws.

INTERPRETATION

The lateral mass screw used in the Harms Construct to stabilize C1/2 showed less bending forces, therefore the construct with lateral mass screws appears more stable in axial compression compared to the one with pedicle screws. However, bending forces did not vary significantly.

The impact of disease time, cervical alignment and range of motion on cervical vertebral Hounsfield unit value in surgery patients with cervical spondylosis

STUDY DESIGN

This study was a retrospective review.

OBJECTIVE

Bone mineral density (BMD) at the surgical site is associated with complications of surgical internal fixation, and it is very important to study the cervical BMD of patients with cervical spondylosis who need surgery and the related factors that affect cervical BMD. It is still unclear about the age-related influence of disease time, cervical alignment and range of motion (ROM) on cervical vertebral Hounsfield unit (HU) value.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent cervical surgery at one institution between January 2014 and December 2021. Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), disease type, comorbidities, neck pain, disease time, C2-7 Cobb angle (CA), cervical ROM and the C2-C7 vertebral HU value were recorded. The association between cervical HU value and each parameter of interest was assessed using the Pearson correlation coefficient. Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to examine the relative influence of the multiple factors on cervical vertebral HU value.

RESULTS

Among patients younger than 50 years old, the HU value of the cervical vertebral in females was higher than that of males, but after the age of 50 years, the value of females was lower than that of males and decreased significantly after 60 years old. In addition, cervical HU value was significantly correlated with the disease time, flexion CA and ROM. Our age-related subgroup of multivariate linear regression analyses shows that disease time and flexion CA negatively affected the C6-7 HU value in more than 60-year-old males and in more than 50-year-old females.

CONCLUSIONS

Disease time and flexion CA were negatively affecting the C6-7 HU values in more than 60-year-old males and in more than 50-year-old females. More attention should be paid to bone quality in cervical spondylosis patients with longer disease time and larger convex of flexion CA.

Characteristics and Comparisons of Morphometric Measurements and Computed Tomography Hounsfield Unit Values of C2 Laminae for Translaminar Screw Placement Between Patients With and Without Basilar Invagination

OBJECTIVE

Patients with basilar invagination (BI) had high incidences of vertebral variations and high-riding vertebral artery (HRVA) that might restrict the use of pedicle or pars screw and increase the use of translaminar screw on axis. Here, we conducted a radiographic study to investigate the feasibility of translaminar screws and the bone quality of C2 laminae in patients with BI, which were compared with those without BI as control to provide guidelines for safe placement.

METHODS

In this study, a total of 410 patients (205 consecutive patients with BI and 205 matched patients without BI) and 820 unilateral laminae of the axis were included at a 1:1 ratio. Comparisons with regard to insertion parameters (laminar length, thickness, angle, and height) for C2 translaminar screw placement and Hounsfield unit (HU) values for the assessment of the appropriate bone mineral density of C2 laminae between BI and control groups were performed. Besides, the subgroup analyses based on the Goel A and B classification of BI, HRVA, atlas occipitalization, and C2/3 assimilation were also carried out. Furthermore, the factors that might affect the insertion parameters and HU values were explored through multiple linear regression analyses.

RESULTS

The BI group showed a significantly smaller laminar length, thickness, height, and HU value than the control group, whereas no significant difference was observed regarding the laminar angle. By contrast, the control group showed significantly higher rates of acceptability for unilateral and bilateral translaminar screw fixations than the BI group. Subgroup analyses showed that the classification of Goel A and B, HRVA, atlas occipitalization, and C2/3 assimilation affected the insertion parameters except the HU values. Multiple linear regression indicated that the laminar length was significantly associated with the male gender (B = 0.190, p < 0.001), diagnoses of HRVA (B = -0.109, p < 0.001), Goel A (B = -0.167, p < 0.001), and C2/3 assimilation (B = -0.079, p = 0.029); the laminar thickness was significantly associated with the male gender (B = 0.353, p < 0.001), diagnoses of HRVA (B = -0.430, p < 0.001), Goel B (B = -0.249, p = 0.026), and distance from the top of odontoid to the Chamberlain line (B = -0.025, p = 0.003); laminar HU values were significantly associated with age (B = -2.517, p < 0.001), Goel A (B = -44.205, p < 0.001), Goel B (B = -25.704, p = 0.014), and laminar thickness (B = -11.706, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients with BI had narrower and smaller laminae with lower HU values and lower unilateral and bilateral acceptability for translaminar screws than patients without BI. Preoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT) and CT angiography were needed for BI patients.

The Prevalence of Osteoporosis in the Thoracic Surgery Patient Population: An Opportunity Assessment from Thorax CT Scans

Aim: To investigate the prevalence of osteoporosis in thoracic surgery patients and highlight the clinical significance for physicians. Methods: Thoracic computed tomographies(CT) of 306 patients were examined for medullary density of T12 vertebra. Hounsfield units (HU) between men and women; under the age of 70 and those who are "70 years and older" groups were compared. To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the age parameter in predicting osteoporosis, ROC analysis, and logistic regression analysis were used. The rib cortical defects identified in this study group and their causes were explained. Results: HUs of 51 subjects (or 16.7%) was less than 110 (osteoporosis); of 177 people (57.8%) was higher than 160 (normal). HU values ranged from 111 to 159 (borderline) for 78 individuals (25.5%). There was no significant difference between males and females. It was discovered that the difference between the population under 70 and the population over 70 was statistically significant (p

Utilizing machine learning for opportunistic screening for low BMD using CT scans of the cervical spine

BACKGROUND

Computed Tomography (CT) scans of the cervical spine are often performed to evaluate patients for trauma and degenerative changes of the cervical spine. We hypothesized that the CT attenuation of the cervical vertebrae can be used to identify patients who should be screened for osteoporosis.

METHODS

Retrospective study of 253 patients (177 training/validation and 76 test) with unenhanced CT scans of the cervical spine and DXA studies within 12 months of each other. Volumetric segmentation of C1-T1, clivus, and first ribs was performed to obtain the CT attenuation of each bone. The correlations of the CT attenuations between the bones and with DXA measurements were evaluated. Univariate receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analyses, and multivariate classifiers (Random Forest (RF), XGBoost, Naïve Bayes (NB), and Support Vector Machines (SVM)) analyzing the CT attenuation of all bones, were utilized to predict patients with osteopenia/osteoporosis and femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) T-scores <-1.

RESULTS

There were positive correlations between the CT attenuation of each bone, and with the DXA measurements. A CT attenuation threshold of 305.2 Hounsfield Units (HU) at C3 had the highest accuracy =0.763 (AUC=0.814) to detect femoral neck BMD T-scores ≤-1 and a CT attenuation threshold of 323.6 HU at C3 had the highest accuracy=0.774 (AUC=0.843) to detect osteopenia/osteoporosis. The SVM classifier (AUC=0.756) had higher AUC than the RF (AUC=0.692, P=0.224), XGBoost (AUC=0.736; P=0.814), NB (AUC=0.622, P=0.133) and CT threshold of 305.2 HU at C3 (AUC=0.704, P=0.531) classifiers to identify patients with femoral neck BMD T-scores <-1. The SVM classifier (accuracy=0.816) was more accurate than using the CT threshold of 305.2 HU at C3 (accuracy=0.671) (McNemar's χ₁²=7.55, P=0.006).

CONCLUSION

Opportunistic screening for low BMD can be done using cervical spine CT scans. A SVM classifier was more accurate than using the CT threshold of 305.2 HU at C3.