1
|
Benzon HT, Provenzano DA, Nagpal A, Souza D, Eckmann MS, Nelson AM, Mina M, Abd-Elsayed A, Elmofty D, Chadwick AL, Doshi TL, Pino CA, Rana M, Shah S, Shankar H, Stout A, Smith E, Abdi S, Cohen SP, Hirsch JA, Schneider BJ, Manchikanti L, Maus TP, Narouze S, Shanthanna H, Wasan AD, Hoang TD, Rivera J, Hunt C, FitzGerald JD. Use and safety of corticosteroid injections in joints and musculoskeletal soft tissue: guidelines from the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, the American Academy of Pain Medicine, the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians, and the International Pain and Spine Intervention Society. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2025:rapm-2024-105656. [PMID: 40015722 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2024] [Accepted: 02/03/2025] [Indexed: 03/01/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intra-articular corticosteroid (IACS) injection and peri-articular corticosteroid injection are commonly used to treat musculoskeletal conditions. Results vary by musculoskeletal region, but most studies report short-term benefit with mixed results on long-term relief. Publications showed adverse events from single corticosteroid injections. Recommended effective doses were lower than those currently used by clinicians. METHODS Development of the practice guideline for joint injections was approved by the Board of Directors of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine and the participating societies. A Corticosteroid Safety Work Group coordinated the development of three guidelines: peripheral nerve blocks and trigger points; joints; and neuraxial, facet, and sacroiliac joint injections. The topics included safety of the technique in relation to landmark-guided, ultrasound-guided, or radiology-aided injections; effect of the addition of the corticosteroid on the efficacy of the injectate; and adverse events related to the injection. Experts on the topics were assigned to extensively review the literature and initially develop consensus statements and recommendations. A modified version of the US Preventive Services Task Force grading of evidence and strength of recommendation was followed. A modified Delphi process was adhered to in arriving at a consensus. RESULTS This guideline focuses on the safety and efficacy of corticosteroid joint injections for managing joint chronic pain in adults. The joints that were addressed included the shoulder, elbow, hand, wrist, hip, knee, and small joints of the hands and feet. All the statements and recommendations were approved by all participants and the Board of Directors of the participating societies after four rounds of discussion. There is little evidence to guide the selection of one corticosteroid over another. Ultrasound guidance increases the accuracy of injections and reduces procedural pain. A dose of 20 mg triamcinolone is as effective as 40 mg for both shoulder IACS and subacromial subdeltoid bursa corticosteroid injections. The commonly used dose for hip IACS is 40 mg triamcinolone or methylprednisolone. Triamcinolone 40 mg is as effective as 80 mg for knee IACS. Overall, IACS injections result in short-term pain relief from a few weeks to a few months. The adverse events include an increase in blood glucose, adrenal suppression, detrimental effect on cartilage lining the joint, reduction of bone mineral density, and postoperative joint infection. CONCLUSIONS In this practice guideline, we provided specific recommendations on the role of corticosteroids in joint, bursa, and peritendon injections for musculoskeletal pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Honorio T Benzon
- Anesthesiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Ameet Nagpal
- PM&R, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Dmitri Souza
- Pain Medicine, Summa Western Reserve Hospital, Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, USA
| | - Maxim S Eckmann
- Anesthesiology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Ariana M Nelson
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA
- Department of Aerospace Medicine, Exploration Medical Capability, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Maged Mina
- Anesthesiology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Alaa Abd-Elsayed
- University of Wisconsin Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Dalia Elmofty
- Department of Anesthesia, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Andrea L Chadwick
- Anesthesiology, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Tina L Doshi
- Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Carlos A Pino
- Anesthesiology, Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Maunak Rana
- Department of Anesthesia, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Shalini Shah
- University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Hariharan Shankar
- Anesthesiology, Clement J Zablocki VA Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Alison Stout
- PM&R, Cleveland Clinic Neurological Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Elizabeth Smith
- American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Salahadin Abdi
- Pain, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Steven P Cohen
- Anesthesiology, Pain Medicine Division; PM&R; Neurology; Psychiatry; Neurosurgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Joshua A Hirsch
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Byron J Schneider
- PM&R, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | | | - Samer Narouze
- Pain Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Ajay D Wasan
- University of Pittsburgh Health Sciences, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Thanh D Hoang
- Endocrinology, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Christine Hunt
- Anesthesiology-Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bernetti A, Agostini F, Finamore N, Dal Borgo M, Mangone M, Ammendolia A, Paoloni M, de Sire A. Effectiveness of ultrasound-guided hip injections on pain and functioning in patients with hip osteoarthritis: A systematic review. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2025; 38:19-47. [PMID: 39970463 DOI: 10.1177/10538127241296338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/21/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Osteoarthritis is the most common form of arthritis, causing pain, functional disability, and a reduction in terms of quality of life. Minimally invasive treatments like intra-articular hip injections are a therapeutic option and ultrasound guidance might improve the results of these injections. OBJECTIVE To summarize the evidence about the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided hip injections in terms of pain and functioning in patients affected by hip osteoarthritis. METHODS A systematic search of the literature was performed on three electronic databases: PubMed, Cochrane and PEDro, using a specific search strategy. We evaluated for inclusion all articles according to the following participants, intervention, comparison, and outcomes (PICO) model: P) Population: human patients affected by hip osteoarthritis; I) Intervention: intra-articular hip injections performed with a ultrasound-guidance; C) Comparator: sham therapy or every other conservative or oral, non-invasive, minimally invasive or surgical technique; O) Outcome measures: pain assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) or Numerical Rating Scale (NRS); functional outcomes. RESULTS At the end of the search, 43 articles were included in the review. Several drugs have been considered in the included studies: hyaluronic acid, platelet-rich plasma, corticosteroids, micro-fragmented adipose tissue, bone marrow concentrates, amniotic suspension allograft. CONCLUSION Ultrasound-guided injections of hyaluronic acid might be effective on pain relief and functioning in patients affected by hip osteoarthritis. Also, other rehabilitative infiltrative techniques (i.e., corticosteroids and platelet-rich plasma) showed a positive effect in the short-term period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Bernetti
- Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technologies (DiSTeBA), University of Salento, Lecce, Italy
| | - Francesco Agostini
- Department of Anatomical and Histological Sciences, Legal Medicine and Orthopedics, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Nikolaos Finamore
- Department of Anatomical and Histological Sciences, Legal Medicine and Orthopedics, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Dal Borgo
- Department of Anatomical and Histological Sciences, Legal Medicine and Orthopedics, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Mangone
- Department of Anatomical and Histological Sciences, Legal Medicine and Orthopedics, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Ammendolia
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Catanzaro "Magna Graecia", Catanzaro, Italy
- Research Center on Musculoskeletal Health, MusculoSkeletalHealth@UMG, University of Catanzaro "Magna Graecia", Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Marco Paoloni
- Department of Anatomical and Histological Sciences, Legal Medicine and Orthopedics, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro de Sire
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Catanzaro "Magna Graecia", Catanzaro, Italy
- Research Center on Musculoskeletal Health, MusculoSkeletalHealth@UMG, University of Catanzaro "Magna Graecia", Catanzaro, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cheng J, Barcavage C, Leupold O, Tsai J, Wyss J. A Tale of Bilateral Rapidly Progressive Osteoarthritis of the Hip-It Is Not Always the Steroid Injection: A Case Report. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2024; 103:e51-e53. [PMID: 38112641 DOI: 10.1097/phm.0000000000002391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Rapidly progressive osteoarthritis of the hip is an unusual subset of hip osteoarthritis in which a >2 mm/yr rate of joint space narrowing occurs. Rapidly progressive osteoarthritis of the hip has been associated with intra-articular steroid injection, with the incidence of rapidly progressive osteoarthritis of the hip after intra-articular steroid injection ranging from 2.8% to 21%. The occurrence of rapidly progressive osteoarthritis of the hip unrelated to intra-articular steroid injection is rare, and not frequently reported. This report presents a unique case of rapidly progressive osteoarthritis of the hip in the bilateral hips of one patient. The first hip developed rapidly progressive osteoarthritis of the hip within 6 mos after an intra-articular steroid injection. Three years later, the second hip developed rapidly progressive osteoarthritis of the hip within 4 mos without any injection or use of systemic steroid medication. The etiology of rapidly progressive osteoarthritis of the hip in the absence of intra-articular steroid injection is unclear, and this case presents the opportunity to observe the development of rapidly progressive osteoarthritis of the hip due to different causes within the same individual.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Cheng
- From the Department of Physiatry, Hospital for Special Surgery (JC, CB, OL, JT, JW), and Athlete's Spine Injury Program at Hospital for Special Surgery (JW, CB), New York, New York
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|