EANM–ESR white paper on multimodality imaging. A white paper for a black project: towards the decline of nuclear medicine as an independent specialty in Europe?

The impact of long axial field of view (LAFOV) PET on oncologic imaging

The development of long axial field of view (LAFOV) positron emission tomography coupled with computed tomography (PET/CT) scanners might be considered the biggest step forward in PET imaging since it became a mainstream clinical modality. Despite increased capital and maintenance costs and data storage requirements, the improvement in image quality, significantly faster acquisition times and lower radiopharmaceutical administered activities, allow a high quality and more efficient clinical service. This step change in technology overcomes some of the limitations of standard short axial field of view scanners. It allows simultaneous imaging of all body systems, and with the ability to obtain high temporal resolution data, it increases potential research applications, particularly in multisystem disease or for dosimetry measurements of novel radiopharmaceuticals. The improvements in sensitivity and signal-to-noise facilitates the use of tracers with long half-lives and low administered activity (e.g. [89Zr]-labelled monoclonal antibodies) or very short half-lives (e.g. [82Rb]), opening up applications that hitherto have been challenging. It is early in the evolution of LAFOV PET/CT and the advantages these systems offer have still to be fully realised in providing additional impact in clinical practice. In this article we describe the potential advantages of LAFOV PET technology and some of the clinical and research applications where it has been applied as well as some of the future developments that may enhance the modality further.

Variations of clinical SPECT/CT operations

Aim: This survey gathers information about clinical SPECT/CT operations worldwide to help guide standardization of clinical SPECT/ CT imaging. Methods: An international, webbased survey of SPECT/CT users was initiated in 12/2010 through an e-mail distribution. Users were asked 71 questions related to (A) demographics, (B) SPECT/CT operations/utilization and (C) variations in imaging protocols. Results: Collected responses originated from 117 imaging centers in the Americas (66%), Europe (20%), Asia-Pacific (11%) and the Middle-East (3%), with the majority of responding sites representing public health care institutions (69%). Most sites operate 1–2 SPECT/CT-systems (74%), typically installed in Nuclear Medicine departments (84%) with extensive prior SPECT-only experience (82%). Only 14% of SPECT/CTs are installed in Radiology departments. Clinical SPECT/CT imaging is performed either as routine (51%) or ad-hoc “add-on” procedure (49%) with a high inter-site and inter-examination variability. The main application of the integrated CT is to provide anatomical localization of the tracer uptake rather than to produce contrast enhanced or other high-quality CT images. Consequently, in only 22% of the sites a CT contrast injector is installed. Only 6% of centers use SPECT/CT devices for stand-alone CT procedures. Conclusion: An international survey among clinical SPECT/CT users revealed that SPECT/CT is a not a routine component of nuclear medicine procedures. The majority of the centers responding do not fully utilize the diagnostic potential of the CT components. Significant variations in standard imaging protocols were observed. These findings illustrate the need for training and standardization and underscore the need for revisiting the role of SPECT/CT in diagnostic imaging.