1
|
PET/CT. PET Clin 2022; 17:297-305. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2021.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
2
|
Pouw JEE, Vriens D, van Velden FHP, de Geus-Oei LF. Use of [18F]FDG PET/CT for Target Volume Definition in Radiotherapy. IMAGE-GUIDED HIGH-PRECISION RADIOTHERAPY 2022:3-30. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-08601-4_1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2025]
|
3
|
Jensen K, Al-Farra G, Dejanovic D, Eriksen JG, Loft A, Hansen CR, Pameijer FA, Zukauskaite R, Grau C. Imaging for Target Delineation in Head and Neck Cancer Radiotherapy. Semin Nucl Med 2020; 51:59-67. [PMID: 33246540 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2020.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
The definition of tumor involved volumes in patients with head and neck cancer poses great challenges with the increasing use of highly conformal radiotherapy techniques eg, volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity modulated proton therapy. The risk of underdosing the tumor might increase unless great care is taken in the process. The information gained from imaging is increasing with both PET and MRI becoming readily available for the definition of targets. The information gained from these techniques is indeed multidimensional as one often acquire data on eg, metabolism, diffusion, and hypoxia together with anatomical and structural information. Nevertheless, much work remains to fully exploit the available information on a patient-specific level. Multimodality target definition in radiotherapy is a chain of processes that must be individually scrutinized, optimized and quality assured. Any uncertainties or errors in image acquisition, reconstruction, interpretation, and delineation are systematic errors and hence will potentially have a detrimental effect on the entire radiotherapy treatment and hence; the chance of cure or the risk of unnecessary side effects. Common guidelines and procedures create a common minimum standard and ground for evaluation and development. In Denmark, the treatment of head and neck cancer is organized within the multidisciplinary Danish Head and Neck Cancer Group (DAHANCA). The radiotherapy quality assurance group of DAHANCA organized a workshop in January 2020 with participants from oncology, radiology, and nuclear medicine from all centers in Denmark, treating patients with head and neck cancer. The participants agreed on a national guideline on imaging for target delineation in head and neck cancer radiotherapy, which has been approved by the DAHANCA group. The guidelines are available in the Supplementary. The use of multimodality imaging is being recommended for the planning of all radical treatments with a macroscopic tumor. 2-[18F]FDG-PET/CT should be available, preferable in the treatment position. The recommended MRI sequences are T1, T2 with and without fat suppression, and T1 with contrast enhancement, preferable in the treatment position. The interpretation of clinical information, including thorough physical examination as well as imaging, should be done in a multidisciplinary setting with an oncologist, radiologist, and nuclear medicine specialist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth Jensen
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy. Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
| | - Gina Al-Farra
- Department of Radiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Denmark
| | - Danijela Dejanovic
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark
| | | | - Annika Loft
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Christian R Hansen
- Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Denmark; Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Danish Center for Particle Therapy. Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Frank A Pameijer
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ruta Zukauskaite
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark; Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Cai Grau
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy. Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dulguerov P, Broglie MA, Henke G, Siano M, Putora PM, Simon C, Zwahlen D, Huber GF, Ballerini G, Beffa L, Giger R, Rothschild S, Negri SV, Elicin O. A Review of Controversial Issues in the Management of Head and Neck Cancer: A Swiss Multidisciplinary and Multi-Institutional Patterns of Care Study-Part 1 (Head and Neck Surgery). Front Oncol 2019; 9:1125. [PMID: 31709185 PMCID: PMC6822016 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2019] [Accepted: 10/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The Head and Neck Cancer Working Group of Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) has investigated the level of consensus (LOC) and discrepancy in everyday practice of diagnosis and treatment in head and neck cancer. Materials and Methods: An online survey was iteratively generated with 10 Swiss university and teaching hospitals. LOC below 50% was defined as no agreement, while higher LOC were arbitrarily categorized as low (51-74%), moderate (75-84%), and high (≥85%). Results: Any LOC was achieved in 62% of topics (n = 60). High, moderate and low LOC were found in 18, 20, and 23%, respectively. Regarding Head and Neck Surgery, Radiation Oncology, Medical Oncology, and biomarkers, LOC was achieved in 50, 57, 83, and 43%, respectively. Conclusions: Consensus on clinical topics is rather low for surgeons and radiation oncologists. The questions discussed might highlight discrepancies, stimulate standardization of practice, and prioritize topics for future clinical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pavel Dulguerov
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Martina A. Broglie
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Guido Henke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Marco Siano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Riviera-Chablais, Vevey, Switzerland
| | - Paul Martin Putora
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Christian Simon
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Zwahlen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital of Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Gerhard F. Huber
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Giorgio Ballerini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinica Luganese SA, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Lorenza Beffa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Roland Giger
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Sacha Rothschild
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Sandro V. Negri
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Lindenhofspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Olgun Elicin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
There are recent advances, namely, a standardized method for reporting therapy response (Hopkins criteria), a multicenter prospective cohort study with excellent negative predictive value of F-FDG PET/CT for N0 clinical neck, a phase III multicenter randomized controlled study establishing the value of a negative posttherapy F-FDG PET/CT for patient management, a phase II randomized controlled study demonstrating radiation dose reduction strategies for human papilloma virus-related disease, and Food and Drug Administration approval of nivolumab for treatment of recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Collapse
|
6
|
A smart and operator independent system to delineate tumours in Positron Emission Tomography scans. Comput Biol Med 2018; 102:1-15. [PMID: 30219733 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2018] [Revised: 08/20/2018] [Accepted: 09/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging has an enormous potential to improve radiation therapy treatment planning offering complementary functional information with respect to other anatomical imaging approaches. The aim of this study is to develop an operator independent, reliable, and clinically feasible system for biological tumour volume delineation from PET images. Under this design hypothesis, we combine several known approaches in an original way to deploy a system with a high level of automation. The proposed system automatically identifies the optimal region of interest around the tumour and performs a slice-by-slice marching local active contour segmentation. It automatically stops when a "cancer-free" slice is identified. User intervention is limited at drawing an initial rough contour around the cancer region. By design, the algorithm performs the segmentation minimizing any dependence from the initial input, so that the final result is extremely repeatable. To assess the performances under different conditions, our system is evaluated on a dataset comprising five synthetic experiments and fifty oncological lesions located in different anatomical regions (i.e. lung, head and neck, and brain) using PET studies with 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose and 11C-labeled Methionine radio-tracers. Results on synthetic lesions demonstrate enhanced performances when compared against the most common PET segmentation methods. In clinical cases, the proposed system produces accurate segmentations (average dice similarity coefficient: 85.36 ± 2.94%, 85.98 ± 3.40%, 88.02 ± 2.75% in the lung, head and neck, and brain district, respectively) with high agreement with the gold standard (determination coefficient R2 = 0.98). We believe that the proposed system could be efficiently used in the everyday clinical routine as a medical decision tool, and to provide the clinicians with additional information, derived from PET, which can be of use in radiation therapy, treatment, and planning.
Collapse
|
7
|
Garibaldi C, Ronchi S, Cremonesi M, Gilardi L, Travaini L, Ferrari M, Alterio D, Kaanders JH, Ciardo D, Orecchia R, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Grana CM. Interim 18 F-FDG PET/CT During Chemoradiation Therapy in the Management of Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 98:555-573. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.02.217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2016] [Revised: 02/20/2017] [Accepted: 02/23/2017] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
|
8
|
Hatt M, Lee JA, Schmidtlein CR, Naqa IE, Caldwell C, De Bernardi E, Lu W, Das S, Geets X, Gregoire V, Jeraj R, MacManus MP, Mawlawi OR, Nestle U, Pugachev AB, Schöder H, Shepherd T, Spezi E, Visvikis D, Zaidi H, Kirov AS. Classification and evaluation strategies of auto-segmentation approaches for PET: Report of AAPM task group No. 211. Med Phys 2017; 44:e1-e42. [PMID: 28120467 DOI: 10.1002/mp.12124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 142] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2016] [Revised: 12/09/2016] [Accepted: 01/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this educational report is to provide an overview of the present state-of-the-art PET auto-segmentation (PET-AS) algorithms and their respective validation, with an emphasis on providing the user with help in understanding the challenges and pitfalls associated with selecting and implementing a PET-AS algorithm for a particular application. APPROACH A brief description of the different types of PET-AS algorithms is provided using a classification based on method complexity and type. The advantages and the limitations of the current PET-AS algorithms are highlighted based on current publications and existing comparison studies. A review of the available image datasets and contour evaluation metrics in terms of their applicability for establishing a standardized evaluation of PET-AS algorithms is provided. The performance requirements for the algorithms and their dependence on the application, the radiotracer used and the evaluation criteria are described and discussed. Finally, a procedure for algorithm acceptance and implementation, as well as the complementary role of manual and auto-segmentation are addressed. FINDINGS A large number of PET-AS algorithms have been developed within the last 20 years. Many of the proposed algorithms are based on either fixed or adaptively selected thresholds. More recently, numerous papers have proposed the use of more advanced image analysis paradigms to perform semi-automated delineation of the PET images. However, the level of algorithm validation is variable and for most published algorithms is either insufficient or inconsistent which prevents recommending a single algorithm. This is compounded by the fact that realistic image configurations with low signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) and heterogeneous tracer distributions have rarely been used. Large variations in the evaluation methods used in the literature point to the need for a standardized evaluation protocol. CONCLUSIONS Available comparison studies suggest that PET-AS algorithms relying on advanced image analysis paradigms provide generally more accurate segmentation than approaches based on PET activity thresholds, particularly for realistic configurations. However, this may not be the case for simple shape lesions in situations with a narrower range of parameters, where simpler methods may also perform well. Recent algorithms which employ some type of consensus or automatic selection between several PET-AS methods have potential to overcome the limitations of the individual methods when appropriately trained. In either case, accuracy evaluation is required for each different PET scanner and scanning and image reconstruction protocol. For the simpler, less robust approaches, adaptation to scanning conditions, tumor type, and tumor location by optimization of parameters is necessary. The results from the method evaluation stage can be used to estimate the contouring uncertainty. All PET-AS contours should be critically verified by a physician. A standard test, i.e., a benchmark dedicated to evaluating both existing and future PET-AS algorithms needs to be designed, to aid clinicians in evaluating and selecting PET-AS algorithms and to establish performance limits for their acceptance for clinical use. The initial steps toward designing and building such a standard are undertaken by the task group members.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathieu Hatt
- INSERM, UMR 1101, LaTIM, University of Brest, IBSAM, Brest, France
| | - John A Lee
- Université catholique de Louvain (IREC/MIRO) & FNRS, Brussels, 1200, Belgium
| | | | | | - Curtis Caldwell
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | | | - Wei Lu
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Shiva Das
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Xavier Geets
- Université catholique de Louvain (IREC/MIRO) & FNRS, Brussels, 1200, Belgium
| | - Vincent Gregoire
- Université catholique de Louvain (IREC/MIRO) & FNRS, Brussels, 1200, Belgium
| | - Robert Jeraj
- University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53705, USA
| | | | | | - Ursula Nestle
- Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, 79106, Germany
| | - Andrei B Pugachev
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Heiko Schöder
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | | | - Emiliano Spezi
- School of Engineering, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom
| | | | - Habib Zaidi
- Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, CH-1211, Switzerland
| | - Assen S Kirov
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cacicedo J, Navarro A, Del Hoyo O, Gomez-Iturriaga A, Alongi F, Medina JA, Elicin O, Skanjeti A, Giammarile F, Bilbao P, Casquero F, de Bari B, Dal Pra A. Role of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in head and neck oncology: the point of view of the radiation oncologist. Br J Radiol 2016; 89:20160217. [PMID: 27416996 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Squamous cell carcinoma is the most common malignant tumour of the head and neck. The initial TNM staging, the evaluation of the tumour response during treatment, and the long-term surveillance are crucial moments in the approach to head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Thus, at each of these moments, the choice of the best diagnostic tool providing the more precise and larger information is crucial. Positron emission tomography with fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose integrated with CT (18F-FDG-PET/CT) rapidly gained clinical acceptance, and it has become an important imaging tool in routine clinical oncology. However, controversial data are currently available, for example, on the role of 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging during radiotherapy planning, the prognostic value or its real clinical impact on treatment decisions. In this article, the role of 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging in HNSCC during pre-treatment staging, radiotherapy planning, treatment response assessment, prognosis and follow-up is reviewed focusing on current evidence and controversial issues. A proposal on how to integrate 18F-FDG-PET/CT in daily clinical practice is also described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jon Cacicedo
- 1 Radiation Oncology Department, Cruces University Hospital/Biocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain.,2 Grupo Español de Oncología Radioterápica en Cabeza y Cuello (GEORCC)
| | - Arturo Navarro
- 3 Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Duran i Reynals (ICO) Avda, Gran Via de L´Hospitalet, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Olga Del Hoyo
- 1 Radiation Oncology Department, Cruces University Hospital/Biocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Alfonso Gomez-Iturriaga
- 1 Radiation Oncology Department, Cruces University Hospital/Biocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Filippo Alongi
- 4 Radiation Oncology Department, Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Jose A Medina
- 2 Grupo Español de Oncología Radioterápica en Cabeza y Cuello (GEORCC).,5 Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Malaga, Spain
| | - Olgun Elicin
- 6 Radiation Oncology Department, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Skanjeti
- 7 Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Francesco Giammarile
- 7 Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Pedro Bilbao
- 1 Radiation Oncology Department, Cruces University Hospital/Biocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Francisco Casquero
- 1 Radiation Oncology Department, Cruces University Hospital/Biocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Berardino de Bari
- 8 fESTRO Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Alan Dal Pra
- 6 Radiation Oncology Department, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Comparison of the Performances of (18)F-FP-CIT Brain PET/MR and Simultaneous PET/CT: a Preliminary Study. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2016; 50:219-27. [PMID: 27540426 DOI: 10.1007/s13139-016-0419-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2015] [Revised: 04/12/2016] [Accepted: 04/15/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE (18)F-FP-CIT [(18)F-fluorinated N-3-fluoropropyl-2-beta-carboxymethoxy-3-beta-(4-iodophenyl) nortropane] has been well established and used for the differential diagnosis of atypical parkinsonian disorders. Recently, combined positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance (MR) was proposed as a viable alternative to PET/computed tomography (CT). The aim of this study was to compare the performances of conventional (18)F-FP-CIT brain PET/CT and simultaneous PET/MR by visual inspection and quantitative analysis. METHODS Fifteen consecutive patients clinically suspected of having Parkinson's disease were recruited for the study.(18)F-FP-CIT PET was performed during PET/CT and PET/MR. PET/CT image acquisition was started 90 min after intravenous injection of (18)F-FP-CIT and then PET/MR images were acquired. Dopamine transporter (DAT) density in bilateral striatal subregions was assessed visually. Quantitative analyses were performed on bilateral striatal volumes of interest (VOIs) using average standardized uptake values (SUVmeans). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and their 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were assessed to compare PET/CT and PET/MR data. Bland-Altman plots were drawn to perform method-comparisons. RESULTS All subjects showed a preferential decrease in DAT binding in the posterior putamen (PP), with relative sparing of the ventral putamen (VP). Bilateral striatal subregional binding ratio (BR) determined PET/CT and PET/MR demonstrated close interequipment correspondence (BRright caudate - ICC, 0.944; 95 % CI, 0.835-0.981, BRleft caudate - ICC, 0.917; 95 % CI, 0.753-0.972, BRright putamen - ICC, 0.976; 95 % CI, 0.929-0.992 and BRleft putamen - ICC, 0.970; 95 % CI, 0.911-0.990, respectively), and Bland-Altman plots showed interequipment agreement between the two modalities. CONCLUSIONS It is known that MR provides more information about anatomical changes associated with brain diseases and to enable the anatomical allocations of subregions than CT, though this was not observed in the present study. Although the subregional BR of simultaneous PET/MR was comparable to that of PET/CT in Parkinson's disease, our isocontouring method could make bias. A future automated method using standard template study or manual segmentation of putamen/caudate based on MR or CT is needed.
Collapse
|
11
|
Stromberger C, Ghadjar P, Marnitz S, Thieme AH, Jahn U, Raguse JD, Karaj-Rossbacher E, Böttcher A, Jamil B, Budach V. Comparative treatment planning study on sequential vs. simultaneous integrated boost in head and neck cancer patients: Differences in dose distributions and potential implications for clinical practice. Strahlenther Onkol 2016; 192:17-24. [PMID: 26462675 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-015-0913-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2015] [Accepted: 09/25/2015] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
AIM The purpose of this work was to compare sequential (SeqB) versus simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) radiotherapy plans delivered with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for patients with locally advanced squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (HNSCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS SeqB and SIB plans using VMAT for 10 HNSCC patients given definitive chemoradiation were generated and analysed for differences in dose distribution, coverage, conformity and homogeneity to the planning target volumes (PTV) 1-3 and sparing of organs at risk (OAR). RESULTS The mean delineated volumes ± standard deviations were 137.7 ± 44.8, 351.3 ± 83.9 and 895.6 ± 120.5 cm3 for PTV1-3. The mean volumes encompassed by the corresponding 95 % isodoses were 281 (+ 110 %) ± 73.4, 712.2 (+ 115 %) ± 146.4 and 1381.1 (+ 54 %) ± 217.3 cm3 with SeqB and 138.2 (+ 7 %) ± 40.1, 380.4 (+ 11 %) ± 91.9 and 1057.3 (+ 21 %) ± 161.4 cm3 with SIB for PTV1-3, respectively. Both strategies achieved excellent PTV coverage. SeqB provided significantly better coverage of PTV1 and 3, worse conformity for PTV1-3 and a higher mean dose than prescribed (111-115 %) to PTV2 and 3 (p ≤ 0.007). Both strategies provided satisfactory OAR sparing. CONCLUSION This study showed significant dosimetric differences with potential clinical relevance between two VMAT boost strategies regarding coverage, conformity and dose to the PTVs. SIB might cause less toxicity. A clinical phase III/IV trial endorsed by the German Head and Neck Clinical Trials Group (IAG-KHT) will evaluate differences in acute/late toxicity as well as in locoregional recurrences between the two boost techniques.
Collapse
|
12
|
18F-FDG PET/CT quantification in head and neck squamous cell cancer: principles, technical issues and clinical applications. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2016; 43:1360-75. [DOI: 10.1007/s00259-015-3294-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2015] [Accepted: 12/14/2015] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
|
13
|
Abstract
Although many PET tracers are in use, FDG still is the most widely used in clinical oncology practice. FDG therefore deserves an in-depth discussion, which is even more interesting because of the huge increase in the molecular biology of glucose metabolism. Obviously, other tracers are of increasing importance as well, and these will be discussed in short.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk De Ruysscher
- Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven/KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium.
- Maastricht University Medical Center, GROW, Maastro clinic, Louvain, Belgium.
| | - Karin Haustermans
- Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven/KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- Section for Biomedical Physics, University Hospital for Radiation Oncology Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Awan MJ, Siddiqui F, Schwartz D, Yuan J, Machtay M, Yao M. Application of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in radiation treatment planning for head and neck cancers. World J Radiol 2015; 7:382-393. [PMID: 26644824 PMCID: PMC4663377 DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v7.i11.382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2015] [Revised: 07/08/2015] [Accepted: 09/18/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
18-fluorodeoxygluocose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18FDG-PET/CT) provides significant information in multiple settings in the management of head and neck cancers (HNC). This article seeks to define the additional benefit of PET/CT as related to radiation treatment planning for squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) of the head and neck through a review of relevant literature. By helping further define both primary and nodal volumes, radiation treatment planning can be improved using PET/CT. Special attention is paid to the independent benefit of PET/CT in targeting mucosal primaries as well as in detecting nodal metastases. The utility of PET/CT is also explored for treatment planning in the setting of SCC of unknown primary as PET/CT may help define a mucosal target volume by guiding biopsies for examination under anesthesia thus changing the treatment paradigm and limiting the extent of therapy. Implications of the use of PET/CT for proper target delineation in patients with artifact from dental procedures are discussed and the impact of dental artifact on CT-based PET attenuation correction is assessed. Finally, comment is made upon the role of PET/CT in the high-risk post-operative setting, particularly in the context of radiation dose escalation. Real case examples are used in these settings to elucidate the practical benefits of PET/CT as related to radiation treatment planning in HNCs.
Collapse
|
15
|
Grégoire V, Langendijk JA, Nuyts S. Advances in Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33:3277-84. [PMID: 26351354 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.61.2994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 144] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Over the last few decades, significant improvements have been made in the radiotherapy (RT) treatment of head and neck malignancies. The progressive introduction of intensity-modulated RT and the use of multimodality imaging for target volume and organs at risk delineation, together with the use of altered fractionation regimens and concomitant administration of chemotherapy or targeted agents, have accompanied efficacy improvements in RT. Altogether, such improvements have translated into improvement in locoregional control and overall survival probability, with a decrease in the long-term adverse effects of RT and an improvement in quality of life. Further progress in the treatment of head and neck malignancies may come from a better integration of molecular imaging to identify tumor subvolumes that may require additional radiation doses (ie, dose painting) and from treatment adaptation tracing changes in patient anatomy during treatment. Proton therapy generates even more exquisite dose distribution in some patients, thus potentially further improving patient outcomes. However, the clinical benefit of these approaches, although promising, for patients with head and neck cancer need to be demonstrated in prospective randomized studies. In this context, our article will review some of these advances, with special emphasis on target volume and organ-at-risk delineation, use of molecular imaging for tumor delineation, dose painting for dose escalation, dose adaptation throughout treatment, and potential benefit of proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Grégoire
- Vincent Grégoire, Institut de Recherche Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, St-Luc University Hospital, Brussels; Sandra Nuyts, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven-University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium; and Johannes A. Langendijk, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Johannes A Langendijk
- Vincent Grégoire, Institut de Recherche Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, St-Luc University Hospital, Brussels; Sandra Nuyts, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven-University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium; and Johannes A. Langendijk, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Sandra Nuyts
- Vincent Grégoire, Institut de Recherche Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, St-Luc University Hospital, Brussels; Sandra Nuyts, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven-University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium; and Johannes A. Langendijk, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Leclerc M, Lartigau E, Lacornerie T, Daisne JF, Kramar A, Grégoire V. Primary tumor delineation based on (18)FDG PET for locally advanced head and neck cancer treated by chemo-radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2015; 116:87-93. [PMID: 26088157 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2015] [Revised: 06/01/2015] [Accepted: 06/07/2015] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE The use of FDG-PET for target volume delineation has been validated by our group for patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated by concomitant chemo-radiotherapy providing a strict methodology for image acquisition and segmentation. The aims of this study were (1) to confirm these results in a multicentric setting, and (2) to evaluate the clinical outcome in a prospective series of patients treated with FDG-PET scan-based radiotherapy planning. MATERIAL/METHODS Forty-one patients with stage III or IV HNSCC were included in this prospective multicentric study from 2007 to 2009. Before treatment, each patient underwent head and neck endoscopy, contrast enhanced CT or MRI and FDG PET scan. Patients were treated with invert or forward planning IMRT (using dose-volume constraints on PTVs and OARs). Primary tumor GTVPET were automatically delineated using a gradient based method and were registered on the planning CT. A prophylactic (50Gy) and a therapeutic (70Gy) primary tumor CTVPET were contoured using GTVPET volume along with data provided by endoscopy and pre-treatment imaging. Nodal CTV were delineated on the planning CT using internationally accepted guidelines. PTV was created by adding a security margin of 4-5mm around CTVPET (PTVPET). At the end of the inclusion period after a minimal follow-up of 2years, target volumes (GTVCT, CTVCT, PTVCT) for the primary tumors were re-delineated on the planning CT-scan using anatomic imaging only to perform a volumetric and a dosimetric comparison. RESULTS Mean age of the population was 59years. Oropharynx was the most common tumor location (68%), followed by oral cavity (17%), larynx (7%) and hypopharynx (7%). GTVPET contours were significantly smaller than GTVCT contours in all cases but one (average volume 28.8ml vs 40.4ml, p<0.0001). The prophylactic primary tumor target volumes (CTV 50Gy and PTV 50Gy) based on PET scan were significantly smaller (p<0.0001) in oropharynx cases. The boost target volumes (CTV 70Gy and PTV 70Gy) contoured on PET scan were also significantly smaller than the ones contoured on CT scan in all cases (p<0.0001). The dosimetry comparison showed a significant decrease in parotid and oral cavity mean dose from the PET-based plans. After completion of chemo-radiotherapy, 5 patients had selective node dissection for suspicious lymph nodes on MRI and/or PET scan; only one had a positive pathological node. At a median follow-up of 3years, the relapse-free and overall survival rates were respectively 32% and 43%. No marginal recurrence (in the CTVCT but outside the CTVPET) was observed. CONCLUSION This study confirms that the use of (18)FDG-PET translated into smaller GTV, CTV and PTV for the primary tumor volumes in comparison with the use of CT. PET planning also demonstrated an improvement on dosimetry by lowering dose to certain organs at risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathieu Leclerc
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Center for Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), Institut de Recherche Clinique (IREC), Université catholique de Louvain, St-Luc University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU de Québec, Canada
| | - Eric Lartigau
- Academic Radiation Oncology Dept., Centre Oscar Lambret, ONCOLille and University Lille 2, France
| | - Thomas Lacornerie
- Academic Radiation Oncology Dept., Centre Oscar Lambret, ONCOLille and University Lille 2, France
| | - Jean-François Daisne
- Radiation Oncology Dept., Clinique et Maternité Sainte-Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium
| | - Andrew Kramar
- Unité de Méthodologie et Biostatistique, Lille, France
| | - Vincent Grégoire
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Center for Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), Institut de Recherche Clinique (IREC), Université catholique de Louvain, St-Luc University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
|
18
|
Thorwarth D. Functional imaging for radiotherapy treatment planning: current status and future directions-a review. Br J Radiol 2015; 88:20150056. [PMID: 25827209 PMCID: PMC4628531 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20150056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
In recent years, radiotherapy (RT) has been subject to a number of technological innovations. Today, RT is extremely flexible, allowing irradiation of tumours with high doses, whilst also sparing normal tissues from doses. To make use of these additional degrees of freedom, integration of functional image information may play a key role (i) for better staging and tumour detection, (ii) for more accurate RT target volume delineation, (iii) to assess functional information about biological characteristics and individual radiation resistance and (iv) to apply personalized dose prescriptions. In this article, we discuss the current status and future directions of different clinically available functional imaging modalities; CT, MRI, positron emission tomography (PET) as well as the hybrid imaging techniques PET/CT and PET/MRI and their potential for individualized RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Thorwarth
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Caldas-Magalhaes J, Kooij N, Ligtenberg H, Jager EA, Schakel T, Kasperts N, Pameijer FA, Terhaard CHJ, Janssen LM, van Diest PJ, Philippens MEP, Raaijmakers CPJ. The accuracy of target delineation in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer. Acta Oncol 2015; 54:1181-7. [PMID: 25734331 DOI: 10.3109/0284186x.2015.1006401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To determine the spatial correspondence between the gross tumor volume (GTV) delineated on computer tomography (CT) and the actual tumor on histopathology. MATERIAL AND METHODS Sixteen patients with T3 or T4 laryngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer underwent a CT scan before total laryngectomy. The GTV was delineated on CT by three independent observers and by consensus between the three observers. After surgery, whole-mount hematoxylin-eosin stained (H&E) sections were obtained. One pathologist delineated the tumor in the H&E sections (tumorH&E). The reconstructed specimen was registered to the CT scan in order to compare the GTV to the tumorH&E in three dimensions. The overlap between the GTV and the tumorH&E was calculated and the distance between the volumes was determined. RESULTS Tumor tissue was delineated in 203 of 516 H&E sections. For 14 patients a detailed analysis could be performed. The GTV volume was on average 1.7 times larger than the volume of the tumorH&E. The mean coverage of the tumorH&E by the consensus GTV was 88%. tumorH&E tissue was found at 1.6 mm to 12.9 mm distance outside the GTV depending on observer and patient. CONCLUSIONS GTVs delineated on CT for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer were 1.7 times larger than the tumor. Complete coverage of the tumor by the GTV was, however, not obtained.
Collapse
|
20
|
Differding S, Hanin FX, Grégoire V. PET imaging biomarkers in head and neck cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2015; 42:613-22. [PMID: 25573630 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-014-2972-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2014] [Accepted: 12/03/2014] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
In locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), the role of imaging becomes more and more critical in the management process. In this framework, molecular imaging techniques such as PET allow noninvasive assessment of a range of tumour biomarkers such as metabolism, hypoxia and proliferation, which can serve different purposes. First, in a pretreatment setting they can influence therapy selection strategies and target delineation for radiation therapy. Second, their predictive and/or prognostic value could help enhance the therapeutic ratio in the management of HNSCC. Third, treatment modification can be performed through the generation of a molecular-based heterogeneous dose distribution with dose escalation to the most resistant parts of the tumour, a concept known as dose painting. Fourth, they are increasingly becoming a tool for monitoring response to therapy. In this review, PET imaging biomarkers used in the routine management of HNSCC or under investigation are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Differding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, and Center for Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Université Catholique de Louvain, St-Luc University Hospital, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium,
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Cheng NM, Fang YHD, Lee LY, Chang JTC, Tsan DL, Ng SH, Wang HM, Liao CT, Yang LY, Hsu CH, Yen TC. Zone-size nonuniformity of 18F-FDG PET regional textural features predicts survival in patients with oropharyngeal cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2014; 42:419-28. [PMID: 25339524 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-014-2933-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2014] [Accepted: 10/02/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The question as to whether the regional textural features extracted from PET images predict prognosis in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) remains open. In this study, we investigated the prognostic impact of regional heterogeneity in patients with T3/T4 OPSCC. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the records of 88 patients with T3 or T4 OPSCC who had completed primary therapy. Progression-free survival (PFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were the main outcome measures. In an exploratory analysis, a standardized uptake value of 2.5 (SUV 2.5) was taken as the cut-off value for the detection of tumour boundaries. A fixed threshold at 42 % of the maximum SUV (SUVmax 42 %) and an adaptive threshold method were then used for validation. Regional textural features were extracted from pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET/CT images using the grey-level run length encoding method and grey-level size zone matrix. The prognostic significance of PET textural features was examined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS Zone-size nonuniformity (ZSNU) was identified as an independent predictor of PFS and DSS. Its prognostic impact was confirmed using both the SUVmax 42 % and the adaptive threshold segmentation methods. Based on (1) total lesion glycolysis, (2) uniformity (a local scale texture parameter), and (3) ZSNU, we devised a prognostic stratification system that allowed the identification of four distinct risk groups. The model combining the three prognostic parameters showed a higher predictive value than each variable alone. CONCLUSION ZSNU is an independent predictor of outcome in patients with advanced T-stage OPSCC, and may improve their prognostic stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nai-Ming Cheng
- Departments of Nuclear Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taiyuan, Taiwan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
|
23
|
Becker M, Zaidi H. Imaging in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: the potential role of PET/MRI. Br J Radiol 2014; 87:20130677. [PMID: 24649835 PMCID: PMC4067029 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20130677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
In head and neck oncology, the information provided by positron emission tomography (PET)/CT and MRI is often complementary because both the methods are based on different biophysical foundations. Therefore, combining diagnostic information from both modalities can provide additional diagnostic gain. Debates about integrated PET/MRI systems have become fashionable during the past few years, since the introduction and wide adoption of software-based multimodality image registration and fusion and the hardware implementation of integrated hybrid PET/MRI systems in pre-clinical and clinical settings. However, combining PET with MRI has proven to be technically and clinically more challenging than initially expected and, as such, research into the potential clinical role of PET/MRI in comparison with PET/CT, diffusion-weighted MRI (DW MRI) or the combination thereof is still ongoing. This review focuses on the clinical applications of PET/MRI in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). We first discuss current evidence about the use of combined PET/CT and DW MRI, and, then, we explain the rationale and principles of PET/MR image fusion before summarizing the state-of-the-art knowledge regarding the diagnostic performance of PET/MRI in HNSCC. Feasibility and quantification issues, diagnostic pitfalls and challenges in clinical settings as well as ongoing research and potential future applications are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minerva Becker
- Department of Imaging, Division of Radiology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|