Incremental diagnostic utility of gastric distension FDG PET/CT

18F-FDG PET/CT findings in a mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma patient coexisting with primary myelofibrosis

A 61-year-old male presented with hematemesis and melena. Biopsy and immunohistochemistry confirmed mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma in the posterior wall of the gastric antrum, prompting further evaluation with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). In addition to elevated uptake in the gastric antrum, 18F-FDG PET/CT showed diffuse uptake in multiple bone marrow, initially suspected to indicate bone marrow involvement by lymphoma. Further examination identified it as primary myelofibrosis (PMF). Following concurrent therapies, 18F-FDG PET/CT demonstrated negative uptake in gastric antrum, indicating complete remission of the lymphoma, while the elevated bone marrow uptake suggested progression of PMF. The coexistence of MALT lymphoma and PMF is very rare. This case highlights the image characteristics and potential diagnostic and therapeutic monitoring value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with concurrent MALT lymphoma and PMF.

Role of PET/Computed Tomography in Gastric and Colorectal Malignancies

This article focuses on the role of PET/computed tomography in evaluating and managing gastric cancer and colorectal cancer. The authors start with describing the common aspects of imaging with 2-deoxy-2-18F-d-glucose, followed by tumor-specific discussions of gastric and colorectal malignancies. Finally, the authors provide a brief overview of non-FDG tracers including their potential clinical applications, and describe future directions in imaging these malignancies.

68Ga-FAPI-04 Positron Emission Tomography Distinguishes Malignancy From 18F-FDG-Avid Colorectal Lesions

PURPOSE

Lesions with a high uptake of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) on positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) can be benign and malignant. New radiotracers, such as the gallium 68 (68Ga)-labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor 4 (FAPI-04), could be used to diagnose colorectal carcinoma. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET in differentiating benign from malignant 18F-FDG-avid colorectal lesions.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

An azoxymethane/dextran sodium sulfate (AOM/DSS)-induced rat colorectal tumor model was developed. Double-tracer 68Ga-FAPI-04 and 18F-FDG PET-CT were applied in the rat model and 22 patients. The PET-CT data were analyzed with enteroscopy, histopathologic observations, immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining, and radioautography results. One hundred seventy-two patients with pathologically confirmed colorectal lesions were enrolled in FAP IHC staining.

RESULTS

We found that 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET-CT imaging accurately distinguished the malignant from benign inflammatory lesions in an AOM/DSS-induced rat colorectal tumor model. Of 22 patients with gastric cancer but without colorectal carcinoma, 8 had 18F-FDG uptake in the colorectum, but 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET was negative in these sites. An inflammatory lesion or adenoma did not interfere with 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET imaging. Among the 18F-FDG-avid colorectal lesions, 80 of 94 pathologically malignant lesions (85.1%) were FAP-positive, and only 16 of the 78 premalignant or benign lesions (20.5%) had a weak 68Ga-FAPI-04 uptake.

CONCLUSIONS

68Ga-FAPI-04 PET-CT could be used to distinguish between benign and malignant 18F-FDG-avid colorectal lesions.

Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitor PET/CT in Gastric Cancer

Like other major cancers, gastric cancer expresses fibroblast activation protein (FAP) in cancer-associated fibroblasts. Many recent studies have reported the utility and superiority of FAP inhibitor (FAPI)-PET over [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET in gastric cancers, from initial staging to recurrence detection. FAPI-PET shows higher accumulation in primary sites and metastatic lesions than does FDG-PET, especially for the detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis. In the case of gastric signet ring cell carcinoma, FAPI-PET showed excellent performance, as uptake is usually weak on FDG-PET in this cohort.

The effect of butylscopolamine on [18F]FDG uptake in the gastrointestinal tract is negligible and regionally variable

BACKGROUND

Butylscopolamine (or hyoscine butylbromide, trade name Buscopan^®) is occasionally administered as a premedication to reduce non-specific FDG uptake in the gastrointestinal tract based on its antiperistaltic effect. To date, there are no consistent recommendations for its use. The aim of this study was to quantify the reduction in intestinal and non-intestinal uptake by butylscopolamine administration and to derive relevance for clinical evaluation.

RESULTS

458 patients (PET/CT for lung cancer) were retrospectively reviewed. 218 patients with butylscopolamine and 240 patients without butylscopolamine had comparable characteristics. While the SUV_mean in the gullet/stomach and small intestine was significantly reduced with butylscopolamine, the colon and rectum/anus showed no difference. The liver and salivary glands showed a reduced SUV_mean, while skeletal muscle and blood pool were unaffected. An effect of butylscopolamine was particularly evident in men and patients under 65 years of age. There was no difference in the perceived confidence in the assessment of intestinal findings in the subjective evaluation, although in the butylscopolamine group further diagnostics appeared advisable more frequently.

CONCLUSIONS

Butylscopolamine reduces gastrointestinal FDG accumulation only in selected segments and, despite a significant effect, only to a small extent. A general recommendation for the use of butylscopolamine cannot be derived from these results, its use for specific issues could be considered individually.

Utility of [68Ga]FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG dual-tracer PET/CT in the initial evaluation of gastric cancer

Objectives

We aimed to investigate the role of [68Ga]FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG dual-tracer PET/CT for the initial assessment of gastric cancer and to explore the factors associated with their uptake.

Methods

This study enrolled 62 patients with histopathologically confirmed gastric cancer. We compared the diagnostic performance of [68Ga]FAPI-04, [18F]FDG, and combined dual-tracer PET/CT. The standardized uptake value (SUV) and tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) were also measured, and the factors that influence tracer uptake were analyzed.

Results

[68Ga]FAPI-04 PET/CT detected more primary lesions (90.3% vs 77.4%, p = 0.008) and peritoneal metastases (91.7% vs 41.7%, p = 0.031) and demonstrated higher SUVmax and TBR values (p < 0.001) of primary lesions compared to [18F]FDG PET/CT. Dual-tracer PET/CT significantly improved the diagnostic sensitivity for the detection of distant metastases, compared with stand-alone [18F]FDG (97.1% vs 73.5%, p = 0.008) or [68Ga]FAPI-04 (97.1% vs 76.5%, p = 0.016) PET/CT. Subsequently, treatment strategies were changed in nine patients following [68Ga]FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG dual-tracer PET/CT. Nevertheless, [68Ga]FAPI-04 uptake was primarily influenced by the size and invasion depth of the tumor. Both [68Ga]FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG PET/CT showed limited sensitivity for detecting early gastric cancer (EGC) (37.5% vs 25.0%, p > 0.05).

Conclusions

In this initial study, [68Ga]FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG dual-tracer PET/CT were complementary and improved sensitivity for the detection of distant metastases pre-treatment in gastric cancer and could improve treatment stratification in the future. [68Ga]FAPI-04 had limited efficacy in detecting EGC.

Key Points

•[68Ga]FAPI-04 and[18F]FDG dual-tracer PET/CT are complementary to each other for improving diagnostic sensitivity in the initial evaluation of distant metastases from gastric cancer.

•[68Ga]FAPI-04 PET/CT showed limited sensitivity in detecting EGC.

• Need for further validation in a larger multi-centre prospective study.

Variants and Pitfalls in PET/CT Imaging of Gastrointestinal Cancers

In the past two decades, PET/CT has become an essential modality in oncology increasingly used in the management of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. Most PET/CT tracers used in clinical practice show some degree of GI uptake. This uptake is quite variable and knowledge of common patterns of biodistribution of various radiotracers is helpful in clinical practice. 18F-Fluoro-Deoxy-Glucose (FDG) is the most commonly used radiotracer and has quite a variable uptake within the bowel. 68Ga-Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) shows intense uptake within the proximal small bowel loops. 11C-methyl-L-methionine (MET) shows high accumulation within the bowels, which makes it difficult to assess bowel or pelvic diseases. One must also be aware of technical artifacts causing difficulties in interpretations, such as high attenuation oral contrast material within the bowel lumen or misregistration artifact due to patient movements. It is imperative to know the common variants and benign diseases that can mimic malignant pathologies. Intense FDG uptake within the esophagus and stomach may be a normal variant or may be associated with benign conditions such as esophagitis, reflux disease, or gastritis. Metformin can cause diffuse intense uptake throughout the bowel loops. Intense physiologic uptake can also be seen within the anal canal. Segmental bowel uptake can be seen in inflammatory bowel disease, radiation, or medication induced enteritis/colitis or infection. Diagnosis of appendicitis or diverticular disease requires CT correlation, as normal appendix or diverticulum can show intense uptake. Certain malignant pathologies are known to have only low FDG uptake, such as early-stage esophageal adenocarcinoma, mucinous tumors, indolent lymphomas, and multicystic mesotheliomas. Response assessment, particularly in the neoadjuvant setting, can be limited by post-treatment inflammatory changes. Post-operative complications such as abscess or fistula formation can also show intense uptake and may obscure underlying malignant pathology. In the absence of clinical suspicion or rising tumor marker, the role of FDG PET/CT in routine surveillance of patients with GI malignancy is not clear.

The utility of pharmacological and radiological interventions to optimize diagnostic information from PET/CT

Background

Positron Emission Tomography with Computed Tomography (PET/CT) is widely used in the assessment of many diseases, particularly including cancer. However, many factors can affect image quality and diagnostic performance of PET scans using FDG or other PET probes.

Main body

The aim of this pictorial essay is to review PET/CT protocols that can be useful to overcome these confounding factors in routine clinical situations, with a particular focus on pharmacological interventions and problem-oriented CT acquisition protocols.

Conclusion

Imaging protocols and representative cases will be discussed, in addition to potential contraindications and precautions to be taken.

Evidence-based management of incidental focal uptake of fluorodeoxyglucose on PET-CT

Focal incidental uptake, with or without CT abnormalities, is a common finding on fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT and evidence-based management for this type of uptake is lacking. This article reviews the evidence on focal incidental uptake including the incidence of malignancy, differential diagnosis and imaging criteria which can be used to further characterize it. The article focusses on PET rather than CT criteria. The strength of the evidence base is highly variable ranging from systematic reviews and meta-analyses to a virtual absence of evidence. Caution needs to be used when using standardized uptake values (SUVs) reported in other studies due to interpatient and institution observed variation in SUVs. There is sufficient evidence to permit specific suggestions on how to interpret the foci and recommend further management in the: pituitary (investigate when SUVmax >4.1), thyroid (investigate all), breast (investigate all), lung parenchyma (if focus of fluorodeoxyglucose without a CT nodule, no further investigations), colon (investigate all foci with SUVmax >5.9, urgently if SUVmax >11.4), adrenals (criteria depend on if patient has cancer) and prostate gland (investigate in males aged >50 years or >40 years if peripheral uptake or patient has other risk factors). There is some evidence to guide further management for the parotid gland, naso-orophaynx, oesophagus, pancreas, uterus and ovaries. There is insufficient evidence to guide management for the liver, spleen, kidneys, gallbladder, testis and bone, for these organs patient characteristics and other guidelines will likely be of more use in determining further management.

Difference in F-18 FDG Uptake After Esophagogastroduodenoscopy and Colonoscopy in Healthy Sedated Subjects

PURPOSE

We aimed to evaluate the difference in fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in sedated healthy subjects after they underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy procedures.

METHODS

The endoscopy group (n = 29) included healthy subjects who underwent screening via F-18 FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) after an EGD and/or colonoscopy under sedation on the same day. The control group (n = 35) included healthy subjects who underwent screening via PET/CT only. FDG uptake in the tongue, uvula, epiglottis, vocal cords, esophagus, stomach, duodenum, liver, cecum, colon, anus, and muscle were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in the tongue, pharynx, larynx, and esophagus did not significantly differ between the endoscopy and control groups. In contrast, mean SUVmax in the whole stomach was 18 % higher in the endoscopy group than in the control group (SUVmax: 2.96 vs. 2.51, P = 0.010). In the lower gastrointestinal track, SUVmax from the cecum to the rectum was not significantly different between the two groups, whereas SUVmax in the anus was 20 % higher in the endoscopy group than in the control group (SUVmax: 4.21 vs. 3.50, P = 0.002). SUVmax in the liver and muscle was not significantly different between the two groups. Mean volume of the stomach and mean cross section of the colon was significantly higher in the endoscopy group than in the control group (stomach: 313.28 cm³ vs. 209.93 cm³, P < 0.001, colon: 8.82 cm² vs. 5.98 cm², P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

EGD and colonoscopy under sedation does not lead to significant differences in SUVmax in most parts of the body. Only gastric FDG uptake in the EGD subjects and anal FDG uptake in the colonoscopy subjects was higher than uptake in those regions in the control subjects.

How We Read Oncologic FDG PET/CT

¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT is a pivotal imaging modality for cancer imaging, assisting diagnosis, staging of patients with newly diagnosed malignancy, restaging following therapy and surveillance. Interpretation requires integration of the metabolic and anatomic findings provided by the PET and CT components which transcend the knowledge base isolated in the worlds of nuclear medicine and radiology, respectively. In the manuscript we detail our approach to reviewing and reporting a PET/CT study using the most commonly used radiotracer, FDG. This encompasses how we display, threshold intensity of images and sequence our review, which are essential for accurate interpretation. For interpretation, it is important to be aware of benign variants that demonstrate high glycolytic activity, and pathologic lesions which may not be FDG-avid, and understand the physiologic and biochemical basis of these findings. Whilst FDG PET/CT performs well in the conventional imaging paradigm of identifying, counting and measuring tumour extent, a key paradigm change is its ability to non-invasively measure glycolytic metabolism. Integrating this "metabolic signature" into interpretation enables improved accuracy and characterisation of disease providing important prognostic information that may confer a high management impact and enable better personalised patient care.