1
|
Girardet R, Knebel JF, Dromain C, Vietti Violi N, Tsoumakidou G, Villard N, Denys A, Halkic N, Demartines N, Kobayashi K, Digklia A, Schaefer N, Prior JO, Boughdad S, Duran R. Anatomical Quantitative Volumetric Evaluation of Liver Segments in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Treated with Selective Internal Radiation Therapy: Key Parameters Influencing Untreated Liver Hypertrophy. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:586. [PMID: 38339337 PMCID: PMC10854872 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16030586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Factors affecting morphological changes in the liver following selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) are unclear, and the available literature focuses on non-anatomical volumetric assessment techniques in a lobar treatment setting. This study aimed to investigate quantitative changes in the liver post-SIRT using an anatomical volumetric approach in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with different levels of treatment selectivity and evaluate the parameters affecting those changes. This retrospective, single-institution, IRB-approved study included 88 HCC patients. Whole liver, liver segments, tumor burden, and spleen volumes were quantified on MRI at baseline and 3/6/12 months post-SIRT using a segmentation-based 3D software relying on liver vascular anatomy. Treatment characteristics, longitudinal clinical/laboratory, and imaging data were analyzed. The Student's t-test and Wilcoxon test evaluated volumetric parameters evolution. Spearman correlation was used to assess the association between variables. Uni/multivariate analyses investigated factors influencing untreated liver volume (uLV) increase. Results: Most patients were cirrhotic (92%) men (86%) with Child-Pugh A (84%). Absolute and relative uLV kept increasing at 3/6/12 months post-SIRT vs. baseline (all, p ≤ 0.005) and was maximal during the first 6 months. Absolute uLV increase was greater in Child-Pugh A5/A6 vs. ≥B7 at 3 months (A5, p = 0.004; A6, p = 0.007) and 6 months (A5, p = 0.072; A6, p = 0.031) vs. baseline. When the Child-Pugh class worsened at 3 or 6 months post-SIRT, uLV did not change significantly, whereas it increased at 3/6/12 months vs. baseline (all p ≤ 0.015) when liver function remained stable. The Child-Pugh score was inversely correlated with absolute and relative uLV increase at 3 months (rho = -0.21, p = 0.047; rho = -0.229, p = 0.048). In multivariate analysis, uLV increase was influenced at 3 months by younger age (p = 0.013), administered 90Y activity (p = 0.003), and baseline spleen volume (p = 0.023). At 6 months, uLV increase was impacted by younger age (p = 0.006), whereas treatment with glass microspheres (vs. resin) demonstrated a clear trend towards better hypertrophy (f = 3.833, p = 0.058). The amount (percentage) of treated liver strongly impacted the relative uLV increase at 3/6/12 months (all f ≥ 8.407, p ≤ 0.01). Conclusion: Liver function (preserved baseline and stable post-SIRT) favored uLV hypertrophy. Younger patients, smaller baseline spleen volume, higher administered 90Y activity, and a larger amount of treated liver were associated with a higher degree of untreated liver hypertrophy. These factors should be considered in surgical candidates undergoing neoadjuvant SIRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raphaël Girardet
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (R.G.); (J.-F.K.); (C.D.); (N.V.V.); (G.T.); (N.V.); (A.D.)
| | - Jean-François Knebel
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (R.G.); (J.-F.K.); (C.D.); (N.V.V.); (G.T.); (N.V.); (A.D.)
| | - Clarisse Dromain
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (R.G.); (J.-F.K.); (C.D.); (N.V.V.); (G.T.); (N.V.); (A.D.)
| | - Naik Vietti Violi
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (R.G.); (J.-F.K.); (C.D.); (N.V.V.); (G.T.); (N.V.); (A.D.)
| | - Georgia Tsoumakidou
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (R.G.); (J.-F.K.); (C.D.); (N.V.V.); (G.T.); (N.V.); (A.D.)
| | - Nicolas Villard
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (R.G.); (J.-F.K.); (C.D.); (N.V.V.); (G.T.); (N.V.); (A.D.)
| | - Alban Denys
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (R.G.); (J.-F.K.); (C.D.); (N.V.V.); (G.T.); (N.V.); (A.D.)
| | - Nermin Halkic
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (N.H.); (N.D.); (K.K.)
| | - Nicolas Demartines
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (N.H.); (N.D.); (K.K.)
| | - Kosuke Kobayashi
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (N.H.); (N.D.); (K.K.)
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan
| | - Antonia Digklia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland;
| | - Niklaus Schaefer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (N.S.); (J.O.P.); (S.B.)
| | - John O. Prior
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (N.S.); (J.O.P.); (S.B.)
| | - Sarah Boughdad
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (N.S.); (J.O.P.); (S.B.)
| | - Rafael Duran
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (R.G.); (J.-F.K.); (C.D.); (N.V.V.); (G.T.); (N.V.); (A.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Carrión L, Clemente-Sánchez A, Márquez-Pérez L, Orcajo-Rincón J, Rotger A, Ramón-Botella E, González-Leyte M, Echenagusía-Boyra M, Luis Colón A, Reguera-Berenguer L, Bañares R, Rincón D, Matilla-Peña A. Portal hypertension increases the risk of hepatic decompensation after 90Yttrium radioembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a cohort study. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2023; 16:17562848231206995. [PMID: 37920686 PMCID: PMC10619355 DOI: 10.1177/17562848231206995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is increasingly used in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This treatment can induce or impair portal hypertension, leading to hepatic decompensation. TARE also promotes changes in liver and spleen volumes that may modify therapeutic decisions and outcomes after therapy. Objectives We aimed to investigate the impact of TARE on the incidence of decompensation events and its predictive factors. Design In all, 63 consecutive patients treated with TARE between February 2012 and December 2018 were retrospectively included. Methods We assessed clinical (including Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage, portal hypertension assessment, and liver decompensation), laboratory parameters, and liver and spleen volumes before and 6 and 12 weeks after treatment. A multivariate analysis was performed. Results In total, 18 out of 63 (28.6%) patients had liver decompensation (ascites, variceal bleeding, jaundice, or encephalopathy) within the first 3 months after therapy, not associated with tumor progression. Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) and bilobar treatment independently predicted the development of liver decompensation after TARE. A significant volume increase in the non-treated hemi-liver was observed only in patients with unilobar treatment (median volume increase of 20.2% in patients with right lobe TARE; p = 0.007), especially in those without CSPH. Spleen volume also increased after TARE (median volume increase of 16.1%; p = 0.0001) and was associated with worsening liver function scores and decreased platelet count. Conclusion Bilobar TARE and CSPH may be associated with an increased risk of liver decompensation in patients with intermediate or advanced HCC. A careful assessment considering these variables before therapy may optimize candidate selection and improve treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Carrión
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Clemente-Sánchez
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
- Centre for Biomedical Research in Liver and Digestive Diseases Network, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Laura Márquez-Pérez
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier Orcajo-Rincón
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain
| | - Amanda Rotger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain
| | - Enrique Ramón-Botella
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain
| | - Manuel González-Leyte
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain
| | - Miguel Echenagusía-Boyra
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain
| | - Arturo Luis Colón
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain
| | - Laura Reguera-Berenguer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rafael Bañares
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
- Centre for Biomedical Research in Liver and Digestive Diseases Network, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Diego Rincón
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
- Centre for Biomedical Research in Liver and Digestive Diseases Network, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, SpainCalle del Doctor Esquerdo 46, 28007 Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Matilla-Peña
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
- Centre for Biomedical Research in Liver and Digestive Diseases Network, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Orcajo Rincón J, Regi AR, Peña AM, Berenguer LR, Leyte MG, Martín LC, Atance García De La Santa J, Boyra ME, Ruiz CG, Rodríguez AC, Farto JCA. Maximum tumor-absorbed dose measured by voxel-based multicompartmental dosimetry as a response predictor in yttrium-90 radiation segmentectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. EJNMMI Phys 2023; 10:7. [PMID: 36745227 PMCID: PMC9902576 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-022-00520-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Advances in hepatic radioembolization are based on a selective approach with radical intent and the use of multicompartment dosimetric analysis. The objective of this study is to assess the utility of voxel-based dosimetry in the quantification of actual absorbed doses in radiation segmentectomy procedures and to establish cutoff values predictive of response. METHODS Ambispective study in hepatocarcinoma patients treated with radiation segmentectomy. Calculated dosimetric parameters were mean tumor-absorbed dose, maximum tumor AD, minimal tumor AD in 30, 50, and 70% of tumor volume and mean AD in non-tumor liver. The actual absorbed dose (aAD) was calculated on the Y-90-PET/CT image using 3D voxel-based dosimetry software. To assess radiological response, localized mRECIST criteria were used. The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as CR or PR. RESULTS Twenty-four HCC patients, BCLC 0 (5), A (17) and B (2) were included. The mean yttrium-90 administered activity was 1.38 GBq in a mean angiosome volume of 206.9 cc and tumor volume 56.01 cc. The mean theoretical AD was 306.3 Gy and aAD 352 Gy. A very low concordance was observed between both parameters (rho_c 0.027). ORR at 3 and 6 m was 84.21% and 92.31%, respectively. Statistically significant relationship was observed between the maximum tumor-absorbed dose and complete radiological response at 3 m (p 0.022). CONCLUSION A segmental approach with radical intention leads to response rates greater than 90%, being the tumor maximum absorbed dose the dosimetric parameter that best predicts radiological response in voxel-based dosimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Orcajo Rincón
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Amanda Rotger Regi
- grid.410526.40000 0001 0277 7938Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Matilla Peña
- grid.410526.40000 0001 0277 7938Gastroenterology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Laura Reguera Berenguer
- grid.410526.40000 0001 0277 7938Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Manuel González Leyte
- grid.410526.40000 0001 0277 7938Interventional Radiology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Laura Carrión Martín
- grid.410526.40000 0001 0277 7938Gastroenterology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Miguel Echenagusia Boyra
- grid.410526.40000 0001 0277 7938Interventional Radiology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Cristina González Ruiz
- grid.410526.40000 0001 0277 7938Dosimetry and Radioprotection Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Arturo Colón Rodríguez
- grid.410526.40000 0001 0277 7938Hepatobiliary Surgery Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Carlos Alonso Farto
- grid.410526.40000 0001 0277 7938Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liver Resection and Transplantation Following Yttrium-90 Radioembolization for Primary Malignant Liver Tumors: A 15-Year Single-Center Experience. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15030733. [PMID: 36765691 PMCID: PMC9913597 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Radioembolization (RE) may help local control and achieve tumor reduction while hypertrophies healthy liver and provides a test of time. For liver transplant (LT) candidates, it may attain downstaging for initially non-candidates and bridging during the waitlist. METHODS Patients diagnosed with HCC and ICC treated by RE with further liver resection (LR) or LT between 2005-2020 were included. All patients selected were discarded for the upfront surgical approach for not accomplishing oncological or surgical safety criteria after a multidisciplinary team assessment. Data for clinicopathological details, postoperative, and survival outcomes were retrospectively reviewed from a prospectively maintained database. RESULTS A total of 34 patients underwent surgery following RE (21 LR and 13 LT). Clavien-Dindo grade III-IV complications and mortality rates were 19.0% and 9.5% for LR and 7.7% and 0% for LT, respectively. After RE, for HCC and ICC patients in the LR group, 10-year OS rates were 57% and 60%, and 10-year DFS rates were 43.1% and 60%, respectively. For HCC patients in the LT group, 10-year OS and DFS rates from RE were 51.3% and 43.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION Liver resection after RE is safe and feasible with optimal short-term outcomes. Patients diagnosed with unresectable or high biological risk HCC or ICC, treated with RE, and rescued by LR may achieve optimal global and DFS rates. On the other hand, bridging or downstaging strategies to LT with RE in HCC patients show adequate recurrence rates as well as long-term survival.
Collapse
|
5
|
Vilgrain V. Techniques interventionnelles de modulation hépatique. BULLETIN DE L'ACADÉMIE NATIONALE DE MÉDECINE 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.banm.2022.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
6
|
Trans-arterial Radioembolization Dosimetry in 2022. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2022; 45:1608-1621. [PMID: 35982334 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-022-03215-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 06/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
Trans-arterial radioembolization is currently performed using 90Y-loaded glass or resin microspheres and also using 166Ho-loaded microspheres. The goal of this review is to present dosimetry and radiobiology concepts, the different dosimetry approaches available (simulation-based dosimetry and post-treatment dosimetry), main confounding factors as main clinical dosimetry results provided during the last decade for both hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and metastases of colorectal carcinoma (mCRC). Based on the different number of microspheres or different isotope used, radiobiology of the three devices is different, meaning that tumouricidal doses and maximal tolerated doses are different. Tumouricidal doses described for HCCs were 100-120 grays (Gy) with 90Y resin microspheres and 205 Gy with 90Y glass microspheres. For mCRC, it is 39-60 with 90Y resin microspheres, 139 Gy with 90Y glass microspheres and 90 Gy with 166Ho microspheres. An impact of tumoural doses with overall survival has also been reported. Personalised dosimetry has been developed and is now recommended by several international expert groups. Level-one evidence of the major impact of personalised dosimetry on response and overall survival in HCC is now available, bringing a new standard approach for TARE in clinical practice as well as for trial design.
Collapse
|
7
|
Transarterial Radioembolization to Impact Liver Volumetry: When and How. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2022; 45:1646-1650. [PMID: 35859212 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-022-03218-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
Inadequate volume of the future liver remnant (FLR) renders many patients with liver malignancies not amenable to surgical resection. Depending on the health of the liver and the patient in general, an FLR of 25-40% is required to avoid acute post-hepatectomy liver failure. Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) of a diseased liver lobe leads to atrophy of the embolized lobe and compensatory hypertrophy of the contralateral lobe. Although the absolute degree of FLR hypertrophy seems to be comparable to portal vein embolization, the kinetic of hypertrophy is much slower after radioembolization. However, TARE has the unique advantages of simultaneously offering local tumor control, possibly downstaging disease, and providing biological test of time. Progressions in technique and personalized dosimetry allow for more predictable ablative treatment of liver malignancies and preparation for major liver surgery. This article provides an overview of the existing literature, discusses the evidence, and considers possible criteria for patient selection.
Collapse
|
8
|
Páramo M, Santamaría E, Idoate MA, Rodríguez-Fraile M, Benito A, Collantes M, Quincoces G, Peñuelas I, Berasain C, Argemi J, Quiroga J, Sangro B, Bilbao JI, Iñarrairaegui M. A new animal model of atrophy-hypertrophy complex and liver damage following Yttrium-90 lobar selective internal radiation therapy in rabbits. Sci Rep 2022; 12:1777. [PMID: 35110610 PMCID: PMC8810801 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-05672-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Lobar selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) is widely used to treat liver tumors inducing atrophy of the treated lobe and contralateral hypertrophy. The lack of animal model has precluded further investigations to improve this treatment. We developed an animal model of liver damage and atrophy–hypertrophy complex after SIRT. Three groups of 5–8 rabbits received transportal SIRT with Yttrium 90 resin microspheres of the cranial lobes with different activities (0.3, 0.6 and 1.2 GBq), corresponding to predicted absorbed radiation dose of 200, 400 and 800 Gy, respectively. Another group received non-loaded microspheres (sham group). Cranial and caudal lobes volumes were assessed using CT volumetry before, 15 and 30 days after SIRT. Liver biochemistry, histopathology and gene expression were evaluated. Four untreated rabbits were used as controls for gene expression studies. All animals receiving 1.2 GBq were euthanized due to clinical deterioration. Cranial SIRT with 0.6 GBq induced caudal lobe hypertrophy after 15 days (median increase 34% -ns-) but produced significant toxicity. Cranial SIRT with 0.3 GBq induced caudal lobe hypertrophy after 30 days (median increase 82%, p = 0.04). No volumetric changes were detected in sham group. Transient increase in serum transaminases was detected in all treated groups returning to normal values at 15 days. There was dose-dependent liver dysfunction with bilirubin elevation and albumin decrease. Histologically, 1.2 GBq group developed permanent severe liver damage with massive necrosis, 0.6 and 0.3 GBq groups developed moderate damage with inflammation and portal fibrosis at 15 days, partially recovering at 30 days. There was no difference in the expression of hepatocyte function and differentiation genes between 0.3 GBq and control groups. Cranial SIRT with 0.3 GBq of 90Y resin microspheres in rabbits is a reliable animal model to analyse the atrophy–hypertrophy complex and liver damage without toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María Páramo
- Department of Radiology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Eva Santamaría
- Hepatology Program, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.,CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Miguel A Idoate
- Department of Pathology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Macarena Rodríguez-Fraile
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.,Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Navarra-IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Alberto Benito
- Department of Radiology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.,Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Navarra-IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Maria Collantes
- Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Navarra-IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain.,Radiopharmacy, Radionanopharmacology and Translational Molecular Imaging Research Group, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Gemma Quincoces
- Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Navarra-IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain.,Radiopharmacy, Radionanopharmacology and Translational Molecular Imaging Research Group, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.,Radiopharmacy Unit, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Iván Peñuelas
- Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Navarra-IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain.,Radiopharmacy, Radionanopharmacology and Translational Molecular Imaging Research Group, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.,Radiopharmacy Unit, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Carmen Berasain
- Hepatology Program, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.,CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Navarra-IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Josepmaria Argemi
- Hepatology Program, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.,CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.,Liver Unit, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Jorge Quiroga
- CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Navarra-IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain.,Liver Unit, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Bruno Sangro
- CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Navarra-IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain.,Liver Unit, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - José I Bilbao
- Department of Radiology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.,Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Navarra-IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Mercedes Iñarrairaegui
- CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain. .,Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Navarra-IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain. .,Liver Unit, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Filippi L, Braat AJ. Theragnostics in primary and secondary liver tumors: the need for a personalized approach. THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE ITALIAN ASSOCIATION OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE (AIMN) [AND] THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RADIOPHARMACOLOGY (IAR), [AND] SECTION OF THE SOCIETY OF... 2021; 65:353-370. [PMID: 34881847 DOI: 10.23736/s1824-4785.21.03407-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Primary and secondary hepatic tumors have a dramatic impact in oncology. Despite many advances in diagnosis and therapy, the management of hepatic malignancies is still challenging, ranging from various loco-regional approaches to system therapies. In this scenario, theragnostic approaches, based on the administration of a radiopharmaceuticals' pair, the first labeled with a radionuclide suitable for the diagnostic phase and the second one bound to radionuclide emitting particles for therapy, is gaining more and more importance. Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) with microspheres labeled with 90Y or 166Ho is widely used as a loco-regional treatment for primary and secondary hepatic tumors. While 166Ho presents both gamma and beta emission and can be therefore considered a real "theragnostic" agent, for 90Y-microspheres theragnostic approach is realized at the diagnostic phase through the utilization of macroaggregates of human albumin, labeled with 99mTc as "biosimilar" agent respect to microspheres. The aim of the present review was to cover theragnostic applications of 90Y/166Ho-labeled microspheres in clinical practice. Furthermore, we report the preliminary data concerning the potential role of some emerging theragnostic biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma, such as glypican-3 (GPC3) and prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Filippi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Santa Maria Goretti Hospital, Latina, Italy -
| | - Arthur J Braat
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|