1
|
Cattabriga A, Renzetti B, Galuppi F, Bartalena L, Gaudiano C, Brocchi S, Rossi A, Schiavina R, Bianchi L, Brunocilla E, Spinozzi L, Catanzaro C, Castellucci P, Farolfi A, Fanti S, Tunariu N, Mosconi C. Multiparametric Whole-Body MRI: A Game Changer in Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2531. [PMID: 39061171 PMCID: PMC11274871 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16142531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2024] [Revised: 06/24/2024] [Accepted: 07/07/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer ranks among the most prevalent tumours globally. While early detection reduces the likelihood of metastasis, managing advanced cases poses challenges in diagnosis and treatment. Current international guidelines support the concurrent use of 99Tc-Bone Scintigraphy and Contrast-Enhanced Chest and Abdomen CT for the staging of metastatic disease and response assessment. However, emerging evidence underscores the superiority of next-generation imaging techniques including PSMA-PET/CT and whole-body MRI (WB-MRI). This review explores the relevant scientific literature on the role of WB-MRI in metastatic prostate cancer. This multiparametric imaging technique, combining the high anatomical resolution of standard MRI sequences with functional sequences such as diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and bone marrow relative fat fraction (rFF%) has proved effective in comprehensive patient assessment, evaluating local disease, most of the nodal involvement, bone metastases and their complications, and detecting the increasing visceral metastases in prostate cancer. It does have the advantage of avoiding the injection of contrast medium/radionuclide administration, spares the patient the exposure to ionizing radiation, and lacks the confounder of FLARE described with nuclear medicine techniques. Up-to-date literature regarding the diagnostic capabilities of WB-MRI, though still limited compared to PSMA-PET/CT, strongly supports its widespread incorporation into standard clinical practice, alongside the latest nuclear medicine techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arrigo Cattabriga
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (B.R.); (F.G.); (L.B.); (C.G.); (S.B.); (C.M.)
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy; (R.S.); (L.B.); (E.B.); (L.S.); (C.C.); (S.F.)
| | - Benedetta Renzetti
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (B.R.); (F.G.); (L.B.); (C.G.); (S.B.); (C.M.)
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy; (R.S.); (L.B.); (E.B.); (L.S.); (C.C.); (S.F.)
| | - Francesco Galuppi
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (B.R.); (F.G.); (L.B.); (C.G.); (S.B.); (C.M.)
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy; (R.S.); (L.B.); (E.B.); (L.S.); (C.C.); (S.F.)
| | - Laura Bartalena
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (B.R.); (F.G.); (L.B.); (C.G.); (S.B.); (C.M.)
| | - Caterina Gaudiano
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (B.R.); (F.G.); (L.B.); (C.G.); (S.B.); (C.M.)
| | - Stefano Brocchi
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (B.R.); (F.G.); (L.B.); (C.G.); (S.B.); (C.M.)
| | - Alice Rossi
- Radiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy;
| | - Riccardo Schiavina
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy; (R.S.); (L.B.); (E.B.); (L.S.); (C.C.); (S.F.)
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Bianchi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy; (R.S.); (L.B.); (E.B.); (L.S.); (C.C.); (S.F.)
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Eugenio Brunocilla
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy; (R.S.); (L.B.); (E.B.); (L.S.); (C.C.); (S.F.)
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Luca Spinozzi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy; (R.S.); (L.B.); (E.B.); (L.S.); (C.C.); (S.F.)
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Calogero Catanzaro
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy; (R.S.); (L.B.); (E.B.); (L.S.); (C.C.); (S.F.)
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Paolo Castellucci
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (P.C.); (A.F.)
| | - Andrea Farolfi
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (P.C.); (A.F.)
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy; (R.S.); (L.B.); (E.B.); (L.S.); (C.C.); (S.F.)
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (P.C.); (A.F.)
| | - Nina Tunariu
- Clinical Radiology, Royal Marsden Hospital & Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JJ, UK;
| | - Cristina Mosconi
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (B.R.); (F.G.); (L.B.); (C.G.); (S.B.); (C.M.)
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy; (R.S.); (L.B.); (E.B.); (L.S.); (C.C.); (S.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alshamrani AFA. Diagnostic Accuracy of Molecular Imaging Techniques for Detecting Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:1315. [PMID: 39001206 PMCID: PMC11240585 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14131315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2024] [Revised: 06/17/2024] [Accepted: 06/19/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Molecular imaging modalities show valuable non-invasive techniques capable of precisely and selectively addressing molecular markers associated with prostate cancer (PCa). This systematic review provides an overview of imaging markers utilized in positron emission tomography (PET) methods, specifically focusing on the pathways and mediators involved in PCa. This systematic review aims to evaluate and analyse existing literature on the diagnostic accuracy of molecular imaging techniques for detecting PCa. The PubMed, EBSCO, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science databases were searched, identifying 32 studies that reported molecular imaging modalities for detecting PCa. Numerous imaging modalities and radiotracers were used to detect PCa, including 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/computed tomography (CT), 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT, 18F-DCFPyL PET/MRI, 18F-choline PET/MRI, and 18F-fluoroethylcholine PET/MRI. Across 11 studies, radiolabelled 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT imaging had a pooled sensitivity of 80 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 35-93), specificity of 90 (95% CI: 71-98), and accuracy of 86 (95% CI: 64-96). The PSMA-ligand 68Ga-PET/CT showed good diagnostic performance and appears promising for detecting and staging PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdullah Fahad A Alshamrani
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology Technology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taibah University, Madinah 42353, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vetrone L, Fortunati E, Castellucci P, Fanti S. Future Imaging of Prostate Cancer: Do We Need More Than PSMA PET/CT? Semin Nucl Med 2024; 54:150-162. [PMID: 37394289 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2023.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
In the setting of prostate cancer (PCa), many different imaging modalities are available to correctly assess staging, restaging, treatment response and radio-ligand therapy recruitment. The introduction of fluoride or gallium-labelled prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) made a revolution in PCa management, also due to its possible theragnostic use. Nowadays PSMA-PET/CT is a fundamental tool for staging and restaging PCa. This review discusses the latest findings in PSMA imaging in PCa patients and the impact of PSMA imaging on the patients' management in primary staging, biochemical recurrence and in advanced prostate cancer, always keeping in mind the important theragnostic role of PSMA. This review tries also to assess the current role of other radiopharmaceuticals as Choline, FACBC or other radiotracers like gastrin-releasing peptide receptor targeting tracers and FAPI in different PCa settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigia Vetrone
- Nuclear Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Emilia Fortunati
- Nuclear Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Paolo Castellucci
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Nuclear Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Volpe F, Nappi C, Piscopo L, Zampella E, Mainolfi CG, Ponsiglione A, Imbriaco M, Cuocolo A, Klain M. Emerging Role of Nuclear Medicine in Prostate Cancer: Current State and Future Perspectives. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4746. [PMID: 37835440 PMCID: PMC10571937 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15194746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most frequent epithelial neoplasia after skin cancer in men starting from 50 years and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) dosage can be used as an early screening tool. Prostate cancer imaging includes several radiological modalities, ranging from ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance to nuclear medicine hybrid techniques such as single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT and positron emission tomography (PET)/CT. Innovation in radiopharmaceutical compounds has introduced specific tracers with diagnostic and therapeutic indications, opening the horizons to targeted and very effective clinical care for patients with prostate cancer. The aim of the present review is to illustrate the current knowledge and future perspectives of nuclear medicine, including stand-alone diagnostic techniques and theragnostic approaches, in the clinical management of patients with prostate cancer from initial staging to advanced disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Michele Klain
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80138 Naples, Italy; (F.V.); (C.N.); (L.P.); (E.Z.); (C.G.M.); (A.P.); (M.I.); (A.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rednam N, Kundra V. Hybrid magnetic resonance and PET imaging for prostate cancer recurrence. Curr Opin Oncol 2023; 35:231-238. [PMID: 36966496 DOI: 10.1097/cco.0000000000000932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Recurrence post definitive local therapy by prostatectomy or radiation therapy is often detected via rise in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels; however, PSA rise does not localize the disease. Distinguishing local versus distant recurrence guides whether to choose subsequent local versus systemic therapy. The purpose of this article is to review imaging for prostate cancer recurrence post local therapy. RECENT FINDINGS Among imaging modalities, multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) is commonly used to assess for local recurrence. New radiopharmaceuticals target prostate cancer cells and enable whole-body imaging. These tend to be more sensitive for lymph node metastases than MRI or computed tomography (CT) and for bone lesions than bone scan at lower PSA levels but can be limited for local prostate cancer recurrence. Given greater soft tissue contrast, similar criteria for lymph nodes, and greater sensitivity for prostate bone metastases, MRI is advantageous to CT. MRI of the whole body and mpMRI are now feasible within a reasonable time frame and complementary to PET imaging, enabling whole-body and pelvis-focused PET-MRI, which should be advantageous in the setting of recurrent prostate cancer. SUMMARY Hybrid PET-MRI with prostate cancer targeted radiopharmaceuticals and whole body with local multiparametric MRI can be complementary for detecting local and distant recurrence to guide treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikita Rednam
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Li M, Zelchan R, Orlova A. The Performance of FDA-Approved PET Imaging Agents in the Detection of Prostate Cancer. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10102533. [PMID: 36289795 PMCID: PMC9599369 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10102533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Revised: 10/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Positron emission tomography (PET) incorporated with X-ray computed tomography (PET/CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) is increasingly being used as a diagnostic tool for prostate cancer (PCa). In this review, we describe and evaluate the clinical performance of some Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved agents used for visualizing PCa: [18F]FDG, [11C]choline, [18F]FACBC, [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11, [18F]DCFPyL, and [18F]-NaF. We carried out a comprehensive literature search based on articles published from 1 January 2010 to 1 March 2022. We selected English language articles associated with the discovery, preclinical study, clinical study, and diagnostic performance of the imaging agents for the evaluation. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted imaging agents demonstrated superior diagnostic performance in both primary and recurrent PCa, compared with [11C]choline and [18F]FACBC, both of which target dividing cells and are used especially in patients with low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values. When compared to [18F]-NaF (which is suitable for the detection of bone metastases), PSMA-targeted agents were also capable of detecting lesions in the lymph nodes, soft tissues, and bone. However, a limitation of PSMA-targeted imaging was the heterogeneity of PSMA expression in PCa, and consequently, a combination of two PET tracers was proposed to overcome this obstacle. The preliminary studies indicated that the use of PSMA-targeted scanning is more cost efficient than conventional imaging modalities for high-risk PCa patients. Furthering the development of imaging agents that target PCa-associated receptors and molecules could improve PET-based diagnosis of PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mei Li
- Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Uppsala University, 751 23 Uppsala, Sweden
- Liaoning Medical Device Test Institute, Shenyang 110171, China
| | - Roman Zelchan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, 5 Kooperativny St., 634009 Tomsk, Russia
- Research Centrum for Oncotheranostics, Research School of Chemistry and Applied Biomedical Sciences, Tomsk Polytechnic University, 634050 Tomsk, Russia
| | - Anna Orlova
- Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Uppsala University, 751 23 Uppsala, Sweden
- Research Centrum for Oncotheranostics, Research School of Chemistry and Applied Biomedical Sciences, Tomsk Polytechnic University, 634050 Tomsk, Russia
- Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, 752 37 Uppsala, Sweden
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Prostate Cancer Imaging with 18F-Fluciclovine. PET Clin 2022; 17:607-620. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2022.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
8
|
Liu X, Liu F, Yu H, Zhang Q, Liu F. Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Predicting the Prognosis of Postoperative Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Int J Gen Med 2022; 15:3625-3637. [PMID: 35411181 PMCID: PMC8994662 DOI: 10.2147/ijgm.s351265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoliang Liu
- Department of General Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of West Anhui Health Vocational College, Lu'an City, Anhui Province, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei City, Anhui Province, People’s Republic of China
| | - Feng Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei City, Anhui Province, People’s Republic of China
| | - Haifeng Yu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei City, Anhui Province, People’s Republic of China
| | - Qiaoqian Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei City, Anhui Province, People’s Republic of China
| | - Fubao Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei City, Anhui Province, People’s Republic of China
- Correspondence: Fubao Liu, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No. 218, Jixi Road, Hefei City, Anhui Province, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 135 1566 2646, Email
| |
Collapse
|