Prospective analysis of clinically significant prostate cancer detection with [18F]DCFPyL PET/MRI compared to multiparametric MRI: a comparison with the histopathology in the radical prostatectomy specimen, the ProStaPET study

Intelligent medicine in focus: the 5 stages of evolution in robot-assisted surgery for prostate cancer in the past 20 years and future implications

Robot-assisted surgery has evolved into a crucial treatment for prostate cancer (PCa). However, from its appearance to today, brain-computer interface, virtual reality, and metaverse have revolutionized the field of robot-assisted surgery for PCa, presenting both opportunities and challenges. Especially in the context of contemporary big data and precision medicine, facing the heterogeneity of PCa and the complexity of clinical problems, it still needs to be continuously upgraded and improved. Keeping this in mind, this article summarized the 5 stages of the historical development of robot-assisted surgery for PCa, encompassing the stages of emergence, promotion, development, maturity, and intelligence. Initially, safety concerns were paramount, but subsequent research and engineering advancements have focused on enhancing device efficacy, surgical technology, and achieving precise multi modal treatment. The dominance of da Vinci robot-assisted surgical system has seen this evolution intimately tied to its successive versions. In the future, robot-assisted surgery for PCa will move towards intelligence, promising improved patient outcomes and personalized therapy, alongside formidable challenges. To guide future development, we propose 10 significant prospects spanning clinical, research, engineering, materials, social, and economic domains, envisioning a future era of artificial intelligence in the surgical treatment of PCa.

The additional value of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT SUVmax in predicting ISUP GG ≥ 2 and ISUP GG ≥ 3 prostate cancer in biopsy

BACKGROUND

Prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) increases the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the prostate may offer additional value in predicting the likelihood of csPCa in biopsy.

METHODS

A single-center cohort study involving patients with biopsy-proven PCa who underwent both MRI and PSMA PET/CT between 2020 and 2021. Logistic regression models were developed for International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group (GG) ≥ 2 and GG ≥ 3 using noninvasive prebiopsy parameters: age, (log-)prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density, PI-RADS 5 lesion presence, extraprostatic extension (EPE) on MRI, and SUVmax of the prostate. Models with and without SUVmax were compared using Likelihood ratio tests and area under the curve (AUC). DeLong's test was used to compare the AUCs.

RESULTS

The study included 386 patients, with 262 (68%) having ISUP GG ≥ 2 and 180 (47%) having ISUP GG ≥ 3. Including SUVmax significantly improved both models' goodness of fit (p < 0.001). The GG ≥ 2 model had a higher AUC with SUVmax 89.16% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 86.06%-92.26%) than without 87.34% (95% CI: 83.93%-90.76%) (p = 0.026). Similarly, the GG ≥ 3 model had a higher AUC with SUVmax 82.51% (95% CI: 78.41%-86.6%) than without 79.33% (95% CI: 74.84%-83.83%) (p = 0.003). The SUVmax inclusion improved the GG ≥ 3 model's calibration at higher probabilities.

CONCLUSION

SUVmax of the prostate on PSMA PET/CT potentially improves diagnostic accuracy in predicting the likelihood of csPCa in prostate biopsy.

Comparison of Multiparametric MRI and the Combination of PSMA Plus MRI for the Intraprostatic Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to perform a head-to-head comparison of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and the combination of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET plus MRI (PSMA + MRI) for detecting intraprostatic clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Relevant databases were searched through November 2023. Only studies directly comparing mpMRI and PSMA + MRI (PET/MRI or PET/CT + mpMRI) were included. A meta-analysis with a random-effects model was used to estimate pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve for each approach.

RESULTS

A total of 19 studies were included. On a patient-level analysis, PSMA + MRI had higher sensitivity (9 studies) than mpMRI for csPCa detection (96% [95% confidence interval (CI): 92%, 98%] vs 89% [95% CI: 81%, 94%]; P = 0.04). The patient-level specificity (4 studies) of PSMA + MRI was 55% (95% CI: 31%-76%) compared with 50% (95% CI: 44%-57%) of mpMRI ( P = 0.67). Region-level sensitivity (10 studies) was 85% (95% CI: 74%-92%) for PSMA + MRI and 71% (95% CI: 58%-82%) for mpMRI ( P = 0.09), whereas specificity (4 studies) was 87% (95% CI: 76%-94%) and 90% (95% CI: 82%-95%), respectively ( P = 0.59). Lesion-level sensitivity and specificity were similar between modalities with pooled data from less than 4 studies.

CONCLUSIONS

PSMA + MRI had superior pooled sensitivity and similar specificity for the detection of csPCa compared with mpMRI in this meta-analysis of head-to-head studies.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Molecular Imaging Techniques for Detecting Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review

Molecular imaging modalities show valuable non-invasive techniques capable of precisely and selectively addressing molecular markers associated with prostate cancer (PCa). This systematic review provides an overview of imaging markers utilized in positron emission tomography (PET) methods, specifically focusing on the pathways and mediators involved in PCa. This systematic review aims to evaluate and analyse existing literature on the diagnostic accuracy of molecular imaging techniques for detecting PCa. The PubMed, EBSCO, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science databases were searched, identifying 32 studies that reported molecular imaging modalities for detecting PCa. Numerous imaging modalities and radiotracers were used to detect PCa, including 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/computed tomography (CT), 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT, 18F-DCFPyL PET/MRI, 18F-choline PET/MRI, and 18F-fluoroethylcholine PET/MRI. Across 11 studies, radiolabelled 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT imaging had a pooled sensitivity of 80 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 35-93), specificity of 90 (95% CI: 71-98), and accuracy of 86 (95% CI: 64-96). The PSMA-ligand 68Ga-PET/CT showed good diagnostic performance and appears promising for detecting and staging PCa.

Head-to-head comparison of prostate-specific membrane antigen PET and multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of pretreatment patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To compare prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET with multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in the diagnosis of pretreatment prostate cancer (PCa).

METHODS

Pubmed, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for eligible studies published before June 22, 2022. We assessed risk of bias and applicability by using QUADAS-2 tool. Data synthesis was performed with Stata 17.0 software, using the "midas" and "meqrlogit" packages.

RESULTS

We included 29 articles focusing on primary cancer detection, 18 articles about primary staging, and two articles containing them both. For PSMA PET versus mpMRI in primary PCa detection, sensitivities and specificities in the per-patient analysis were 0.90 and 0.84 (p<0.0001), and 0.66 and 0.60 (p <0.0001), and in the per-lesion analysis they were 0.79 and 0.78 (p <0.0001), and 0.84 and 0.82 (p <0.0001). For the per-patient analysis of PSMA PET versus mpMRI in primary staging, sensitivities and specificities in extracapsular extension detection were 0.59 and 0.66 (p =0.005), and 0.79 and 0.76 (p =0.0074), and in seminal vesicle infiltration (SVI) detection they were 0.51 and 0.60 (p =0.0008), and 0.93 and 0.96 (p =0.0092). For PSMA PET versus mpMRI in lymph node metastasis (LNM) detection, sensitivities and specificities in the per-patient analysis were 0.68 and 0.46 (p <0.0001), and 0.91 and 0.90 (p =0.81), and in the per-lesion analysis they were 0.67 and 0.36 (p <0.0001), and 0.99 and 0.99 (p =0.18).

CONCLUSION

PSMA PET has higher diagnostic value than mpMRI in the detection of primary PCa. Regarding the primary staging, mpMRI has potential advantages in SVI detection, while PSMA PET has relative advantages in LNM detection.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The integration of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET into the diagnostic pathway may be helpful for improving the accuracy of prostate cancer detection. However, further studies are needed to address the cost implications and evaluate its utility in specific patient populations or clinical scenarios. Moreover, we recommend the combination of PSMA PET and mpMRI for cancer staging.

KEY POINTS

• Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET has higher sensitivity and specificity for primary tumor detection in prostate cancer compared to multiparametric MRI. • Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET also has significantly better sensitivity and specificity for lymph node metastases of prostate cancer compared to multiparametric MRI. • Multiparametric MRI has better accuracy for extracapsular extension and seminal vesicle infiltration compared to ate-specific membrane antigen PET.

Comparison of Multiple Segmentation Methods for Volumetric Delineation of Primary Prostate Cancer with Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Targeted 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT

This study aimed to assess the accuracy of intraprostatic tumor volume measurements on prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT made with various segmentation methods. An accurate understanding of tumor volumes versus segmentation techniques is critical for therapy planning, such as radiation dose volume determination and response assessment. Methods: Twenty-five men with clinically localized, high-risk prostate cancer were imaged with 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT before radical prostatectomy. The tumor volumes and tumor-to-prostate ratios (TPRs) of dominant intraprostatic foci of uptake were determined using semiautomatic segmentation (applying SUVmax percentage [SUV%] thresholds of SUV30%-SUV70%), adaptive segmentation (using adaptive segmentation percentage [A%] thresholds of A30%-A70%), and manual contouring. The histopathologic tumor volume (TV-Histo) served as the reference standard. The significance of differences between TV-Histo and PET-based tumor volume were assessed using the paired-sample Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The Spearman correlation coefficient was used to establish the strength of the association between TV-Histo and PET-derived tumor volume. Results: Median TV-Histo was 2.03 cm3 (interquartile ratio [IQR], 1.16-3.36 cm3), and median TPR was 10.16%. The adaptive method with an A40% threshold most closely determined the tumor volume, with a median difference of +0.19 (IQR, -0.71 to +2.01) and a median relative difference of +7.6%. The paired-sample Wilcoxon test showed no significant difference in PET-derived tumor volume and TV-Histo using A40%, A50%, SUV40%, and SUV50% threshold segmentation algorithms (P > 0.05). For both threshold-based segmentation methods, use of higher thresholds (e.g., SUV60% or SUV70% and A50%-A70%) resulted in underestimation of tumor volumes, and use of lower thresholds (e.g., SUV30% or SUV40% and A30%) resulted in overestimation of tumor volumes relative to TV-Histo and TPR. Manual segmentation overestimated the tumor volume, with a median difference of +2.49 (IQR, 0.42-4.11) and a median relative difference of +130%. Conclusion: Segmentation of intraprostatic tumor volume and TPR with an adaptive segmentation approach most closely approximates TV-Histo. This information might be used to guide the primary treatment of men with clinically localized, high-risk prostate cancer.

The diagnostic accuracy of radiolabeled PSMA-ligand PET for tumour staging in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients compared to histopathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The current clinical recommendations posit the deployment of specific approved radiolabeled prostate-specific membrane antigen-ligand positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) for detecting metastatic prostate cancer during primary staging. Nevertheless, the precise efficacy of such ligands in localizing intraprostatic tumours (index tumour) and T-staging is not well established. Consequently, the objective of this inquiry is to ascertain the diagnostic accuracy of PSMA-PET in the tumour staging of newly diagnosed prostate cancer by means of a meta-analysis that integrates studies utilizing histological confirmation as the reference standard.

METHODS

In this study, we conducted a systematic literature search of the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases using a predefined collection of search terms. These terms included 'PSMA PET', 'primary staging', and 'prostate cancer'. Subsequently, two independent reviewers evaluated all the studies based on predetermined inclusion criteria, extracted pertinent data, and assessed the quality of evidence. Any disparities were resolved by a third reviewer. A random effects Sidik-Jonkman model was applied to conduct a meta-analysis and estimate the diagnostic accuracy on a per-patient basis, along with 95% confidence intervals. Moreover, an appraisal regarding the likelihood of publication bias and the impact of small-study effects was performed utilizing both Egger's test and a graphical examination of the funnel plot.

RESULTS

The present analysis comprised a total of twenty-three scientific papers encompassing 969 patients and involved their analysis by both qualitative and quantitative approaches. The results of this study demonstrated that the estimated diagnostic accuracy of PSMA PET/CT and PSMA PET/MRI, for the detection of intraprostatic tumours, regardless of the type of PSMA-ligand, was 86% (95% CI: 76-96%) and 97% (95% CI: 94-100%), respectively. Furthermore, the diagnostic accuracy for the detection of extraprostatic extension (EPE) was 73% (95% CI: 64-82%) and 77% (95% CI: 69-85%), while the diagnostic accuracy for the detection of seminal vesicle involvement (SVI) was 87% (95% CI: 80-93) and 90% (95% CI: 82-99%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The present investigation has demonstrated that PSMA PET/MRI surpasses currently recommended multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in terms of diagnostic accuracy as inferred from a notable data trajectory, whereas PSMA-PET/CT exhibited comparable diagnostic accuracy for intraprostatic tumour detection and T-staging compared to mpMRI. Nevertheless, the analysis has identified certain potential limitations, such as small-study effects and a potential for publication bias, which may impact the overall conclusions drawn from this study.

Systematic Review and Metanalysis on the Role of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Intraprostatic Tumour Assessment

The present systematic review and meta-analysis are focused on the diagnostic accuracy of PSMA PET/MRI in primary prostate cancer assessment. A literature search was conducted on the PubMed database using the terms "PSMA" AND "prostate cancer" or "prostate" AND "PET/MRI" or "PET MRI" or "PET-MRI" or "PET-MR" AND "primary" or "staging." Ten articles were eligible for analysis after applying the exclusion criteria. PET/MRI showed better diagnostic accuracy in detecting primary PCa compared to multiparametric (mp) MRI and PET alone. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of 68Ga-PSMA PET/MRI at the per-patient level were 0.976 (CI: 0.943-0.991) and 0.739 (CI: 0.437-0.912); respectively. PSMA PET/MRI has good sensitivity in detecting primary PCa, especially in patients with PIRADS 3 PCa.

Immunohistochemical and histopathological validation of 18 F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT for intraprostatic cancerous lesions

INTRODUCTION

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is overexpressed in prostate cancer (PCa). In this study, we aim to immunohistochemically and histopathological validate the fluorine-18 (18 F)-PSMA-1007 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for intraprostatic PCa lesions.

METHODS

Between February 2019 and October 2020, patients with biopsy-proven, treatment-naïve intermediate-to-high-risk PCa undergoing an 18 F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT before robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) were prospectively enrolled. For all PCa lesions found on whole-mount histopathology, location, size, International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group (GG), and immune reactive score (IRS) were assessed after PSMA staining. ISUP GG ≥ 3 PCa was defined as clinically significant (cs) PCa. All lesions were matched on PSMA PET/CT and the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was measured.

RESULTS

A total of 125 lesions were analyzed in the 80 RARP specimens, of which 49 (40%) were csPCa and 76 (60%) non-csPCa. Linear multivariable regressions showed that an increase in SUVmax significantly correlated with a higher ISUP GG (p values between 0.021 and 0.001) and a higher IRS (p = 0.017). Logistic multivariable regression showed that csPCa significantly correlated with a higher SUVmax (odds ratio, OR: 1.17 [95% confidence interval, CI: 1.04-1.21, p = 0.005]), an increase in tumor length (OR: 1.05 [95% CI 1.01-1.10, p = 0.020]) and a higher IRS (OR; 1.24 [95% CI 1.07-1.47, p = 0.006]). A SUVmax threshold of 4 would have resulted in one (2%) missed lesion with csPCa.

CONCLUSION

This prospective study revealed that 18 F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT SUVmax is correlated with the ISUP GG and IRS, and thereby could be a tool to characterize intraprostatic PCa lesions.

Impact of 18F-DCFPyL PET/MRI in Selecting Men With Low-/Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer for Focal Ablative Therapies

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic performance of multiparametric (mp) MRI to 18F-DCFPyL PET/MRI for detecting clinically significant (cs) prostate cancer (PCa) in men with low-/intermediate-risk PCa being considered for focal ablative therapy (FT), using 2 interpretation schemes, and to assess the rate of exclusion from FT for each modality.

METHODS

This prospective study evaluated men with low- or intermediate-risk PCa, potential candidates for FT based on initial biopsy as per institutional protocol, who underwent 18F-DCFPyL PET/MRI. Each modality (mpMRI, PET/MRI using PROMISE classification [PET/MRI PROMISE], and PET/MRI considering any focal lesion on PET as positive [PETFL/MRI]) was assessed independently. All suspicious lesions underwent PET/MRI-ultrasound fusion biopsies. Diagnostic performances were calculated and compared using the exact binomial test on paired proportions.

RESULTS

Thirty-four men (median age, 64 years; interquartile range, 60-70 years) were included. Overall, 40 of 67 lesions (60%) identified on mpMRI and/or PET/MRI were malignant, and 34 of 40 lesions (85%) were csPCa (≥6 mm ISUP [International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group] GG1 or ISUP-GG ≥2). On lesion-level analysis, for detecting csPCa, sensitivity appeared higher for PETFL/MRI than mpMRI and PET/MRI PROMISE (97% vs 76% and 79%, respectively [P = 0.02 and 0.03]), whereas specificity was lower (30% vs 85% and 88%, respectively [P < 0.001]). The calculated overall accuracy rates for PETFL/MRI, mpMRI, and PET/MRI PROMISE were 64%, 81%, and 84%, respectively. PETFL/MRI, mpMRI, and PET/MRI PROMISE excluded 10 of 34 (29%), 7 of 34 (21%), and 6 of 34 (18%) men from FT, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

18F-DCFPyL PET/MRI excluded nearly 30% of patients with low-/intermediate-risk PCa from FT, with a potential role in decreasing selection failure. Compared with mpMRI, PET/MRI had a higher sensitivity for detecting csPCa in men who were candidates for FT.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03149861.

Prostate MRI and PSMA-PET in the Primary Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer

Over the last years, prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has gained a key role in the primary diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). While a negative MRI can avoid unnecessary prostate biopsies and the overdiagnosis of indolent cancers, a positive examination triggers biopsy samples targeted to suspicious imaging findings, thus increasing the diagnosis of csPCa with a sensitivity and negative predictive value of around 90%. The limitations of MRI, including suboptimal positive predictive values, are fueling debate on how to stratify biopsy decisions and management based on patient risk and how to correctly estimate it with clinical and/or imaging findings. In this setting, "next-generation imaging" imaging based on radiolabeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA)-Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is expanding its indications both in the setting of primary staging (intermediate-to-high risk patients) and primary diagnosis (e.g., increasing the sensitivity of MRI or acting as a problem-solving tool for indeterminate MRI cases). This review summarizes the current main evidence on the role of prostate MRI and PSMA-PET as tools for the primary diagnosis of csPCa, and the different possible interaction pathways in this setting.

A Systematic Review of the Variability in Performing and Reporting Intraprostatic Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Primary Staging Studies

Context

Prostate cancer (PCa) remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths in men worldwide. Men at risk are typically offered multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and, if suspicious, a targeted biopsy. However, false-negative rates of magnetic resonance imaging are consistently 18%; therefore, there is growing interest in improving the diagnostic performance of imaging through novel technologies. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) is being utilised for PCa staging and, more recently, for intraprostatic tumour localisation. However, significant variability has been observed in how PSMA PET is performed and reported.

Objective

In this review, we aim to evaluate how pervasive this variability is in trials investigating the performance of PSMA PET in primary PCa workup.

Evidence acquisition

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, we performed an optimal search in five different databases. After removing duplicates, 65 studies were included in our review.

Evidence synthesis

Studies dated back as early as 2016, with numerous different source countries. There was variation in the reference standard for PSMA PET, with some using biopsy specimens or surgical specimens, and in some cases, a combination of the two. Similar inconsistencies were noted when studies selected histological definitions of clinically significant PCa, while some omitted their definition altogether. The most significant variations in performing PSMA PET were the radiotracer type, dose, acquisition time after injection, and the PET camera being utilised. Substantial variation in the reporting of PSMA PET was noted, with no consistency in defining what constitutes a positive intraprostatic lesion. Across 65 studies, four different definitions were used.

Conclusions

This systematic review has highlighted considerable variation in obtaining and performing a PSMA PET study in the context of primary PCa diagnosis. Given the discrepancy in how PSMA PET was performed and reported, it questions the homogony of studies from centre to centre. Standardisation of PSMA PET is required for this to become a consistently useful and reproducible modality in the diagnosis of PCa.

Patient summary

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) is being utilised for staging and localisation of prostate cancer (PCa); however, there is significant variability in performing and reporting PSMA PET. Standardisation of PSMA PET is required for results to be consistently useful and reproducible for the diagnosis of PCa.

PSMA-based 18F-DCFPyL PET: a better choice than multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer diagnosis?

Owing to the high tissue contrast, multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) has already been the most widely applied imaging method for prostate cancer. Recently, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligands for nuclear imaging are emerging as a promising modality in prostate cancer, especially since the 2 PET/CT agents (68Ga-PSMA-11 and 18F-DCFPy) approved by U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). However, limited studies have performed the comparison of mpMRI versus recently approved 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT. In this issue of AJNMMI, Lu et al. compared the performance of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT and pelvic mpMRI in intermediate-high risk and biochemical recurrent prostate cancer patients. The results demonstrated the two modalities have a good concordance rate for patient-based analysis, and 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT has a better diagnostic performance in detecting lymph node metastases and bone metastases for lesion-based analysis. The use of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT provides more diagnostic confidence to better assess prostate cancer lesions.

Recent topics of the clinical utility of PET/MRI in oncology and neuroscience

Since the inline positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system appeared in clinical, more than a decade has passed. In this article, we have reviewed recently-published articles about PET/MRI. There have been articles about staging in rectal and breast cancers by PET/MRI using fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) with higher diagnostic performance in oncology. Assessing possible metastatic bone lesions is considered a proper target by FDG PET/MRI. Other than FDG, PET/MRI with prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted tracers or fibroblast activation protein inhibitor have been reported. Especially, PSMA PET/MRI has been reported to be a promising tool for determining appropriate sites in biopsy. Independent of tracers, the clinical application of artificial intelligence (AI) for images obtained by PET/MRI is one of the current topics in this field, suggesting clinical usefulness for differentiating breast lesions or grading prostate cancer. In addition, AI has been reported to be helpful for noise reduction for reconstructing images, which would be promising for reducing radiation exposure. Furthermore, PET/MRI has a clinical role in neuroscience, including localization of the epileptogenic zone. PET/MRI with new PET tracers could be useful for differentiation among neurological disorders. Clinical applications of integrated PET/MRI in various fields are expected to be reported in the future.

Intraindividual Comparison Between [18F] PSMA-1007 PET/CT and Multiparametric MRI for Radiotherapy Planning in Primary Prostate Cancer Patients

Introduction

Accurate detection and segmentation of the intraprostatic gross tumor volume (GTV) is pivotal for radiotherapy (RT) in primary prostate cancer (PCa) since it influences focal therapy target volumes and the patients’ cT stage. The study aimed to compare the performance of multiparametric resonance imaging (mpMRI) with [¹⁸F] PSMA-1007 positron emission tomography (PET) for intraprostatic GTV detection as well as delineation and to evaluate their respective influence on RT concepts.

Materials and Methods

In total, 93 patients from two German University Hospitals with [¹⁸F] PSMA-1007-PET/CT and MRI (Freiburg) or [¹⁸F] PSMA-1007-PET/MRI (Dresden) were retrospectively enrolled. Validated contouring techniques were applied for GTV-PET and -MRI segmentation. Absolute tumor volume and cT status were determined for each imaging method. The PCa distribution from histopathological reports based on biopsy cores and surgery specimen was used as reference in terms of laterality (unilateral vs. bilateral).

Results

In the Freiburg cohort (n = 84), mpMRI and PET detected in median 2 (range: 1–5) and 3 (range: 1–8) GTVs, respectively (p < 0.01). The median GTV-MRI was significantly smaller than the GTV-PET, measuring 2.05 vs. 3.65 ml (p = 0.0005). PET had a statistically significant higher concordance in laterality with surgery specimen compared to mpMRI (p = 0.04) and biopsy (p < 0.01), respectively. PSMA PET led to more cT2c and cT3b stages, whereas cT3a stage was more pronounced in mpMRI. Based on the cT stage derived from mpMRI and PET information, 21 and 23 as well as 59 and 60 patients, respectively, were intermediate- and high-risk according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) v1.2022 criteria. In the Dresden cohort (n = 9), similar results were observed.

Conclusion

Intraprostatic GTV segmentation based on [18F] PSMA-1007 PET results in more and larger GTVs compared to mpMRI. This influences focal RT target volumes and cT stage definition, but not the NCCN risk group.

The future of PSMA PET and WB MRI as next-generation imaging tools in prostate cancer

Radiolabelled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based PET-CT has been shown in numerous studies to be superior to conventional imaging in the detection of nodal or distant metastatic lesions. ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET-CT is now recommended by many guidelines for the detection of biochemically relapsed disease after radical local therapy. PSMA radioligands can also function as radiotheranostics, and Lu-PSMA has been shown to be a potential new line of treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Whole-body (WB) MRI has been shown to have a high diagnostic performance in the detection and monitoring of metastatic bone disease. Prospective, randomized, multicentre studies comparing ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET-CT and WB MRI for pelvic nodal and metastatic disease detection are yet to be performed. Challenges for interpretation of PSMA include tracer trapping in non-target tissues and also urinary excretion of tracers, which confounds image interpretation at the vesicoureteral junction. Additionally, studies have shown how long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) affects PSMA expression and could, therefore, reduce tracer uptake and visibility of PSMA⁺ lesions. Furthermore, ADT of short duration might increase PSMA expression, leading to the PSMA flare phenomenon, which makes the accurate monitoring of treatment response to ADT with PSMA PET challenging. Scan duration, detection of incidentalomas and presence of metallic implants are some of the major challenges with WB MRI. Emerging data support the wider adoption of PSMA PET and WB MRI for diagnosis, staging, disease burden evaluation and response monitoring, although their relative roles in the standard-of-care management of patients are yet to be fully defined.

Radiolabeled PSMA Inhibitors

PSMA has shown to be a promising target for diagnosis and therapy (theranostics) of prostate cancer. We have reviewed developments in the field of radio- and fluorescence-guided surgery and targeted photodynamic therapy as well as multitargeting PSMA inhibitors also addressing albumin, GRPr and integrin αvβ3. An overview of the regulatory status of PSMA-targeting radiopharmaceuticals in the USA and Europe is also provided. Technical and quality aspects of PSMA-targeting radiopharmaceuticals are described and new emerging radiolabeling strategies are discussed. Furthermore, insights are given into the production, application and potential of alternatives beyond the commonly used radionuclides for radiolabeling PSMA inhibitors. An additional refinement of radiopharmaceuticals is required in order to further improve dose-limiting factors, such as nephrotoxicity and salivary gland uptake during endoradiotherapy. The improvement of patient treatment achieved by the advantageous combination of radionuclide therapy with alternative therapies is also a special focus of this review.