1
|
Bagnalasta M, Mazzaglia S, De Nile MC, Romanò C, Pitoni G, Phillips A, Amato G, Spreafico C, Morosi C, Cascella T, Marchianò A, Maspero M, Bellia V, Aliberti G, Alessi A, Mazzaferro V, Maccauro M, Chiesa C. Radioembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma with 90Y glass microspheres: an earlier administration day unexpectedly improves tumour control probability. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2025:10.1007/s00259-025-07295-y. [PMID: 40397136 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-025-07295-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2025] [Accepted: 04/19/2025] [Indexed: 05/22/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE 90Y glass microspheres have a shelf life of 12 days from the calibration date, allowing flexible administration after a variable decay interval. For a fixed intended activity, a longer interval results in a higher number of administered microspheres per GBq and in a lower activity per sphere as. This study aimed to demonstrate that, for a fixed Tumour Absorbed Dose (TAD), Tumour Control Probability (TCP) is higher when the decay interval is shorter (4 days vs. 8 days). In the second part of the study, we focused on fully perfused lesions, i.e. those showing matching perfused and radiological volumes, where calculating mean microsphere spatial density (ρ) is meaningful. We investigated which variable was associated with radiological response. METHODS We retrospectively analysed lesion-by-lesion response at the best response time using the mRECIST criterion. Two chronologically sequential cohorts of patients were compared. Both cohorts were planned and treated with lobar administration, with exactly the same methodology, except for the post-calibration decay interval (Administration day: day 4 vs day 8). Infiltrative lesions and those with additional treatments post-radioembolization were excluded. To compare efficacy at the same TAD, we plotted TCP curves as a function of TAD and stratified TCP by lesion mass (M), using an arbitrary 50 g cut-off (equivalent to a 4.6 cm diameter). On fully perfused lesions, TCP was analyzed also as function of ρ and mass. We then conducted univariate ROC and multivariate analysed to assess response impact based on TAD, ρ, as, and M, grouping CR + PR (Objective Response, OR) versus SD + PD, as well as CR versus PR + SD + PD. RESULTS A total of 94 patients with 150 lesions were analyzed. TCP (for TAD up to 600 Gy) was significantly higher for the 59 lesions treated on Day 4 compared to the 91 lesions treated on Day 8, though the difference diminished at higher TAD values. In fully perfused lesions, TCP plateaued at 344 Gy and 160 Gy for lesions treated on Day 8 and Day 4 respectively. ROC analysis for fully perfused lesions showed poor AUC values for CR + PR versus SD + PD: 0.62, p = 0.01 for as, 0.63, p = 0.01 for TAD, and 0.60 p = 0.01 for M, with AUC for ρ being non-significant. When comparing CR versus PR + SD + PD classes, only M was significant, with a fair AUC value of 0.71, p = 0.01. Multivariate analysis showed that CR + PR was significantly associated only to as, with 79% higher response probability for administration on Day 4. When considering CR alone, significance was confirmed only for M, with an odd ratio of 0.19. DISCUSSION Our findings on TCP confirmed our preliminary unpublished studies from a different lesion cohort assessed by two independent radiologists. Additionally, our results align with recent experimental histological studies on complete pathological necrosis (CPN) in explanted liver samples after neoadjuvant segmentectomy prior to liver transplantation. However, our data and the CPN findings contrast with previously published simulations based purely on physical parameters (dose-volume histograms at microscopic scale). No explanation is currently available for this discrepancy. CONCLUSION When considering OR probability, administration of 90Y glass microsphere on Day 8 is not recommended, favouring Day 4 instead. For tumours < 50 g treated on Day 4, increasing TAD beyond 160 Gy does not improve response probability but may increase toxicity risk in lobar administrations. Conversely, larger lesions benefit from a maximal tolerable activity approach. TRIAL REGISTRATION : NumberDose in TARE, INT 154/19. Registered on 8 August 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Bagnalasta
- Nuclear Medicine, Foundation IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
- Postgraduation School in Medical Physics, Università degli Studi, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Mazzaglia
- Nuclear Medicine, Foundation IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
- Postgraduation School in Medical Physics, Università di Catania, Catania, Italy
| | | | - Chiara Romanò
- Nuclear Medicine, Foundation IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
- Postgraduation School in Medical Physics, Università degli Studi, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanna Pitoni
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi, Milan, Italy
| | - Alice Phillips
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi, Milan, Italy
| | - Gaetano Amato
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Spreafico
- Radiology 2, Foundation IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Morosi
- Radiology 2, Foundation IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Tommaso Cascella
- Radiology 2, Foundation IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Alfonso Marchianò
- Radiology 2, Foundation IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Marianna Maspero
- HPB Surgery, Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Foundation IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Valentina Bellia
- HPB Surgery, Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Foundation IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Gianluca Aliberti
- Nuclear Medicine, Foundation IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandra Alessi
- Nuclear Medicine, Foundation IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- HPB Surgery, Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Foundation IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Maccauro
- Nuclear Medicine, Foundation IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Chiesa
- Nuclear Medicine, Foundation IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fassia MK, Charalel RA. Techniques to Optimize Radioembolization Tumor Coverage. Semin Intervent Radiol 2024; 41:16-19. [PMID: 38495264 PMCID: PMC10940038 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1778659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
Yttrium-90 (Y90) radioembolization has become a major locoregional treatment option for several primary and secondary liver cancers. Understanding the various factors that contribute to optimal tumor coverage including sphere count, embolization techniques, and catheter choice is important for all interventional radiologists while planning Y90 dosimetry and delivery. Here, we review these factors and the evidence supporting current practice paradigms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Kasim Fassia
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Resmi Ann Charalel
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Aramburu J, Antón R, Rodríguez-Fraile M, Bilbao JI. Understanding of Flow Allows Better Tumor Microsphere Coverage. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2023; 34:21-22. [PMID: 36108900 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2022.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge Aramburu
- Universidad de Navarra, TECNUN Escuela de Ingeniería, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain; Centro de Ingeniería Biomédica, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain.
| | - Raúl Antón
- Universidad de Navarra, TECNUN Escuela de Ingeniería, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain; Centro de Ingeniería Biomédica, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain; IdiSNA, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Macarena Rodríguez-Fraile
- IdiSNA, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - José I Bilbao
- IdiSNA, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain; Department of Radiology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|