Comparing the clinical value of baseline [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT and [18F]F-FDG PET/CT in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: additional prognostic value of the distal pancreatitis

FAPI PET Versus FDG PET/CT in Gastrointestinal Cancers: An Overview

Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is a type II transmembrane serine protease that is highly expressed in cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) but absent in quiescent fibroblasts. Its overexpression is associated with poor prognosis in various cancers and contributes to treatment resistance. In recent years, radiolabeled FAP inhibitors (FAPI) for PET imaging have shown promising clinical value across a range of cancers. Gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies, which often exhibit a desmoplastic reaction with a high density of FAP-expressing CAFs, are particularly well-suited for FAPI PET. Given the limitations of [18F]FDG PET in GI cancers, such as low sensitivity in certain histological subtypes and high physiological background uptake, FAPI PET is expected to serve as a complementary method, potentially enhancing both diagnostic accuracy and treatment guidance. This review provides a comprehensive comparison of the clinical applications of FAPI PET and [18F]FDG PET in various GI cancers, including their value in diagnosis, staging, and treatment guidance. Additionally, this review summarizes studies on the expanding role of FAPI PET, including its use in assessing treatment response and predicting prognosis, aiming to provide insights into its potential contribution to the improved management of GI malignancies.

FAPI radiopharmaceuticals in nuclear oncology and theranostics of solid tumours: are we nearer to surrounding the hallmarks of cancer?

[18F]FDG PET/CT is the most widely used PET radiopharmaceutical in oncology, but it is not exempt of diagnostic limitations. FAPI have emerged as a great tool in the management of several different solid tumours in which [18F]FDG is not able to provide enough information. The aim of this work was to evaluate the available evidence on diagnostic and therapeutic applications of PET/CT with FAPI radiopharmaceuticals. We underwent a non-systematic review focusing in the utility of FAPI radiopharmaceuticals in PET/CT diagnosis and in the treatment of several malignancies. FAPI radiopharmaceuticals present characteristics that can potentially overcome some known diagnostic limitations of [18F]FDG. FAPI radiopharmaceuticals present a high target-to-background ratio (TBR) in many solid tumours such as oesophageal cancer, gastric cancer, pancreatic cancer, hepatic cancer, colorectal cancer, breast cancer, ovarian, cervical cancer, and head and neck cancer. Available evidence suggests the high TBR improves sensitivity and specificity compared to [18F]FDG, especially for the detection of lymphadenopathies and peritoneal metastases, and may improve patient management and radiation treatment planning. Moreover, it is important to underline the potential theranostic application of FAPI radiopharmaceuticals.

Evaluating the diagnostic value of 18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT in various malignant tumors: a head-to-head comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of 18F-fibroblast activation protein inhibitor-04 (18F-FAPI-04) PET/CT for various malignant tumors and compare it head-to-head with 18F-FDG PET/CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-center, prospective study continuously recruited patients with suspected or confirmed malignant tumors for concurrent 18F-FDG and 18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT scans from April 2022 to October 2023. The pathological diagnosis or clinical follow-up served as the reference standard. The Z-test for two proportions was used to compare the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of tumor diagnosis between the two imaging agents. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were employed to compare the uptake of the two radiotracers and the tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) differences in tumors.

RESULTS

The study involved 15 types of tumors and included 88 patients, comprising 53 males and 39 females, with an average age of 57.7 ± 10.8 years. In patient-based analysis, 18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy than 18F-FDG PET/CT for both initial staging and restaging patients (77.4% vs 56.6%, p = 0.0389; 94.3% vs 54.3%, p < 0.001), prompting treatment plan adjustments in 17% of restaged patients. The lesion-based analysis revealed comparable diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT for primary tumors (78.9% vs 75.4%, p = 0.8234), while showing superior accuracy for residual/recurrent tumors, lymph node metastases, and distant metastases compared to 18F-FDG PET/CT (100.0% vs 50.0%, p = 0.002; 98.8% vs 86.0%, p < 0.001; 98.3% vs 79.3%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT exhibits higher uptake and TBR in most tumors demonstrating superior diagnostic efficacy for primary lesions, residual/recurrent disease, and metastases compared to 18F-FDG PET/CT, particularly beneficial for restaging post-treatment patients.

Dynamic FDG PET/CT imaging: quantitative assessment, advantages and application in the diagnosis of malignant solid tumors

Dynamic imaging has obtained remarkable achievements among a variety of malignant tumors due to the development of multiple simplified scanning protocols and the emergence of whole-body PET/CT scanners, which promote wider application of dynamic PET/CT. In this paper, we mainly review the acquisition protocols of dynamic imaging, related kinetic parameters, advantages and the application of dynamic PET/CT imaging in malignant tumors, including lung cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, breast cancer, pancreatic carcinoma, prostate neoplasm, and cancer of head and neck. Dynamic PET/CT imaging is increasingly being applied the diagnosis, staging, efficacy monitoring, and prognosis evaluation of malignant tumors. Although standardized uptake value is the most frequently employed semi-quantitative assessment index for static imaging, it is susceptible to several factors, thus cannot be used to evaluate the tracer kinetic information of the lesion. Dynamic PET/CT imaging can be used to achieve continuous assessment of the metabolic activity of a lesion over a certain time frame through quantitative measurement of kinetic parameters, such as the net uptake rate constant. Compared with conventional static imaging, dynamic scanning can be used for the early estimation of minute metabolic changes in tumors. Besides, dynamic scanning can directly and effectively reflect tracer uptake. Nevertheless, the intricacy of parameter analysis and the lengthy scanning time related to dynamic scanning limits its clinical application. Dynamic imaging has obtained remarkable achievements among a variety of malignant tumors due to the development of multiple simplified scanning protocols and the emergence of whole-body PET/CT scanners, which promote wider application of dynamic PET/CT. In this paper, we mainly review the acquisition protocols of dynamic imaging, related kinetic parameters, advantages and the application of dynamic PET/CT imaging in malignant tumors, including lung cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, breast cancer, pancreatic carcinoma, prostate neoplasm, and cancer of head and neck.

Diagnostic performance of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET vs. [18F]FDG PET in detecting lymph node metastasis in digestive system cancers: a head-to-head comparative meta-analysis

Purpose

This meta-analysis aimed to compare the diagnostic effectiveness of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET and [18F]FDG PET for detecting lymph node metastasis in digestive system cancer patients.

Methods

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases was conducted to identify relevant articles up to June 2024. Studies were included if they evaluated the diagnostic performance of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET and [18F]FDG PET in detecting lymph node metastasis in digestive system cancer patients. Sensitivity and specificity were assessed using the DerSimonian and Laird method and were transformed using the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation.

Results

Fifteen articles, encompassing a total of 617 patients, were included in this study. The overall sensitivity of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET for diagnosing lymph node metastasis in digestive system cancers was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.67-0.93), and the specificity was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.84-0.97). In comparison, the sensitivity of [18F]FDG PET was 0.51 (95% CI: 0.38-0.63), with a specificity of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.64-0.94). These results suggest that [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET has a significantly higher sensitivity (P < 0.01) and similar specificity (P = 0.20) compared to [18F]FDG PET in detecting lymph node metastasis in digestive system cancers.

Conclusion

Our meta-analysis indicates that [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET has higher sensitivity and similar specificity compared to [18F]FDG PET in diagnosing lymph node metastasis in digestive system cancers. However, the high heterogeneity among the studies may impact the robustness of the current evidence. Therefore, future research should prioritize larger prospective studies with more diverse populations and specific cancer subtypes to draw more definitive conclusions.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024572412, Unique Identifier: CRD42024572412.

Comparison of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET and 68Ga-fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitor PET in Head and Neck Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the diagnostic efficiency of 68Ga-fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) positron emission tomography (PET) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC).

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were used to perform a systemic search through June 26, 2024.

METHODS

Studies comparing the diagnostic value of 68Ga-FAPI PET and 18F-FDG PET in patients with HNC were included. We performed a bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic data and a meta-analysis of the quantitative parameters. The summary receiver operating characteristic curve was plotted, and publication bias was evaluated via Egger's test.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included 12 studies on 386 patients with HNC. 68Ga-FAPI PET had superior pooled sensitivity to 18F-FDG PET in detecting primary/recurrent tumors and distant metastases in both lesion-based analysis and patient-based analysis. Although the sensitivity of 18F-FDG PET for detecting lymph node metastases was greater than that of 68Ga-FAPI PET (0.93 [95% CI 0.83-0.97] vs. 0.82 [95% CI 0.63-0.93]), the specificity of 18F-FDG PET was lower than that of 68Ga-FAPI PET (0.36 [95% CI 0.01-0.96] vs. 0.97 [95% CI 0.53-1.00]). In addition, 68Ga-FAPI PET had a higher pooled mean maximum standardized uptake value for distant metastases (3.28 [95% CI 1.90-4.66]) and a higher pooled mean tumor-to-background ratio for primary/recurrent tumors (1.24 [95% CI 0.44-2.04]) than 18F-FDG PET.

CONCLUSION

Compared to 18F-FDG PET, 68Ga-FAPI PET has superior diagnostic accuracy in HNC lesions. Thus, 68Ga-FAPI PET may be a better tool for staging and restaging than 18F-FDG PET in patients with HNC.

The Role of FAPI PET Imaging in Pancreatic Cancer: A Meta-analysis Compared with 18F-FDG PET

PURPOSE

Fibroblast activating protein is a promising target for tumor molecular imaging and therapy. Studies showed that fibroblast activating protein inhibitor (FAPI) radioactive tracers presented superiority over 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of various cancer types, including pancreatic cancer (PC). Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate and analyze the differences between 68Ga/18F-FAPI and 18F-FDG in PC, in order to provide evidence for the clinical application of FAPI PET imaging.

METHODS

In the current meta-analysis, original studies published as of January 1, 2024 were analyzed using radiolabeled FAPI as a diagnostic radioactive tracer and compared to 18F-FDG for PET in PC. Databases searched included pubmed and web of science, and subject headings searched included PC and FAPI. The quality of the enrolled studies was evaluated by Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2, and the meta-analysis was conducted using R language.

RESULTS

A total of seven studies including 322 patients compared the diagnostic performance of FAPI PET imaging and 18F-FDG PET/CT in PC. Overall, FAPI PET imaging showed higher pooled sensitivity (0.99 [95% CI: 0.97-1.00] vs. 0.84 [95% CI: 0.70-0.92]) and area under the curve (0.99 [95% CI: 0.98-1.00] vs. 0.91 [95% CI: 0.88-0.93]) than 18F-FDG PET/CT. The evidence showed that FAPI PET imaging is superior to 18F-FDG in pooled sensitivity to primary tumor, lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis. Moreover, FAPI PET imaging improved TNM staging in 25% of PC patients and changed clinical management in 11.7% of PC patients compared to 18F-FDG.

CONCLUSION

FAPI PET imaging is superior to that of 18F-FDG in the detection of primary PC, nodal and distant metastases, TNM staging and clinical management.

Performance of fibroblast activating protein inhibitor PET imaging for pancreatic neoplasms assessment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have shown the potential of fibroblast activating protein inhibitor (FAPI) PET imaging for pancreatic cancer assessment.

PURPOSE

This article is dedicated to comparing the diagnostic efficacy of FAPI PET and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET in the evaluation of primary tumors, lymph nodes, and distant metastases in pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

In this review, we conducted a systematic search of studies published in PubMed and Web of Science databases up to September 18, 2023. All included studies used radionuclide labeled FAPI and FDG as PET diagnostic tracers to evaluate their applicability in patients with pancreatic cancer.

RESULTS

The FAPI PET imaging group showed significantly higher sensitivity in the detection of primary lesions (1.000, [95% CI: 0.999-1.000]), lymph node metastases (0.624 [95% CI: 0.391-0.834]) and distant metastatic (0.965 [95% CI: 0.804-1.000]) in pancreatic cancer compared to the FDG PET imaging group (0.889 [95% CI: 0.788-0.966], 0.373 [95% CI: 0.163-0.606] and 0.889 [95% CI: 0.689-0.999], respectively). Furthermore, the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in FAPI PET imaging is significantly higher than that in FDG imaging for primary lesions (mean difference (MD) = 7.51, 95% CI: 5.34-9.67).

CONCLUSION

Compared with [18F]FDG PET/CT, FAPI PET imaging showed higher sensitivity, SUVmax. This method can be effectively utilized for the evaluation of pancreatic cancer.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Fibroblast activating protein inhibitor PET may be a better alternative to [18F]FDG in evaluating primary pancreatic cancer, lymph node metastases, and distant metastases.

KEY POINTS

Fibroblast activating protein inhibitor (FAPI) PET is compared with FDG PET for evaluating pancreatic cancer. Multiple radiolabeled FAPI variants have shown promising results in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. FAPI PET imaging effectively helps clinicians diagnose and stage pancreatic cancer.

Theranostics: Timing is Everything

On stage, and in real life, timing is critical for success. Theranostic cancer care epitomizes the central role of timing in the evolution of efficacious molecular targeted radioligand therapy and its incorporation into routine clinical practice of oncology. Nuclear medicine has returned to its therapeutic roots, having been founded as a medical specialty, over three-quarters of a century ago, with radioiodine therapy of thyroid cancer. The very recent oncologist acceptance of 68Ga/177Lu/225Ac-PSMA effectiveness in treating prostate cancer has re-established the role of the physician in nuclear medicine. This article addresses various important issues in respect of timing related to this resurgence. Training of the required new workforce in technical -omics expertise and physicianly virtues is an urgent priority. Precision in radioligand therapy requires definition of individual radiation absorbed dose (Gy) to tumor and to critical normal organs, preferably prospectively. It is time to abandon one-size-fits-all administration of fixed activities (GBq) in arbitrary cycle intervals and duration. The time has also come to design combination sequenced theranostic-immuno-chemotherapeutic approaches to metastatic cancer to address unmet needs, particularly in pancreatic carcinoma; exploiting the potential of new fibroblast activation protein inhibitor radioligands targeting the tumor microenvironment. Public perception of all things "nuclear," including nuclear medicine, has recently recovered from the general opprobrium and radiophobia of the last half-century. Nuclear is the new green. At last, there have arisen propitious circumstances for the future development of theranostics: The timing is right, now.

Peptidase inhibitor 16 promotes proliferation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells through OASL signaling

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly invasive cancer with a poor prognosis and a 5-year survival rate of less than 11%. As a member of the CAP superfamily of proteins, the role of peptidase inhibitor 16 (Pi16) in tumor progression is still unclear. Immunohistochemistry and quantitative RT-PCR methods were used to detect the expression levels of Pi16 protein and mRNA in PDAC patients. CRISPR/Cas9 technology was used to knock out the expression of Pi16 in PDAC cell lines. In vivo and in vitro experiments were used to verify the effect of Pi16 on PDAC proliferation ability. By RNA sequencing, we found that oligoadenylate synthetase L (OASL) can serve as a potential downstream target of Pi16. The expression of Pi16 was higher in PDAC tissues than in matched adjacent tissues. High expression of Pi16 was associated with PDAC progression and poor prognosis. Overexpression of Pi16 could promote the proliferation of PDAC cells in vitro and in vivo. Bioinformatics analysis and coimmunoprecipitation assays showed that Pi16 could bind to OASL. Moreover, the functional recovery test confirmed that Pi16 could promote the proliferation of PDAC via OASL. Our present study demonstrates that Pi16 might participate in the occurrence and development of PDAC by regulating cell proliferation by binding to OASL, indicating that Pi16 might be a promising novel therapeutic target for PDAC.