1
|
Wang T, Huang G, Zhao H, Li L, Shen Y, Lou W, Liu J. [ 68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR imaging strategy in management of Krukenberg tumors (KTs) from gastric signet-ring-cell carcinoma: to overcome limitation of [ 68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET imaging in KTs. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024:10.1007/s00259-024-06761-3. [PMID: 38767660 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06761-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare performance of whole-body [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG PET imaging in the detection of Krukenberg tumors (KTs), primary site and extra-ovarian metastases of gastric signet-ring-cell carcinoma (GSRCC), and evaluate the value of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR imaging strategy and its potential impact on the management of KTs from GSRCC. METHODS Twelve patients with twenty-three KTs from GSRCC, who underwent both [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 pelvic PET/MR and whole-body [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG PET imaging were retrospectively analyzed. [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG uptakes were compared by using Wilcoxon signed-rank test or paired t test. McNemar's test was used to compare lesion detectability between two modalities. Two-tailed P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Immunohistochemistry staining was utilized to analyze the fibroblast activation protein (FAP) expression in KTs. RESULTS A total of 12 patients with 23 KTs from GSRCC (8 synchronous and 4 metachronous) were evaluated. [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 was superior to [18F]FDG PET in detecting primary sites of GSRCC (100% [11/11] vs. 18.2% [2/11], p = 0.002), involved lymph nodes (90.9% [10/11] vs. 54.5% [6/11], p = 0.046) and peritoneal metastases (100% [12/12] vs. 41.7% [5/12], p = 0.008), with higher SUVmax and TBR (all p < 0.005). Both tracers had limited value in identifying KTs, with 100% false negative rate on [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET and a low detection rate of 8.7% on [18F]FDG PET. Fap immunohistochemistry showed negative or slight FAP expression in neoplastic signet ring cells and ovarian stroma. [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR imaging strategy greatly improved the detection rate of Krukenberg tumors (87%, 20/23). After adding diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), the detection rate was further improved (87.5% vs. 100%, p = 0.083). [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR imaging strategy either upgraded TNM staging or changed treatment management in twelve patients. CONCLUSIONS [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET outperformed [18F]FDG PET in detecting primary site and most extra-ovarian metastases of GSRCC, but both tracers had limited value in identifying Krukenberg tumors. Pelvis MRI should be applied to compensate the limitation of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET imaging to identify Krukenberg tumours. The [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR imaging strategy has the potential to impact treatment decisions for GSRCC patients with KTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tingting Wang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Gan Huang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Haitao Zhao
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Lianghua Li
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Yanying Shen
- Department of Pathology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Weihua Lou
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200127, China.
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
| | - Jianjun Liu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200127, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wilson MP, Sorour S, Bao B, Murad MH, Man V, Krill M, Low G. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced CT versus PET/CT for advanced ovarian cancer staging: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024:10.1007/s00261-024-04195-x. [PMID: 38523146 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04195-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Revised: 01/07/2024] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Accurate staging of ovarian cancer is critical to guide optimal management pathways. North American guidelines recommend contrast-enhanced CT as the primary work-up for staging ovarian cancer. This meta-analysis aims to compare the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced CT alone to PET/CT for detecting abdominal metastases in patients with a new or suspected diagnosis of ovarian cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and the gray literature from inception to October 2022 was performed. Studies with a minimum of 5 patients evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced CT and/or PET/CT for detecting stage 3 ovarian cancer as defined by a surgical/histopathological reference standard ± clinical follow-up were included. Study, clinical, imaging, and accuracy data for eligible studies were independently acquired by two reviewers. Primary meta-analysis was performed in studies reporting accuracy on a per-patient basis using a bivariate mixed-effects regression model. Risk of bias was evaluated using QUADAS-2. RESULTS From 3701 citations, 15 studies (918 patients with mean age ranging from 51 to 65 years) were included in the systematic review. Twelve studies evaluated contrast-enhanced CT (6 using a per-patient assessment and 6 using a per-region assessment) and 11 studies evaluated PET/CT (7 using a per-patient assessment and 4 using a per-region assessment). All but one reporting study used consensus reading. Respective sensitivity and specificity values on a per-patient basis were 82% (67-91%, 95% CI) and 72% (59-82%) for contrast-enhanced CT and 87% (75-94%) and 90% (82-95%) for PET/CT. There was no significant difference in sensitivities between modalities (p = 0.29), but PET/CT was significantly more specific than CT (p < 0.01). Presumed variability could not be assessed in any single category due to limited studies using per-patient assessment. Studies were almost entirely low risk for bias and applicability concerns using QUADAS-2. CONCLUSION Contrast-enhanced CT demonstrates non-inferior sensitivity compared to PET/CT, although PET/CT may still serve as an alternative and/or supplement to CT alone prior to and/or in lieu of diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with ovarian cancer. Future revisions to existing guidelines should consider these results to further refine the individualized pretherapeutic diagnostic pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitchell P Wilson
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, 2B2.41 WMC, 8440-112 Street NW, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7, Canada.
| | - Sara Sorour
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, 2B2.41 WMC, 8440-112 Street NW, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7, Canada
| | - Bo Bao
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, 2B2.41 WMC, 8440-112 Street NW, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7, Canada
| | - Mohammad Hassan Murad
- Evidence-Based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Room 2-54, 205 3rd Ave SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Vincent Man
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, 2B2.41 WMC, 8440-112 Street NW, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7, Canada
| | - Matthew Krill
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, 2B2.41 WMC, 8440-112 Street NW, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7, Canada
| | - Gavin Low
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, 2B2.41 WMC, 8440-112 Street NW, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li T, Zhang J, Yan Y, Tan M, Chen Y. Applications of FAPI PET/CT in the diagnosis and treatment of breast and the most common gynecologic malignancies: a literature review. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1358070. [PMID: 38505595 PMCID: PMC10949888 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1358070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024] Open
Abstract
The fibroblast activating protein (FAP) is expressed by some fibroblasts found in healthy tissues. However, FAP is overexpressed in more than 90% of epithelial tumors, including breast and gynecological tumors. As a result, the FAP ligand could be used as a target for diagnosis and treatment purposes. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is a hybrid imaging technique commonly used to locate and assess the tumor's molecular and metabolic functions. PET imaging involves the injection of a radiotracer that tends to accumulate more in metabolically active lesions such as cancer. Several radiotracers have been developed to target FAP in PET/CT imaging, such as the fibroblast-activation protein inhibitor (FAPI). These tracers bind to FAP with high specificity and affinity, allowing for the non-invasive detection and quantification of FAP expression in tumors. In this review, we discussed the applications of FAPI PET/CT in the diagnosis and treatment of breast and the most common gynecologic malignancies. Radiolabeled FAPI can improve the detection, staging, and assessment of treatment response in breast and the most common gynecologic malignancies, but the problem with normal hormone-responsive organs remains insurmountable. Compared to the diagnostic applications of FAPI, further research is needed for future therapeutic applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tengfei Li
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
- Nuclear Medicine Institute of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
| | - Jintao Zhang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
- Nuclear Medicine Institute of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
| | - Yuanzhuo Yan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
- Nuclear Medicine Institute of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
| | - Min Tan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
- Nuclear Medicine Institute of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
| | - Yue Chen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
- Nuclear Medicine Institute of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pisano G, Wendler T, Valdés Olmos RA, Garganese G, Rietbergen DDD, Giammarile F, Vidal-Sicart S, Oonk MHM, Frumovitz M, Abu-Rustum NR, Scambia G, Rufini V, Collarino A. Molecular image-guided surgery in gynaecological cancer: where do we stand? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024:10.1007/s00259-024-06604-1. [PMID: 38233609 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06604-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this review is to give an overview of the current status of molecular image-guided surgery in gynaecological malignancies, from both clinical and technological points of view. METHODS A narrative approach was taken to describe the relevant literature, focusing on clinical applications of molecular image-guided surgery in gynaecology, preoperative imaging as surgical roadmap, and intraoperative devices. RESULTS The most common clinical application in gynaecology is sentinel node biopsy (SNB). Other promising approaches are receptor-target modalities and occult lesion localisation. Preoperative SPECT/CT and PET/CT permit a roadmap for adequate surgical planning. Intraoperative detection modalities span from 1D probes to 2D portable cameras and 3D freehand imaging. CONCLUSION After successful application of radio-guided SNB and SPECT, innovation is leaning towards hybrid modalities, such as hybrid tracer and fusion of imaging approaches including SPECT/CT and PET/CT. Robotic surgery, as well as augmented reality and virtual reality techniques, is leading to application of these innovative technologies to the clinical setting, guiding surgeons towards a precise, personalised, and minimally invasive approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giusi Pisano
- Section of Nuclear Medicine, University Department of Radiological Sciences and Haematology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Thomas Wendler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
- Chair for Computer-Aided Medical Procedures and Augmented Reality, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Near Munich, Germany
| | - Renato A Valdés Olmos
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory & Section Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Giorgia Garganese
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Women, Children and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Section of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Daphne D D Rietbergen
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory & Section Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Francesco Giammarile
- Nuclear Medicine and Diagnostic Imaging Section, Division of Human Health, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sergi Vidal-Sicart
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi iSunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maaike H M Oonk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Frumovitz
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Women, Children and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Section of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Vittoria Rufini
- Section of Nuclear Medicine, University Department of Radiological Sciences and Haematology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Angela Collarino
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|