Tumor-associated focal chronic pancreatitis from invasion of the pancreatic duct by common bile duct carcinoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation

The clinical characteristics of focal acute pancreatitis based on imaging diagnosis: comparison with non-localized acute pancreatitis- a preliminary result

BACKGROUND

Focal acute pancreatitis is a special type of acute pancreatitis, which diagnosis is based on image showing a focal mass formation in the pancreas. For acute pancreatitis with or without focal inflammatory enlargement, little is known on differences between them. Our purpose was to find differences between focal acute pancreatitis and non-localized acute pancreatitis.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of a total of 24 patients diagnosed with focal acute pancreatitis by imaging and clinical diagnosis, and 27 cases of acute pancreatitis which manifest non-localized pancreas inflammation were selected as the control group. The differences of the two groups were compared to describe their clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

Differences in bloating (4.2% VS 29.6%,P = 0.026), abdominal tenderness (58.3% VS 85.2%,P = 0.032), peripheral blood neutrophil ratio (60.1 ± 23.3VS 75.9 ± 12.6,P = 0.004), serum D-Dimer (0.40(0.25,0.98) VS 1.59(0.49,4.63),P = 0.008), serum GGT (40(25,91) VS120(22,383),P = 0.046), serum amylase(435(241,718) VS 591(394,1333),P = 0.044) and lipase(988(648,1067) VS 1686(525,2675),P = 0.027) between focal acute pancreatitis and non-localized acute pancreatitis groups were statistically significant. However, difference of the severity of two groups was not statistically significant (P = 1.000).

CONCLUSION

Compared with non-localized acute pancreatitis, changes in symptoms, signs and laboratory indicators of focal acute pancreatitis are non-obvious, however, there was no significant difference in the severity of two groups, indicating that we should pay more attention to diagnosis of focal acute pancreatitis in clinical practice.

Optimizing b-values for accurate depiction of pancreatic cancer with tumor-associated pancreatitis on computed diffusion-weighted imaging

PURPOSE

To determine the optimal b-value for accurate depiction of pancreatic cancer (PC) in patients with active tumor-associated pancreatitis (TAP), using computed diffusion-weighted imaging (cDWI) with a range of b-values up to 3000 s/mm².

METHODS

The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board. We retrospectively analyzed 34 consecutive PC cases with active TAP who underwent pancreatectomy without preoperative therapy. Four cDWI datasets with b-values of 1500-3000 s/mm² (cDWI₁₅₀₀-cDWI₃₀₀₀) were generated from the original DWI datasets with b-values of 0 and 1000 s/mm² obtained using a 3-T scanner. Two board-certified radiologists evaluated images qualitatively (tumor conspicuity and total image quality), and another two board-certified radiologists placed regions of interest for quantitative evaluations (apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC] values of both lesions, contrast ratio [CR] of PC to active TAP, and volume ratio [VR] of PC to surgical specimen).

RESULTS

As the b-value increased, tumor conspicuity improved significantly in cDWI₂₀₀₀ and cDWI₂₅₀₀ (P = 0.0121 and 0.0015, respectively), although total image quality decreased in all cDWIs compared with DWI₁₀₀₀ (P < 0.0001). Significantly lower ADC values were seen in PC (P < 0.0001). All cDWI groups showed positive correlation between the tumor conspicuity and ADC difference between PC and TAP. CR increased with the b-value, while VR decreased. Significant equivalence of VR to the surgical specimen was seen on cDWI₂₀₀₀ (P = 0.0031).

CONCLUSION

Accurate depiction of PC was optimal with cDWI₂₀₀₀ in the presence of active TAP.

Extrapancreatic neural plexus invasion by carcinomas of the pancreatic head region: evaluation using thin-section helical CT

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine the computed tomographic (CT) criteria for diagnosing the second portion of the extrapancreatic neural plexus (PLX-II) invasion by carcinoma of the pancreatic head region on thin-section helical CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 41 patients with carcinoma of the pancreatic head region (17 in the pancreas, 24 in the lower common bile duct) underwent three-phase helical CT (collimation 5 mm; reconstruction 2.5 mm) before surgery. Two criteria were established for the assessment of the PLX-II running between the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and the medial margin of the uncinate process: criterion A: assessment of the area around the SMA and inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery; criterion B: assessment of the jejunal trunk.

RESULTS

PLX-II invasion was pathologically confirmed in 19 patients with pancreatobiliary carcinoma. For criterion A, all 19 patients with positive PLX-II invasion and 20 of the 22 with negative PLX-II invasion were correctly diagnosed (sensitivity 100%; specificity 91%; accuracy 95%). For criterion B, 3 of the 17 patients with positive PLX-II invasion and all 20 with negative PLX-II invasion were correctly diagnosed (sensitivity 18%; specificity 100%; accuracy 62%). The two false-positive cases using criterion A were correctly diagnosed using criterion B.

CONCLUSION

Thin-section helical CT provides sufficient diagnostic ability regarding PLX-II invasion by carcinoma of the pancreatic head region.