2
|
Sala P, Bogliolo S, Barra F, Fazio A, Maramai M, Cassani C, Gardella B, Babilonti L, Giannelli F, Mammoliti S, Spinillo A, Ferrero S, Valenzano Menada M, Costantini S, Bruzzi P, Marchiolè P. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Radical Surgery versus Concurrent Chemo-Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis. J INVEST SURG 2020; 35:308-314. [PMID: 33289585 DOI: 10.1080/08941939.2020.1856239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aims to evaluate oncological outcomes in women affected by locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical surgery (NACT + RS) or concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT). METHODS This was a multicenter retrospective analysis of data related to women with LACC (FIGO stage IB2-IVA), who were treated by NACT + RS or CCRT between November 2006 and January 2018. The first endpoints were the evaluation of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS); univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for identifying the prognostic factors independently associated with these oncological outcomes. RESULTS Overall, 106 women were included in the analysis; 55 of them (51.9%) underwent NACT + RS and 51 (48.1%) CCRT, respectively. Patients in the NACT + RS group had a significant better five-year DFS and five-year OS than those in the CCRT group (77.4% vs. 33.4%, p < .001 and 93.8% vs. 56.5%, p = .003). In the multivariate analyses, treatment choice (NACT + RS or CCRT) was the only independent prognostic factor for predicting both DFS (HR = 3.954; 95 CI = 1.898-8.236; p < 0.001) and OS (HR = 5.330; 95 CI = 1.563-18.178; p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS This retrospective study demonstrated an improved survival outcome for patients undergoing NACT + RS compared with those undergoing CCRT. Our findings seem to support the use of NACT before RS as an effective alternative option to CCRT standard therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Sala
- Unit of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Stefano Bogliolo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Service of Medical and Surgical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.,Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Division of Gynecology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabio Barra
- Academic Unit of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Alessandra Fazio
- Academic Unit of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Mattia Maramai
- Academic Unit of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Chiara Cassani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Service of Medical and Surgical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Barbara Gardella
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Service of Medical and Surgical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Luciana Babilonti
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Service of Medical and Surgical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Flavio Giannelli
- Unit of Radiotherapy, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Serafina Mammoliti
- Unit of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Arsenio Spinillo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Service of Medical and Surgical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Simone Ferrero
- Academic Unit of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Mario Valenzano Menada
- Academic Unit of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Sergio Costantini
- Academic Unit of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Paolo Bruzzi
- Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Engelaere C, Poncelet E, Durot C, Dohan A, Rousset P, Hoeffel C. Pelvic MRI: Is Endovaginal or Rectal Filling Needed? Korean J Radiol 2018; 19:397-409. [PMID: 29713217 PMCID: PMC5904466 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2018.19.3.397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2017] [Accepted: 10/07/2017] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging is the optimal modality for pelvic imaging. It is based on T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) sequences allowing uterine and vaginal cavity assessment as well as rectal evaluation. Anatomical depiction of these structures may benefit from distension, and conditions either developing inside the lumen of cavities or coming from the outside may then be better delineated and localized. The need for distension, either rectal or vaginal, and the way to conduct it are matters of debate, depending on indication for which the MR examination is being conducted. In this review, we discuss advantages and potential drawbacks of this technique, based on literature and our experience, in the evaluation of various gynecological and rectal diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constance Engelaere
- Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Reims, Reims 51092, France
| | - Edouard Poncelet
- Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de Valenciennes, Valenciennes 59300, France
| | - Carole Durot
- Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Reims, Reims 51092, France
| | - Anthony Dohan
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, Hôpital Lariboisière-APHP, Paris 75010, France
| | - Pascal Rousset
- Department of Radiology, Hospices civils de Lyon, Centre hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Université Claude-Bernard Lyon 1, Pierre-Bénite 69495, France
| | - Christine Hoeffel
- Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Reims, Reims 51092, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rockall AG, Qureshi M, Papadopoulou I, Saso S, Butterfield N, Thomassin-Naggara I, Farthing A, Smith JR, Bharwani N. Role of Imaging in Fertility-sparing Treatment of Gynecologic Malignancies. Radiographics 2017; 36:2214-2233. [PMID: 27831834 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2016150254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Treatments for gynecologic cancer usually result in loss of fertility due to surgery or radical radiation therapy in the pelvis. In countries with an established screening program for cervical cancer, the majority of gynecologic malignancies occur in postmenopausal women. However, a substantial number of affected women are of childbearing age and have not completed their families. In these younger women, consideration of fertility preservation may be important. This article describes the fertility-sparing treatment options that are currently available and outlines the role of imaging in the selection of eligible patients on the basis of a review of the literature. In the setting of cervical cancer, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is used to delineate the size, position, and stage of the tumor for selection of patients who are suitable for radical trachelectomy. In patients with solitary complex adnexal masses, diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MR imaging sequences are used to categorize the likelihood of invasive or borderline malignancy for consideration of unilateral ovarian resection, with fertility preservation when possible. In patients with endometrial cancer, MR imaging is used to rule out signs of invasive disease before hormone therapy is considered. Imaging is also used at patient follow-up to detect recurrent disease; however, evidence to support this application is limited. In conclusion, imaging is an essential tool in the care of patients with gynecologic malignancies who are considering fertility-preserving treatment options. ©RSNA, 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea G Rockall
- From the Department of Radiology, Hammersmith Hospital (A.G.R.), and Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer (A.G.R., N. Bharwani), Imperial College London, England; Department of Radiology, Royal Free NHS Trust, London, England (M.Q.); Departments of Radiology (I.P., N. Butterfield, N. Bharwani), Surgery (S.S.), and Gynecology (A.F., J.R.S.), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, England; and Department of Radiology, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, APHP, HUEP, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France (I.T.N.)
| | - Mahrukh Qureshi
- From the Department of Radiology, Hammersmith Hospital (A.G.R.), and Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer (A.G.R., N. Bharwani), Imperial College London, England; Department of Radiology, Royal Free NHS Trust, London, England (M.Q.); Departments of Radiology (I.P., N. Butterfield, N. Bharwani), Surgery (S.S.), and Gynecology (A.F., J.R.S.), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, England; and Department of Radiology, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, APHP, HUEP, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France (I.T.N.)
| | - Ioanna Papadopoulou
- From the Department of Radiology, Hammersmith Hospital (A.G.R.), and Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer (A.G.R., N. Bharwani), Imperial College London, England; Department of Radiology, Royal Free NHS Trust, London, England (M.Q.); Departments of Radiology (I.P., N. Butterfield, N. Bharwani), Surgery (S.S.), and Gynecology (A.F., J.R.S.), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, England; and Department of Radiology, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, APHP, HUEP, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France (I.T.N.)
| | - Srdjan Saso
- From the Department of Radiology, Hammersmith Hospital (A.G.R.), and Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer (A.G.R., N. Bharwani), Imperial College London, England; Department of Radiology, Royal Free NHS Trust, London, England (M.Q.); Departments of Radiology (I.P., N. Butterfield, N. Bharwani), Surgery (S.S.), and Gynecology (A.F., J.R.S.), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, England; and Department of Radiology, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, APHP, HUEP, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France (I.T.N.)
| | - Nicholas Butterfield
- From the Department of Radiology, Hammersmith Hospital (A.G.R.), and Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer (A.G.R., N. Bharwani), Imperial College London, England; Department of Radiology, Royal Free NHS Trust, London, England (M.Q.); Departments of Radiology (I.P., N. Butterfield, N. Bharwani), Surgery (S.S.), and Gynecology (A.F., J.R.S.), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, England; and Department of Radiology, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, APHP, HUEP, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France (I.T.N.)
| | - Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara
- From the Department of Radiology, Hammersmith Hospital (A.G.R.), and Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer (A.G.R., N. Bharwani), Imperial College London, England; Department of Radiology, Royal Free NHS Trust, London, England (M.Q.); Departments of Radiology (I.P., N. Butterfield, N. Bharwani), Surgery (S.S.), and Gynecology (A.F., J.R.S.), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, England; and Department of Radiology, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, APHP, HUEP, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France (I.T.N.)
| | - Alan Farthing
- From the Department of Radiology, Hammersmith Hospital (A.G.R.), and Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer (A.G.R., N. Bharwani), Imperial College London, England; Department of Radiology, Royal Free NHS Trust, London, England (M.Q.); Departments of Radiology (I.P., N. Butterfield, N. Bharwani), Surgery (S.S.), and Gynecology (A.F., J.R.S.), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, England; and Department of Radiology, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, APHP, HUEP, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France (I.T.N.)
| | - J Richard Smith
- From the Department of Radiology, Hammersmith Hospital (A.G.R.), and Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer (A.G.R., N. Bharwani), Imperial College London, England; Department of Radiology, Royal Free NHS Trust, London, England (M.Q.); Departments of Radiology (I.P., N. Butterfield, N. Bharwani), Surgery (S.S.), and Gynecology (A.F., J.R.S.), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, England; and Department of Radiology, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, APHP, HUEP, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France (I.T.N.)
| | - Nishat Bharwani
- From the Department of Radiology, Hammersmith Hospital (A.G.R.), and Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer (A.G.R., N. Bharwani), Imperial College London, England; Department of Radiology, Royal Free NHS Trust, London, England (M.Q.); Departments of Radiology (I.P., N. Butterfield, N. Bharwani), Surgery (S.S.), and Gynecology (A.F., J.R.S.), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, England; and Department of Radiology, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, APHP, HUEP, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France (I.T.N.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Isla Ortiz D, Montalvo-Esquivel G, Chanona-Vilchis JG, Herrera Gómez Á, Ñamendys Silva SA, Pareja Franco LR. [Laparoscopic radical trachelectomy for preservation of fertility in early cervical cancer. A case report]. CIR CIR 2016; 84:329-35. [PMID: 26738647 DOI: 10.1016/j.circir.2015.04.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2014] [Accepted: 04/20/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radical hysterectomy is the standard treatment for patients with early-stage cervical cancer. However, for women who wish to preserve fertility, radical trachelectomy is a safe and viable option. OBJECTIVE To present the first case of laparoscopic radical trachelectomy performed in the National Cancer Institute, and published in Mexico. CLINICAL CASE Patient, 34 years old, gravid 1, caesarean 1, stage IB1 cervical cancer, squamous, wishing to preserve fertility. She underwent a laparoscopic radical trachelectomy and bilateral dissection of the pelvic lymph nodes. Operation time was 330minutes, and the estimated blood loss was 100ml. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. The final pathology reported a tumour of 15mm with infiltration of 7mm, surgical margins without injury, and pelvic nodes without tumour. After a 12 month follow-up, the patient is having regular periods, but has not yet tried to get pregnant. No evidence of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic radical trachelectomy and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy is a safe alternative in young patients who wish to preserve fertility with early stage cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Isla Ortiz
- Servicio de Ginecología Oncológica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología México, México D.F., México.
| | | | | | - Ángel Herrera Gómez
- Servicio de Ginecología Oncológica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología México, México D.F., México
| | | | | |
Collapse
|