Primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: MR imaging findings including preliminary observation on diffusion-weighted imaging

Primary hepatic neuroendocrine neoplasms of children, a systematic review

The term "carcinoid tumour" is no longer used and has given up its place to neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). Primary hepatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PHNENs) are as rare as compromising 0.4% of all neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). Searching the central medical databases of PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, and the references of the articles, we have collected 10 cases of pediatric PHNENs of children. The inclusion criteria were full-text available literature in English and those under and equal to 19 years old. Diseases found during autopsy, carcinoma, and isolated gall bladder involvement also made the exclusion criteria. The mean age of the patients was 13.86 years, ranging from 8 to 19 years. Six female patients (55%) were in front of 5 males (45%). The right lobe was the most frequent site of involvement and surgery in four cases. Abdominal pain comprised the main symptom, and CT scans of most of them were common which helped in diagnosis. While a hepatic tumour is considered NEN, a detailed systemic evaluation of a primary tumour is mandatory to exclude metastatic HNEN. Secondary hepatic NENs are more common than primary ones. Surgical resection has had the most long-term success.

Case report: Recurrence of primary hepatic neuroendocrine tumors after resection of liver segments IV in 8 years follow-up

Background

Primary hepatic neuroendocrine tumors (PHNETs) are an utterly rare entity. The diagnosis of PHNETs could legitimize when an extrahepatic primary NET must always be excluded. PHNETs can achieve a high survival rate after complete surgical resection, however, most patients still have an 18% risk of recurrence within 5 years after surgery. In our case, the recurrence occurred 8 years after the first hepatectomy, which is relatively rare in the current literature. Therefore, rigorous postoperative follow-up is necessary for early detection and timely treatment of recurrent PHNETs.

Case information

We report a case of PHNET in a 24-year-old previously healthy female patient who relapsed 8 years after hepatectomy. This case focuses on the importance of diagnosis of primary and recurrent PHNETS in young patients, rare pathological types, and post-operative follow-up.

Conclusion

This case report detailed the rare pathological morphology and characteristic immunohistochemical markers in our case for PHNETS, which enhanced the new understanding of the diagnosis of this entity. In addition, we also highlighted the variable duration of recurrence after treatment of PHNETs. The 8-year recurrent period in our case suggests the importance of regular examination in patients with PHNETs by following the doctor's instructions.

Case Report: Primary hepatic neuroendocrine tumor: two cases report with literature review

Background & Aims

Primary hepatic neuroendocrine tumors (PHNETs) are rare malignant liver tumors that present diagnostic challenges owing to their rarity and absence of specific clinical features. This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of this rare liver tumor to enhance our understanding of the disease, improve diagnostic accuracy, and explore standardized diagnostic and treatment approaches.

Case description

During physical examination, two elderly women, aged 64 and 74 years, were found to have liver masses. 18F-FDG Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography (18F-FDG PET-CT) and Ga68-DOTATATE PET-CT scans of both individuals revealed multiple liver masses that were initially suspected to be hepatic neuroendocrine tumors. Subsequent puncture pathology confirmed the diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumors. Furthermore, in Case 1, the tumor was also detected by 18F-FDG PET-CT in the lung, suggesting a metastatic tumor, in conjunction with liver immunohistochemistry and imaging findings. Laboratory tests revealed no significant abnormalities in liver function or autoimmune liver disease indicators, and there was no evidence of viral hepatitis infection. However, partial hepatectomy was not indicated for cases with distant metastasis or multiple space-occupying lesions. Individualized treatment approaches have been developed for such situations. A large portion of the tumor underwent Transarterial Embolization (TAE), and targeted combination chemotherapy or endocrine therapy was administered based on the pathological results. During regular follow-ups a 13 and 12 months, the tumor remained stable. The patients' quality of life was good, and their psychological well-being was healthy. They led active lifestyles, demonstrated a thorough understanding of their disease and its progression, and actively cooperated during the follow-up process.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that a combination of serological, radiological, and immunohistochemical examinations can aid in the diagnosis of PHNET. In addition, we determined that TAE combined with drug therapy could be an effective method for controlling PHNET progression. Regular postoperative follow-ups are important for monitoring the prognosis and tumor progression status of patients with PHNET.

Primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinoma with subsequent cerebral and spinal metastases

A 72-year-old man was referred to us for evaluation of asymptomatic masses in the liver that had been detected on ultrasonography performed during a physical screening. The level of neuron-specific enolase was elevated (56.97 ng/mL; normal level, 15.7-17.0 ng/mL). Other tumor markers were normal, including alpha fetoprotein, carcinoembryonic antigen and cancer antigen 199. No tumor was found through chest CT scan, gastroscopy and colonoscopy. Abdominal MR demonstrated multiple masses with irregular central necrosis, which appeared as marked hyperintensity on T2WI. Most lesions showed rim-like enhancement at portal venous phase. Pathological examination of tissue obtained by means of percutaneous biopsy indicated that the tumor was composed of small cells which were arranged in nests and trabeculae, the nuclei were round with little cytoplasm, and nuclear division was present (hematoxylin-eosin stain.

A fat containing combined neuroendocrine carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma in the liver: A case report

A 79-year-old man was admitted to our hospital because of increased hepatobiliary enzyme levels. Dynamic computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging showed a liver tumor measuring 60mm containing fat foci at the cranial aspect of the tumor. We diagnosed the patient with hypovascular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and fat deposition, and performed a caudate lobe resection. Pathology examination revealed two intermingled components: moderately differentiated HCC with fat deposition and neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). Primary combined NEC and HCC is extremely rare. To our knowledge, this is the first report of combined NEC and HCC including a fat component. HCC is the most common primary hepatic malignancy with fat. HCC might include fat, even if HCC coexists with another type of cancer. The imaging characteristics of and HCC with another type of cancer vary depending on the amount of each component. We should not simply diagnose such tumors as HCC, but think about the possibilities of HCC with another type of cancer, because there is a fat component.

Long-term postresection prognosis of primary neuroendocrine tumors of the liver

Purpose

Primary hepatic neuroendocrine tumor (PHNET) is a very rare neoplasm, requiring strict exclusion of metastasis from possible extrahepatic primary sites for its diagnosis.

Methods

We reviewed our clinical experience of 13 patients with primary hepatic NET who underwent liver resection from January 1997 to December 2015.

Results

The mean age of the 13 patients (8 males and 5 females) was 51.1 ± 12.8 years; the most common clinical manifestation was vague, nonspecific abdominal pain (n = 9). Of them, 11 patients underwent preoperative liver biopsy, 7 of which correctly diagnosed as neuroendocrine tumor (NET). Ten patients underwent R0 resection, and 3 underwent R1 resection. Diagnosis of PHNET was confirmed both immunohistochemically and by absence of extrahepatic primary sites. All tumors were single lesions, with a mean size of 9.6 ± 7.6 cm and a median size of 4.3 cm; all showed positive staining for synaptophysin and chromogranin. During a mean follow-up period of 95.1 ± 86.6 months, 7 patients died from tumor recurrence, whereas the other 6 remain alive to date, making the 5-year tumor recurrence rate 56.0% and the 5-year patient survival rate 61.5%. When confined to R0 resection, 5-year recurrence and survival rates were 42.9% and 70.0%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that Ki-67 proliferative index was the only risk factor for tumor recurrence.

Conclusion

PHNET is a very rare tumor with no specific clinical features, and its final diagnosis depends primarily on pathology, immunohistochemistry, and exclusion of metastasis from other sites. Aggressive surgical treatment is highly recommended for PHNET because of acceptably favorable postresection outcomes.

Hepatic neuroendocrine tumors: gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging findings with an emphasis on differentiation between primary and secondary tumors

PURPOSE

To describe the findings of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of hepatic neuroendocrine tumors (hNET) and to identify the features that differentiate secondary from primary tumors.

METHODS

This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board, and the requirement for informed consent was waived. Between August 2008 and December 2014, 50 patients with pathologically proven hNETs who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging with diffusion-weighted images were included. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether they had primary (n = 17) or secondary (n = 33) hNETs. Qualitative values based on a consensus between two observers [morphologic findings, signal intensity, and enhancement pattern (poor or indeterminate; hepatocellular carcinoma-like or cholangiocarcinoma-like)], and quantitative values (apparent diffusion coefficient) were evaluated as predictors of secondary hNETs using multivariable logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

In multivariate analysis, the presence of multiple lesions (p = 0.011), a tumor size less than 6.3 cm (p = 0.001), and a hepatocellular carcinoma-like enhancement pattern (p = 0.031) were significant independent factors for differentiating secondary from primary hNETs, and achieved a sensitivity of 91%, a specificity of 82%, and an accuracy of 88%, with a value of the area under the ROC curve of 0.931.

CONCLUSION

Using these specific MR imaging criteria, secondary hNETs could be differentiated from primary hNETs with a high degree of accuracy in patients with histopathologically proven hNETs.

Comparative Clinical Analysis of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinomas with Liver Metastasis and Primary Hepatic Neuroendocrine Carcinomas

Purpose

The objective of this study was to analyze the clinical features and prognosis of gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) with liver metastasis and primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (PHNECs), as these rare hepatic neuroendocrine carcinomas have not been exhaustively studied.

Methods

The clinical data of 47 patients with hepatic NECs were retrospectively reviewed and categorized to analyze features and prognosis.

Results

The 47 studied cases comprised 13 cases of primary hepatic NECs (primary group) and 34 cases of metastatic hepatic NECs (metastatic group). Male patients were slightly dominant in both groups, while no age predilection was present. PHNECs were mostly single nodules located in the right lobe of the liver. Metastatic hepatic NECs originated mostly from the pancreas and stomach without distinction of the lobes of the liver. Univariate analysis showed that the treatment protocol (radical operation or others) was correlated with the overall survival (OS; p < 0.05) in the primary group, while treatment protocol and cytokeratin 7 (CK7) were associated with OS (p < 0.05) in the metastatic group. Cox proportional hazard regression showed that radical operation was an independent prognostic factor (p < 0.05) for OS in the metastatic group.

Conclusions

No significant differences in the clinicopathological features between PHNECs and metastatic hepatic GEP NECs were found, but radical operation was significantly correlated with OS for both carcinomas. Radical operation is the first choice for patients who are eligible for operation.

Primary hepatic neuroendocrine tumor case with a preoperative course of 26 years: A case report and literature review

Primary hepatic neuroendocrine tumor (PHNET) is an extremely rare liver tumor. Patients often have no clinical symptoms or have only non-specific symptoms, such as abdominal pain and abdominal mass. The clinical manifestations, disease development, treatment methods, and treatment outcomes of PHNET vary greatly among cases. Here we report a case of PHNET with a confirmed 26-year survival before surgery. The patient was a 56-year-old female. A large right hepatic mass was detected when the patient was 30 years old. The tumor could not be removed during exploratory laparotomy, and constriction of the right hepatic artery and biopsy were conducted. Pathological results indicated a diagnosis of benign tumor, but a confirmed diagnosis was not reached. Twenty-six years after the patient had been living with the tumor, she sought treatment again because of tumor progression. After systematic evaluation of the resectability, the tumor was resected. Based on the examination results of the gastrointestinal tract and lungs, intraoperative examination results, pathological findings, and long-term follow-up results, the diagnosis of PHNET was confirmed. This case represents the longest reported survival time for a PHNET patient before removal of the tumor.

Primary hepatic neuroendocrine tumors: comparing CT and MRI features with pathology

Background

Primary hepatic neuroendocrine tumors (PHNET) are extremely rare and difficult to distinguish from primary and metastatic liver cancers since PHNETs blood supply comes from the liver artery. This study aims to investigate CT and MR imaging findings of primary hepatic neuroendocrine tumor (PHNET) and correlation with the 2010 WHO pathological classification.

Methods

We examined CT and MRI scans from 29 patients who were diagnosed with PHNET and correlated the data with the 2010 WHO classification of neuroendocrine tumors.

Results

According to the 2010 WHO classification system, PHNETs are divided into three grades based on histological criteria. Grade 1 tumors are singular, solid nodules with enhancement at the arterial phase on CT and MRI scans. In grade 1 tumors, the dynamic-contrast enhancement curve shows rapid wash-in in the arterial phase. Grade 2 tumors can have a singular or multiple distribution pattern, necrosis, and nodule or marginal ring-like enhancements. Grade 3 tumors have multiple lesions, internal necrosis, and evidence of hemorrhage. Portal venous tumor thrombus was seen in one case. As tumor grades increase, the capsule begins to lose integrity and tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values decrease(grade 1: 1.39 ± 0.20× 10⁻³ mm²/s versus grade 2: 1.26 ± 0.23× 10⁻³ mm²/s versus grade 3: 1.14 ± 0.17× 10⁻³ mm²/s).

Conclusion

CT and MRI can reflect tumor grade and pathological features of PHNETs, which are helpful in accurately diagnosing PHNETs.

MR imaging of primary hepatic neuroendocrine neoplasm and metastatic hepatic neuroendocrine neoplasm: a comparative study

PURPOSE

To investigate MR characteristics in differentiating primary hepatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (PHNEN) from metastatic hepatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (MHNEN).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-nine patients with histopathologically proven liver neuroendocrine neoplasm were retrospectively analyzed. The morphological and MR signal features on T1, T2-weighted, dynamic-enhanced, and diffusion-weighted imaging were evaluated and compared between the PHNEN group (n = 12) and the MHNEN group (n = 27).

RESULTS

The tumor size (P = 0.0084), number (P = 0.017), distribution (P = 0.000), contour (P = 0.041), the presence of capsule-like enhancement (P = 0.034), tumor homogeneity (P = 0.018) and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values (P = 0.024) were different between PHNENs and MHNENs. Large, solitary or massive-growing nodules with lobulated or irregular contour, capsule-like enhancement, heterogeneous signals or lower ADC values supported the diagnosis of PHNEN compared with MHNEN. ROC analysis demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.746, when the optimal cutoff value of 1.049 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s was used, a sensitivity of 63.0 % (95 % CI, 44.2-79.4 %), a specitivity of 80.0 % (95 % CI, 50.1-96.4 %), a positive predictive value of 89.5 % (95 % CI, 70.9-98.2 %), and a negative predictive value of 44.4 % (95 % CI, 23.4-67.0 %) can be achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI may provide valuable information for the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of PHNENs and MHNENs.

Hepatic primary neuroendocrine carcinoma: about a new case

We report a new case of Primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinoma admitted in our hospital and revealed in 53 years man by epigastric pain and flush syndrome. A liver biopsy with immunohistochemical study confirmed the original location of a neuroendocrine carcinoma. After 12 cures of Chemotherapy and a follow up of 12 months, the patient is still in complete remission.

Computer tomography and magnetic resonance image manifestations of primary hepatic neuroendocrine cell carcinomas

AIM

This study aims to investigate the manifestation of CT, MRI and dynamic enhanced scans for primary hepatic neuroendocrine cell carcinoma.

METHODS

CT or MRI arterial and venous phase scan images of 19 cases of pathologically confirmed PHNEC were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

14 cases (73.68%) with single lesion, 5 cases (26.3%) with multiple lesions, with an average diameter of 13.2 cm. Some 12 cases (63.16%) showed inhomogeneous enhancement, seven cases (36.8%) showed homogeneous enhancement, 13 cases (68.4%) demonstrated significant enhancement in the arterial phase, 13 cases (68.4%) had significantly enhanced portal venous phase including 7 cases (36.8 %) with portal venous phase density or signal above the arterial phase and 5 cases (26.3%) with the portal vein density or signal below the arterial phase. Seven cases (36.8%) had continued strengthened separate shadows in the center of the lesion. Thrombosis were not seen in portal veins.

CONCLUSION

CT and MRI images of liver cell neuroendocrine carcinoma have certain characteristics that can provide valuable information for diagnosis and differential diagnosis.

Diagnosis and therapy of primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: clinical analysis of 10 cases

BACKGROUND

Primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (PHNEC) is rarer than extrahepatic gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). It is difficult to make a correct diagnosis and poses a challenge for management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten PHNEC patients were admitted to our hospital from June 2006 to June 2011. Laboratory tests and imaging scans were performed for diagnosis and exclusion of extrahepatic NEC. All patients were AFP - and CA199- . Seven patients had solid tumors with cystic changes on ultrasonography, CT and/or MRI. For the initial treatment, four patients received combined-therapy and six monotherapy. Considering overall treatment, six patients received combined-therapy and four patients monotherapy. Staging criteria of primary hepatocellular carcinoma (PHC, AJCC 7th edition) were used to differentiate the stage of all patients: 3 patients were stage I, 2 stage II, 4 patients stage III and 1 stage IV. All patients were followed up and clinical data were gathered.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration was 38.5 months. The 1-year, 2-year, 3-year and 6-year disease-free survival was 80.0%, 46.2% and 46.2% and 0% respectively. The overall survival rates were 100%, 67.1%, 67.1% and 33.6% respectively. Patients in early-stages (I/II) had similar disease-free and overall survival as those in advanced-stages (III/IV). Patients with monotherapy had significant shorter disease-free and overall survival than the patients with combination-therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

PHNEC has a unique specificity during its occurrence and development. The staging criteria of PHC might not be suitable for the PHENT. More convenient and effective features need to be found in imaging and laboratory detection. Surgical resection, TACE, chemotherapy and radiofrequency ablation should be performed in combination and actively for patients with PHNEC or recurrence to get the best effectiveness; they might extend the disease-free and overall survival.

PET/MR in Oncology: Non-18F-FDG Tracers for Routine Applications

PET/MR is a new multimodal imaging technique that is expected to improve diagnostic performance, especially in oncologic patients in certain indications. Apart from the clinical relevance of PET with ¹⁸F-FDG, various other tracers exist and are increasingly used, which allow insights into multiple physiologic and biologic processes. In this review, we discuss the current and potential future applications of hybrid PET/MR, focusing on non-¹⁸F-FDG tracers. The combination of PET and MR in hybrid whole-body PET/MR systems has the potential to combine excellent morphologic, functional, and biologic information in 1 imaging session with precise image coregistration, thus paving the way for the concept of multimodal multiparametric imaging for future more widespread clinical use.