Liver adenomatosis: serial investigation on MRI

Retracted: Systematic review: benefits and harms of transarterial embolisation for treating hepatocellular adenoma

The above article1 from Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, published online on 20 March 2017 in Wiley OnlineLibrary (www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com) has been retracted by agreement between the Authors, the Editor-in-Chief, R.E. Pounder, and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. The retraction has been agreed due to the inclusion of data accessible only during peer review for another journal.

Systematic review of transarterial embolization for hepatocellular adenomas

Background

Hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) larger than 5 cm in diameter is considered an indication for elective surgery, because of the risk of haemorrhage and malignant transformation. Transarterial embolization (TAE) is used to manage bleeding HCA and occasionally to reduce tumour size. TAE might have potential as an elective therapy, but its current role in this context is uncertain. This systematic review provides an overview of clinical outcomes after TAE, in bleeding and non-bleeding HCA.

Methods

Two independent reviewers performed a systematic search of literature in PubMed and Embase. Outcomes were change in tumour size, avoidance of surgery, complications and malignant transformation after TAE in bleeding and non-bleeding HCA. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool for cohort studies was used for quality assessment of included studies.

Results

From 320 potential articles, 20 cohort studies and 20 case reports including 851 patients met the inclusion criteria. TAE was performed in 151 of 851 patients (17·7 per cent), involving 196 tumours, of which 95 (48·5 per cent) were non-bleeding. Surgical treatment was avoided in 68 of 151 patients (45·0 per cent). Elective TAE was performed in 49 patients involving 66 HCAs, with 41 of these patients (84 per cent) not requiring surgery. Major complications occurred in eight of 151 patients (5·3 per cent); no death was reported. Among cohort studies, complete tumour disappearance was observed in 10 per cent of patients, and regression in 75 per cent.

Conclusion

Acute or elective TAE in the management of HCA is safe. In the elective setting, TAE provides a potential alternative to surgery.

Management of hepatic adenomatosis

Hepatic adenomatosis (HeAs) is a rare clinical entity defined by the presence of 10 or more hepatic adenomas (HA) within the background of an otherwise normal liver parenchyma, in the absence of glycogen storage disease or anabolic steroid use. HA is a benign tumor associated with oral contraceptive use. Recent advances in pathogenesis and classification of HA have questioned the distinction between these two diseases. HA are currently classified into four different subtypes with genotypic and phenotypic correlation: HNF-1a inactivated HA, B-catenin activated HA, inflammatory HA, and undetermined subtype. The clinical presentation of HA depends on the lesion size and the subtype. MRI using hepatospecific contrast agents is helpful in diagnosing the most common subtypes. When diagnosis is uncertain, biopsy with immunohistochemistry is used to diagnose and classify the lesions. Management is governed by the molecular subtype and tumor size. Pregnancy is not routinely discouraged but management is individualized.

[Focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma]

CLINICAL ISSUE

Focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) are liver lesions of hepatocellular origin. The FNH is a commonly occurring hepatic lesion whereas HCA is very rare. Non-invasive differentiation between HCA subtypes and atypical FNH may pose a diagnostic challenge as both entities predominantly occur in middle-aged female patients.

STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS

The conventional imaging modalities include ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Distinguishing FNH from HCA is of great importance clinically as FNH is considered to be a benign lesion and needs no further management. In contrast HCA is considered to be a borderline tumor due to the risk of hemorrhage, growth and even malignant transformation and requires individualized management.

METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS

The above mentioned radiological procedures usually enable an accurate and certain diagnosis of a typical FNH to be achieved. In cases of atypical FNH, particularly in patients with a clinical history of malignancy, these imaging modalities are insufficient to establish a clear diagnosis. In this scenario, the use of modern hepatobiliary contrast-enhanced MRI will enable a differentiation between FNH and metastasis with a high sensitivity and specificity. Furthermore, it allows a differentiation of FNH from 90 % of adenoma subtypes.

ACHIEVEMENTS

This article describes the histopathological and radiological features of these lesions and explains the advantages and limitations of various imaging modalities used for the diagnosis and differentiation of these entities.

PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

The new classification of HCAs according to phenotype and genotype and their imaging features, as well as different enhancement patterns, are described. The correlation between HCA subtypes and their individual management are also discussed.

Intraoperative ultrasound for liver tumor resection in children

BACKGROUND

Primary hepatic neoplasms in children are rare tumors. All malignant and medically refractive benign primary pediatric liver tumors ultimately require surgical resection for cure. Accurate preoperative imaging including multidetector helical computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is necessary to determine resectability. In the literature intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) has proven to be a vital adjunct to liver surgery in adults, but this is not well established in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between April 2003 and November 2014, children (<18-y-old) with a primary liver neoplasm, preoperatively evaluated with multidetector helical computerized tomography or MRI, who had IOUS used at the time of surgery were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Preoperative evaluation with high-resolution MRI and IOUS were discordant in 4 of 19 patients (21%). In one case, right hepatic vein involvement was not accurately assessed with MRI. Two cases showed tumor involvement in segment IV by MRI; however, IOUS revealed no medial segment involvement. The final patient had a large (>5 cm), solitary hepatic adenoma on MRI, but IOUS in this case revealed diffuse adenomatosis. The operative management was altered in three of these cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Although MRI can provide a detailed view of the hepatic anatomy and is an invaluable tool for preoperative planning for the pediatric patient with a primary liver neoplasm, IOUS may provide further and more up to date delineation of tumor extent and should be considered a crucial element in operative planning for hepatectomy in children.