CT enterography at 100 kVp with iterative reconstruction compared to 120 kVp filtered back projection: evaluation of image quality and radiation dose in the same patients

Fixed rate vs fixed injection duration in single-pass contrast-enhanced abdominal multi-detector CT: effects on vascular enhancement

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects on vascular enhancement of either a fixed rate (FR) or a fixed injection duration (FID) in single-pass (SP) contrast-enhanced abdominal multi-detector CT (CE-MDCT).

METHODS

Ninety-nine (54 M; 45 F; aged 18-86 years) patients with nontraumatic acute abdomen underwent a SP CE-MDCT after i.v. injection of 1.7 cc/Kg of a nonionic iodinated contrast media (370 mgI/mL) performed with either a FR (2 cc/s; Group A) or a FID (55 s; Group B). In both groups, patients were further stratified according to total body weight (kg) as follows: 40-60 (L); 61-80 (M); 81-100 (H). Signal- (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were calculated for the liver and for both abdominal aorta (AA) and main portal vein (MPV). Statistical analysis was performed by Student t- or Chi-square test for continuous and categorical data, respectively, whereas post hoc analysis was performed by the Mann-Whitney test (P < .05).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in demographic and physical characteristics between Group A (n = 50; 53 ± 20 years; BMI = 23.4 ± 4.4) and Group B (n = 50; 51 ± 17 years; BMI 22.7 ± 4.2). Whereas overlapping findings were observed in the M sub-groups (n = 40), SNR and CNR were significantly higher (P < .01) in Group B for both AA and MPV in the high (H) weight sub-groups (n = 20) while not significant differences were observed in the low (L) weight sub-groups (n = 40) despite a significantly lower injection rate (1.6 ± 0.2 cc/s, P < .01) in Group B.

CONCLUSION

A FID results in an overall better vascular enhancement than a FR in SP CE-MDCT.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Single-pass is an optimized contrast-enhanced abdominal CT protocol combining the benefits of vascular and visceral enhancement and characterized by a customized scan delay tailored around a monophasic contrast injection. In single-pass protocol, a fixed injection duration (55 s) results in an overall better vascular enhancement than a fixed rate (2 cc/s) and should be therefore regarded as the injection modality of choice.

Is the Mixed Use of Magnetic Resonance Enterography and Computed Tomography Enterography Adequate for Routine Periodic Follow-Up of Bowel Inflammation in Patients with Crohn's Disease?

OBJECTIVE

Computed tomography enterography (CTE) and magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) are considered substitutes for each other for evaluating Crohn's disease (CD). However, the adequacy of mixing them for routine periodic follow-up for CD has not been established. This study aimed to compare MRE alone with the mixed use of CTE and MRE for the periodic follow-up of small bowel inflammation in patients with CD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively compared two non-randomized groups, each comprising 96 patients with CD. One group underwent CTE and MRE (MRE followed by CTE or vice versa) for the follow-up of CD (interval, 13-27 months [median, 22 months]), and the other group underwent MRE alone (interval, 15-26 months [median, 21 months]). However, these two groups were similar in clinical characteristics. Three independent readers from three different institutions determined whether inflammation had decreased, remained unchanged, or increased within the entire small bowel and the terminal ileum based on sequential enterography of the patients after appropriate blinding. We compared the two groups for inter-reader agreement and accuracy (terminal ileum only) using endoscopy as the reference standard for enterographic interpretation.

RESULTS

The inter-reader agreement was greater in the MRE alone group for the entire small bowel (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]: 0.683 vs. 0.473; p = 0.005) and the terminal ileum (ICC: 0.656 vs. 0.490; p = 0.030). The interpretation accuracy was higher in the MRE alone group without statistical significance (70.9%-74.5% vs. 57.9%-64.9% in individual readers; adjusted odds ratio = 3.21; p = 0.077).

CONCLUSION

The mixed use of CTE and MRE was inferior to MRE alone in terms of inter-reader reliability and could probably be less accurate than MRE alone for routine monitoring of small bowel inflammation in patients with CD. Therefore, the consistent use of MRE is favored for this purpose.

Tailored versus fixed scan delay in contrast-enhanced abdominal multi-detector CT: An intra-patient comparison of image quality

PURPOSE

To perform anintra-patient comparison betweena single-pass protocol (SP) and a portal venous phase (PVP) by means ofboth quantitative and qualitative analysis of image quality.

METHODS

Forty patients (31 M; 9F; aged 20-77 years; BMI 23 ± 4 Kg/m²) underwent both a SP and a PVP using a 64-rows multi-detector CT with a median interval time of 56 days (range5-903). All patients underwent i.v. bolus injection (2.0 cc/sec) of 1.7 cc/Kg of a non ionic iodinated contrast-media (370 mgI/ml) with scan delays of 67 ± 8 and 90 s for the SP and the PVP, respectively. Signal- (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were calculated for most visceral organs and for both abdominal aorta (AA) and main portal vein (MPV). For qualitative analysis, reproduction of abdominal viscera and vascular structures was blindly evaluated and inter-observer agreement calculated by the weighted Cohen k-analysis.

RESULTS

Attenuation values (H.U.) of AA (232 ± 53vs180 ± 36) and MPV (215 ± 39vs187 ± 42) were significantly (p < 0.001) higher in the SP than in PVP, respectively. At qualitative analysis, reproduction of mostabdominal viscerawas also significantly sharper (p < 0.001) with the SP than the PVPwith inter-observer agreement scores (k)ranging from 0.60 to 0.88 for all but one imaging criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

As the SP resulted in a significantly higher vascular enhancement and in a sharper reproduction of most abdominal viscera, it may be better suited than a PVP for the CT evaluation of non traumatic acute abdomen.

Multi-detector CT enterography in active inflammatory bowel disease: Image quality and diagnostic efficacy of a low-radiation high contrast protocol

PURPOSE

To prospectively evaluate image quality and diagnostic efficacy of a low radiation-high contrast (LR-HC) CT Enterography (CTE) in active Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty-five (36M; 49F; 17-75 yrs) patients with active IBD underwent contrast-enhanced CTE and were stratified in two groups according to age (< or ≥45 yrs): Group A (N = 45; 32 ± 9 yrs; 58 ± 10 kg) and Group B (N = 40; 58 ± 10 yrs; 61 ± 13 kg). Each group received a different amount of radiation (Noise Index, NI) and non-ionic iodinated contrast media (LOCM) as follows: Group A (NI = 15; 2.5 ml/kg) and Group B (NI = 12.5; 2 ml/kg). Thyroid functional tests were performed in all patients of group A at 4-6 wks. Signal- and contrast-to-noise ratios were calculated for liver (L) and abdominal aorta (A). Statistical analysis was performed by Student's t- or Chi-square test for continuous and categorical data, respectively.

RESULTS

No patient of Group A developed signs of thyrotoxicosis. SNR_L, CNR_L and diagnostic accuracy of CTE were 8.4 ± 1.7 vs 8.9 ± 2.1 (p = 0.256), 5.4 ± 1.5 vs 5.6 ± 1.7 (p = 0.486) and 91.1 vs 92.5% (p = 0.764) whereas the effective dose and the LOCM administered were 6.7 ± 2.2 vs 13.9 ± 6.0 mSv (p < 0.001) and 144 ± 25 vs 122 ± 25 ml (p < 0.001) for Group A and B, respectively.

CONCLUSION

LR-HC CTE is a dose-effective protocol in the evaluation of active IBD in young patients.

Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Small Bowel Enterography: Current Status and Future Trends Focusing on Crohn's Disease

Computed tomography enterography (CTE) and magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) are presently state-of-the-art radiologic tests used to examine the small bowel for various indications. This article focuses on CTE and MRE for the evaluation of Crohn disease. The article describes recent efforts to achieve more standardized interpretation of CTE and MRE, summarizes recent research studies investigating the role and impact of CTE and MRE more directly for several different clinical and research issues beyond general diagnostic accuracy, and provides an update on progress in imaging techniques. Also addressed are areas that need further exploration in the future.

Diagnostic Performance and Dose Comparison of Filtered Back Projection and Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction Three-dimensional CT Enterography in Children and Young Adults

PURPOSE

To investigate diagnostic performance and radiation dose with the use of computed tomographic (CT) enterography in children and young adults and to compare reconstruction with filtered back projection (FBP) to that with adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR) with three-dimensional (3D) processing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective investigation was HIPAA compliant and approved by the institutional review board. Informed consent was waived. CT enterographic examinations performed between October 2008 and June 2009 with FBP and between August 2012 and April 2014 with AIDR 3D in patients who had received histologic evaluation within 45 days of imaging were included. Two reviewers retrospectively and independently evaluated the studies for findings of active inflammation, and diagnostic performance and interreader reliability were assessed. The reference standard was histologic findings. Objective and subjective image quality also was assessed. The size-specific dose estimate was compared between the two groups. Two-sample t tests or analysis of variance tests were performed to assess for differences in diagnostic accuracy, image quality, and radiation dose between the FBP and AIDR 3D examinations.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were included in the FBP group (mean age, 14.1 years; range, 8-21 years) and 68 patients were in the AIDR 3D group (mean age, 13.2 years; range, 2-29 years). Sensitivity and specificity for detection of active inflammation were 96% (26 of 27) and 96% (22 of 23), respectively, for the FBP group and 90% (45 of 50) and 89% (16 of 18), respectively, for the AIDR 3D group. Dichotomous interreader reliability (κ) for the entire group was 0.86. The mean size-specific dose estimate for all weights was significantly lower for the AIDR 3D group (6.1 mGy ± 2.1) than that for the FBP group (16.7 mGy ± 5.2; P < .0001). No significant difference was found in objective image noise for soft-tissue structures (P = .2-.8).

CONCLUSION

CT enterography is highly accurate for detection of active inflammation in pediatric patients and has excellent interreader reliability. Reduced-dose CT enterography with AIDR 3D allowed substantial dose reduction compared with that used with FBP CT enterographic examinations, while maintaining a high diagnostic performance.