1
|
Rudolph MM, Baur ADJ, Haas M, Cash H, Miller K, Mahjoub S, Hartenstein A, Kaufmann D, Rotzinger R, Lee CH, Asbach P, Hamm B, Penzkofer T. Validation of the PI-RADS language: predictive values of PI-RADS lexicon descriptors for detection of prostate cancer. Eur Radiol 2020; 30:4262-4271. [PMID: 32219507 PMCID: PMC7338829 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-06773-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2019] [Revised: 01/22/2020] [Accepted: 02/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the discriminatory power of lexicon terms used in PI-RADS version 2 to describe MRI features of prostate lesions. METHODS Four hundred fifty-four patients were included in this retrospective, institutional review board-approved study. Patients received multiparametric (mp) MRI and subsequent prostate biopsy including MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy and 10-core systematic biopsy. PI-RADS lexicon terms describing lesion characteristics on mpMRI were assigned to lesions by experienced readers. Positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) of each lexicon term were assessed using biopsy results as a reference standard. RESULTS From a total of 501 lesions, clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) was present in 175 lesions (34.9%). Terms related to findings of restricted diffusion showed PPVs of up to 52.0%/43.9% and NPV of up to 91.8%/89.7% (peripheral zone or PZ/transition zone or TZ). T2-weighted imaging (T2W)-related terms showed a wide range of predictive values. For PZ lesions, high PPVs were found for "markedly hypointense," "lenticular," "lobulated," and "spiculated" (PPVs between 67.2 and 56.7%). For TZ lesions, high PPVs were found for "water-drop-shaped" and "erased charcoal sign" (78.6% and 61.0%). The terms "encapsulated," "organized chaos," and "linear" showed to be good predictors for benignity with distinctively low PPVs between 5.4 and 6.9%. Most T2WI-related terms showed improved predictive values for TZ lesions when combined with DWI-related findings. CONCLUSIONS Lexicon terms with high discriminatory power were identified (e.g., "markedly hypointense," "water-drop-shaped," "organized chaos"). DWI-related terms can be useful for excluding TZ cancer. Combining T2WI- with DWI findings in TZ lesions markedly improved predictive values. KEY POINTS • Lexicon terms describing morphological and functional features of prostate lesions on MRI show a wide range of predictive values for prostate cancer. • Some T2-related terms have favorable PPVs, e.g., "water-drop-shaped" and "organized chaos" while others show less distinctive predictive values. DWI-related terms have noticeable negative predictive values in TZ lesions making DWI feature a useful tool for exclusion of TZ cancer. • Combining DWI- and T2-related lexicon terms for assessment of TZ lesions markedly improves PPVs. Most T2-related lexicon terms showed a significant decrease in PPV when combined with negative findings for "DW hyperintensity."
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madhuri M Rudolph
- Department of Radiology, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Alexander D J Baur
- Department of Radiology, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Matthias Haas
- Department of Radiology, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Hannes Cash
- Department of Urology, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kurt Miller
- Department of Urology, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Samy Mahjoub
- Department of Radiology, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Urology, Universität zu Köln, Uniklinik Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Germany
| | - Alexander Hartenstein
- Department of Radiology, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - David Kaufmann
- Department of Radiology, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Roman Rotzinger
- Department of Radiology, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Chau Hung Lee
- Department of Radiology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Patrick Asbach
- Department of Radiology, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bernd Hamm
- Department of Radiology, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tobias Penzkofer
- Department of Radiology, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Anna-Louisa-Karsch-Str. 2, 10178, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhu C, Hou X, Zhu J, Jiang C, Wei W. Expression of miR-30c and miR-29b in prostate cancer and its diagnostic significance. Oncol Lett 2018; 16:3140-3144. [PMID: 30127906 PMCID: PMC6096223 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.9007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2018] [Accepted: 06/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the expression of miR-30c and miR-29b in prostate cancer (PCa) and its clinical significance. The expression of miR-30c and miR-29b was detected by RT-qPCR in 187 cases of PCa and their adjacent tissues. Combined with clinical information, the correlation between the expression of miR-29b and miR-30c and the clinical features of PCa was analyzed, and ROC curve was plotted. The expression of miR-30c and miR-29b detected by RT-qPCR showed that the expression of miR-29b and miR-30c in PCa tissues was significantly lower than that in adjacent cancerous tissues (p<0.05). By comparing the expression and clinical data of miR-29b and miR-30c in the cancer tissues of PCa patients, it was observed that age, smoking, and TNM staging were not related to miR-29b and miR-30c expression (p>0.05), while lymph node metastasis, bone metastasis, and Gleason score were related to the expression of miR-29b and miR-30c (p<0.01). The ROC curve showed that miR-29b AUC, 0.924; 95% CI, 0.824–0.967, and miR-30c AUC, 0.944; 95% CI, 0.798–0.972. miR-30c and miR-29b are clinically relevant to PCa. In conclusion, detecting the expression of miR-30c and miR-29b not only can differentiate between PCa and paracancerous tissues, but it is also anticipated to become a new biomarker for the diagnosis of PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chuanan Zhu
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Jining First People's Hospital, Jining, Shandong 272000, P.R. China
| | - Xiumei Hou
- Nursing Department, Jining Psychiatric Hospital, Jining, Shandong 272051, P.R. China
| | - Jiabin Zhu
- Department of Neurology, The General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia 750000, P.R. China
| | - Chunxiao Jiang
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Jining First People's Hospital, Jining, Shandong 272000, P.R. China
| | - Wei Wei
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Jining First People's Hospital, Jining, Shandong 272000, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schieda N, Lim CS, Idris M, Lim RS, Morash C, Breau RH, Flood TA, McInnes MDF. MRI assessment of pathological stage and surgical margins in anterior prostate cancer (APC) using subjective and quantitative analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2016; 45:1296-1303. [PMID: 27726247 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2016] [Accepted: 09/26/2016] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for assessment of extraprostatic extension (EPE) and positive surgical margins (PSM) in anterior prostate cancer (APC). MATERIALS AND METHODS With Institutional Review Board approval, 25 APC (>2/3 of tumor anterior to urethra) were assessed using 3T MRI by two blinded radiologists for: size and maximal leading edge of tumor (relative to anterior fibromuscular stroma [AFMS]) on b ≥1000 sec/mm2 echo-planar-MRI fused onto T2 -weighted-MRI, invasion of AFMS and EPE. Comparisons were performed between APCs by EPE/PSM using chi-square, multivariable analysis, and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS The prevalence of EPE and PSM were 52% (13/25) and 36% (9/25). Tumor sizes were larger with EPE (22.5 ± 8.4 vs. 14.7 ± 6.3, P = 0.02) and PSM (23.0 ± 9.3 vs. 16.4 ± 7.0, P = 0.06). Area under ROC curve (AUC-ROC) for the diagnosis of EPE by tumor size was 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58-0.95); ≥16 mm size = sensitivity/specificity 69.2/66.7%. Maximal leading edge of tumor was greater with EPE (2.4 ± 2.2 vs. -0.2 ± 3.0) and PSM (2.8 ± 2.3 vs. -0.3 ± 2.5), (P = 0.023, 0.031). AUC-ROC for diagnosis of EPE/PSM by leading edge was 0.78 (CI 0.57-0.97) and 0.75 (CI 0.56-0.94). A ≥1 mm leading edge yielded sensitivity/specificity of 76.9/75.0% and 77.8/62.5% for diagnosis of EPE/PSM. 60-72% (15-18/25) tumors invaded AFMS (k = 0.74), which was not associated with EPE/PSM (P = 0.12-0.14). Radiologists' assessment of EPE had sensitivity/specificity of 61.5-69.2/50.0-75.0% (k = 0.53). CONCLUSION Tumor size and leading edge of tumor relative to AFMS may enable diagnosis of EPE and positive surgical margins in APC. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2 J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2017;45:1296-1303.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Schieda
- Department of Medical Imaging, Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christopher S Lim
- Department of Medical Imaging, Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Muhammad Idris
- Department of Medical Imaging, Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robert S Lim
- Department of Medical Imaging, Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christopher Morash
- Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rodney H Breau
- Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Trevor A Flood
- Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Department of Anatomical Pathology, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthew D F McInnes
- Department of Medical Imaging, Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|