Erratum to: Identifying decreased peristalsis of abnormal small bowel segments in Crohn’s disease using cine MR enterography: the frozen bowel sign

Small Bowel Imaging from Stepchild of Roentgenology to MR Enterography: Part I: Guidance in Performing and Observing Normal and Abnormal Imaging Findings

MRE has become a standard imaging test for evaluating patients with small bowel pathology, but the indications, interpretation of imaging findings, methodology, and appropriate use must be standardized and widely known. Several signs of small bowel damage in inflammatory and non-inflammatory small bowel pathology include strictures, abscess, inflammatory activity, sinus tract, wall edema, fistula, mucosal lesions, and mesentery fat hypertrophy, all of which are widely and accurately explained by MRE. MRE is a non-invasive modality that accurately assesses the intra-luminal, parietal, and extra-luminal small bowel. The differential MRE appearance allows us to distinguish between different small bowel pathologies, such as neoplastic and non-neoplastic small bowel diseases. The purpose of this paper is to present the MRE technique, as well as the interpretation of imaging findings, through the approach of a rigorous stepwise methodology.

Role of abbreviated non-contrast-enhanced MR-enterography in the evaluation of Crohn's disease activity and complications as an alternative for full protocol contrast-enhanced study: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic disorder that often starts at a young age and involves periods of remission and relapse. Prompt diagnosis of relapses through screening is crucial due to the potential morbid complications of untreated active inflammation. Magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) is a noninvasive technique to screen for active inflammation. The standard protocol involves intravenous injection of contrast agents with potential side effects. Some abbreviated non-contrast-enhanced MRE protocols are proposed as alternatives for conventional MRE to identify active inflammation. Currently, there is controversy regarding the applicability and accuracy of these protocols. This study aims to describe and compare these protocols and evaluate their accuracy in detecting active inflammation and CD complications.

Methods

Results from a systematic search of three databases in August 2022 were queried and screened by abstract and full text. Eligible studies were qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed by diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis.

Results

59 studies entered the systematic review, and 37 were eligible for meta-analysis. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and fast T2-weighted (T2w) sequences were most frequently used in abbreviated protocols and showed non-inferior accuracy compared to the full protocol in detecting active inflammation. ADC and qualitative DWI had pooled sensitivity of 90% (CI: 82-95%) and 89% (CI:82-93%) and pooled specificity of 94% (CI: 88-97%) and 89% (CI: 79-94%), respectively for detecting active inflammation. Moreover, T2w and combined T2w+DWI sequences had pooled sensitivity of 80% (CI: 64-90%) and 76% (CI: 61-86%) and pooled specificity of 90% (CI: 80-95%) and 87% (CI: 74 - 94%), respectively. Unenhanced protocols show relatively poor diagnostic accuracy in detecting penetrating complications of CD. Magnetization transfer imaging (MTI) has demonstrated excellent accuracy in detecting fibrosis. High heterogeneity was observed in all subgroups, and accuracy was reported to be highly operator dependent in most studies.

Conclusion

An abbreviated protocol consisting of DWI and fast T2w imaging can potentially replace the full protocol MRE. Full protocol MRE will still have its role in identifying penetrating complications. MTI should be indicated in case of suspected fibrostenotic disease.

Detecting the effects of a standardized meal challenge on small bowel motility with MRI in prepared and unprepared bowel

OBJECTIVE

MRI is increasingly used to evaluate small bowel contractility. The objective of this study was to validate a clinically practical stimulation test (300-kcal meal) for small bowel motility.

METHODS

Thirty-one healthy subjects underwent dynamic MRI to capture global small bowel motility after ±10h fasting, of which 15 underwent bowel preparation consisting of 1 L 2.5% mannitol solution and 16 did not. Each subject underwent (1) a baseline motility scan (2) a food challenge (3) a post-challenge scan, and (4) second post-challenge scan (after ±20 minutes). This protocol was repeated within 2 weeks. Motility was quantified using a validated motility assessment technique.

KEY RESULTS

Motility in prepared subjects at baseline was significantly higher than motility in unprepared subjects (0.36 AU vs 0.18 AU, P < 0.001). In the prepared group, the food challenge produced an 8% increase in motility (P = 0.33) while in the unprepared subjects a significant increase of 30% was observed (P < 0.001). Responses to food remained insignificant (P = 0.21) and significant (P = 0.003), for the prepared and unprepared subjects, respectively, ±20 minutes post food challenge. These results were confirmed in the repeated scan session.

CONCLUSION & INFERENCES

A significant response to a 300-kcal meal was measured within 10 minutes in unprepared bowel, supporting the clinical use of this challenge to provoke and assess motility changes. A caloric challenge did not produce an observable increase in motility in mannitol prepared subjects.

Dynamic MRI for bowel motility imaging-how fast and how long?

Objective:

Dynamic imaging of small intestinal motility is an increasingly common research method to examine bowel physiology in health and disease. However, limited data exist to guide imaging protocols with respect to quantitative analysis. The purpose of this study is to define the required temporal resolution and scan duration in dynamic MRI for small bowel motility assessment.

Methods:

Six healthy volunteers underwent motility imaging with MR enterography using breath-hold protocol. A coronal two-dimensional balanced fast field echo sequence was used to acquire dynamic data at a high temporal resolution of 10 frames per second (fps). Motility was quantified by generating a registration-derived motility index for local and global regions of bowel. To evaluate temporal resolution and scan duration, the data were undersampled and the scan length was varied to determine the impact on motility index.

Results:

The mean motility index stabilizes at a temporal resolution of 1 fps (median absolute percentage change 1.4% for global and 1.9% for local regions of interest). The mean motility index appears to stabilize for scan durations of 15 s or more in breath-hold (median absolute % change 2.8% for global and 1.7% for local regions of interest).

Conclusion:

A temporal resolution of at least 1 fps and a scan duration of at least 15 s is necessary in breath-hold scans for consistent motility observations. The majority of small bowel motility studies to date are in line with these requirements.

Advances in knowledge:

This study suggests the minimum temporal resolution and scan duration required in breath-hold scans to obtain robust measurements of small bowel motility from MRI.

Evaluation of gastrointestinal motility with MRI: Advances, challenges and opportunities

Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of gastrointestinal motility has developed rapidly over the past few years. The non-invasive and non-ionizing character of MRI is an important advantage together with the fact that it is fast and can visualize the entire gastrointestinal tract. Advances in imaging and quantification techniques have facilitated assessment of gastric, small intestinal, and colonic motility in a clinical setting. Automated quantitative motility assessment using dynamic MRI meets the need for non-invasive techniques. Recently, studies have begun to examine this technique in patients, including those with IBD, pseudo-obstruction and functional bowel disorders. Remaining challenges for clinical implementation are processing the large amount of data, standardization and validation of the numerous MRI metrics and subsequently assessment of the potential role of dynamic MRI. This review examines the methods, advances, and remaining challenges of evaluation of gastrointestinal motility with MRI. It accompanies an article by Khalaf et al. in this journal that describes a new protocol for assessment of pan-intestinal motility in fasted and fed state in a single MRI session.