Management of Patients With Common Bile Duct Dilatation Without a Sonographic Evident Cause: Evaluating the Yield of Subsequent Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Findings Correlated With Causative Pancreaticobiliary Pathology.
J Comput Assist Tomogr 2022;
46:163-168. [PMID:
35297572 DOI:
10.1097/rct.0000000000001277]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
The aims of the study were to evaluate the yield of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with common bile duct (CBD) dilatation without a sonographic evident cause and to investigate sonographic and laboratory findings at presentation that might predict identification of underlying pancreaticobiliary pathology.
METHODS
Included were consecutive patients in whom MRI was performed for further evaluation of CBD dilatation detected on ultrasound (US), without a sonographic evident cause, from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2014. Magnetic resonance imaging and clinical data were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups: patients with and without identified underlying causative pancreaticobiliary pathology. Ultrasound findings and laboratory results at presentation were compared between groups to identify findings suggestive of underlying pancreaticobiliary pathology.
RESULTS
Fifty-seven patients, with a mean age of 54 ± 16 years including 37 females (65%), underwent MRI. Specific pancreaticobiliary causes for CBD dilatation were identified in 38 patients (66%, 31 benign and 7 malignant). In the remaining patients, no cause was identified in 17 (30%) and MRIs were nondiagnostic in 2 patients. Magnetic resonance imaging accuracy for correctly identifying the underlying cause of CBD dilatation was 91%. Patients with associated intrahepatic bile duct dilatation on US and elevated alanine aminotransferase and alkaline phosphatase were more likely to have underlying pancreaticobiliary pathology (P < 0 .05). No patient with initial negative MRI had pancreaticobiliary malignancy.
CONCLUSIONS
Magnetic resonance imaging seems to be an accurate noninvasive method for identifying the underlying cause in most patients with CBD dilatation on US and in excluding pancreaticobiliary malignancy. Patients with associated intrahepatic bile duct dilatation and/or elevated liver enzymes are at higher risk of harboring underlying pancreaticobiliary pathology.
Collapse