1
|
Bampton TJ, Chen JW, Brown A, Barnett MI, Coates PT, Palmer LJ. Epidemiology and burden of adult chronic pancreatitis in South Australia: a 20-year data linkage study. BMJ Open 2025; 15:e089297. [PMID: 40050052 PMCID: PMC11887304 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2024] [Accepted: 01/24/2025] [Indexed: 03/09/2025] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the epidemiology and burden of adult-onset chronic pancreatitis (CP) in South Australia. DESIGN Retrospective case-control study; data linkage. SETTING All public adult hospitals in SA. PARTICIPANTS Administrative data linkage from South Australia-Northern Territory DataLink was used to ascertain an index cohort of all adults with an initial diagnosis of CP aged >19 years between June 2000 and June 2019. Age- and sex-matched controls were drawn from the general population of SA, adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus and adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (defined by International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision coding). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Hospital visits, days in hospital, emergency department visits, intensive care unit admissions, incidence, prevalence. RESULTS A total of 2503 incident index cases with CP were identified. The crude prevalence and incidence were estimated as 195.1 per 100 000 and 10.4 per 100 000 per annum, respectively. Cases of CP averaged more hospital visits for any reason (median 11, IQR 5 to 21.75) than the general population (median 1, IQR 0 to 4) and had a higher healthcare burden than controls with type 1 diabetes or type 2 diabetes (all p<0.001). Indigenous individuals were over-represented in the cohort (n=358; 14.8% vs 1.5% of the general population) and had higher healthcare utilisation than other patients with CP (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS CP is a significant burden on the SA healthcare system and was more prevalent and more burdensome in Indigenous adults. CP consumes a disproportionate level of public health services. Our findings support further research and preventive efforts, particularly in the Indigenous population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tristan J Bampton
- School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - John W Chen
- Department of Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, Australia
| | - Alex Brown
- Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Meghan I Barnett
- School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - P Toby Coates
- Central Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Service, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Lyle John Palmer
- School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nathan JD, Yang Y, Eaton A, Witkowski P, Wijkstrom M, Walsh M, Trikudanathan G, Singh VK, Schwarzenberg SJ, Pruett TL, Posselt A, Naziruddin B, Mokshagundam SP, Morgan K, Lara LF, Kirchner V, He J, Gardner TB, Freeman ML, Ellery K, Conwell DL, Chinnakotla S, Beilman GJ, Ahmad S, Abu-El-Haija M, Hodges JS, Bellin MD. Surgical approach and short-term outcomes in adults and children undergoing total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation: A report from the Prospective Observational Study of TPIAT. Pancreatology 2022; 22:1-8. [PMID: 34620552 PMCID: PMC8748311 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2021.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Revised: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (TPIAT) is a viable option for treating debilitating recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP) and chronic pancreatitis (CP) in adults and children. No data is currently available regarding variation in approach to operation. METHODS We evaluated surgical techniques, islet isolation and infusion approaches, and outcomes and complications, comparing children (n = 84) with adults (n = 195) enrolled between January 2017 and April 2020 by 11 centers in the United States in the Prospective Observational Study of TPIAT (POST), which was launched in 2017 to collect standard history and outcomes data from patients undergoing TPIAT for RAP or CP. RESULTS Children more commonly underwent splenectomy (100% versus 91%, p = 0.002), pylorus preservation (93% versus 67%; p < 0.0001), Roux-en-Y duodenojejunostomy reconstruction (92% versus 35%; p < 0.0001), and enteral feeding tube placement (93% versus 63%; p < 0.0001). Median islet equivalents/kg transplanted was higher in children (4577; IQR 2816-6517) than adults (2909; IQR 1555-4479; p < 0.0001), with COBE purification less common in children (4% versus 15%; p = 0.0068). Median length of hospital stay was higher in children (15 days; IQR 14-22 versus 11 days; IQR 8-14; p < 0.0001), but 30-day readmissions were lower in children (13% versus 26%, p = 0.018). Rate of portal vein thrombosis was significantly lower in children than in adults (2% versus 10%, p = 0.028). There were no mortalities in the first 90 days post-TPIAT. CONCLUSIONS Pancreatectomy techniques differ between children and adults, with islet yields higher in children. The rates of portal vein thrombosis and early readmission are lower in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaimie D. Nathan
- Division of Pediatric General and Thoracic Surgery, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH,Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Yi Yang
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Anne Eaton
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | | | - Martin Wijkstrom
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Guru Trikudanathan
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis MN
| | - Vikesh K. Singh
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Timothy L. Pruett
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Andrew Posselt
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | - Katherine Morgan
- Department of Surgery, The Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Luis F. Lara
- Department of Medicine, The Ohio State Wexner University Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Varvara Kirchner
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Martin L. Freeman
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis MN
| | - Kate Ellery
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Darwin L. Conwell
- Department of Medicine, The Ohio State Wexner University Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Srinath Chinnakotla
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN,Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Gregory J. Beilman
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Syed Ahmad
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Maisam Abu-El-Haija
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH,Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | - James S. Hodges
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Melena D. Bellin
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN,Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mendieta PJO, Sagae VMT, Ribeiro IB, de Moura DTH, Scatimburgo MVCV, Hirsch BS, Rocha RSDP, Visconti TADC, Sánchez-Luna SA, Bernardo WM, de Moura EGH. Pain relief in chronic pancreatitis: endoscopic or surgical treatment? a systematic review with meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2021; 35:4085-4094. [PMID: 33948714 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08515-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2020] [Accepted: 04/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Pain is one of the consequences of chronic pancreatitis (CP) that has the greatest impact on the quality of life of patients. Endoscopic and surgical interventions, by producing a decrease in intraductal pancreatic pressure, can provide pain relief. This is the first systematic review that includes only randomized clinical trials (RTCs) comparing outcomes in the short-term (less than 2 years) and long-term (more than 2 years) between these two types of interventions. MATERIAL AND METHODS A comprehensive search of multiple electronic databases to identify RTCs comparing short and long-term pain relief, procedural complications, and days of hospitalization between endoscopic and surgical interventions was performed following the PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS Three RCTs evaluating a total of 199 patients (99 in the endoscopy group and 100 in the surgery group) were included in this study. Surgical interventions provided complete pain relief, with statistical difference, in the long-term (16,4% vs 35.7%; RD 0.19; 95% CI 0.03-0.35; p = 0.02; I2 = 0%), without significant difference in short-term (17.5% vs 31.2%; RD 0.14; 95% CI -0.01-0.28; p = 0.07; I2 = 0%) when compared to endoscopy. There was no statistical difference in short-term (17.5% vs 28.1%; RD 0.11; 95% CI -0.04-0.25; p = 0.15; I2 = 0%) and long-term (34% vs 41.1%; RD 0.07; 95% CI -0.10-0.24; p = 0.42; I2 0%) in partial relief of pain between both interventions. In the short-term, both complications (34.9% vs 29.7%; RD 0.05; 95% CI -0.10-0.21; p = 0.50; I2 = 48%) and days of hospitalization (MD -1.02; 95% CI -2.61-0.58; p = 0.21; I2 = 0%) showed no significant differences. CONCLUSION Surgical interventions showed superior results when compared to endoscopy in terms of complete long-term pain relief. The number of complications and length of hospitalization in both groups were similar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pastor Joaquín Ortiz Mendieta
- Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal do Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Vitor Massaro Takamatsu Sagae
- Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal do Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Igor Braga Ribeiro
- Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal do Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
| | - Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura
- Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal do Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Maria Vitória Cury Vieira Scatimburgo
- Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal do Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Bruno Salomao Hirsch
- Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal do Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Rodrigo Silva de Paula Rocha
- Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal do Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Thiago Arantes de Carvalho Visconti
- Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal do Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Sergio A Sánchez-Luna
- Center for Advanced Endoscopy, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Basil I. Hirschowitz Endoscopic Center of Excellence, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham,, Alabama, USA
| | - Wanderley Marques Bernardo
- Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal do Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura
- Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal do Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Atypical Hepatic Steatosis Patterns on MRI After Total Pancreatectomy With Islet Autotransplant. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2021; 217:100-106. [PMID: 33909467 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.20.23303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the prevalence and patterns of hepatic steatosis after total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplant (TPIAT) and to determine if the unique patterns of steatosis seen in this study correlated with islet graft function. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Fifty-two subjects who had undergone MRI after TPIAT were reviewed for the presence of hepatic steatosis. Patterns of steatosis were categorized into three groups: normal (no steatosis), homogeneous, and atypical. Demographics and outcomes were compared between the groups. Islet graft function 1 year after surgery was classified as full graft function, partial graft function, and graft failure. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, and Fisher exact tests. RESULTS. Sixty-three percent of patients had steatosis present on MRI after TPIAT (33 subjects of 52 total), and 48% (25/52) exhibited an atypical pattern. Twenty-four percent of the 37 patients who had MRI examinations before TPIAT showed steatosis preoperatively, yet none of these showed an atypical steatosis pattern. Islet graft function was not statistically different between the groups. The only statistically significant variable difference between the groups was body mass index (p = .02). CONCLUSION. Steatosis is a common finding after TPIAT, and atypical steatosis patterns frequently develop after the procedure, implying that the procedure itself is the causal factor. There was no correlation between islet graft function and the presence or pattern of steatosis. An atypical pattern of hepatic steatosis can therefore be considered an incidental finding after TPIAT and does not require additional workup or treatment.
Collapse
|
5
|
Shanbhogue KP, Pourvaziri A, Jeyaraj SK, Kambadakone A. Endoscopic and surgical treatment options for chronic pancreatitis: an imaging perspective. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2020; 45:1397-1409. [PMID: 31707437 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-02249-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Chronic pancreatitis is a chronic fibro-inflammatory syndrome characterized by chronic pancreatic inflammation leading to fibrosis and scarring. Patients with this multifactorial debilitating illness often require endoscopic or surgical intervention for treatment. Radiologists play a crucial role in pre-therapeutic workup as well as post-treatment imaging of chronic pancreatitis. This review summarizes the most common surgical and endoscopic treatment options that are currently available for chronic pancreatitis, including the implications on imaging.
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Multidisciplinary collaboration (MDC) has been widely adopted in healthcare to optimize patient care. MDC brings several specialized healthcare providers to the table using several methods, including multidisciplinary meetings (MDMs), multidisciplinary clinics, teleconferences, and online multidisciplinary expert panels, to reach the goal of achieving the best diagnosis and treatment plan for complex diseases. Diagnosis and management of acute/chronic pancreatitis is complex which necessitates the development and utilization of MDC. The key members of pancreatitis MDM include gastroenterologists, radiologists, pathologists, hepatobiliary surgeons, chairperson, and a coordinator. After selection of admitted or referred patients, the availability of required information is reviewed, and then each case is discussed. The final diagnosis and treatment plan is confirmed by consensus, especially for complex cases that require endoscopic intervention or pancreatectomy and patients with the possibility of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. It has been shown that MDMs have improved the clinical outcome of patients with acute/chronic pancreatitis. In addition to MDM, the feasibility of multidisciplinary clinics, teleconferences, and online multidisciplinary expert panels for the management of pancreatic disorders has been investigated. Understanding structure, potential advantages, and limitations of MDC will help clinicians and healthcare systems in developing an optimized MDC to improve the management of acute/chronic pancreatitis. This narrative review summarized prior recommendations and explored the impact of MDC on clinical outcomes of patients with pancreatitis. Our recommendations offer a generalizable method that can be utilized by healthcare systems.
Collapse
|
7
|
Interobserver agreement of computed tomography reporting standards for chronic pancreatitis. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2019; 44:2459-2465. [PMID: 30955070 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-01979-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIM To assess the interobserver agreement of computed tomography (CT) reporting standards for chronic pancreatitis (CP). SUBJECTS AND METHODS Retrospective analysis of CT of 47 patients (33 males and 11 females, age range 36 to 56 years) with CP who presented with abdominal pain (n = 41), steatorrhea (n = 37), and glucose intolerance (n = 31). The patients underwent CT study using a 16-multidetector CT scanner with a pancreatic protocol including a nonenhanced scan followed by pancreatic phase at 35 s and portal venous phase at 65 s after intravenous injection of nonionic contrast medium. Image analysis was performed by two radiologists according to reporting standards for CP. RESULTS There was excellent interobserver agreement (84.8 %) between the two reviewers in CT reporting standards for CP (K = 0.80, 95 % CI 0.75-0.85, P = 0.001). There was good interobserver agreement for pancreatic duct (PD) caliber (K = 0.71, 95 % CI 0.56-0.87, P = 0.001), PD contour (K = 0.76, 95 % CI 0.61-0.91, P = 0.001), PD stricture (K = 0.070, 95 % CI 0.53-0.88, P = 0.001), and distribution of findings (K = 0.69, 95 % CI 0.51-0.86, P = 0.001). There was excellent interobserver agreement for intraductal calculi (K = 0.84, 95 % CI 0.68-0.98, P = 0.001), pancreatic calcifications (K = 0.86, 95 % CI 0.84-0.98, P = 0.001), and pancreatic diameter (K = 0.87, 95 % CI 0.75-0.99, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION CT reporting standards for CP is a reliable method for diagnosis of patients with CP.
Collapse
|
8
|
Bieliuniene E, Frøkjær JB, Pockevicius A, Kemesiene J, Lukosevicius S, Basevicius A, Barauskas G, Dambrauskas Z, Gulbinas A. Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Valid Noninvasive Tool for the Assessment of Pancreatic Fibrosis. Pancreas 2019; 48:85-93. [PMID: 30451794 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000001206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the noninvasive assessment of pancreatic fibrosis (PF). METHODS Fifty-two patients who underwent surgical resection of the pancreas, histological examination of resection margins, preoperative abdominal MRI, and fecal elastase-1 test were enrolled in the study. Pancreatic tissue was identified on the MRI T1-, T2-, and diffusion-weighted imaging sequences. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was measured at the expected resection margin of the pancreas. RESULTS There was a significant negative correlation between the ADC mean and histologically determined PF (r = -0.752, P = 0.001). For equal to or greater than 25% of PF, the ADC cutoff value was 1.331 or less, with a sensitivity of 77% and specificity of 88%. The unenhanced T1-weighted signal intensity ratio (T1SI) cutoff value was 172.1 or less. For equal to or greater than 50% of PF, the ADC cutoff value was 1.316 or less with a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 88%. The highest sensitivity was obtained by combining ADC and T1SI values. CONCLUSIONS Combining both the ADC and T1SI measurement allows the detection of early PF with good sensitivity and specificity. Magnetic resonance imaging has the advantage of being noninvasive and widely used in the clinical setting, thus making our results easily transferable to routine clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edita Bieliuniene
- Department of Radiology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Jens Brøndum Frøkjær
- Department of Radiology, Aalborg University Hospital
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | | | - Jurate Kemesiene
- Department of Radiology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Saulius Lukosevicius
- Department of Radiology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Algidas Basevicius
- Department of Radiology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Giedrius Barauskas
- Department of Surgery, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Zilvinas Dambrauskas
- Department of Surgery, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Antanas Gulbinas
- Department of Surgery, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| |
Collapse
|