Prevalence of hepatic lesion types defined by T2-weighted and dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging in patients with metastasized neuroendocrine tumors

Small bowel neuroendocrine tumours - casting the net wide

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Our aim is to provide an overview of small bowel neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), clinical presentation, diagnosis algorithm and management options. We also highlight the latest evidence on management and suggest areas for future research.

RECENT FINDINGS

Dodecanetetraacetic acid (DOTATATE) scan can detect NETs with an improved sensitivity than when compared with an Octreotide scan. It is complimentary to small bowel endoscopy that provides mucosal views and allows the delineation of small lesions undetectable on imaging. Surgical resection is the best management modality even in metastatic disease. Prognosis can be improved with the administration of somatostatin analogues and Evarolimus as second-line therapies.

SUMMARY

NETs are heterogenous tumours affecting most commonly the distal small bowel as single or multiple lesions. Their secretary behaviour can lead to symptoms, most commonly diarrhoea and weight loss. Metastases to the liver are associated with carcinoid syndrome.

Iodine quantification to distinguish hepatic neuroendocrine tumor metastasis from hepatocellular carcinoma at dual-source dual-energy liver CT

PURPOSE

To investigate the value of third-generation dual-source dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) iodine quantification to distinguish hepatic neuroendocrine tumor (NET) metastasis from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in non-cirrhotic liver parenchyma.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty-six patients (mean age, 64.9 ± 10.1 years; 28 male and 18 female) with either hepatic NET metastasis or HCC, who had undergone liver DECT, were included in this retrospective study. For each lesion, arterial-phase attenuation values and DECT quantitative parameters, including iodine uptake, fat fraction, normalized iodine uptake (NIU), and lesion-to-liver-parenchyma ratio (LPR) were evaluated. Available cumulative data from histopathology, MRI, PET/CT, or interval imaging follow-up served as the reference standard for all liver lesions. In addition, the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced and material decomposition analysis for the differentiation of hepatic NET metastasis and HCC was assessed using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

Hepatic NET metastasis and HCC showed significant differences in arterial attenuation (P = 0.003), iodine uptake (P < 0.001), NIU (P < 0.001), and LPR (P = 0.003). No significant differences were found for unenhanced attenuation and fat fraction values (P = 0.686 and P = 0.892, respectively). NIU showed superior sensitivity (100%; iodine uptake, 71%), while both iodine uptake and NIU revealed superior specificity (100% and 90%, respectively) compared to LPR (sensitivity, 96%; specificity, 80%) and arterial attenuation analysis (sensitivity, 79%; specificity, 80%) (P ≤ 0.016).

CONCLUSION

Third-generation DECT with assessment of iodine uptake improves the differentiation of hepatic NET metastasis and HCC in non-cirrhotic liver, with NIU showing the strongest diagnostic performance.

The Surgical Management of Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors: Consensus Guidelines of the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society

Small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SBNETs) have been increasing in frequency over the past decades, and are now the most common type of small bowel tumor. Consequently, general surgeons and surgical oncologists are seeing more patients with SBNETs in their practices than ever before. The management of these patients is often complex, owing to their secretion of hormones, frequent presentation with advanced disease, and difficulties with making the diagnosis of SBNETs. Despite these issues, even patients with advanced disease can have long-term survival. There are a number of scenarios which commonly arise in SBNET patients where it is difficult to determine the optimal management from the published data. To address these challenges for clinicians, a consensus conference was held assembling experts in the field to review and discuss the available literature and patterns of practice pertaining to specific management issues. This paper summarizes the important elements from these studies and the recommendations of the group for these questions regarding the management of SBNET patients.