Abdominal manifestations of fishbone perforation: a pictorial essay

Case Report: Cholecystitis and gastric perforation caused by a fishbone and treated by laparoscopic surgery

Rare cases of swallowed fish bones leading to cholecystitis and gastric perforation have been reported. Here, we present the case of a 71-year-old male patient who experienced 10 days of right upper quadrant pain after eating fish. Laparoscopic repair of gastric perforation and cholecystectomy was performed and successfully removed a fishbone of 3 cm in length from the region between the gallbladder cavity and the gastric antrum. The patient was 10 days after surgery and recovered well. No sign of recurrence was observed at the 3-month follow-up.

Accidental Fish Bone Ingestion Leading to Gastric Perforation: A Diagnostic Challenge

Accidental ingestion of animal bones, including fish bones, often goes unnoticed and rarely leads to acute medical complications. However, in rare cases, fish bones can perforate the gastrointestinal tract, causing serious complications such as perforation, abscess formation, or fistula development, necessitating emergent surgical intervention. This case report describes a rare case of gastric perforation by a fish bone ingestion, complicated by perigastric and hepatic abscesses. The patient initially presented to a rural emergency department with acute abdominal pain, where limited imaging resources posed a diagnostic challenge. After repeated rural emergency department presentations, a definitive diagnosis was only established after the patient was transferred to a tertiary center and evaluated using computed tomography (CT) imaging. This helped to guide appropriate surgical management, and an emergency laparotomy was performed, which was followed by an uneventful recovery. We emphasize the critical role of CT imaging in diagnosing fish bone perforation, discuss common sites of perforation, and highlight the need to consider this pathology as a differential diagnosis in patients with undifferentiated abdominal pain.

Fishbone perforation of the stomach into the lesser sac and pancreas with abscess, a fishy business

Ingestion of foreign bodies is common in critical practice. Thankfully, most of these objects will pass without complications; however, sharp and metallic objects can cause severe complications like ulcers and perforation. Perforation of the gastrointestinal tract is rare; however, once it happens, prompt treatment is needed to prevent dreadful complications. We present the case of a 52-year-old patient who presented with abdominal pain and fever. A tomography detected a fishbone perforation of the stomach, which was in the lesser sac attached to the pancreas. After surgery, the patient successfully recovered.

Foreign body-intestinal canal angle guides management of ingested foreign bodies in the lower gastrointestinal tract

BACKGROUND

Determining whether prompt surgery is required for patient with ingested foreign bodies is clinically important.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the potential value of computed tomography (CT) in guiding the selection of surgical treatment for patients with ingested foreign bodies in the lower gastrointestinal tract.

METHODS

Between January 2014 and December 2023, we analyzed the data of 58 patients (median age: 65.4 years; range, 31-96 years) with ingested foreign bodies in the lower gastrointestinal tract who underwent CT examinations. Patients were treated either conservatively (35 cases) or surgically (23 cases). The angle between the long axis of the foreign body and the intestinal canal (FB-IC angle) was measured. CT findings and clinical variables were evaluated to identify potential indicators for surgical treatment through univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis revealed the FB-IC angle (P = 0.002), presence of free peritoneal gas (P = 0.002), white blood cell count (P = 0.018), and neutrophil count (P = 0.007) as significant factors associated with surgical treatment. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the FB-IC angle (odds ratio, 1.033; P = 0.045) and the presence of free peritoneal gas (odds ratio, 41.335; P = 0.002) are independent indicators for surgical management. The FB-IC angle showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.755, with a cutoff value of 51.25 degrees.

CONCLUSION

The FB-IC angle and presence of free peritoneal gas serve as potential predictive imaging markers for surgical intervention.

The role of radiology in diagnosing gastrointestinal tract perforation

Spontaneous, iatrogenic or surgical perforation of the whole gastrointestinal wall can lead to serious complications, resulting in increased morbidity and mortality. Optimal patient management requires early clinical appraisal and prompt imaging evaluation. Both radiologists and referring clinicians should recognize the importance of choosing the ideal imaging modality and the usefulness of oral and rectal contrast medium. Surgeons and radiologists should be familiar with CT and fluoroscopy findings of the normal and pathologic anatomy after esophageal, stomach or colon surgery. Specifically, they should be able to differentiate innocuous from clinically-relevant, life-threatening postoperative complications to guide appropriate treatment. Advantages of esophagram, CT-esophagram, CT after rectal contrast enema and other imaging modalities are discussed.

Imaging spectrum of non-neoplastic and neoplastic conditions of the duodenum: a pictorial review

Given its crucial location at the crossroads of the gastrointestinal tract, the hepatobiliary system and the splanchnic vessels, the duodenum can be affected by a wide spectrum of abnormalities. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, in conjunction with endoscopy, are often performed to evaluate these conditions, and several duodenal pathologies can be identified on fluoroscopic studies. Since many conditions affecting this organ are asymptomatic, the role of imaging cannot be overemphasized. In this article we will review the imaging features of many conditions affecting the duodenum, focusing on cross-sectional imaging studies, including congenital malformations, such as annular pancreas and intestinal malrotation; vascular pathologies, such as superior mesenteric artery syndrome; inflammatory and infectious conditions; trauma; neoplasms and iatrogenic complications. Because of the complexity of the duodenum, familiarity with the duodenal anatomy and physiology as well as the imaging features of the plethora of conditions affecting this organ is crucial to differentiate those conditions that could be managed medically from the ones that require intervention.

Misdiagnosis of food-borne foreign bodies outside of the digestive tract on magnetic resonance imaging: Two case reports

BACKGROUND

Patients with foreign bodies in the digestive tract are often encountered, but complete penetration of a foreign body through the gastrointestinal tract is rare, and the choice of imaging method is very important. Improper selection may lead to missed diagnosis or misdiagnosis.

CASE SUMMARY

An 81-year-old man was diagnosed as having a liver malignancy after he took magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (CT) examinations. The pain improved after the patient accepted gamma knife treatment. However, he was admitted to our hospital 2 mo later due to fever and abdominal pain. This time, he received a contrast-enhanced CT scan, which showed fish-boon-like foreign bodies in the liver with peripheral abscess formation, then he went to the superior hospital for surgery. It lasted for more than 2 mo from the onset of the disease to the surgical treatment. A 43-year-old woman with a 1 mo history of a perianal mass with no obvious pain or discomfort was diagnosed as having an anal fistula with the formation of a local small abscess cavity. Clinical perianal abscess surgery was performed, and fish bone foreign body was found in perianal soft tissue during the operation.

CONCLUSION

For patients with pain symptoms, the possibility of foreign body perforation should be considered. Magnetic resonance imaging is not comprehensive and that a plain computed tomography scan of the pain area is necessary.

A rare case of perforation of a colorectal tumor by a fish bone

The accidental ingestion of foreign bodies is a common clinical issue. While most foreign bodies pass through the gastrointestinal (GI) tract without complications, a few cases unfortunately result in GI perforation. Fish bones are one of the most frequent foreign bodies found in the GI tract, and they are high-risk objects for GI perforation due to their hard and sharp-pointed ends. Here, we present a rare case of a 64-year-old man with perforation of a colorectal tumor by a fish bone. The patient received emergency Hartmann's operation with lymph node dissection. Although the patient experienced recurrence in the liver rather than peritoneal dissemination, systemic chemotherapy was considerably effective, and conversion therapy with hepatectomy was successfully performed; the patient achieved 5-year relapse-free survival after the operation. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the perforation of a GI tumor by a fish bone. This rare case suggests the significant clinical implication that proper preoperative diagnosis and prompt surgical treatment lead to better postoperative outcomes for patients with tumor perforation by a foreign body.

A Case Report on Fish Bone Perforating Meckel’s Diverticulum Mimicking Appendicitis

Meckel’s diverticulum (MD) is the most frequent congenital abnormality of the digestive tract. Although it is silent, it can rarely come up as a complicated case including but not limited to obstruction, inflammation, and neoplasm. Perforation as a consequence of MD is extremely infrequent and mostly related to foreign objects. We report a case of a 24-year-old man who presented to the emergency department with signs and symptoms suggestive of acute appendicitis. Computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen demonstrated foreign body perforation from a protrusion outside the small bowel. The patient underwent laparoscopy and a fish bone perforating MD was found which was removed.

Abdominal CT manifestations in fish bone foreign body injuries: What the radiologist needs to know

Fish bone is one of the most common foreign body ingestions encountered in the emergency department. Fish bone perforations occur most commonly in segments with acute angulation like the ileocecal region and rectosigmoid junction and can present acutely with obstruction and free air or with chronic complications like abscess and sepsis. Radiologists should be familiar with the high-risk clinical scenarios, the CT appearance of radiopaque fishbones, and the spectrum of imaging findings related to gastrointestinal (GI) tract so as to direct management and timely referral to GI endoscopists and surgeons.

Gastric perforation by fish bone with hepatic abscess formation presenting as prolonged fever

A 70-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with a 3-week history of prolonged fever, asthenia and anorexia, denying other symptoms. Physical examination was unremarkable and the patient admitted for further investigation. Initial laboratory testing showed leucocytosis, elevated C-reactive protein and cholestasis, without hyperbilirubinemia or cytolysis. Abdominal ultrasonography found no abnormalities. Viral serologies, autoimmune tests and blood cultures were collected for further investigation of causes of prolonged fever with hepatic involvement. After two days, Citrobacter koseri was isolated in blood cultures and intravenous (IV) piperacillin-tazobactam initiated. Computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen showed a left lobe hepatic abscess with gas and a linear hyperdense image, possibly a foreign body, piercing through the gastric antrum into the abscess. Surgical exploration was done for source control. The abscess was drained and the foreign body, a 3.5 cm long fishbone, was removed. The patient's condition rapidly improved. Gastrointestinal perforation due to the ingestion of sharp and elongated foreign bodies usually occur in ileal loops, where the intestinal wall is thinner, causing extravasation of fluids and air into the peritoneum and typically presents with an acute abdomen. The uncommon location of perforation masked these symptoms leading to the unusual presentation with prolonged fever.

Teach a man to fillet: gastrointestinal and extra-gastrointestinal complications related to fish bone ingestion

Accidental ingestion of fish bone is a common occurrence in populations that consume unfilleted fish. Although most ingested foreign bodies pass through the gastrointestinal tract uneventfully within a week, less than 1% of patients unfortunately develop gastrointestinal perforation. Occasionally, some patients who are unaware of an episode of fish bone ingestion may present sub-acutely with symptoms mimicking inflammatory conditions or pyrexia of unknown origin. Computed tomography (CT) is the definitive imaging modality in the diagnosis of fish bone foreign body and its complications. This pictorial essay aims to illustrate the various complications related to fish bone ingestion, broadly divided into gastrointestinal related complications and extra-gastrointestinal complications related to migration of fish bone. Radiologists should be familiar with the myriad of possible complications, and take heed that a relevant history of fish bone ingestion is often absent.

Emergency CT of abdominal complications of ingested fish bones: what not to miss

Fish bones are the most commonly ingested structures and the most common cause of foreign body perforation of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). Clinical presentation of foreign body GIT perforation is nonspecific, in many cases with clinical signs of acute abdomen, which can mimic appendicitis, diverticulitis, ulcer peptic disease, and other common inflammatory conditions. Besides, patients commonly do not refer that a fish bone was swallowed. Since this condition is usually not suspected by referring physicians of the emergency department (ED), radiologists play a key role in this diagnosis; the spectrum of these imaging features must be known in order to be accurately reported in the ED.

Improving translational research in sex-specific effects of comorbidities and risk factors in ischaemic heart disease and cardioprotection: position paper and recommendations of the ESC Working Group on Cellular Biology of the Heart

Ischaemic heart disease (IHD) is a complex disorder and a leading cause of death and morbidity in both men and women. Sex, however, affects several aspects of IHD, including pathophysiology, incidence, clinical presentation, diagnosis as well as treatment and outcome. Several diseases or risk factors frequently associated with IHD can modify cellular signalling cascades, thus affecting ischaemia/reperfusion injury as well as responses to cardioprotective interventions. Importantly, the prevalence and impact of risk factors and several comorbidities differ between males and females, and their effects on IHD development and prognosis might differ according to sex. The cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying these differences are still poorly understood, and their identification might have important translational implications in the prediction or prevention of risk of IHD in men and women. Despite this, most experimental studies on IHD are still undertaken in animal models in the absence of risk factors and comorbidities, and assessment of potential sex-specific differences are largely missing. This ESC WG Position Paper will discuss: (i) the importance of sex as a biological variable in cardiovascular research, (ii) major biological mechanisms underlying sex-related differences relevant to IHD risk factors and comorbidities, (iii) prospects and pitfalls of preclinical models to investigate these associations, and finally (iv) will provide recommendations to guide future research. Although gender differences also affect IHD risk in the clinical setting, they will not be discussed in detail here.

Gastric Perforation due to Fish Bone

Unintentional ingestion of fish bones is a common but frequently unrecognized occurrence at the emergency room. Most ingested fish bones pass through the gastrointestinal tract without complications, but approximately 1% may perforate and cause acute abdomen, peritonitis and/or abscesses, requiring emergent surgery.

Clinical presentation is non-specific and computed tomography is essential to confirm the diagnosis and guide the surgery.

We present a case of gastric perforation by fish bone and discuss the clinical and radiological challenges in the diagnosis of this condition.

Gastrointestinal perforation caused by ingested fish bone. Computed tomography findings in 58 patients

CONTEXT AND OBJETIVE

Fish bones (FB) are the most commonly ingested objects and the most common cause of foreign body perforation of the GI tract. Patients present with varied and nonspecific clinical presentations. The inability to obtain a history of FB ingestion and its wide spectrum of nonspecific clinical presentations makes dietary FB perforation extremely difficult to diagnose, being a laparoscopic or surgical diagnosis. The aim of our study is to describe radiological features in CT that will alert you to look for the FB and then make an accurate presurgical diagnosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients (n=58) with radiological diagnosis of gastrointestinal perforation caused by fish bone detected by CT between 2007 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were: fish bone located beyond the esophagus, radiological diagnosis by CT and confirmation by surgery, endoscopy or radiological control. Descriptive analysis was made. Radiological features were studied including radioopaque foreign body, mural thickness, fatty infiltration or extraluminal air bubbles. Also potential complications were assessed.

RESULTS

There were 58 patients, 39 men and 19 women, with an average age of 70. Ileon was the most frequent site of perforation (20 patients). 100% showed regional fatty infiltration, 98% included foreign body, 45% had mural thickening and 20% localized extraluminal air bubbles. 15 abscess were found (3 in the liver) and just 5 showed pneumoperitoneum.

CONCLUSION

Fatty infiltration is the feature more common. Therefore, if fatty infiltration is seen in isolation radiologist should look for foreign body.

Gastrointestinal perforation: clinical and MDCT clues for identification of aetiology

Gastrointestinal tract (GIT) perforation is a common medical emergency associated with considerable mortality, ranging from 30 to 50%. Clinical presentation varies: oesophageal perforations can present with acute chest pain, odynophagia and vomiting, gastroduodenal perforations with acute severe abdominal pain, while colonic perforations tend to follow a slower progression course with secondary bacterial peritonitis or localised abscesses. A subset of patients may present with delayed symptoms, abscess mimicking an abdominal mass, or with sepsis.

Direct multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) findings support the diagnosis and localise the perforation site while ancillary findings may suggest underlying conditions that need further investigation following primary repair of ruptured bowel. MDCT findings include extraluminal gas, visible bowel wall discontinuity, extraluminal contrast, bowel wall thickening, abnormal mural enhancement, localised fat stranding and/or free fluid, as well as localised phlegmon or abscess in contained perforations.

The purpose of this article is to review the spectrum of MDCT findings encountered in GIT perforation and emphasise the MDCT and clinical clues suggestive of the underlying aetiology and localisation of perforation site.

Porta hepatis abscess and portal vein thrombosis following ingestion of a fishbone

A man in his late 50s presented to the emergency room with a 1-month history of severe abdominal pain and an endoscopic fishbone retrieval from his rectum. Serial CT scans revealed a fishbone located in the patient's upper abdomen, which had migrated through the stomach wall, into the periportal space, causing a contained gastric perforation, development of a porta hepatis abscess and secondary portal vein thrombosis. Furthermore, the sharp tip of the fishbone lay 5 mm from the patient's hepatic artery. He was transferred to a hepatobiliary centre where he underwent urgent exploratory laparotomy, with surgical exploration of the porta, drainage of the abscess and retrieval of the fishbone. Postoperatively, he received further treatment with antibiotics and anticoagulation and recovered without further sequelae.

Uncommon cause of liver abscess

Gastrointestinal perforation by fishbone causing a liver abscess is a rare entity, but should be included in the differential diagnosis to avoid delay in the treatment.