Role of MRI and added value of diffusion-weighted and gadolinium-enhanced MRI for the diagnosis of local recurrence from rectal cancer

Multidisciplinary approach to target volume delineation in locally recurrent rectal cancer: An explorative study

Background and purpose

Interobserver variation (IOV) in locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) delineations is large, possibly because of different interpretations of imaging. An explorative study was performed to investigate the benefit of additional delineations by expert radiologists.

Materials and methods

14 cases of LRRC were delineated on planning CT by 8 radiologists (RADs) to construct a median and total radiology contour, followed by 12 radiation oncologists (ROs), without (GTV-) or with (GTV+) the additional contours. IOV was calculated separately for RADs, GTV- and GTV+. The following metrics were used: the Surface Dice Similarity Coefficient (SDSC), Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and Hausdorff Distance at the 98th percentile (HD98%). The median SDSC, DSC, and HD98% of GTV- and GTV+ were compared. Sub-analyses of IOV in different recurrence types were performed.

Results

Median SDSC significantly improved from GTV- to GTV+ overall, but a significant benefit could not be proven in individual cases. Additional radiological input consistently improved all parameters in 4/14 cases (29 %). Geographical miss occurred after radiological input in 7 %. Subgroup analyses show large IOV in mainly fibrotic and intraluminal recurrences. Little IOV is seen in solitary nodal recurrences.

Conclusion

This study highlights target volume delineation challenges in LRRC. Overall, radiological input reduced IOV amongst ROs in target volume delineation for LRRC. Large differences do however exist amongst recurrence types. A standard terminology for LRRC and close collaboration between radiologists and radiation oncologists seems necessary to reduce IOV and improve quality of care.

Dutch national guidelines for locally recurrent rectal cancer

Due to improvements in treatment for primary rectal cancer, the incidence of LRRC has decreased. However, 6-12% of patients will still develop a local recurrence. Treatment of patients with LRRC can be challenging, because of complex and heterogeneous disease presentation and scarce - often low-grade - data steering clinical decisions. Previous consensus guidelines have provided some direction regarding diagnosis and treatment, but no comprehensive guidelines encompassing all aspects of the clinical management of patients with LRRC are available to date. The treatment of LRRC requires a multidisciplinary approach and overarching expertise in all domains. This broad expertise is often limited to specific expert centres, with dedicated multidisciplinary teams treating LRRC. A comprehensive, narrative literature review was performed and used to develop the Dutch National Guideline for management of LRRC, in an attempt to guide decision making for clinicians, regarding the complete clinical pathway from diagnosis to surgery.

Local Recurrences in Rectal Cancer: MRI vs. CT

Rectal cancers are often considered a distinct disease from colon cancers as their survival and management are different. Particularly, the risk for local recurrence (LR) is greater than in colon cancer. There are many factors predisposing to LR such as postoperative histopathological features or the mesorectal plane of surgical resection. In addition, the pattern of LR in rectal cancer has a prognostic significance and an important role in the choice of operative approach and. Therefore, an optimal follow up based on imaging is critical in rectal cancer. The aim of this review is to analyse the risk and the pattern of local recurrences in rectal cancer and to provide an overview of the role of imaging in early detection of LRs. We performed a literature review of studies published on Web of Science and MEDLINE up to January 2023. We also reviewed the current guidelines of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO). Although the timing and the modality of follow-up is not yet established, the guidelines usually recommend a time frame of 5 years post surgical resection of the rectum. Computed Tomography (CT) scans and/or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) are the main imaging techniques recommended in the follow-up of these patients. PET-CT is not recommended by guidelines during post-operative surveillance and it is generally used for problem solving.

Post-Surgical Imaging Assessment in Rectal Cancer: Normal Findings and Complications

Rectal cancer (RC) is one of the deadliest malignancies worldwide. Surgery is the most common treatment for RC, performed in 63.2% of patients. The type of surgical approach chosen aims to achieve maximum residual function with the lowest risk of recurrence. The selection is made by a multidisciplinary team that assesses the characteristics of the patient and the tumor. Total mesorectal excision (TME), including both low anterior resection (LAR) and abdominoperineal resection (APR), is still the standard of care for RC. Radical surgery is burdened by a 31% rate of major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade 3-4), such as anastomotic leaks and a risk of a permanent stoma. In recent years, less-invasive techniques, such as local excision, have been tested. These additional procedures could mitigate the morbidity of rectal resection, while providing acceptable oncologic results. The "watch and wait" approach is not a globally accepted model of care but encouraging results on selected groups of patients make it a promising strategy. In this plethora of treatments, the radiologist is called upon to distinguish a physiological from a pathological postoperative finding. The aim of this narrative review is to identify the main post-surgical complications and the most effective imaging techniques.

Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Colorectal Cancer Detection: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which uses strong magnetic fields and radio waves (radiofrequency energy) to make images, is one of the best imaging methods for soft tissues and can clearly display unique anatomical structures. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has been developed for identifying various malignant tumors.

Aim

To investigate the diagnostic value of DWI-MRI quantitative analysis in colorectal cancer detection.

Methods

The PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were searched from inception to May 29, 2020. Studies published in English that used DWI-MRI for diagnosing colorectal cancer were included. Case reports, letters, reviews, and studies conducted in non-humans or in-vitro experiments were excluded. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) curves were computed for DWI, and the area under the curve (AUC) and associated standard error (SE) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were also used.

Results

In total, 15 studies with 1,655 participants were finally included in this meta-analysis. There were four prospective studies and 11 retrospective studies. Eight studies focused on rectal cancer, six on colorectal cancer, and one on colonic cancer. The performance of DWI-MRI for diagnosing colorectal cancer was accurate, with pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio of 0.88 (95% CI = 0.85–0.91), 0.92 (95% CI = 0.91–0.94), 30.36 (95% CI = 11.05–83.43), and 0.44 (95% CI = 0.30–0.64), respectively. The DOR and HSROC curves were 121 (95% CI = 56–261) and 0.92 (λ: 4.79), respectively.

Conclusion

DWI showed high diagnostic accuracy for colorectal cancer detection. Further studies with large sample sizes and prospective design are needed to confirm these results.

Comparison of Computed and Acquired DWI in the Assessment of Rectal Cancer: Image Quality and Preoperative Staging

Objective

The aim of the study was to evaluate the computed diffusion-weighted images (DWI) in image quality and diagnostic performance of rectal cancer by comparing with the acquired DWI.

Methods

A total of 103 consecutive patients with primary rectal cancer were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent two DWI sequences, namely, conventional acquisition with b = 0 and 1,000 s/mm2 (aDWIb1,000) and another with b = 0 and 700 s/mm2 on a 3.0T MR scanner (MAGNETOM Prisma; Siemens Healthcare, Germany). The images (b = 0 and 700 s/mm2) were used to compute the diffusion images with b value of 1,000 s/mm2 (cDWIb1,000). Qualitative and quantitative analysis of both computed and acquired DWI images was performed, namely, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and signal intensity ratio (SIR), and also diagnostic staging performance. Interclass correlation coefficients, weighted κ coefficient, Friedman test, Wilcoxon paired test, and McNemar or Fisher test were used for repeatability and comparison assessment.

Results

Compared with the aDWIb1,000 images, the cDWIb1,000 ones exhibited significant higher scores of subjective image quality (all P <0.050). SNR, SIR, and CNR of the cDWIb1,000 images were superior to those of the aDWIb1,000 ones (P <0.001). The overall diagnostic accuracy of computed images was higher than that of the aDWIb1,000 images in T stage (P <0.001), with markedly better sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing T1–2 tumors from the T3–4 ones (P <0.050).

Conclusion

cDWIb1,000 images from lower b values might be a useful alternative option and comparable to the acquired DWI, providing better image quality and diagnostic performance in preoperative rectal cancer staging.

Diagnostic performance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/MRI versus MRI alone in the diagnosis of pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer

Purpose

To compare the diagnostic performance of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/MRI and MRI in the diagnosis of pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer.

Methods

All PET/MRIs of patients in the follow-up of rectal cancer performed between 2011 and 2018 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Recurrence was confirmed/excluded either by histopathology or imaging follow-up (> 4 months). Four groups of readers (groups 1/2: one radiologist each, groups 3/4: one radiologist/one nuclear medicine physician) independently interpreted MRI and PET/MRI. The likelihood of recurrence was scored on a 5-point-scale. Inter-reader agreement, sensitivity, specificity, PPV/NPV and accuracy were assessed. ROC curve analyses were performed.

Results

Fourty-one PET/MRIs of 40 patients (mean 61 years ± 10.9; 11 women, 29 men) were included. Sensitivity of PET/MRI in detecting recurrence was 94%, specificity 88%, PPV/NPV 97% and 78%, accuracy 93%. Sensitivity of MRI was 88%, specificity 75%, PPV/NPV 94% and 60%, accuracy 85%. ROC curve analyses showed an AUC of 0.97 for PET/MRI and 0.92 for MRI, but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.116). On MRI more cases were scored as equivocal (12% versus 5%). Inter-reader agreement was substantial for PET/MRI and MRI (0.723 and 0.656, respectively).

Conclusion

¹⁸F-FDG-PET/MRI and MRI are accurate in the diagnosis of locally recurrent rectal cancer. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy are comparable for both modalities, but PET/MRI increases readers’ confidence levels and reduces the number of equivocal cases.

Graphic abstract

Efficacy of endoscopic surveillance in the detection of local recurrence after radical rectal cancer surgery is limited? A retrospective study

Background

Rectal cancer, one of most common neoplasms, is characterized by an overall survival rate exceeding 60%. Nonetheless, local recurrence (LR) following surgery for rectal cancer remains a formidable clinical problem. The aim of this study was to assess the value of postoperative endoscopic surveillance (PES) for the early detection of LR in rectal cancer after radical anterior resection with sigmoid-rectal anastomosis.

Methods

We performed an anterior resection in 228 patients with stages I‑III rectal cancer who had undergone surgery from 2001 to 2008 in the Oncology Center in Bydgoszcz, Poland. Of these patients, 169 had perioperative radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy. All patients underwent PES with abdominal and pelvic imaging (abdominal ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance) and clinical examination. Sensitivities, specificities, positive likelihood ratios, negative likelihood ratios, and receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated to compare the value of colonoscopy versus imaging techniques for the diagnosis of LR.

Results

During the 5-year follow-up, recurrences occurred in 49 (21%) patients; of these, 15 (6%) had LR, which was most often located outside the intestinal lumen (n = 10, 4%). Anastomotic LR occurred in 5 (2%) patients. The mean time to anastomotic LR was 30 months after initial surgery, similar to that of other locations (29 months). Both imaging and endoscopy were shown to be efficient techniques for the diagnosis of LR in anastomotic sites. In the study group, endoscopy did not provide any additional benefit in patients who were receiving radiation therapy.

Conclusions

The benefit of PES for the detection of LR after curative treatment of rectal cancer is limited and not superior to imaging techniques. It remains a useful method, however, for the histopathological confirmation of suspected or confirmed recurrence.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-021-02413-0.

Postoperative complications of colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer, and surgery is the most common treatment. Several surgical options are available, but each is associated with a range of potential complications. The timely and efficient identification of these complications is vital for effective clinical management of these patients in order to minimise their morbidity and mortality. This review aims to describe the range of commonly performed surgical treatments for colorectal surgery. In addition, frequent post-surgical complications are explored with investigative options explained and illustrated.

Value of diffusion-weighted images in diagnosis of locoregionally recurrent rectal tumors

INTRODUCTION

To assess the value of referring to Diffusion-weighted images in evaluation of T2-weighted images of patients clinically suspicious of locoregional rectal cancer recurrence.

METHODS

After ethics committee approval and informed consent were obtained, 37 consecutive patients (male/female of 22/15; mean age 56 ± 13.5 SD) clinically suspicious of recurrent rectal tumor were prospectively included in the study over a two-year period. T2-weighted images of the patients were reviewed and the results were recorded. Right after that, the corresponding DWI images were provided for the radiologist and new ratings were given to the patients after taking into account the DWI findings. Finally, the patients underwent tissue biopsy. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed, and Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the "T2-weighted alone" and "T2-weighted + DWI" methods were calculated and compared.

RESULTS

"T2-weighted alone" and "T2-weighted + DWI" methods had an AUC of 0.64 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.79) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.88), respectively. The Difference between the two AUCs was 0.11 (P = 0.16). In the subgroup of patients having equivocal ratings in T2-weighted images, DWI images correctly identified 81% (13/16) of patients with true tumor recurrence and 66% (8/12) of patients without recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that referring to DWI does not significantly change the overall diagnostic performance of T2-weighted images. However, DWI is of great value in evaluation of the subgroup of patients with equivocal findings in T2-weighted images. Studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these findings.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

When T2-weighted images are equivocal, DWI images may be helpful in evaluation of patients with suspected locoregional recurrence of rectal tumor.

Reduced and standard field-of-view diffusion weighted imaging in patients with rectal cancer at 3 T-Comparison of image quality and apparent diffusion coefficient measurements

PURPOSE

To compare a zoomed EPI-DWI (z-EPI) with a standard EPI-DWI (s-EPI) in the primary diagnostics of rectal cancer and assess its potential of reduced image artifacts.

METHOD

22 therapy-naïve patients with rectal cancer underwent rectal MRI at a 3 T-system. The protocols consisted of a z-EPI DWI and s-EPI DWI sequence. Images were assessed by two independent and experienced readers regarding overall image quality and artifacts on a 5-point Likert scale, as well as overall sequence preference. In a lesion-based analysis, tumor and lymph node detection were rated on a 4-point Likert scale. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements were performed.

RESULTS

Overall Image quality score for z-EPI and s-EPI showed no statistically significant differences (p = 0.80/0.54, reader 1/2) with a median score of 4 ("good" image quality) for both sequences. The image quality preference rank for z-EPI and s-EPI was given the category 'no preference' in 64 % (reader 1) and 50 % (reader 2). Most artifact-related scores (susceptibility, motion and distortion) did not show reproducible significant differences between z-EPI and s-EPI. The two sequences exhibited comparable, mostly good and excellent quality scores for tumor and lymph node detection (p = 0.19-0.99). ADC values were significantly lower for z-EPI than for s-EPI (p = 0.001/0.002, reader 1/2) with good agreement of ADC measurements between both readers.

CONCLUSION

Our data showed comparable image quality and lesion detection for the z-EPI and the s-EPI sequence in MRI of rectal cancer, whereas the mean ADC of the tumor was significantly lower in z-EPI compared to s-EPI.

The added value of pelvic surveillance by MRI during postoperative follow-up of rectal cancer, with a focus on abbreviated MRI

OBJECTIVES

To assess the added value of MRI over CT for the detection of pelvic recurrence during postoperative surveillance after rectal cancer surgery and to compare the diagnostic accuracy for pelvic recurrence achieved with abbreviated MRI (aMRI) with that of conventional enhanced MRI (cMRI).

METHODS

Patients who underwent rectal cancer surgery followed by MRI in addition to the standard CT follow-up protocol were evaluated retrospectively. Two readers independently scored images from CT, cMRI, and aMRI, which consisted of T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging, to rate the likelihood of recurrence. Diagnostic accuracy and ROC curves were calculated. The patients were divided into two groups for risk-adapted surveillance according to risk of recurrence: high-risk (n = 157) and low-risk (n = 169) groups.

RESULTS

In total, 579 MRIs from 326 patients were assessed. A total of 48 pelvic recurrences occurred in 33 patients. The AUC in cMRI, aMRI, and CT were 0.98, 0.99, and 0.84, respectively. The difference in performance between CT and cMRI or aMRI for identifying recurrence was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Both cMRI and aMRI showed superior performance compared with CT in the high-risk group (p < 0.001), but this was not the case in the low-risk group (p = 0.13). Furthermore, the diagnostic accuracy of aMRI was similar to that of cMRI.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of MRI to the postoperative surveillance protocol may result in an improvement in the detection of pelvic recurrence after rectal cancer surgery. For patients at high risk of recurrence, an aMRI surveillance may be justified to improve the diagnostic yield.

KEY POINTS

• The addition of MRI to the postoperative surveillance protocol improved the diagnostic yield in patients at a high risk of recurrence. • Abbreviated non-enhanced MRI with DWI allows detection of pelvic recurrence with a diagnostic accuracy that is similar to that of contrast-enhanced MRI (AUC, 0.99 and 0.98, respectively; p = 0.12). • Abbreviated MRI that is restricted to high spatial resolution structural imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging takes less time and can be carried out without the need for injection of a contrast agent.

Locally recurrent rectal cancer: what the radiologist should know

Despite advances in surgical techniques and chemoradiation therapy, recurrent rectal cancer remains a cause of morbidity and mortality. After successful treatment of rectal cancer, patients are typically enrolled in a surveillance strategy that includes imaging as studies have shown improved prognosis when recurrent rectal cancer is detected during imaging surveillance versus based on development of symptoms. Additionally, patients who experience a complete clinical response with chemoradiation therapy may elect to enroll in a "watch-and-wait" strategy that includes imaging surveillance rather than surgical resection. Factors that increase the likelihood of recurrence, patterns of recurrence, and the imaging appearances of recurrent rectal cancer are reviewed with a focus on CT, PET CT, and MR imaging.

Optimized Parameters of Diffusion-Weighted MRI for Prediction of the Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Aim

To identify the optimal diffusion-weighted MRI-derived parameters for predicting the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Methods

This prospective study enrolled 92 patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Diffusion-weighted MRI sequences with two b-value combinations of b (0, 800) and b (0, 1000) were acquired before the start of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery. The pathological tumor regression grade was obtained according to the Mandard criteria, recommended by the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer, to act as the reference standard. Pathological good responders (pathological tumor regression grade 1-2) were compared with poor responders (pathological tumor regression grade 3–5).

Results

The good responder group contained 37 (40.2%) patients and the poor responder group 55 (59.8%) patients. Both before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, the mean ADC value for b = 1000 was significantly higher than that for b = 800. In the two patient groups, the post-ADC value and ΔADC for b = 800 were significantly lower than those for b = 1000, but percentages of ADC increase for b = 800 and b = 1000 showed no significant difference.

Conclusions

The percentage of ADC increase, as an optimized predictor unaffected by different b-values, may have a significant role in differentiating those patients with a good response to N-CRT from those with a poor response.

Basic concepts and applications of functional magnetic resonance imaging for radiotherapy of prostate cancer

Recently, the interest to integrate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in radiotherapy for prostate cancer has increased considerably. MRI can contribute in all steps of the radiotherapy workflow from diagnosis, staging, and target definition to treatment follow-up. Of particular interest is the ability of MRI to provide a wide range of functional measures. The complexity of MRI as an imaging modality combined with the growing interest of the application to prostate cancer radiotherapy, emphasize the need for dedicated education within the radiation oncology community. In this context, an overview of the most common as well as a few upcoming functional MR imaging techniques is presented: the basic methodology and measurement is described, the link between the functional measures and the underlying biology is established, and finally relevant applications of functional MRI useful for prostate cancer radiotherapy are given.