Liver metastases of neuroendocrine tumors: is it possible to diagnose different histologic subtypes depending on multiphasic CT features?

Clinical TNM Lung Cancer Staging: A Diagnostic Algorithm with a Pictorial Review

Lung cancer is a prevalent malignant disease with the highest mortality rate among oncological conditions. The assessment of its clinical TNM staging primarily relies on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) of the thorax and proximal abdomen, sometimes with the addition of positron emission tomography/CT scans, mainly for better evaluation of mediastinal lymph node involvement and detection of distant metastases. The purpose of TNM staging is to establish a universal nomenclature for the anatomical extent of lung cancer, facilitating interdisciplinary communication for treatment decisions and research advancements. Recent studies utilizing a large international database and multidisciplinary insights indicate a need to update the TNM classification to enhance the anatomical categorization of lung cancer, ultimately optimizing treatment strategies. The eighth edition of the TNM classification, issued by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC), transitioned to the ninth edition on 1 January 2025. Key changes include a more detailed classification of the N and M descriptor categories, whereas the T descriptor remains unchanged. Notably, the N2 category will be split into N2a and N2b based on the single-station or multi-station involvement of ipsilateral mediastinal and/or subcarinal lymph nodes, respectively. The M1c category will differentiate between single (M1c1) and multiple (M1c2) organ system involvement for extrathoracic metastases. This review article emphasizes the role of radiologists in implementing the updated TNM classification through CT imaging for correct clinical lung cancer staging and optimal patient management.

Imaging for Interventional Radiology Liver-Directed Therapies for Neuroendocrine Liver Metastases

Neuroendocrine tumors are an indolent, heterogeneous group of tumors that primarily arise from the gastropancreatic tract and lungs. Most patients present with liver metastases at the time of diagnosis, which cause significant morbidity and mortality due to excess hormone secretion, bile duct obstruction, and liver damage. A small percentage of these patients are eligible for potential cure through surgical resection. However, interventional radiology provides liver-directed therapies, such as percutaneous ablation, transarterial embolization, chemoembolization, and radioembolization, for palliative care and potential bridging to debulking and surgical resection of neuroendocrine liver metastases. This article aims to provide a brief overview of these liver-directed therapies focusing on the pre-, intra-, and postprocedural imaging findings.

Diagnosis and management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms by nuclear medicine: Update and future perspective

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers are the second most common cause of cancer related deaths in the World. Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) is a rare tumor that originated from peptidergic neurons and neuroendocrine cells. NENs occurs in all parts of the body, especially in stomach, intestine, pancreas and lung. These rare tumors are challenging to diagnose at earlier stages because of their wide anatomical distribution and complex clinical features. Traditional imaging methods including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) are mostly of useful for detection of larger primary tumors that are 1cm in size. A new medical imaging specialty called nuclear medicine uses radioactive substances for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Nuclear medicine imaging relies on the tissue-specific uptake of radiolabeled tracers. Nuclear medicine techniques can easily identify the NENs tissues for their ability to absorb and concentrate amine, precursors, and peptides, whereas the traditional imaging methods are difficult to perform well. The somatostatin receptor (SSTR) is a targetable receptor frequently expressed in the gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs), and is a promising target for tumor-targeted therapies and radiography. SSTR based somatostatin receptor imaging and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has emerged as a new hot subject in the diagnosis and treatment of GEP-NENs due to the rapid development of somatostatin analogues (SSAs) and radionuclide. This review aims to provide an overview of the current status of nuclear medicine imaging modalities in the imaging of GEP-NENs, and puts them in perspective of clinical practice.

Imaging of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Monitoring Treatment Response-AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) encompass a broad spectrum of tumors throughout the body and range in biologic behavior from indolent to aggressive. Consequently, a wide spectrum of treatment options are available for NENs, including observation, somatostatin analogues, targeted therapy, chemotherapy, surgical resection, liver-directed therapy (embolization and ablation), and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Given the wide variety of tumor behaviors and treatments, precise criteria for treatment response in NENs are lacking. Though conventional anatomic imaging with CT and MRI remains important for NEN response assessment, the use of somatostatin receptor (SSR) PET is increasing and often provides synergistic and complementary information. Additionally, in certain clinical scenarios, a particular imaging strategy may prove superior or inferior to others for the detection of metastatic disease and evaluation of therapy response. A strong need exists to further define appropriate and standardized assessment criteria for tumor response and progression in NEN. This article presents the strengths and weaknesses of individual imaging modalities for evaluating NEN therapy response, including conventional anatomic imaging, SSR PET, FDG PET, dual-tracer PET, and PET/MRI. Ongoing challenges and unmet needs in the use of imaging for NEN response evaluation are explored.

Accuracy of a CT density threshold enhancement in distinguishing pancreas parenchymal necrosis in cases of acute pancreatitis in the first week

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to identify attenuation threshold value on computed tomography (CT) that allowed discriminating between interstitial edematous pancreatitis (IEP) and necrotizing pancreatitis (NP) in patients with acute pancreatitis during the first week of the disease and evaluate interobserver reproducibility for the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis category.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with acute pancreatitis who underwent CT examination of the abdomen between March 2015 and December 2019 were retrospectively included. Actual diagnosis of IEP or NP was based on final clinical report, follow-up evaluation, and complications. Six regions of interest were manually placed in the pancreatic gland and peripancreatic fat, and differences in CT attenuation values before contrast injection and during the portal venous phase of enhancement were computed. Performance in the diagnosis of AP category was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Interobserver agreement was estimated by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland Altman analysis was used to estimate reproducibility between pairs of observers.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients with NP (46 men, 20 women; mean age, 55 ± 17 [SD] years; age range: 20-89 years) and 70 patients with IEP (39 men, 31 women; mean age, 54 ± 18 [SD] years; age range: 21-87 years) were included. An enhancement value less than 30 Hounsfield units (HU) in the pancreatic gland during the portal phase compared to non-contrast phase, yielded 90.9% sensitivity (60/66; 95% CI: 81.3-96.6), 94.3% specificity (66/70; 95% CI: 86.0-98.4) and an area under curve of 0.958 (95% CI: 0.919-0.996) for the diagnosis of NP versus IEP. Interobserver reproducibility for pancreas enhancement was good using Bland Altman plot and ICC was excellent for pancreatic gland analysis (ICC 0.978; 95% CI: 0.961-0.988) but poor or moderate (ICC ≤0.634) regarding peripancreatic fat necrosis.

CONCLUSION

By using a pancreas enhancement threshold value of 30 HU, CT is accurate and reproducible for the diagnosis of NP during the first week of the disease.

Hypovascular pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor with hepatic metastases: A case report and literature review

Hypovascular pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are uncommon pancreatic tumors and commonly misdiagnosed as pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma or chronic mass-forming pancreatitis. The liver is the organ most commonly affected by neuroendocrine tumor metastases but hepatic neuroendocrine tumor metastases are quite difficult to discriminate from other hepatic metastases and primary hepatic tumors. We describe a case of a 47-year-old man with incidentally detected multiple hepatic lesions on ultrasound. On further imaging technique including computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, the patient had an abnormal hypoenhancing lesion at the pancreatic tail and multiple hyperenhancing hepatic metastases that were diagnosed as hypovascular pancreatic well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor Grade 2 with multiple hypervascular hepatic metastases after liver biopsy and surgery. Neuroendocrine tumor is a rare etiology among hypoenhancing pancreatic tumors, and must be considered to discriminate from pancreatic adenocarcinomas in cases there are multiple hyperenhancing hepatic metastases on the arterial phase without typical washout on the portal venous phase.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging May Be Able to Identify the Origin of Neuroendocrine Tumor Liver Metastases

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to discriminate hepatic metastases from pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET) and hepatic metastases from midgut neuroendocrine tumors (mNET) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

MRI examinations of 24 patients with hepatic metastases from pNET were quantitatively and qualitatively assessed by 2 blinded readers and compared to those obtained in 23 patients with hepatic metastases from mNET. Inter-reader agreement was calculated with kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of each variable for the diagnosis of hepatic metastasis from pNET were calculated. Associations between variables and primary tumor (i.e., pNET vs. mNET) were assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses. A nomogram was developed and validated using an external cohort of 20 patients with pNET and 20 patients with mNET.

RESULTS

Interobserver agreement was strong to perfect (k = 0.893-1) for qualitative criteria and excellent for quantitative variables (ICC: 0.9817-0.9996). At univariate analysis, homogeneity on T1-weighted images was the most discriminating variable for the diagnosis of pNET (OR: 6.417; p = 0.013) with greatest sensitivity (88%; 21/24; 95% CI: 68-97%). At multivariate analysis, tumor homogeneity on T1-weighted images (p = 0.007; OR: 17.607; 95% CI: 2.179-142.295) and target sign on diffusion-weighted images (p = 0.007; OR: 19.869; 95% CI: 2.305-171.276) were independently associated with pNET. Nomogram yielded a corrected AUC of 0.894 (95% CI: 0.796-0.992) for the diagnosis of pNET in the training cohort and 0.805 (95% CI: 0.662-0.948) in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI provides qualitative features that can help discriminate between hepatic metastases from pNET and those from mNET.

Hepatic nodules with arterial phase hyperenhancement and washout on enhanced computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging: how to avoid pitfalls

This essay aimed to illustrate the various hepatic nodules that may exhibit arterial phase hyperenhancement and washout on computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI). Hepatic nodules with arterial phase hyperenhancement and washout on CT/MRI include hepatocellular carcinoma, focal nodular hyperplasia-like nodules, serum amyloid A-positive hepatocellular neoplasms, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, intrahepatic bile duct adenoma, hepatoblastoma, hepatocellular adenoma, hepatic epithelioid angiomyolipoma, and metastasis including neuroendocrine and gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Understanding the imaging findings is important to ensure correct diagnosis.

Can we differentiate histologic subtypes of neuroendocrine tumour liver metastases at a single phase contrast-enhanced CT-correlation with Ga-68 DOTATATE PET/CT findings

OBJECTIVE

To assess the usefulness of a single-phase contrast-enhanced CT to differentiate subtypes of neuroendocrine tumour (NET) liver metastases and to evaluate the correlation between CT features and Ga-68 DOTATATE positron emission tomography/CT (PET/CT) findings.

METHODS

Between December 2017 and April 2019 patients with liver metastases of neuroendocrine tumours who underwent CT and Ga-68 DOTATATE PET/CT were enrolled in the study. All patients involved in the study had undergone a standardised single-phase contrast-enhanced CT. Whole body PET/CT images were obtained with a combined PET/CT scanner. All CT images were retrospectively analysed by two radiologists. Enhancement patterns of lesions were assessed. For quantitative examination; CT attenuation values of metastatic lesions, liver parenchyma and aorta were measured using a freehand ROI and tumour-to-liver ratio [T-L = (Tumour-Liver) / Liver] and tumour-to-aorta ratio [T-A = (Tumour-Aorta) / Aorta] were calculated. The lesion with the highest Ga-68 DOTATATE uptake in the liver was used for calculations. The metabolic tumour volume (MTV), maximum standardised uptake value (SUV _max) and SUV _mean were calculated for the target liver lesion.

RESULTS

A total of 137 NET liver metastases divided into in three groups: 49 (35.7%) pancreatic, 60 (44.5%) gastroenteric and 26 (18.9%) lung NET liver metastases were analysed. Gastroenteric NET metastases often showed heterogeneous enhancement which was significantly higher than in the pancreas and lung NET liver metastases (p < 0.001). 96.72% (n = 59) of the gastroenteric NET liver metastases were hypoattenuating whereas the most frequent presentation for the pancreatic group was hyperattenuation (63.26%,n = 31). The difference in enhancement patterns of the liver metastases was statistically significant (p < 0.001) with respect to the location of the primary tumour. For quantitative analysis; tumour CT values were significantly different between the groups (p < 0.001). The T-L ratio was statistically different between gastroenteric and pancreatic NET liver metastases and pancreatic and lung NET groups (p < 0.001). The T-A ratio was significantly higher in the pancreatic NET metastases (p < 0.001). SUV_max, SUV_mean and MTV values, however, were not significantly different between the subgroups. There was a weak positive correlation between T-L ratio and SUV _meanvalues.

CONCLUSION

We noticed statistically significant differences in both qualitative and quantitative CT features between histologic subgroups of neuroendocrine tumour liver metastases at a single phase contrast-enhanced CT.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Our study will be the first in the literature which extensively focus on assessing the CT features of liver metastases of NETs at a single phase CT and Ga-68DOTATATE PET/CT. As the different histological subtypes of NET liver metastases exhibit different clinical outcomes, these features might help to identify the primary tumour to provide optimal treatment.