Consistency of hepatocellular gadoxetic acid uptake in serial MRI examinations for evaluation of liver function

Evaluation and Prediction of Post-Hepatectomy Liver Failure Using Imaging Techniques: Value of Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Despite improvements in operative techniques and perioperative care, post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) remains the most serious cause of morbidity and mortality after surgery, and several risk factors have been identified to predict PHLF. Although volumetric assessment using imaging contributes to surgical simulation by estimating the function of future liver remnants in predicting PHLF, liver function is assumed to be homogeneous throughout the liver. The combination of volumetric and functional analyses may be more useful for an accurate evaluation of liver function and prediction of PHLF than only volumetric analysis. Gadoxetic acid is a hepatocyte-specific magnetic resonance (MR) contrast agent that is taken up by hepatocytes via the OATP1 transporter after intravenous administration. Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging (MRI) offers information regarding both global and regional functions, leading to a more precise evaluation even in cases with heterogeneous liver function. Various indices, including signal intensity-based methods and MR relaxometry, have been proposed for the estimation of liver function and prediction of PHLF using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. Recent developments in MR techniques, including high-resolution hepatobiliary phase images using deep learning image reconstruction and whole-liver T1 map acquisition, have enabled a more detailed and accurate estimation of liver function in gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.

Assessment of Liver Function With MRI: Where Do We Stand?

Liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have become a global health burden. For this reason, the determination of liver function plays a central role in the monitoring of patients with chronic liver disease or HCC. Furthermore, assessment of liver function is important, e.g., before surgery to prevent liver failure after hepatectomy or to monitor the course of treatment. Liver function and disease severity are usually assessed clinically based on clinical symptoms, biopsy, and blood parameters. These are rather static tests that reflect the current state of the liver without considering changes in liver function. With the development of liver-specific contrast agents for MRI, noninvasive dynamic determination of liver function based on signal intensity or using T1 relaxometry has become possible. The advantage of this imaging modality is that it provides additional information about the vascular structure, anatomy, and heterogeneous distribution of liver function. In this review, we summarized and discussed the results published in recent years on this technique. Indeed, recent data show that the T1 reduction rate seems to be the most appropriate value for determining liver function by MRI. Furthermore, attention has been paid to the development of automated tools for image analysis in order to uncover the steps necessary to obtain a complete process flow from image segmentation to image registration to image analysis. In conclusion, the published data show that liver function values obtained from contrast-enhanced MRI images correlate significantly with the global liver function parameters, making it possible to obtain both functional and anatomic information with a single modality.

T1 reduction rate with Gd-EOB-DTPA determines liver function on both 1.5 T and 3 T MRI

Magnetic resonance T1 mapping before and after Gd-EOB-DTPA administration allows quantification of the T1 reduction rate as a non-invasive surrogate marker of liver function. A major limitation of T1 relaxation time measurement is its dependency on MRI field strengths. Since T1 reduction rate is calculated as the relative shortening of T1 relaxation time before and after contrast administration, we hypothesized that the T1 reduction rate is comparable between 1.5 and 3 T. We thus compared liver T1 relaxation times between 1.5 and 3 T in a total of 243 consecutive patients (124, 1.5 T and 119, 3 T) between 09/2018 and 07/2019. T1 reduction rates were compared between patients with no cirrhosis and patients with cirrhosis Child-Pugh A-C. There was no significant difference of T1 reduction rate between 1.5 and 3 T in any patient group (p-value 0.126-0.861). On both 1.5 T and 3 T, T1 reduction rate allowed to differentiate between patients with no cirrhosis and patients with liver cirrhosis Child A-C (p < 0.001). T1 reduction rate showed a good performance to predict liver cirrhosis Child A (AUC = 0.83, p < 0.001), Child B (AUC = 0.83, p < 0.001) and Child C (AUC = 0.92, p < 0.001). In conclusion, T1 reduction rate allows to determine liver function on Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI with comparable values on 1.5 T and 3 T.

Bias, Repeatability and Reproducibility of Liver T1 Mapping With Variable Flip Angles

Background

Three‐dimensional variable flip angle (VFA) methods are commonly used for T₁ mapping of the liver, but there is no data on the accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility of this technique in this organ in a multivendor setting.

Purpose

To measure bias, repeatability, and reproducibility of VFA T₁ mapping in the liver.

Study Type

Prospective observational.

Population

Eight healthy volunteers, four women, with no known liver disease.

Field Strength/Sequence

1.5‐T and 3.0‐T; three‐dimensional steady‐state spoiled gradient echo with VFAs; Look‐Locker.

Assessment

Traveling volunteers were scanned twice each (30 minutes to 3 months apart) on six MRI scanners from three vendors (GE Healthcare, Philips Medical Systems, and Siemens Healthineers) at two field strengths. The maximum period between the first and last scans among all volunteers was 9 months. Volunteers were instructed to abstain from alcohol intake for at least 72 hours prior to each scan and avoid high cholesterol foods on the day of the scan.

Statistical Tests

Repeated measures ANOVA, Student t‐test, Levene's test of variances, and 95% significance level. The percent error relative to literature liver T₁ in healthy volunteers was used to assess bias. The relative error (RE) due to intrascanner and interscanner variation in T₁ measurements was used to assess repeatability and reproducibility.

Results

The 95% confidence interval (CI) on the mean bias and mean repeatability RE of VFA T₁ in the healthy liver was 34 ± 6% and 10 ± 3%, respectively. The 95% CI on the mean reproducibility RE at 1.5 T and 3.0 T was 29 ± 7% and 25 ± 4%, respectively.

Data Conclusion

Bias, repeatability, and reproducibility of VFA T₁ mapping in the liver in a multivendor setting are similar to those reported for breast, prostate, and brain.

Level of Evidence

1

Technical Efficacy Stage

1

Correlation of liver enhancement in gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI with liver functions: a multicenter-multivendor analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma patients from SORAMIC trial

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the correlation between liver enhancement on hepatobiliary phase and liver function parameters in a multicenter, multivendor study.

METHODS

A total of 359 patients who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI using a standardized protocol with various scanners within a prospective multicenter phase II trial (SORAMIC) were evaluated. The correlation between liver enhancement on hepatobiliary phase normalized to the spleen (liver-to-spleen ratio, LSR) and biochemical laboratory parameters, clinical findings related to liver functions, liver function grading systems (Child-Pugh and Albumin-Bilirubin [ALBI]), and scanner characteristics were analyzed using uni- and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

There was a significant positive correlation between LSR and albumin (rho = 0.193; p < 0.001), platelet counts (rho = 0.148; p = 0.004), and sodium (rho = 0.161; p = 0.002); and a negative correlation between LSR and total bilirubin (rho = -0.215; p < 0.001) and AST (rho = -0.191; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed independent significance for each of albumin (p = 0.022), total bilirubin (p = 0.045), AST (p = 0.031), platelet counts (p = 0.012), and sodium (p = 0.006). The presence of ascites (1.47 vs. 1.69, p < 0.001) and varices (1.55 vs. 1.69, p = 0.006) was related to significantly lower LSR. Similarly, patients with ALBI grade 1 had significantly higher LSR than patients with grade 2 (1.74 ± 0.447 vs. 1.56 ± 0.408, p < 0.001); and Child-Pugh A patients had a significantly higher LSR than Child-Pugh B (1.67 ± 0.44 vs. 1.49 ± 0.33, p = 0.021). Also, LSR was negatively correlated with MELD-Na scores (rho = -0.137; p = 0.013). However, one scanner brand was significantly associated with lower LSR (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The liver enhancement on the hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI is correlated with biomarkers of liver functions in a multicenter cohort. However, this correlation shows variations between scanner brands.

KEY POINTS

• The correlation between liver enhancement on the hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and liver function is consistent in a multicenter-multivendor cohort. • Signal intensity-based indices (liver-to-spleen ratio) can be used as an imaging biomarker of liver function. • However, absolute values might change between vendors.

Quantification of liver function using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI

The introduction of hepatobiliary contrast agents, most notably gadoxetic acid (GA), has expanded the role of MRI, allowing not only a morphologic but also a functional evaluation of the hepatobiliary system. The mechanism of uptake and excretion of gadoxetic acid via transporters, such as organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATP1,3), multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (MRP2) and MRP3, has been elucidated in the literature. Furthermore, GA uptake can be estimated on either static images or on dynamic imaging, for example, the hepatic extraction fraction (HEF) and liver perfusion. GA-enhanced MRI has achieved an important role in evaluating morphology and function in chronic liver diseases (CLD), allowing to distinguish between the two subgroups of nonalcoholic fatty liver diseases (NAFLD), simple steatosis and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and help to stage fibrosis and cirrhosis, predict liver transplant graft survival, and preoperatively evaluate the risk of liver failure if major resection is planned. Finally, because of its noninvasive nature, GA-enhanced MRI can be used for long-term follow-up and post-treatment monitoring. This review article aims to describe the current role of GA-enhanced MRI in quantifying liver function in a variety of hepatobiliary disorders.

Prediction of post-hepatectomy liver failure using gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein invasion

PURPOSE

Accurate prediction of post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is important in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to retrospectively evaluate the utility of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for predicting PHLF in patients who underwent anatomic hepatectomy for HCC with portal vein invasion.

METHODS

Forty-one patients (32 men, 9 women) were included. Hepatobiliary-phase MR images were acquired 20 min after injection of gadoxetic acid using a 3D fat-suppressed T1-weighted spoiled gradient-echo sequence. Liver-spleen ratio (LSR), remnant hepatocellular uptake index (rHUI), and HUI were calculated. The severity of PHLF was defined according to the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Differences in LSR between the resected liver and the remnant liver, and HUI and rHUI/HUI between no/mild and severe PHLF were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test, respectively. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of severe PHLF. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of rHUI and rHUI/HUI were calculated for predicting severe PHLF.

RESULTS

Nine patients developed severe PHLF. LSR of the remnant liver was significantly higher than that of the resected liver (P < 0.001). Severe PHLF demonstrated significantly lower rHUI (P < 0.001) and rHUI/HUI (P < 0.001) compared with no/mild PHLF. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that decreased rHUI (P = 0.012, AUC=0.885) and rHUI/HUI (P = 0.002, AUC=0.852) were independent predictors of severe PHLF.

CONCLUSION

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI can be a promising noninvasive examination for assessing global and regional liver function, allowing estimation of the functional liver remnant and accurate prediction of severe PHLF before hepatic resection.

Combined gadoxetic acid and gadobenate dimeglumine enhanced liver MRI: a parameter optimization study

PURPOSE

To demonstrate the feasibility of combined delayed-phase gadoxetic acid (GA) and gadobenate dimeglumine (GD) enhanced liver MRI for improved detection of liver metastases, and to optimize contrast agent dose, timing, and flip angle (FA).

METHODS

Fourteen healthy volunteers underwent liver MRI at 3.0T at two visits during which they received two consecutive injections: 1. GA (Visit 1 = 0.025 mmol/kg; Visit 2 = 0.05 mmol/kg) and 2. GD (both visits = 0.1 mmol/kg) 20 min after GA administration. Two sub-studies were performed: Experiment-1 Eight subjects underwent multi-phase breath-held 3D-fat-saturated T1-weighted spoiled gradient echo (SGRE) imaging to determine the optimal imaging window for the combined GA + GD protocol to create a homogeneously hyperintense liver and vasculature ("plain-white-liver") with maximum contrast to muscle which served as a surrogate for metastatic lesions in both experiments. Experiment-2 Six subjects underwent breath-held 3D-fat-saturated T1-weighted SGRE imaging at three different FA to determine the optimal FA for best image contrast. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Experiment-1 The combined GA + GD protocol created a homogeneously hyperintense liver and vasculature with maximum CNR liver/muscle at approximately 60-120 s after automatic GD-bolus detection. Experiment-2 Flip angles between 25° and 35° at a dose of 0.025 mmol/kg GA provided the best combination that minimized liver/vasculature CNR, while maximizing liver/muscle CNR. CNR performance to achieve a "plain-white-liver" was superior with 0.025 mmol/kg GA compared to 0.05 mmol/kg.

CONCLUSION

Combined GA + GD enhanced T1-weighted MRI is feasible to achieve a homogeneously "plain-white-liver". Future studies need to confirm that this protocol can improve sensitivity of liver lesion detection in patients with metastatic liver disease.

Evaluating hepatotoxic effects of chemotherapeutic agents with gadoxetic-acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

PURPOSE

To evaluate the hepatotoxicity of different chemotherapeutic agents used to treat neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) with gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 129 patients with NETs who underwent two or more serial gadoxetic-acid-enhanced MRI examinations between 2014 and 2018 and started chemotherapy in the beginning of that time period were retrospectively analysed. Linear mixed model analysis evaluating relative enhancement (RE) of the liver in the hepatobiliary phase with respect to time between MRI examinations, primary chemotherapy, hepatotoxicity score of preceding and subsequent chemotherapies as well as age and gender as fixed variables was performed. Binary logistic regression was used to verify whether the hepatotoxicity score predicts a significant impact of a chemotherapeutic regimen on RE and hence liver function.

RESULTS

Linear mixed model analysis of a total of 539 MRI examinations identified all chemotherapeutic agents with known hepatoxicity as a factor with a statistically significant negative impact on RE of the liver in gadoxetic-acid-enhanced MRI in addition to age. This result was confirmed by binary logistic regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

Our results confirm that gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI can be used as an imaging-based liver function test for assessing hepatotoxicity of chemotherapeutic agents used for NETs. The findings underscore the known degrees of hepatotoxicity of the chemotherapeutic agents currently used in the treatment of NETs.