Lexicon for renal mass terms at CT and MRI: a consensus of the society of abdominal radiology disease-focused panel on renal cell carcinoma

World Health Organization 2022 Classification Update: Radiologic and Pathologic Features of Papillary Renal Cell Carcinomas

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To describe imaging and pathology features of newly defined papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) based on the WHO 2022 update.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 87 patients with 93 pathologically proven papillary renal cell carcinomas who underwent pre-treatment renal mass protocol CT or MRI. Baseline and post-treatment follow-up imaging was evaluated by two radiologists systematically based on established lexicon.

RESULTS

At pathology, 63 (68%) were grade 1-2, 29 (31%) were grade 3-4, and 1 (%) was unreported. At surgical pathology, 84 (90%) were localized (≤pT2b), 5 (5%) were pT3a, and none were ≥pT3b; 4 (4%) had unknown pT stage (core biopsies). 33 (35%) had necrosis and 39 (41%) had hemorrhage. None had sarcomatoid or rhabdoid differentiation. At imaging, 73 (83%) were solid and 16 (17%) were cystic. Of 16 cystic masses, four were Bosniak class IIF (three were heterogeneously T1 hyperintense) and 12 were class IV. All were well-circumscribed. 92 (99%) were hypovascular. Median follow-up for 74 patients was 30 months (IQR 12-56). One untreated patient had non-regional nodal metastasis at presentation, and one patient had metastasis to lymph nodes and bones after surgery, but the patient had unresected renal masses elsewhere without pathology. Otherwise, no recurrence or metastases were detected.

CONCLUSION

Most pRCCs present as a hypovascular, circumscribed, solid renal mass. A few pRCCs present as the newly defined Bosniak class IIF subtype. Our results can form the basis of a non-invasive, likelihood score to identify this relatively indolent pathology in the era of virtual biopsy and active surveillance.

Low-grade oncocytic tumor: a review of radiologic and clinical features

PURPOSE

The 2022 World Health Organization classification of renal neoplasia expanded the spectrum of oncocytic neoplasms to encompass newly established and emerging entities; one of the latter is the low-grade oncocytic tumor (LOT). This study reports the radiologic appearance and clinical behavior of LOT.

METHODS

In this IRB-approved, HIPPA-compliant retrospective study, our institution's pathology database was searched for low-grade oncocytic tumors or neoplasms. Patient age, gender, and comorbidities were obtained from a review of electronic medical records, and imaging characteristics of the tumors were assessed through an imaging platform.

RESULTS

The pathology database search yielded 14 tumors in 14 patients. Four patients were excluded, as radiologic images were not available in three, and one did not fulfill diagnostic criteria after pathology re-review. The resulting cohort consisted of 10 tumors (median diameter 2.3 cm, range 0.7-5.1) in 10 patients (median age 68 years, range 53-91, six women). All tumors presented as a solitary, well-circumscribed, mass with solid components. All enhanced as much or almost as much as adjacent renal parenchyma; all but one enhanced heterogeneously. None had lymphadenopathy, venous invasion, or metastatic disease at presentation or at clinical follow-up (median, 22.2 months, range 3.4-71.6). Among five tumors undergoing active surveillance, mean increase in size was 0.4 cm/year at imaging follow-up (median 16.7 months, range 8.9-25.4).

CONCLUSION

LOT, a recently described pathologic entity in the kidney, can be considered in the differential diagnosis of an avidly and typically heterogeneously enhancing solid renal mass in an adult patient.

CT findings and clinical characteristics in distinguishing renal urothelial carcinoma mimicking renal cell carcinoma from clear cell renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

We aimed to characterize the clinical and multiphase computed tomography (CT) features, which can distinguish renal urothelial carcinoma (RUC) mimicking renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) with collecting system invasion (CSI).

METHODS

Data from 56 patients with RUC (46 men and 10 women) and 366 patients with ccRCC (262 men and 104 women) were collected and assessed retrospectively. The median age was 65.50 (IQR: 56.25-69.75) and 53.50 (IQR: 42.25-62.5) years, respectively. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed on clinical and CT characteristics to determine independent factors for distinguishing RUC and ccRCC, and an integrated predictive model was constructed. Differential diagnostic performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

The independent predictors for differentiating RUC from ccRCC were infiltrative growth pattern, hydronephrosis, heterogeneous enhancement, preserving reniform contour, and hematuria. The differential diagnostic performance of the integrated predictive model-1 (AUC: 0.947, sensitivity: 89.07%, specificity: 89.29%) and model-2 (AUC: 0.960, sensitivity: 92.1%, specificity: 89.3%) were both better than that of the infiltrative growth pattern (AUC: 0.830, sensitivity: 71.9%, specificity: 92.9%), heterogeneous enhancement (AUC: 0.771, sensitivity: 86.3%, specificity: 67.9%), preserving reniform contour (AUC = 0.758, sensitivity: 85.5%, specificity: 66.1%), hydronephrosis (AUC: 0.733, sensitivity: 87.7%, specificity: 58.9%), or hematuria (AUC: 0.706, sensitivity: 79.5%, specificity: 51.8%).

CONCLUSION

The CT and clinical characteristics showed extraordinary discriminative abilities in the differential diagnosis of RUC and ccRCC, which might provide helpful information for clinical decision-making.

Risk of malignancy in T1-hyperintense Bosniak version 2019 class II and IIF cystic renal masses

BACKGROUND

Bosniak classification version 2019 includes cystic masses in class II and IIF based partly on their hyperintense appearance at T1-weighted MRI. The prevalence of malignancy in non-enhancing heterogeneously T1-hyperintense masses is unknown, nor whether the pattern of T1 hyperintensity affects malignancy likelihood.

PURPOSE

To determine the malignancy proportion among six patterns of T1 hyperintensity within non-enhancing cystic renal masses.

METHODS

This retrospective, single-institution study included 72 Bosniak class II and IIF, non-enhancing, T1-hyperintense cystic renal masses. Diagnosis was confirmed by histopathology or by follow-up imaging demonstrating 5-year size and morphologic stability, decreased in size by ≥ 30%, resolution, or Bosniak down-classification. Six patterns of T1 hyperintensity were pre-defined: homogeneous (pattern A), fluid-fluid level (pattern B), peripherally markedly T1-hyperintense (pattern C), containing a T1-hyperintense non-enhancing nodule (pattern D), peripherally T1-hypointense (pattern E), and heterogeneously T1-hyperintense without a distinct pattern (pattern F). Three readers independently assigned each mass to a pattern. Individual and mean malignancy proportion were determined. Mann-Whitney test and Fischer's exact test compared the likelihood of malignancy between patterns. Inter-reader agreement was analyzed with Gwet's agreement coefficient (AC).

RESULTS

Among 72 masses, the mean number of masses assigned was 11 (15%) to pattern A, 21 (29%) to pattern B, 6 (8%) to pattern C, 7 (10%) to pattern D, 5 (7%) to pattern E, and 22 (31%) to pattern F. Five of 72 masses (7%) were malignant; none was assigned pattern A, B, or D. Mean malignancy proportion was 5% (0/9, 1/6, and 0/4) for pattern C, 13% (0/4, 1/3, and 1/7) for pattern E, and 18% (5/20, 3/21, and 4/25) for pattern F. Malignant masses were more likely assigned to pattern E or F (p = 0.003-0.039). Inter-reader agreement was substantial (Gwet's AC: 0.68).

CONCLUSION

Bosniak version 2019 class IIF masses that are non-enhancing and heterogeneously T1-hyperintense with a fluid-fluid level are likely benign. Those that are non-enhancing and heterogeneously T1-hyperintense without a distinct pattern have a malignancy proportion up to 25% (5/20).

CT findings and clinical characteristics in distinguishing renal urothelial carcinoma mimicking renal cell carcinoma from clear cell renal cell carcinoma.. [DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2655480/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0]

Background: We aimed to characterize the clinical and multiphase computed tomography (CT) features, which can distinguish renal urothelial carcinoma (RUC) mimicking renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) with collecting system invasion (CSI). Methods: Data from 56 patients with RUC (46 men and 10 women) and 366 patients with ccRCC (262 men and 104 women) were collected and assessed retrospectively. The median age was 65.50 (IQR: 56.25–69.75) and 53.50 (IQR: 42.25–62.5) years, respectively. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed on clinical and CT characteristics to determine independent factors for distinguishing RUC and ccRCC, and an integrated predictive model was constructed. Differential diagnostic performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: The independent predictors for differentiating RUC from ccRCC were infiltrative growth pattern, hydronephrosis, heterogeneous enhancement, preserving reniform contour, and hematuria. The differential diagnostic performance of the integrated predictive model (AUC: 0.960, sensitivity: 92.1%, specificity: 89.3%) was better than that of the infiltrative growth pattern (AUC: 0.830, sensitivity: 71.9%, specificity: 92.9%), heterogeneous enhancement (AUC: 0.771, sensitivity: 86.3%, specificity: 67.9%), preserving reniform contour (AUC=0.758, sensitivity: 85.5%, specificity: 66.1%), hydronephrosis (AUC: 0.733, sensitivity: 87.7%, specificity: 58.9%), or hematuria (AUC: 0.706, sensitivity: 79.5%, specificity: 51.8%). Conclusion: The CT and clinical characteristics showed extraordinary discriminative abilities in the differential diagnosis of RUC and ccRCC, which might provide helpful information for clinical decision-making.

Lexicon for adrenal terms at CT and MRI: a consensus of the Society of Abdominal Radiology adrenal neoplasm disease-focused panel

PURPOSE

Substantial variation in imaging terms used to describe the adrenal gland and adrenal findings leads to ambiguity and uncertainty in radiology reports and subsequently their understanding by referring clinicians. The purpose of this study was to develop a standardized lexicon to describe adrenal imaging findings at CT and MRI.

METHODS

Fourteen members of the Society of Abdominal Radiology adrenal neoplasm disease-focused panel (SAR-DFP) including one endocrine surgeon participated to develop an adrenal lexicon using a modified Delphi process to reach consensus. Five radiologists prepared a preliminary list of 35 imaging terms that was sent to the full group as an online survey (19 general imaging terms, 9 specific to CT, and 7 specific to MRI). In the first round, members voted on terms to be included and proposed definitions; subsequent two rounds were used to achieve consensus on definitions (defined as ≥ 80% agreement).

RESULTS

Consensus for inclusion was reached on 33/35 terms with two terms excluded (anterior limb and normal adrenal size measurements). Greater than 80% consensus was reached on the definitions for 15 terms following the first round, with subsequent consensus achieved for the definitions of the remaining 18 terms following two additional rounds. No included term had remaining disagreement.

CONCLUSION

Expert consensus produced a standardized lexicon for reporting adrenal findings at CT and MRI. The use of this consensus lexicon should improve radiology report clarity, standardize clinical and research terminology, and reduce uncertainty for referring providers when adrenal findings are present.

CT and clinical features for distinguishing endophytic clear cell renal cell carcinoma from urothelial carcinoma

PURPOSE We aimed to characterize the clinical and multiphase computed tomography (CT) features of the distinguishing endophytic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ECCRCC) from endophytic renal urothelial carcinoma (ERUC). METHODS Data from 44 patients (35 men and 9 women) with ECCRCC and 21 patients (17 men and 4 women) with ERUC were retrospectively assessed. The mean patient age was 55 years (48.25- 59.50 years) and 68 years (63.00-73.00 years), respectively. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine independent predictors for ECCRCC and to construct a predictive model that comprised clinical and CT characteristics for the differential diagnosis of ECCRCC and ERUC. Differential diagnostic performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS The independent predictors of ECCRCC were heterogeneous enhancement (odds ratio [OR]=0.027, P=.005), hematuria (OR for gross hematuria=53.995, P=.003; OR for microscopic hematuria=31.126, P = .027), and an infiltrative growth pattern (OR=24.301, P = .022). The AUC of the predictive model was 0.938 (P < .001, sensitivity=84.10%, specificity=95.20%), which had a better diagnostic performance than heterogeneous enhancement (AUC=0.766, P=.001, sensitivity=81.82%, specificity=71.43%), hematuria (AUC=0.786, P < .001, sensitivity=81.82%, specificity=66.67%), and infiltrative growth pattern (AUC=0.748, P=.001, sensitivity=90.48%, specificity=59.09%). CONCLUSION The independent predictors, as well as the predictive model of CT and clinical characteristics, may assist in the differential diagnosis of ECCRCC and ERUC and provide useful information for clinical decision-making.

Novel Imaging Methods for Renal Mass Characterization: A Collaborative Review

CONTEXT

The incidental detection of localized renal masses has been rising steadily, but a significant proportion of these tumors are benign or indolent and, in most cases, do not require treatment. At the present time, a majority of patients with an incidentally detected renal tumor undergo treatment for the presumption of cancer, leading to a significant number of unnecessary surgical interventions that can result in complications including loss of renal function. Thus, there exists a clinical need for improved tools to aid in the pretreatment characterization of renal tumors to inform patient management.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the evidence on noninvasive, imaging-based tools for solid renal mass characterization.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The MEDLINE database was systematically searched for relevant studies on novel imaging techniques and interpretative tools for the characterization of solid renal masses, published in the past 10 yr.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Over the past decade, several novel imaging tools have offered promise for the improved characterization of indeterminate renal masses. Technologies of particular note include multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the kidney, molecular imaging with targeted radiopharmaceutical agents, and use of radiomics as well as artificial intelligence to enhance the interpretation of imaging studies. Among these, 99mTc-sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (CT) for the identification of benign renal oncocytomas and hybrid oncocytic chromophobe tumors, and positron emission tomography/CT imaging with radiolabeled girentuximab for the identification of clear cell renal cell carcinoma, are likely to be closest to implementation in clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

A number of novel imaging tools stand poised to aid in the noninvasive characterization of indeterminate renal masses. In the future, these tools may aid in patient management by providing a comprehensive virtual biopsy, complete with information on tumor histology, underlying molecular abnormalities, and ultimately disease prognosis.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Not all renal tumors require treatment, as a significant proportion are either benign or have limited metastatic potential. Several innovative imaging tools have shown promise for their ability to improve the characterization of renal tumors and provide guidance in terms of patient management.

Ovarian cancer reporting lexicon for computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging developed by the SAR Uterine and Ovarian Cancer Disease-Focused Panel and the ESUR Female Pelvic Imaging Working Group

OBJECTIVES

Imaging evaluation is an essential part of treatment planning for patients with ovarian cancer. Variation in the terminology used for describing ovarian cancer on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging can lead to ambiguity and inconsistency in clinical radiology reports. The aim of this collaborative project between Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) Uterine and Ovarian Cancer (UOC) Disease-focused Panel (DFP) and the European Society of Uroradiology (ESUR) Female Pelvic Imaging (FPI) Working Group was to develop an ovarian cancer reporting lexicon for CT and MR imaging.

METHODS

Twenty-one members of the SAR UOC DFP and ESUR FPI working group, one radiology clinical fellow, and two gynecologic oncology surgeons formed the Ovarian Cancer Reporting Lexicon Committee. Two attending radiologist members of the committee prepared a preliminary list of imaging terms that was sent as an online survey to 173 radiologists and gynecologic oncologic physicians, of whom 67 responded to the survey. The committee reviewed these responses to create a final consensus list of lexicon terms.

RESULTS

An ovarian cancer reporting lexicon was created for CT and MR Imaging. This consensus-based lexicon has 6 major categories of terms: general, adnexal lesion-specific, peritoneal carcinomatosis-specific, lymph node-specific, metastatic disease -specific, and fluid-specific.

CONCLUSIONS

This lexicon for CT and MR imaging evaluation of ovarian cancer patients has the capacity to improve the clarity and consistency of reporting disease sites seen on imaging.

KEY POINTS

• This reporting lexicon for CT and MR imaging provides a list of consensus-based, standardized terms and definitions for reporting sites of ovarian cancer on imaging at initial diagnosis or follow-up. • Use of standardized terms and morphologic imaging descriptors can help improve interdisciplinary communication of disease extent and facilitate optimal patient management. • The radiologists should identify and communicate areas of disease, including difficult to resect or potentially unresectable disease that may limit the ability to achieve optimal resection.

Magnetic Fields and Cancer: Epidemiology, Cellular Biology, and Theranostics

Humans are exposed to a complex mix of man-made electric and magnetic fields (MFs) at many different frequencies, at home and at work. Epidemiological studies indicate that there is a positive relationship between residential/domestic and occupational exposure to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields and some types of cancer, although some other studies indicate no relationship. In this review, after an introduction on the MF definition and a description of natural/anthropogenic sources, the epidemiology of residential/domestic and occupational exposure to MFs and cancer is reviewed, with reference to leukemia, brain, and breast cancer. The in vivo and in vitro effects of MFs on cancer are reviewed considering both human and animal cells, with particular reference to the involvement of reactive oxygen species (ROS). MF application on cancer diagnostic and therapy (theranostic) are also reviewed by describing the use of different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) applications for the detection of several cancers. Finally, the use of magnetic nanoparticles is described in terms of treatment of cancer by nanomedical applications for the precise delivery of anticancer drugs, nanosurgery by magnetomechanic methods, and selective killing of cancer cells by magnetic hyperthermia. The supplementary tables provide quantitative data and methodologies in epidemiological and cell biology studies. Although scientists do not generally agree that there is a cause-effect relationship between exposure to MF and cancer, MFs might not be the direct cause of cancer but may contribute to produce ROS and generate oxidative stress, which could trigger or enhance the expression of oncogenes.

Update on the Role of Imaging in Clinical Staging and Restaging of Renal Cell Carcinoma Based on the AJCC 8th Edition, From the AJR Special Series on Cancer Staging

This article reviews the essential role of imaging in clinical staging and restaging of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). To completely characterize and stage an indeterminate renal mass, renal CT or MRI without and with IV contrast administration is recommended. The critical items for initial clinical staging of an indeterminate renal mass or of a known RCC according to the TNM staging system are tumor size, renal sinus fat invasion, urinary collecting system invasion, perinephric fat invasion, venous invasion, adrenal gland invasion, invasion of the perirenal (Gerota) fascia, invasion into other adjacent organs, the presence of enlarged or pathologic regional (retroperitoneal) lymph nodes, and the presence of distant metastatic disease. Larger tumor size is associated with higher stage disease and invasiveness, lymph node spread, and distant metastatic disease. Imaging practice guidelines for clinical staging of RCC, as well as the role of renal mass biopsy, are highlighted. Specific findings associated with response of advanced cancer to antiangiogenic therapy and immunotherapy are discussed, as well as limitations of changes in tumor size after targeted therapy. The accurate clinical staging and restaging of RCC using renal CT or MRI provides important prognostic information and helps guide the optimal management of patients with RCC.

Clinical Importance of Incidental Homogeneous Renal Masses That Measure 10-40 mm and 21-39 HU at Portal Venous Phase CT: A 12-Institution Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND. Incidental homogeneous renal masses are frequently encountered at portal venous phase CT. The American College of Radiology Incidental Findings Committee's white paper on renal masses recommends additional imaging for incidental homogeneous renal masses greater than 20 HU, but single-center data and the Bosniak classification version 2019 suggest the optimal attenuation threshold for detecting solid masses should be higher. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to determine the clinical importance of small (10-40 mm) incidentally detected homogeneous renal masses measuring 21-39 HU at portal venous phase CT. METHODS. We performed a 12-institution retrospective cohort study of adult patients who underwent portal venous phase CT for a nonrenal indication. The date of the first CT at each institution ranged from January 1, 2008, to January 1, 2014. Consecutive reports from 12,167 portal venous phase CT examinations were evaluated. Images were reviewed for 4529 CT examinations whose report described a focal renal mass. Eligible masses were 10-40 mm, well-defined, subjectively homogeneous, and 21-39 HU. Of these, masses that were shown to be solid without macroscopic fat; classified as Bosniak IIF, III, or IV; or confirmed to be malignant were considered clinically important. The reference standard was renal mass protocol CT or MRI, ultrasound of definitively benign cysts or solid masses, single-phase contrast-enhanced CT or unenhanced MRI showing no growth or morphologic change for 5 years or more, or clinical follow-up 5 years or greater. A reference standard was available for 346 masses in 300 patients. The 95% CIs were calculated using the binomial exact method. RESULTS. Eligible masses were identified in 4.2% of patients (514/12,167; 95% CI, 3.9-4.6%). Of 346 masses with a reference standard, none were clinically important (0%; 95% CI, 0-0.9%). Mean mass size was 17 mm; 72% (248/346) measured 21-30 HU, and 28% (98/346) measured 31-39 HU. CONCLUSION. Incidental small homogeneous renal masses measuring 21-39 HU at portal venous phase CT are common and highly likely benign. CLINICAL IMPACT. The change in attenuation threshold signifying the need for additional imaging from greater than 20 HU to greater than 30 HU proposed by the Bosniak classification version 2019 is supported.