Does microenema administration improve the quality of DWI sequences in rectal MRI?

MRI of early rectal cancer; bisacodyl micro-enema increases submucosal width, reader confidence, and tumor conspicuity

PURPOSE

To investigate the influence of a micro-enema on diagnostic performance, submucosal width, reader confidence, and tumor conspicuity using MRI to stage early rectal cancers (ERC).

METHODS

In this single-center study, we consecutively included 50 participants with assumed ERC who all completed MRI with (MRin) and without (MRex) a micro-enema. The diagnostic performance was recorded for two experienced radiologists using histopathology as the gold standard. In addition, the width of the submucosa in the tumor-bearing wall, reader confidence for T-staging, and tumor conspicuity were assessed. Significance levels were calculated using McNemar's test (diagnostic performance) and Wilcoxon's signed-rank test (reader confidence, submucosal width, and conspicuity). Interreader agreement was assessed using kappa statistics.

RESULTS

Sensitivity/specificity were for Reader1 91%/87% for both MRex and MRin and for Reader2 74%/87% and 89%/87%, both readers p > 0.05. The micro-enema induced a significant widening of the submucosa, p < 0.001, with a mean increase of 2.2/2.8 mm measured by Reader1/Reader2. Reader confidence in T-staging and tumor conspicuity increased for both readers, p < 0.005. The proportion of tumors with both correct staging and high reader confidence increased from 58% (29/50) to 80% (40/50) (p = 0.04) for Reader1 and from 42% (21/50) to 72% (36/50) (p = 0.002) for Reader2. Interreader agreement increased from moderate (kappa 0.58) to good (kappa 0.68).

CONCLUSION

The micro-enema significantly increased the submucosal width in the tumor-bearing wall, reader confidence, and tumor conspicuity and improved interreader agreement from moderate to good. Sensitivity and specificity in T-staging did not improve, but there was a significant increase in the proportion of tumors staged with both high confidence and correct T-stage.

Rectal MR Imaging

MR imaging comprising high-resolution T2-weighted imaging and high b value diffusion-weighted imaging has proven effective in guiding treatment selection and preoperative planning for rectal cancer. In addition to staging, it enables the noninvasive assessment of key bioimaging markers such as extramural vascular invasion, tumor deposits, and the presence and location of mesorectal fascia and anal sphincter involvement. After neoadjuvant therapy, MR imaging offers noninvasive treatment response, complementing endoscopic and digital rectal evaluations. This assessment plays a crucial role in determining the feasibility of organ preservation or watch-and-wait strategy in patients who achieve complete clinical response.

Micro-enema immediately prior to prostate MRI: effects on rectal gas, image quality and PI-QUAL score

PURPOSE

Our aim was to determine whether the administration of a micro-enema immediately prior to prostate MRI is associated with a reduction in rectal gas, gas related artifacts and an improvement in image quality and PI-QUAL score.

METHOD

This retrospective analysis enrolled 171 patients who underwent multiparametric 3T prostate MRI at our institution between January 2021 and September 2022. 86 patients received a micro-enema, and a further 85 patients did not. Two fellowship trained abdominal radiologists were blinded and independently reviewed each prostate MRI, recording scores on a dedicated scoring sheet. The quality of T2 weighted (T2W), diffusion weighted (DWI), and dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) images were assessed according to standardised scales supported in the literature. In addition, gas related artifacts and rectal gas level were examined. An independent-samples Mann-Whitney U and t-test were performed, comparing both the median and mean score between micro-enema and no micro-enema groups for each reader. Spearman's correlation was used to determine the strength of relationship between variables. A quadratic weighted Cohen's Kappa and percent agreement were used to assess inter-observer agreement.

RESULTS

Image quality was improved in those who received the micro-enema compared to those who did not according to the visual grading scale on the DWI sequence for both readers (reader 1: median 4 vs. 4, p < 0.001, mean 4.27 vs. 3.92, p < 0.001; reader 2: median 5 vs. 4, p < 0.001, mean 4.74 vs. 4.14, p < 0.001). PI-QUAL score was significantly improved in the micro-enema group for reader 2 only (reader 1: median 4 vs. 4, p = 0.25, mean 3.99 vs. 4.08, p = 0.21; reader 2: median 5 vs. 5, p = 0.01, mean 4.95 vs. 4.78, p = 0.01). Visual grading score for both the T2W and DCE images was not significantly different. Rectal gas level was lower in patients who received the micro-enema for both readers (reader 1: median 2 vs. 4, p < 0.001, mean 2.12 vs. 3.60, p < 0.001; reader 2: median 1 vs. 2, p < 0.001, mean 1.37 vs. 2.48, p < 0.001), correlating with a lower score for gas-related artifacts (reader 1: median 1 vs. 2, p < 0.001, mean 1.50 vs. 1.92, p < 0.001; reader 2: median 1 vs. 1, p < 0.001, mean 1.16 vs. 1.71, p < 0.001) in this group. Correlation between rectal gas level and gas-related artifacts on DWI regardless of whether a micro-enema was given was strong (rs = 0.71, p < 0.001). Correlation was moderate to strong between rectal gas level and image quality on DWI (rs = -0.63, p < 0.001). There was only 1 (1.2%) borderline diagnostic or non-diagnostic DWI sequence in those who received the micro-enema, compared to 9 (10.6%) in those who did not (p = 0.009). Interobserver agreement was moderate for image quality on DWI, gas related artifacts and rectal gas level (weighted kappa values of 0.52, 0.49 and 0.53 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of a micro-enema immediately prior to prostate MRI is associated with a significant improvement in image quality on the DWI sequence compared to no bowel preparation. This is mediated through a reduction in rectal gas and gas related artifacts. Improvements in PI-QUAL score was mixed between readers.

Mastering rectal cancer MRI: From foundational concepts to optimal staging

MRI plays a critical role in the local staging, restaging, surveillance, and risk stratification of patients, ensuring they receive the most tailored therapy. As such, radiologists must be familiar not only with the key MRI findings that influence management decisions but also with the appropriate MRI protocols and structured reporting. Given the complexity of selecting the optimal therapy for each patient-which often requires multidisciplinary discussions-radiologists should be well-versed in relevant treatment strategies and surgical terms, understanding their significance in guiding patient care. In this manuscript, we review the most common treatment options for managing patients with rectal adenocarcinoma, emphasizing key MRI principles and protocol characteristics for accurate staging. We also highlight important anatomical landmarks and essential factors to be described during baseline assessment. Additionally, we discuss crucial information for restaging and surveillance.

Roles of MRI evaluation of pelvic recurrence in patients with rectal cancer

Developments in the multidisciplinary treatment of rectal cancer with advances in preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), surgical techniques, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and adjuvant chemotherapy have had a significant impact on patient outcomes, increasing the rates of curative surgeries and reducing pelvic recurrence. Patients with pelvic recurrence have worse prognoses, with an impact on morbidity and mortality. Although local recurrence is more frequent within 2 years of surgical resection of the primary tumor, late recurrence may occur. Clinical manifestations can vary from asymptomatic, nonspecific symptoms, to pelvic pain, bleeding, and fistulas. Synchronous metastatic disease occurs in approximately 50% of patients diagnosed with local recurrence. MRI plays a crucial role in posttreatment follow-up, whether by identifying viable neoplastic tissues or acting as a tool for therapeutic planning and assessing the resectability of these lesions. Locally recurrent tissues usually have a higher signal intensity than muscle on T2-weighted imaging. Thus, attention is required for focal heterogeneous lesions, marked contrast enhancement, early invasive behavior, and asymmetric appearance, which are suspicious for local recurrence. However, postsurgical inflammatory changes related to radiotherapy and fibrosis make it difficult to detect initial lesions. This study therefore aimed to review the main imaging patterns of pelvic recurrence and their implications for the surgical decision-making process. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: MRI plays a crucial role in the posttreatment follow-up of rectal cancer, whether by identifying viable neoplastic tissues or by acting as a tool for therapeutic planning. This study reviewed the main imaging patterns of pelvic recurrence. KEY POINTS: MRI aids in surgical planning and the detection of pelvic recurrence and postoperative complications. Being familiar with surgical techniques enables radiologists to identify expected MRI findings. Patterns of rectal cancer recurrence have been categorized by pelvic compartments. Neoplastic tissue may mimic postsurgical and postradiotherapy changes. Resectability of pelvic recurrence is highly related to lesion location.

Primary staging of rectal cancer on MRI: an updated pictorial review with focus on common pitfalls and current controversies

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a pivotal role in primary staging of rectal cancer, enabling the determination of appropriate management strategies and prediction of patient outcomes. However, inconsistencies and pitfalls exist in various aspects, including rectal anatomy, MRI protocols and strategies for artifact resolution, as well as in T- and N-staging, all of which limit the diagnostic value of MRI. This narrative and pictorial review offers a comprehensive overview of factors influencing primary staging of rectal cancer and the role of MRI in assessing them. It highlights the significance of the circumferential resection margin and its relationship with the mesorectal fascia, as well as the prognostic role of extramural venous invasion and tumor deposits. Special attention is given to tumors of the lower rectum due to their complex anatomy and the challenges they pose in MRI staging. The review also addresses current controversies in rectal cancer staging and the need for personalized risk stratification. In summary, this review provides valuable insights into the role of MRI in the primary staging of rectal cancer, emphasizing key aspects for accurate assessment to enhance patient outcomes.

Watch & wait - Post neoadjuvant imaging for rectal cancer

Rectal cancer management has evolved over the past decade with the emergence of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). For select patients who achieve a clinical complete response following TNT, organ preservation by means of the watch-and-wait (WW) strategy is an increasingly adopted alternative that preserves rectal function and quality of life without compromising oncologic outcomes. Recently, published 5-year results from the OPRA trial demonstrated that organ preservation can be achieved in approximately half of patients managed with the WW strategy, with most local regrowth events occurring within two years. Considering the potential for local regrowth, the implementation of the WW strategy mandates rigorous clinical and radiographic surveillance. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) serves as the conventional imaging modality for local staging and surveillance of rectal cancer given its excellent soft-tissue resolution. This review will discuss the current evidence for the WW strategy and the role of restaging rectal MRI in determining patient eligibility for this strategy. Restaging rectal MRI acquisition parameters and treatment response assessment, including important factors to assess, pitfalls, and classification systems, will be discussed in the context of the WW strategy.

PET/MRI in colorectal and anal cancers: an update

Positron emission tomography (PET) in the era of personalized medicine has a unique role in the management of oncological patients and offers several advantages over standard anatomical imaging. However, the role of molecular imaging in lower GI malignancies has historically been limited due to suboptimal anatomical evaluation on the accompanying CT, as well as significant physiological 18F-flurodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in the bowel. In the last decade, technological advancements have made whole-body FDG-PET/MRI a feasible alternative to PET/CT and MRI for lower GI malignancies. PET/MRI combines the advantages of molecular imaging with excellent soft tissue contrast resolution. Hence, it constitutes a unique opportunity to improve the imaging of these cancers. FDG-PET/MRI has a potential role in initial diagnosis, assessment of local treatment response, and evaluation for metastatic disease. In this article, we review the recent literature on FDG-PET/MRI for colorectal and anal cancers; provide an example whole-body FDG-PET/MRI protocol; highlight potential interpretive pitfalls; and provide recommendations on particular clinical scenarios in which FDG-PET/MRI is likely to be most beneficial for these cancer types.

Staging of Cervical Cancer: A Practical Approach Using MRI and FDG PET

This review provides a practical approach to the imaging evaluation of patients with cervical cancer (CC), from initial diagnosis to restaging of recurrence, focusing on MRI and FDG PET. The primary updates to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) CC staging system, as well as these updates' relevance to clinical management, are discussed. The recent literature investigating the role of MRI and FDG PET in CC staging and image-guided brachytherapy is summarized. The utility of MRI and FDG PET in response assessment and posttreatment surveillance is described. Important findings on MRI and FDG PET that interpreting radiologists should recognize and report are illustrated. The essential elements of structured reports during various phases of CC management are outlined. Special considerations, including the role of imaging in patients desiring fertility-sparing management, differentiation of CC and endometrial cancer, and unusual CC histologies, are also described. Finally, future research directions including PET/MRI, novel PET tracers, and artificial intelligence applications are highlighted.

A primer on rectal MRI in patients on watch-and-wait treatment for rectal cancer

Total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) for rectal cancer is becoming an accepted treatment paradigm and is changing the landscape of this disease, wherein up to 50% of patients who undergo TNT are able to avoid surgery. This places new demands on the radiologist in terms of interpreting degrees of response to treatment. This primer summarizes the Watch-and-Wait approach and the role of imaging, with illustrative "atlas-like" examples as an educational guide for radiologists. We present a brief literature summary of the evolution of rectal cancer treatment, with a focus on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment of response. We also discuss recommended guidelines and standards. We outline the common TNT approach entering mainstream practice. A heuristic and algorithmic approach to MRI interpretation is also offered. To illustrate management and common scenarios, we arranged the illustrative figures as follows: (I) Clinical complete response (cCR) achieved at the immediate post-TNT "decision point" scan time; (II) cCR achieved at some point during surveillance, later than the first post-TNT MRI; (III) near clinical complete response (nCR); (IV) incomplete clinical response (iCR); (V) discordant findings between MRI and endoscopy where MRI is falsely positive, even at follow-up; (VI) discordant cases where MRI seems to be falsely positive but is proven truly positive on follow-up endoscopy; (VII) cases where MRI is falsely negative; (VIII) regrowth of tumor in the primary tumor bed; (IX) regrowth outside the primary tumor bed; and (X) challenging scenarios, i.e., mucinous cases. This primer is offered to achieve its intended goal of educating radiologists on how to interpret MRI in patients with rectal cancer undergoing treatment using a TNT-type treatment paradigm and a Watch-and-Wait approach.

Radiologic T staging of colon cancer: renewed interest for clinical practice

Radiologic imaging, especially MRI, has long been the mainstay for rectal cancer staging and patient selection for neoadjuvant therapy prior to surgical resection. In contrast, colonoscopy and CT have been the standard for colon cancer diagnosis and metastasis staging with T and N staging often performed at the time of surgical resection. With recent clinical trials exploring the expansion of the use of neoadjuvant therapy beyond the anorectum to the remainder of the colon, the current and future state of colon cancer treatment is evolving with a renewed interest in evaluating the role radiology may play in the primary T staging of colon cancer. The performance of CT, CT colonography, MRI, and FDG PET-CT for colon cancer staging will be reviewed. N staging will also be briefly discussed. It is expected that accurate radiologic T staging will significantly impact future clinical decisions regarding the neoadjuvant versus surgical management of colon cancer.

The optimized rectal cancer MRI protocol: choosing the right sequences, sequence parameters, and preparatory strategies

Pelvic MRI plays a critical role in rectal cancer staging and treatment response assessment. Despite a consensus regarding the essential protocol components of a rectal cancer MRI, substantial differences in image quality persist across institutions and vendor software/hardware platforms. In this review, we present image optimization strategies for rectal cancer MRI examinations, including but not limited to preparation strategies, high-resolution T2-weighted imaging, and diffusion-weighted imaging. Our specific recommendations are supported by case studies from multiple institutions. Finally, we describe an ongoing initiative by the Society of Abdominal Radiology's Disease-Focused Panel (DFP) on Rectal and Anal Cancer to create standardized rectal cancer MRI protocols across scanner platforms.

Imaging of colon and rectal cancer

Colon and rectal cancer imaging has traditionally been performed to assess for distant disease (typically lung and liver metastases) and to assess the resectability of the primary tumor. With technological and scientific advances in imaging and the evolution of treatment options, the role of imaging has expanded. Radiologists are now expected to provide a precise description of primary tumor invasion extent, including adjacent organ invasion, involvement of the surgical resection plane, extramural vascular invasion, lymphadenopathy, and response to neoadjuvant treatment, and to monitor for recurrence after clinical complete response.

Watch-and-Wait Approach to Rectal Cancer: The Role of Imaging

The diagnosis and treatment of rectal cancer have evolved dramatically over the past several decades. At the same time, its incidence has increased in younger populations. This review will inform the reader of advances in both diagnosis and treatment. These advances have led to the watch-and-wait approach, otherwise known as nonsurgical management. This review briefly outlines changes in medical and surgical treatment, advances in MRI technology and interpretation, and landmark studies or trials that have led to this exciting juncture. Herein, the authors delve into current state-of-the-art methods to assess response to treatment with MRI and endoscopy. Currently, these methods for avoiding surgery can be used to detect a complete clinical response in as many as 50% of patients with rectal cancer. Finally, the limitations of imaging and endoscopy and future challenges will be discussed.

Restaging MRI of Rectal Adenocarcinoma after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: Imaging Findings and Potential Pitfalls

Rectal adenocarcinoma constitutes about one-third of all colorectal adenocarcinoma cases. Rectal MRI has become mandatory for evaluation of patients newly diagnosed with rectal cancer because it can help accurately stage the disease, impact the choice to give neoadjuvant therapy or proceed with up-front surgery, and even direct surgical dissection planes. Better understanding of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy effects on rectal tumors and recognition that up to 30% of patients can have a pathologic complete response have opened the door for the nonsurgical "watch-and-wait" management approach for rectal adenocarcinoma. Candidates for this organ-preserving approach should have no evidence of malignancy on all three components of response assessment after neoadjuvant therapy (ie, digital rectal examination, endoscopy, and rectal MRI). Hence, rectal MRI again has a major role in directing patient management and possibly sparing patients from unnecessary surgical morbidity. In this article, the authors discuss the indications for neoadjuvant therapy in management of patients with rectal adenocarcinoma, describe expected imaging appearances of rectal adenocarcinoma after completion of neoadjuvant therapy, and outline the MRI tumor regression grading system. Since pelvic sidewall lymph node dissection is associated with a high risk of permanent genitourinary dysfunction, it is performed for only selected patients who have radiologic evidence of sidewall lymph node involvement. Therefore, the authors review the relevant lymphatic compartments of the pelvis and describe lymph node criteria for determining locoregional nodal spread. Finally, the authors discuss limitations of rectal MRI, describe several potential interpretation pitfalls after neoadjuvant therapy, and emphasize how these pitfalls may be avoided. ^© RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

Multiplexed sensitivity-encoding diffusion-weighted imaging (MUSE) in diffusion-weighted imaging for rectal MRI: a quantitative and qualitative analysis at multiple b-values

PURPOSE

To compare four diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences for image quality, rectal contour, and lesion conspicuity, and to assess the difference in their signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC).

METHODS

In this retrospective study of 36 consecutive patients who underwent 3.0 T rectal MRI from January-June 2020, DWI was performed with single-shot echo planar imaging (ss-EPI) (b800 s/mm2), multiplexed sensitivity encoding (MUSE) (b800 s/mm2), MUSE (b1500 s/mm2), and field-of-view optimized and constrained undistorted single-shot (FOCUS) (b1500 s/mm2). Two radiologists independently scored image quality using a 5-point Likert scale. Inter-reader agreement was assessed using the weighted Cohen's к. SNR, CNR, and ADC measurements were compared using the paired t-test.

RESULTS

For both readers, MUSE b800 scored significantly higher for image quality, rectal contour, and lesion conspicuity compared to ss-EPI; MUSE b800 also scored significantly higher for image quality and rectal contour compared to all other sequences. Lesion conspicuity was equally superior for MUSE b800 and MUSE b1500 compared to the other two sequences. There was good to excellent inter-reader agreement for all qualitative features (к = 0.72-0.88). MUSE b800 had the highest SNR; MUSE b1500 had the highest CNR. A significant difference in ADC was observed between ss-EPI compared to the other sequences (p < 0.001) and between MUSE b800 and FOCUS. No significant difference in ADC was found between MUSE b1500 and FOCUS b1500.

CONCLUSION

MUSE b800 improved image quality over ss-EPI and both MUSE b800 and b1500 showed better tumor conspicuity compared to conventional ss-EPI.

Rectal MRI Interpretation After Neoadjuvant Therapy

In recent years, several key advances in the management of locally advanced rectal cancer have been made, including the implementation of total mesorectal excision as the standard surgical approach; use of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in selected patients with a high risk of local recurrence, and finally, adoption of organ preservation strategies, through either local excision or nonoperative management in selected patients with clinical complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. This review aims to shed light on the role of rectal MRI in the assessment of treatment response after neoadjuvant therapy, which is especially important given the growing feasibility of nonoperative management. First, an overview of current neoadjuvant therapies and response assessment based on digital rectal examination, endoscopy, and MRI will be provided. Second, the use of a high-quality restaging rectal MRI protocol will be presented. Third, a step-by-step approach to assessing treatment response on restaging rectal MRI following neoadjuvant treatment will be outlined, acknowledging challenges faced by radiologists during MRI interpretation. Finally, research related to response assessment will be discussed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

MRI for Rectal Cancer: Staging, mrCRM, EMVI, Lymph Node Staging and Post-Treatment Response

Rectal cancer is a relatively common malignancy in the United States. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of rectal cancer has evolved tremendously in recent years, and has become a key component of baseline staging and treatment planning. In addition to assessing the primary tumor and locoregional lymph nodes, rectal MRI can be used to help with risk stratification by identifying high-risk features such as extramural vascular invasion and can assess treatment response for patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy. As the practice of rectal MRI continues to expand further into academic centers and private practices, standard MRI protocols, and reporting are critical. In addition, it is imperative that the radiologists reading these cases work closely with surgeons, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, and pathologists to ensure we are providing the best possible care to patients. This review aims to provide a broad overview of the role of MRI for rectal cancer.

The importance of MRI for rectal cancer evaluation

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has gained increasing importance in the management of rectal cancer over the last two decades. The role of MRI in patients with rectal cancer has expanded beyond the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) system in both staging and restaging scenarios and has contributed to identifying "high" and "low" risk features that can be used to tailor and personalize patient treatment; for instance, selecting the patients for neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NCRT) before the total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery based on risk of recurrence. Among those features, the status of the circumferential resection margin (CRM), extramural vascular invasion (EMVI), and tumor deposits (TD) have stood out. Moreover, MRI also has played a role in surgical planning, especially when the tumor is located in the low rectum, when the relationship between tumor and the anal canal is important to choose the best surgical approach, and in cases of locally advanced or recurrent tumors invading adjacent pelvic organs that may require more complex surgeries such as pelvic exenteration. As approaches using organ preservation emerge, including transanal local excision and "watch-and-wait", MRI may help in the patient selection for those treatments, follow up, and detection of tumor regrowth. Additionally, potential MRI-based prognostic and predictive biomarkers, such as quantitative and semi-quantitative metrics derived from functional sequences like diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE), and radiomics, are under investigation. This review provides an overview of the current role of MRI in rectal cancer in staging and restaging and highlights the main areas under investigation and future perspectives.

Multi-practice survey on MR imaging practice patterns in rectal cancer in the United States

PURPOSE

To investigate practice patterns related to MR technique and structured reporting for MRI of rectal cancer at academic centers and private practice groups in the United States.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A survey developed by active members of the Society of Abdominal Radiology Rectal and Anal Cancer Disease Focus Panel was sent to 100 private practice and 189 academic radiology groups. The survey asked targeted questions about practice demographics and utilization, technical MR parameters and reporting practices related to MRI of rectal cancer. The results were analyzed using software in an online survey program.

RESULTS

The survey received 47 unique responses from academic (37/47, 78.7%) and private practice (10/47, 21.3%) groups. Most practices report using rectal MR for staging newly diagnosed rectal cancer always (29/47, 61.7%), and less than half always do so for re-staging after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (20/47, 42.6%). Most groups perform between 1 to 5 rectal MR studies for baseline staging per week (32/47, 68.1%) and most groups perform 0 to 2 MR studies for re-staging per week (27/47, 57.4%). Regarding patient preparation and MR technical parameters, there is variability, but a few key points include most practices (27/47, 57.4%) acquire axial T2-weighted images at a slice thickness of 3 mm or less, axial T2-weighted images with 2D acquisition (30/47, 63.8%), a T2-weighted axial oblique sequence through the tumor (43/47, 91.5%), and T2-weighted images without fat suppression (37/47, 78.7%). Equal numbers of groups report using a maximal b-value less than 1000 s/mm² (19/43, 44.2%) and 1000 s/mm² or greater (19/43, 44.2%); the rest were unsure. A substantial portion of respondents do not use intravenous contrast (13/47, 27.7%). Most believe that structured report templates contribute to uniformity of reporting practices (39/47, 83.0%), though there is considerable heterogeneity in usage and included elements.

CONCLUSION

There is considerable technical heterogeneity among respondents' answers and reporting practices in MR for rectal cancer, and most of the groups report reading only a modest number of studies per week. Our findings suggest there may be room for improvement in terms of radiologist education for performance and standardization of clinical practice for MR imaging of rectal cancer.

Rectal cancer with complete endoscopic response after neoadjuvant therapy: what is the meaning of a positive MRI?

OBJECTIVES

To determine the short-term outcomes of discordant tumor assessments between DWI-MRI and endoscopy in patients with treated rectal cancer when tumor-bed diffusion restriction is present ("+DWI").

METHODS

In this HIPPA-compliant, IRB-approved retrospective study, rectal MRI and endoscopic reports were reviewed for patients with locally advanced primary rectal adenocarcinoma (LARC) treated with chemoradiotherapy or total neoadjuvant therapy and imaged between January 2016 and December 2019. Eligible patients had a +DWI and endoscopy within 2 weeks of each other. True positive MRI were those with tumor on endoscopy and/or biopsy (TP^a) or in whom endoscopy was negative for tumor, but subsequent 3-month follow-up endoscopy and DWI were both positive (TP^b). The positive predictive value of DWI-MRI was calculated on a per-scan and per-patient basis. DWI-negative MRI exams were not explored in this study.

RESULTS

In total, 397 patients with nonmetastatic primary LARC were analyzed. After exclusions, 90 patients had 98 follow-up rectal MRI studies with +DWI. Seventy-six patients underwent 80 MRI scans and had concordant findings at endoscopy (TPa). Seventeen patients underwent 18 MRI scans and had discordant findings at endoscopy (FP); among these, 4 scans in 4 patients were initially false positive (FP) but follow-up MRI remained +DWI and the endoscopy turned concordantly positive (TP^b). PPV was 0.86 per scan and per patient. In 4/18 (22%) scans and 4/17 (24%) patients with discordances, MRI detected tumor regrowth before endoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

Although most +DWI exams discordant with endoscopy are false positive, 22% will reveal that DWI-MRI detects tumor recurrence before endoscopy.

KEY POINTS

• Most often, in post-treatment assessment for rectal cancer when DWI-MRI shows restriction in the tumor bed and endoscopy shows no tumor, +DWI MRI will be proven false positive. • Conversely, our study demonstrated that, allowing for sequential follow-up at a 3-month maximum interval, DWI-MRI may detect tumor presence in the treated tumor bed before endoscopy in 22% of discordant findings between DWI-MRI and endoscopy. • Our results showed that a majority of DWI-MRI-positive scans in treated rectal cancer concur with the presence of tumor on endoscopy performed within 2 weeks.