Longitudinal changes in quantitative magnetic resonance imaging metrics in children and young adults with autoimmune liver disease

Practical approach to quantitative liver and pancreas MRI in children

Quantitative abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers non-invasive, objective assessment of diseases in the liver, pancreas, and other organs and is increasingly being used in the pediatric population. Certain quantitative MRI techniques, such as liver proton density fat fraction (PDFF), R2* mapping, and MR elastography, are already in wide clinical use. Other techniques, such as liver T1 mapping and pancreas quantitative imaging methods, are emerging and show promise for enhancing diagnostic sensitivity and treatment monitoring. Quantitative imaging techniques have historically required a breath-hold, making them more difficult to implement in the pediatric population. However, technological advances, including free-breathing techniques and compressed sensing imaging, are making these techniques easier to implement. The purpose of this article is to review current liver and pancreas quantitative techniques and to provide a practical guide for implementing these techniques in pediatric practice. Future directions of liver and pancreas quantitative imaging will be briefly discussed.

Advanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detection of Liver Fibrosis and Inflammation in Autoimmune Hepatitis: A State-of-the-Art Review

Autoimmune hepatitis is a rare chronic liver disease, associated with a high level of morbidity and high mortality; approximately 40% of patients with severe untreated disease die within 6 months of diagnosis. It should be treated to achieve complete biochemical and histologic resolution of the disease using corticosteroids and immunosuppression to prevent further progression to cirrhosis. The use of invasive liver biopsy is recommended for the staging and assessment of inflammation and fibrosis for treatment decision-making in the face of an unsatisfactory response or clinical remission, including being a determinant for withdrawal of immunosuppression. On the other hand, liver biopsy is invasive, costly, and not free of complications. It also has potential sampling error and poor interobserver agreement. The limitations of liver biopsy highlight the importance of developing new imaging biomarkers that allow accurate and non-invasive assessment of autoimmune hepatitis in terms of liver inflammation and fibrosis, developing the virtual biopsy concept. Therefore, we review the state-of-the-art of Magnetic Resonance Imaging sequences for the noninvasive evaluation of autoimmune hepatitis, including historical advances and future directions.

Association Between MR Elastography Liver Stiffness and Histologic Liver Fibrosis in Children and Young Adults With Autoimmune Liver Disease

BACKGROUND. Liver fibrosis is an important clinical endpoint of the progression of autoimmune liver disease (AILD); its monitoring would benefit from noninvasive imaging tools. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between MR elastography (MRE) liver stiffness measurements and histologic liver fibrosis, as well as to evaluate the performance of MRE and biochemical-based clinical markers for stratifying histologic liver fibrosis severity, in children and young adults with AILD. METHODS. This retrospective study used an existing institutional registry of children and young adults diagnosed with AILD (primary sclerosing cholangitis [PSC], autoimmune sclerosing cholangitis [ASC], or autoimmune hepatitis [AIH]). The registry was searched to identify patients who underwent both a research abdominal 1.5-T MRI examination that included liver MRE (performed for registry enrollment) and a clinically indicated liver biopsy within 6 months of that examination. MRE used a 2D gradient-recalled echo sequence. One analyst measured mean liver shear stiffness (in kilopascals) for each examination. Laboratory markers of liver fibrosis (aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index [APRI] and fibrosis-4 [FIB-4] score) were recorded. For investigational purposes, one pathologist, blinded to clinical and MRI data, determined histologic Metavir liver fibrosis stage. The Spearman rank order correlation coefficient was calculated between MRE liver stiffness and Metavir liver fibrosis stage. ROC analysis was used to evaluate diagnostic performance for identifying advanced fibrosis (i.e., differentiating Metavir F0-F1 from F2-F4 fibrosis), and sensitivity and specificity were calculated using the Youden index. RESULTS. The study included 46 patients (median age, 16.6 years [IQR, 13.7-17.8 years]; 20 female patients, 26 male patients); 12 had PSC, 10 had ASC, and 24 had AIH. Median MRE liver stiffness was 2.9 kPa (IQR, 2.2-4.0 kPa). MRE liver stiffness and Metavir fibrosis stage showed strong positive correlation (ρ = 0.68). For identifying advanced liver fibrosis, MRE liver stiffness had an AUC of 0.81, with sensitivity of 65.4% and specificity of 90.0%; APRI had an AUC of 0.72, with sensitivity of 64.0% and specificity of 80.0%; and FIB-4 score had an AUC of 0.71, with sensitivity of 60.0% and specificity of 85.0%. CONCLUSION. MRE liver stiffness measurements were associated with histologic liver fibrosis severity. CLINICAL IMPACT. The findings support a role for MRE in noninvasive monitoring of liver stiffness, a surrogate for fibrosis, in children and young adults with AILD. TRIAL REGISTRATION. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03175471.