Image-guided percutaneous ablation of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma

Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma: Treatment Landscape and Innovations for an Ultra-Rare Sarcoma

OPINION STATEMENT

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) is an ultra-rare sarcoma with a paucity of data on best practices for management. Pathogenic translocations involving the YAP or TAZ genes lead to constitutive activation of TEAD and TEAD-associated pathways. As our understanding of the molecular drivers of EHE has advanced, investigational treatment strategies have shifted away from cytotoxic chemotherapy toward more targeted approaches. This review focuses on the historical context and evolving landscape of systemic therapies for patients with EHE. For newly diagnosed patients, we recommend consultation at a high-volume sarcoma center whenever possible. If the disease is localized and resectable, surgical excision by a sarcoma-focused surgical oncologist is preferred. When the disease is unresectable, we first assess for disease progression to determine whether active surveillance is appropriate. Some patients may experience indolent, asymptomatic disease for years-or even decades-without requiring intervention. In patients with progressive or symptomatic unresectable disease, systemic therapy is warranted. Setting realistic expectations about the goals of treatment is essential, as no current systemic therapies reliably reduce tumor burden. However, molecular profiling and ongoing correlative studies from clinical trials may soon identify more effective therapeutic targets. For this reason, we encourage referral to centers that routinely perform molecular profiling and offer clinical trials with eligibility criteria for EHE, even to be considered as a first-line approach. Outside of a clinical trial, cytotoxic chemotherapy remains the frontline standard of care for patients who require systemic treatment. Importantly, treatment decisions must incorporate patient preferences and recognition that symptomatic improvement alone can be a meaningful outcome for preserving quality of life.

I thought it was a hemangioma! A pictorial essay about common and uncommon liver hemangiomas' mimickers

Focal liver lesions are frequently encountered during imaging studies, and hemangiomas represent the most common solid liver lesion. Liver hemangiomas usually show characteristic imaging features that enable characterization without the need for biopsy or follow-up. On the other hand, there are many benign and malignant liver lesions that may show one or more imaging features resembling hemangiomas that radiologists must be aware of. In this article we will review the typical imaging features of liver hemangiomas and will show a series of potential liver hemangiomas' mimickers, giving radiologists some hints for improving differential diagnoses. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The knowledge of imaging features of potential liver hemangiomas mimickers is fundamental to avoid misinterpretation. KEY POINTS: Liver hemangiomas typically show imaging features that enable avoiding a biopsy. Many benign and malignant liver lesions show imaging features resembling hemangiomas. Radiologists must know the potentially misleading imaging features of hemangiomas' mimickers.

Irreversible Electroporation as a Valid Treatment Option for Hepatic Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma: An International Multicenter Experience

PURPOSE

Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) is a rare tumor with currently no established standard of care. This international multicenter retrospective study assesses the use of percutaneous irreversible electroporation (IRE) as an ablative tool to treat HEHE and provides a clinical overview of the current management and role of IRE in HEHE treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between 2017 and 2023, 14 patients with 47 HEHE tumors were treated with percutaneous IRE using CT-scan guidance in 23 procedures. Baseline patient and tumor characteristics were evaluated. Primary outcome measures included safety and effectiveness, analyzed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and treatment response by mRECIST criteria. Secondary outcome measures included technical success, post-treatment tumor sizes and length of hospital stay. Technical success was defined as complete ablation with an adequate ablative margin (intentional tumor free ablation margin > 5 mm).

RESULTS

IRE treatment resulted in technical success in all tumors. Following a median follow-up of 15 months, 30 tumors demonstrated a complete response according to mRECIST criteria. The average tumor size pre-treatment was 25.8 mm, accompanied by an average reduction in tumor size by 7.5 mm. In 38 out of 47 tumors, there was no evidence of local recurrence. In nine tumors, residual tumor was present. There were no cases of progressive disease. Median length of hospital stay was one day. Only one grade 3 CTCAE event occurred, a pneumothorax requiring chest tube placement.

CONCLUSION

The current study provides evidence that IRE is a safe and efficacious minimally invasive treatment option for HEHE.

Electrochemotherapy in Aggressive Hemangioma of the Spine: A Case Series and Narrative Literature Review

(1) Background: this case series and literature review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of electrochemotherapy in the management of aggressive spinal hemangiomas, presenting two distinct cases. (2) Methods: we present two cases of spinal aggressive hemangioma which were refractory to conventional treatments and underwent electrochemotherapy. Case 1 involves a 50-year-old female who presented with an aggressive spinal hemangioma of L1, who previously underwent various treatments including surgery, radio-chemotherapy, and arterial embolization. Case 2 describes a 16-year-old female with a T12 vertebral hemangioma, previously treated with surgery and stabilization, who faced limitations in treatment options due to her young age and the location of the hemangioma. (3) Results: in Case 1, electrochemotherapy with bleomycin was administered following the failure of previous treatments and resulted in the reduction of the lesion size and improvement in clinical symptoms. In Case 2, electrochemotherapy was chosen due to the risks associated with other treatments and was completed without any adverse events. Both cases demonstrated the potential of electrochemotherapy as a viable treatment option for spinal hemangiomas, especially in complex or recurrent cases. (4) Conclusions: electrochemotherapy with bleomycin is a promising treatment for aggressive spinal hemangiomas when conventional therapies are not feasible or have failed. Further research is needed to establish definitive protocols and long-term outcomes of electrochemotherapy in spinal hemangioma management.