Primary small bowel tumors: a radiologic-pathologic correlation

Clinical features of intussusception in children secondary to small bowel tumours: a retrospective study of 31 cases

BACKGROUND

Summarizing the clinical features of children with intussusception secondary to small bowel tumours and enhancing awareness of the disease.

METHODS

Retrospective summary of children with intussusception admitted to our emergency department from January 2016 to January 2022, who underwent surgery and were diagnosed with small bowel tumours. Summarize the types of tumours, clinical presentation, treatment, and prognosis.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were included in our study, 24 males and 7 females, with an age of onset ranging from 1 m to 11y 5 m. Post-operative pathology revealed 4 types of small intestinal tumour, 17 lymphomas, 10 adenomas, 4 inflammatory myofibroblastomas and 1 lipoma. The majority of tumours in the small bowel occur in the ileum (83.9%, 26/31). Abdominal pain, vomiting and bloody stools were the most common clinical signs. Operative findings indicated that the small bowel (54.8%, 17/31) and ileocolic gut were the main sites of intussusception. Two types of procedure were applied: segmental bowel resection (28 cases) and wedge resection of mass in bowel wall (3 cases). All patients recovered well postoperatively, with no surgical complications observed. However, the primary diseases leading to intussusception showed slight differences in long-term prognosis due to variations in tumor types.

CONCLUSIONS

Lymphoma is the most common cause of intussusception in pediatric patients with small bowel tumours, followed by adenoma. Small bowel tumours in children tend to occur in the ileum. Therefore, the treatment of SBT patients not only requires surgeons to address symptoms through surgery and obtain tissue samples but also relies heavily on the expertise of pathologists for accurate diagnosis. This has a significant impact on the overall prognosis of these patients.

Spectral CT Imaging in the Differential Diagnosis of Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma From Primary Small Intestinal Lymphoma

PURPOSE

To investigate the value of dual-energy spectral computed tomography (CT) imaging in the differential diagnosis of small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) from primary small intestinal lymphoma (PSIL).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the images of 27 SBA cases and 15 PSIL cases. These patients underwent spectral CT imaging in the arterial phase (AP) and venous phase (VP). CT attenuation values of tumors at different energy levels were measured to generate spectral attenuation curve and to calculate curve slope (λ_HU). Iodine concentration (IC) in tumors at AP and VP were measured and normalized to that of aorta as normalized iodine concentration (NIC). Independent samples t test was used to analyze the spectral CT parameters; Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of each parameter.

RESULTS

There were significant differences between SBA and PSIL in IC (2.09 ± 0.71 vs 1.33 ± 0.15 mg/ml), NIC (0.20 ± 0.06 vs 0.13 ± 0.02) and slope (λ_HU) (2.78 ± 1.06 vs 1.86 ± 0.30) in AP and (1.86 ± 0.68 vs 1.37 ± 0.18 mg/ml for IC; 0.47 ± 0.13 vs 0.33 ± 0.02 for NIC and 2.00 ± 0.56 vs 1.50 ± 0.26 for λ_HU) in VP (all p < 0.05). For the CT value measurement, there were significant differences between SBA and PSIL in the 40-60keV energy range (p < 0.05), but not in the 70-140keV range (p > 0.05). Using 1.38 mg/ml as a threshold value for iodine concentration at AP, one could obtain the area-under-curve of 0.93 for receiver operating characteristic study and sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 85% for differentiating SBA from PSIL. The sensitivity and specificity values were significantly higher than the respective values of 62% and 60% with the conventional CT numbers at 70keV.

CONCLUSION

Quantitative parameters obtained in spectral CT, especially iodine concentration in AP, provide high accuracy for differentiating SBA from PSIL.

The management of primary small bowel and colon lymphoma--a review

AIMS

The management of primary small bowel and colon lymphoma is controversial. A review of the literature was therefore undertaken to evaluate the evidence for the classification, staging, diagnosis, and treatment of primary small bowel and colon lymphoma and guide management.

METHODS

A literature search was performed utilising Embase, Medline, and Pubmed and papers were evaluated on an individual basis.

RESULTS

Consensus opinion favours the WHO classification scheme and the TNM staging systems for primary small bowel and colon lymphoma. CT enteroclysis and barium enterolysis are recommended for the diagnosis of primary small bowel lymphoma and capsule endoscopy and double-balloon enteroscopy maybe useful diagnostic tools. In terms of the diagnosis and staging of primary colonic lymphoma, the evidence is scarce and CT is to be recommended. The mainstay of treatment for primary GI lymphoma is surgery and/or chemotherapy. For primary small bowel and colonic lymphoma, there was no definitive evidence regarding the benefits of either strategy; however, chemotherapy seemed to give a survival benefit over surgery alone for primary small bowel lymphoma and colonic lymphoma was skewed towards surgery plus chemotherapy due to the large number of patients presenting as an emergency.

CONCLUSION

Published data regarding the management of primary small bowel and colon lymphoma is very limited. Classification and staging should be standardised to enable accurate evaluation of investigations and treatments and a large RCT undertaken to compare chemotherapy and surgery. Currently, we would recommend that management should involve chemotherapy with surgery reserved for those with clinical indication.

Laparoscopic resection of small bowel lipoma causing obscure gastrointestinal bleeding

Small bowel lipomas are rare gastrointestinal benign neoplasms, whose signs and symptoms are often obscure. When symptoms are clinically present, one of the most common is usually gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. It is very difficult to make a precise preoperative diagnosis in the absence of evident signs. Definitive diagnosis can only be made through histopathological examination, after the surgical resection. We report a case of obscure and persistent GI bleeding in a 78-year-old woman. Through the combination of endoscopy and computed tomography (CT), it was possible to identify a small bowel lesion, being its direct cause. CT showed a certain fat component within the mass pinpointing the hypothesis of a lipoma. We then performed a laparoscopic resection of 21 cm of the middle jejunum, including the mass and an intussusception. The results of the subsequent histopathological examination of the resected specimen allowed us to conclude that the lesion was an intestinal lipoma. Surgical resection appears to be the most successful approach as good short- and long-term results are achieved.

Prognostic Factors of Primary Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: Univariate and Multivariate Analysis

BACKGROUND

Adenocarcinoma of the small bowel is relatively less common than malignancies of the esophagus, stomach, and colorectum. In small bowel adenocarcinoma, various prognostic factors influence the disease-free status and overall survival rates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty patients who were diagnosed with small bowel adenocarcinoma and treated at our institute between 1983 and 2003 were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

The patients included 40 men and 40 women with an age range of 15 to 93 years (median: 62 years). Only 51.3% of patients were accurately proved preoperatively to have a malignancy by endoscopic biopsy. Sixty patients underwent surgical treatment, and 45 of those patients had curative resection. The follow-up period ranged from 2.5 to 229.7 months, with a median of 9.1 months. The cumulative 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates for all patients (excluding 3 patients who died in the immediate postoperative period) were 43.6%, 22.8%, and 17.5%, respectively. The cumulative 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival rate for all 43 patients with curative resection (excluding 2 patients who died in the immediate postoperative period) was 54.9%, 30.5%, and 27.4%, respectively. Meanwhile, multivariate analysis with Cox proportional hazards analysis demonstrated that earlier tumor stages (stages I and II) and curative resection were two independent factors influencing favorable overall survival. Lymph node metastasis was the only independent factor predicting poor disease-free survival in patients undergoing curative resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Poor prognosis of small bowel adenocarcinoma may be related to a delay in the diagnosis and treatment of the disease. Curative resection is the aim of surgical treatment for small bowel adenocarcinoma. Lymph node metastasis at presentation of the disease predicts tumor recurrence and distant metastasis after curative surgical treatment.

Malignant tumors of the small intestine

Malignant tumors of the small bowel are unusual and account for only 1% to 5% of all gastrointestinal tract malignancies. Thirteen cases of malignant tumors of the small bowel identified at the VAMC in Puerto Rico from January 1999 to September 2001 and a review of the literature are presented. The mean age of our cases was 67 (range: 45-78). Vague abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and melena were the most frequently reported symptoms. The average time from first symptoms to diagnosis was 3.2 months. A positive test for occult blood or hypochromic microcytic anemia was invariably present. Hyperbilirubinemia and increased alkaline phosphatase were warning signs that allowed earlier diagnosis in patients with duodenal tumors. Fifty-four percent of the lesions were detected by endoscopic examination while 46% relied on radiographic studies. Eleven had carcinomas and two malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Neither carcinoids nor lymphomas were identified. Our report of thirteen cases of malignant small bowel tumors is unusual and exhibits differences with the previously reported data. The cases were identified in a limited Hispanic population in a short period of time. Aggressive evaluation and a high suspicion of these malignancies should be entertained whenever subtle symptoms and unexplained gastrointestinal blood loss are assessed.

Small bowel tumors

Primary tumors of the small bowel are rare, and their clinical presentation is nonspecific. Consequently, preoperative diagnosis remains the exception rather than the rule. Although the small intestine makes up 75% of the length and 90% of the surface area of the gastrointestinal tract, small bowel tumors make up approximately 3% of all malignant gastrointestinal neoplasms. Primary neoplasms of the small intestine are notorious for their insidious presentation and vague symptoms, including abdominal pain, anorexia, and weight loss. These nonspecific symptoms, coupled with the lack of physical findings, often cause a significant delay in reaching a diagnosis. Because the small bowel has been a relatively inaccessible area to standard endoscopic techniques, contrast radiography has been regarded historically as the gold standard diagnostic modality. The management of primary malignant small bowel tumors is invariably surgical. However, adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy may be warranted, depending on the type of tumor.