T2-weighted MR imaging for hepatic hemangiomas: comparison of breath-hold and non-breath-hold turbo spin-echo pulse sequences with phased-array multicoil

Hepatocellular carcinoma: detection with diffusion-weighted versus contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in pretransplant patients

This study evaluates the performance of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in pre-liver transplantation patients, compared and combined with contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (CET1WI), using liver explant as the standard of reference. We included 52 patients with cirrhosis (40 men, 12 women; mean age, 56 years) who underwent DWI and CET1WI within 90 days of liver transplantation. Magnetic resonance images were analyzed for HCC detection in three separate sessions by two independent observers: DWI images (DW-set), CET1WI (CE-set), and all images together (All-set). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), per-patient accuracy, and per-lesion PPV were calculated for each image set. A total of 72 HCCs were present in 33 patients at explant (mean size, 1.5 cm [range, 0.3-6.2 cm]). Per-patient sensitivity and NPV of CE-set were significantly higher than those of DW-set when using pooled data between observers (P = 0.02 and 0.03, respectively), whereas specificity, PPV, and accuracy were equivalent. Per-lesion sensitivity was significantly higher for CE-set versus DW-set (59.0% versus 43.8%; P = 0.008, pooled data from two observers). When stratified by lesion size, the difference was significant only for lesions with a size between 1 and 2 cm (42.0% for DW-set versus 74.0% for CE-set; P = 0.001). The addition of DWI to CET1WI improved sensitivity for the more experienced observer.

CONCLUSION

DWI is outperformed by CET1WI for detection of HCC, but represents a reasonable alternative to CET1WI for detection of HCC with a size above 2 cm. The addition of DWI to CET1WI slightly increases the detection rate.

Focal liver lesion detection and characterization with diffusion-weighted MR imaging: comparison with standard breath-hold T2-weighted imaging

PURPOSE

To retrospectively compare diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with standard breath-hold T2-weighted MR imaging for focal liver lesion (FLL) detection and characterization, by using consensus evaluation and other findings as the reference standard.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Approval for this retrospective HIPAA-compliant study was obtained from the institutional review board; informed consent was waived. Fifty-three consecutive patients (30 men, 23 women; mean age, 60.7 years) with at least one FLL of 1 cm or greater in diameter were evaluated. Two independent observers reviewed DW (b values of 0, 50, and 500 sec/mm(2)) and T2-weighted images for FLL detection and characterization. Reference standard for diagnosis was obtained from consensus review by the two observers of DW, T2-weighted, and dynamic contrast material-enhanced images, pathologic data, and follow-up imaging results. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was measured for FLLs identified at consensus review. DW and T2-weighted images were compared for FLL detection and characterization by using a binary logistic regression model. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were conducted to evaluate the utility of ADC for diagnosis of malignancy.

RESULTS

Two hundred eleven FLLs (136 malignant, 75 benign) were detected at consensus review. Overall detection rate (averaged for two observers) was significantly higher for DW (87.7%) versus T2-weighted (70.1%) imaging (P < .001). FLL characterization was not significantly different between DW (89.1%) and T2-weighted (86.8%) imaging (P = .51). ADCs of malignant FLLs were significantly lower than those of benign FLLs (P < .001). The area under the curve for diagnosis of malignancy was 0.839, with sensitivity of 74.2%, specificity of 77.3%, positive predictive value of 85.5%, negative predictive value of 62.3%, and accuracy of 75.3%, by using a threshold ADC of less than 1.60 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec.

CONCLUSION

DW MR imaging was better than standard breath-hold T2-weighted imaging for FLL detection and was equal to breath-hold T2-weighted imaging for FLL characterization.

Prospective study of contrast-enhanced computed tomography, computed tomography during arterioportography, and magnetic resonance imaging for staging colorectal liver metastases for liver resection

BACKGROUND

This study compared the value of contrast-enhanced helical computed tomography (CT), CT during arterioportography (CTAP), and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for staging patients with colorectal liver metastases.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty patients with known or suspected colorectal liver metastases were evaluated prospectively. MRI and CTAP were performed within 3 weeks of CT in patients with potentially resectable tumours. Results of imaging were compared with findings at surgery, intraoperative ultrasonography and histological examination.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were not considered for liver resection following CT. The remaining 100 patients underwent CT and CTAP, 85 of whom had CT, CTAP and MRI. The sensitivity and specificity were 73.0 and 96.5 per cent for CT, 87.1 and 89.3 per cent for CTAP, and 81.9 and 93.2 per cent for MRI. Positive predictive values were 89.7, 87.5 and 87.5 per cent respectively. Receiver-operator characteristic analysis gave an accuracy on a segment-by-segment analysis of 0.73 for CT, 0.87 for CTAP and 0.82 for MRI. Combining information from CT and CTAP, CT and MRI, or all three modalities, did not significantly increase the percentage of patients staged correctly (71, 72 and 76 per cent respectively).

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic accuracy of spiral CT, MRI and CTAP was similar. Combining modalities did not improve accuracy.

Estudo comparativo das seqüências rápidas ponderadas em T2, utilizando-se sincronização respiratória, apnéia, supressão de gordura, bobina de corpo e bobina de sinergia para a avaliação do fígado pela ressonância magnética

OBJETIVO: Comparar, qualitativa e quantitativamente, as imagens de ressonância magnética do fígado, ponderadas em T2, utilizando-se seqüências rápidas, diferenciadas pela técnica de controle respiratório, pela utilização de supressão de gordura e pelo tipo de bobina de radiofreqüência. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Estudo prospectivo em 71 pacientes consecutivos, sendo realizadas seis seqüências para comparação: 1) supressão de gordura com sincronização respiratória e bobina de corpo; 2) supressão de gordura em apnéia e bobina de corpo; 3) sem supressão de gordura com sincronização respiratória e bobina de corpo; 4) sem supressão de gordura em apnéia e bobina de corpo; 5) com supressão de gordura com sincronização respiratória e bobina de sinergia; 6) com supressão de gordura em apnéia e bobina de sinergia. A avaliação qualitativa foi baseada em três critérios: detecção de determinadas estruturas anatômicas do fígado, definição dos contornos hepáticos, e presença de artefatos de respiração. A análise quantitativa foi obtida através da relação das intensidades de sinal do fígado e do ruído de fundo. RESULTADOS: O valor médio dos índices globais de qualidade de imagem para cada uma das seis seqüências supracitadas foi de 7,8, 4,6, 7,9, 5,2, 6,7 e 4,6, respectivamente. As seqüências obtidas com sincronização respiratória apresentaram melhor qualidade de imagem e relação sinal/ruído superiores às seqüências com apnéia (p < 0,001). As seqüências realizadas com e sem supressão de gordura apresentaram qualidade de imagem e relação sinal/ruído semelhantes (p > 0,05). As seqüências obtidas com bobina de sinergia apresentaram qualidade de imagem semelhante (p > 0,05) e relação sinal/ruído inferior àquelas com bobina de corpo (p < 0,001). CONCLUSÃO: Associando-se as análises qualitativa e quantitativa das imagens, as melhores seqüências foram aquelas obtidas com sincronização respiratória e bobina de corpo, utilizando-se ou não supressão de gordura.

O valor da ressonância magnética na detecção de nódulos hepáticos utilizando-se diversas técnicas ponderadas em T2: existe consenso?

Desde o início da década de 80 a ressonância magnética vem sendo utilizada para o estudo do abdome e principalmente na detecção de nódulos hepáticos. As imagens ponderadas em T2 são as que trouxeram maior benefício quando comparadas à tomografia computadorizada com contraste. Inúmeras técnicas e seqüências de ressonância magnética ponderadas em T2 surgiram desde então, na tentativa de aumentar a eficácia diagnóstica, com menores tempos de exame. Neste sentido, foram publicados inúmeros trabalhos demonstrando a utilidade de seqüências rápidas e ultra-rápidas, com e sem supressão de gordura, em apnéia, com sincronizador respiratório e com bobinas de sinergia, entre outros avanços tecnológicos. No entanto, não há um consenso sobre qual a técnica mais apropriada e sensível para a detecção de lesões hepáticas focais. Neste artigo fazemos uma revisão bibliográfica e análise crítica das diversas técnicas de imagens ponderadas em T2, no que diz respeito às suas sensibilidades na detecção de nódulos hepáticos.

T2-weighted breath-hold MRI of the liver at 1.0 T: comparison of turbo spin-echo and HASTE sequences with and without fat suppression

To compare the clinical usefulness of T2-weighted breath-hold sequences for imaging the liver, 33 patients with 97 focal hepatic lesions were studied with a 1.0-T scanner by using T2-weighted breath-hold turbo spin-echo (SE) sequences and T2-weighted breath-hold half-Fourier single-shot turbo SE (HASTE) sequences with and without fat suppression. Images were quantitatively analyzed for liver signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and lesion-to-liver contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR). Qualitative analysis was performed for lesion conspicuity, motion artifacts, and anatomic sharpness of extrahepatic structures. Breath-hold turbo SE imaging with fat suppression showed the highest CNR for cystic lesions and the best lesion conspicuity for cystic and solid lesions among the four sequences. For solid lesions, there was no significant difference of lesion-to-liver CNR between them. HASTE sequence was superior to turbo SE sequences in terms of motion artifacts; however, the usefulness for evaluating focal hepatic lesions was limited compared with turbo SE sequence with fat suppression. Addition of fat suppression was not helpful for HASTE imaging because of decreased lesion conspicuity and extrahepatic details without the advantage of reducing motion artifacts. This study suggests that turbo SE sequence with fat suppression is most useful for breath-hold T2-weighted liver imaging at 1.0 T. Addition of imaging without fat suppression can be considered for evaluating extrahepatic structures. HASTE sequence may have a role for imaging uncooperative patients due to absence of motion artifacts.