Outcome evaluation measures for wrist and hand: which one to choose?

Comparative analysis of closed reduction with external fixation versus closed reduction with percutaneous pinning for distal radius fractures

Closed reduction with external fixation (CREF) and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) are commonly used surgical interventions to treat distal radius fractures. However, there is no consensus regarding the optimal management of these types of fractures. Therefore, this study aimed to compare these treatments' clinical and radiological outcomes in two subgroups of distal radius fractures. The patients who were ≥ 18 and were referred for the diagnosis of type I and III (Fernandez) distal radius fractures were treated with one of these two methods, which have been evaluated through a retrospective analysis of the medical records. A total of 244 patients were divided into CREF treatment (n = 122) and control treatment (n = 122). These patients' radiological, clinical, functional, and incidence rates of complications (over-distraction, radial neuropathy, and deep or superficial infection) were compared to analyze each method's positive and negative aspects. This study showed that patients in the PP group reported significantly less pain than those in the EF group (P-value < 0.05). The PP group scored lower in the specific and general activities categories, significantly reducing Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE). Although the CREF group had greater radius shortening, the difference was not statistically significant. Notably, the CREF group exhibited a significantly higher incidence of complications. Percutaneous pinning proved to be a more effective method for treating distal radius type I and III fractures. Compared to those treated with external fixation, patients experienced fewer post-treatment complications, lower pain levels, and less difficulty in daily activities.

ILOBONE: A phase I/IIa randomized controlled trial to assess the safety and feasibility of local iloprost therapy for enhancing proximal humerus fracture healing- a pilot study design

BACKGROUND

Proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) are the third most common fractures in elderly patients. Over 70% of PHFs in patients aged over 60 are displaced fractures, often necessitating surgical treatment. However, osteosynthesis is associated with a high rate of complications, highlighting the urgent need for additional therapeutic approaches to enhance bone healing and prevent osteonecrosis. This study evaluates the safety, feasibility and potential efficacy of local prostacyclin (iloprost) to improve bone healing in patients with PHFs.

METHODS

Thirty eligible patients will be randomized into one of three groups at a 1:1:1 ratio. All patients will receive angular stable locking plate fixation. Two treatment groups will receive an additional single dose of local iloprost through a 24-hour infusion postoperatively (group 1: low dose; group 2: high dose), while the control group will only receive the osteosynthesis. Patients will be monitored for 52 weeks. The primary endpoint is safety, with secondary endpoints including the preservation of the screw tip apex distance as an indicator of fracture healing, head shaft angle, necrosis rate, and patient-related outcome measures.

DISCUSSION

The Ilobone study aims to provide data on the potential for biological augmentation of osteosynthesis procedures in PHFs, prone to healing challenges and complications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial is registered with ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT04543682), registered 02 Sep. 2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT04543682 and the German Clinical Trials Registry (DRKS00027081), registered 10 Nov. 2021 https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00027081 .

Central sensitization inventory score after surgical treatment for distal radius fractures

PURPOSE

Volar locking plate (VLP) fixation for distal radius fractures has relatively stable clinical outcomes. However, surgeons who assess postoperative outcomes as good may have difficulty fully understanding the perspectives of patients who express dissatisfaction. Central sensitization inventory (CSI) score is now thought to assess psychogenic pain. Therefore, clinical evaluation related to CSI score following volar locking plate fixation for distal radius fractures in this study.

METHODS

Twenty-nine distal radius fracture patients (12 males and 17 females; mean age: 55.2 ± 15.9 years) treated with VLP were included. At final follow up before removal of volar locking plate, wrist joint range of motion (flexion, extension, pronation, and supination), grip strength (% of the healthy side), numerical rating scale (NRS), quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (Q-DASH) score, and CSI score were investigated. In addition, the association between each evaluation item and Q-DASH and CSI scores was analyzed using univariate analysis.

RESULTS

Wrist range of motion and grip strength were not associated with CSI score (flexion: P = 0.651, r = - 0.089; extension: P = 0.689, r = 0.079; pronation: P = 0.241, r = 0.229; supination: P = 0.864, r = 0.034; grip strength healthy side ratio: P = 0.582, r = - 0.109). On the other hand, NRS (P = 0.038, r = 0.393) and Q-DASH scores (P = 0.012, r = 0.469) were significantly associated with CSI scores.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggested that after volar locking plate fixation (before plate removal), patient-reported outcomes (Q-DASH score and CSI score) were not associated with clinician-reported outcomes and impairment measure.

Stability of the distal radioulnar joint before and after corrective osteotomy of the distal radius

Malunion of the distal radius with dorsal angulation reduces stability of the distal radioulnar joint. The aim of the study was to sonographically quantify the stability of the distal radioulnar joint in 20 patients following corrective osteotomy of the distal radius and to investigate the subjective and clinical results preoperatively, three and twelve months postoperatively. Sonographically measured dorsovolar ulnar head translation relative to the distal radius was significantly higher (3.6 mm) preoperatively compared to 2.9 mm three months postoperatively. Twelve months postoperatively the result was 3.2 mm, equal to the contralateral side (3.2 mm). Pain, Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire and Patient-Reported Wrist Evaluations, wrist flexion, radial and ulnar inclination, grip strength and pronation and supination torque improved significantly. Corrective osteotomy of the distal radius shows good subjective and clinical results and improves sonographically measured distal radioulnar joint stability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Autologous nerve coverage in revision surgery for recurrent or persistent carpal tunnel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Initial carpal tunnel surgery fails in about 5% to 10% of cases, with revision rates from 0.3% to 7%. When repeated release is not feasible, autologous nerve coverage may be beneficial, although the optimal technique remains uncertain. The aim of this review was to systematically analyze postoperative outcomes of the different types of autologous nerve coverage techniques for recurrent or persistent carpal tunnel syndrome. A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Literature was searched in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Among the 26 included studies, 8 different nerve coverage techniques were identified, but only 2 could be compared. Based on a random-effects model, meta-analysis showed that the hypothenar fat pad and the synovial flap both seem to be effective procedures, with more patients achieving complete relief of symptoms, satisfaction, and pain improvement in the hypothenar fat pad group.

A survey of practice on the use of condition-specific patient reported outcome measures with patients who have distal radius fractures

Introduction

Distal radius fractures (DRF) are common injuries seen by therapists. Patient Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs) are a way to measure recovery, yet previous research suggests PROM utilisation is low amongst therapists. This study looks at current use of condition specific PROMs amongst UK therapists treating patients with DRF and explores possible barriers and facilitators to their use.

Methods

An online anonymised cross-sectional survey hosted on Qualtrics software was distributed to UK physiotherapists, occupational therapists, and therapy technicians via special interest groups and social media. Analysis was carried out on Excel and Qualtrics Software.

Results

There were 60 responses to the survey. For therapists who use PROMs the Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire, and Patient Reported Wrist Evaluation were the most used, but many therapists reported never using a PROM. Barriers identified included not having enough time in a therapy session, already collecting generic PROMs, and current PROMs did not add to their clinical reasoning. Therapists reported current condition specific PROMs did not capture the psychosocial impact of a DRF or help to assess return to full function.

Conclusion

NHS managers should explore opportunities to collect generic PROMs in a way that has the least impact on clinician time. The development of a Core Outcome Set for hand and wrist trauma may help therapists to identify a toolkit of PROMs to measure different aspects of recovery from this injury but further research is needed to understand the utility of PROMs over individualised therapist assessment.

Rehabilitation of stage-one scapholunate instability (ReSOS): An online survey of UK practice

Introduction

Scapholunate instability is one of the most frequent types of wrist instability, but optimal management is not established. This research aims to identify current conservative management strategies for stage-one scapholunate instability and how these interventions are evaluated in the UK.

Methods

A cross-sectional online survey of UK physiotherapists and occupational therapists with self-reported experience in the rehabilitation of stage-one scapholunate instability (ReSOS), was developed using the CROSS guideline and a clinical vignette. The frequency of treatment strategies was collated via a five-point Likert-type scale and evaluation strategies via fixed-response answers at three-to-six, seven-to-eleven and after 12 weeks post-injury. Data were analysed descriptively.

Results

Forty-three electronic surveys were completed and analysed. Thirty physiotherapists and 13 occupational therapists responded, with 90% working in the NHS. Activity advice and education was the most frequently used treatment at all time-points (100%, 98%, 98%). Quick-DASH was most frequently used region-specific patient reported outcome measure at all time-points (72%, 60%, 67%).

Discussion

Despite some identified themes, including neuromuscular rehabilitation strategies, the supporting evidence is limited in the ReSOS. It is unclear what rehabilitation and evaluation strategies are optimal and the development of a consensus on best practice is recommended.

The Natural History of Non-operatively Treated Traumatic Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tears: A Systematic Review

Purpose  Operative treatment of triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tears has been well researched; however, data regarding nonoperative management is mixed and scarce. Our review aimed to utilize available data to formulate conclusions regarding treatment algorithms for this heterogeneous injury group. Methods  A thorough literature review was performed in Medline (OVID), Embase, Cochrane Library, and PubMed databases with search terms including "triangular fibrocartilage complex" and variations on the full term including "triangular fibrocartilage" or "TFCC," alongside "non-operative" and "conservative." Results were then subject to inclusion criteria, ultimately identifying eight studies. Results  The studies involved a total of 425 patients and 427 wrists for analysis. The mean age ranged from 30.7 years to 60.4 years. 53.6% of patients were male. The mean follow-up ranged from 12 months to 7 years, with an overall mean follow-up period of 27 months. Primary endpoints focused on various functional outcome scores, range of motion, grip strength, and pain. The nonoperative management of TFCC tears resulted in noninferior and comparable outcomes to operative management. Conclusion  Our review identified that the nonoperative management of Palmer-type IB tears with a short period of above-elbow immobilization was an effective treatment option with good functional outcome scores. The nonoperative management of general TFCC tears resulted in comparable functional outcomes when viewed alongside results from other systematic reviews. Risk factors for developing a poor functional outcome or requiring operative management included distal radioulnar joint subluxation, short-arm immobilization, and full tears of the foveal attachment. However, further randomized controlled trials with homogenous data collection are required to make further conclusions regarding the management of this condition.

Treatment Effectiveness of Volar Plates in Distal Radius Dorsal Rim Fractures

Objective  To assess the efficacy of distal radius volar plates in cases involving dorsal fragments at the Ulnar Corner (UC) and Lister Tubercle (LT). Methods  A retrospective study that included patients with distal radius fractures (DRFs) featuring UC and LT dorsal fragments treated with volar plates. The exclusion criteria comprised lunate facet fractures, UC fragment ratio below 25%, and patients treated with dorsal plates. Radiographic and tomographic measurements included radial length (RL), radial inclination (RI), ulnar variance (UV), palmar tilt (PT), fragment areas, UC fragment ratio, and displacement. The scores on the Gartland Werley (GW) classification and on the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, as well as grip strength, and range of motion (ROM), were assessed. Results  The study involved 17 male and 5 female subjects (mean age: 39.7 ± 10.7 years). The UC and LT fragments displayed mean areas of 1.6 ± 0.7cm 2 and UC fragment ratio of 0.4 ± 0.1. The fixation rates for UC and LT fragments were of 18.2% and 31.8% respectively. Improved RI, UV, and PT were noted postoperatively. The mean GW and DASH scores were of 2.1 ± 2.0 and 4.3 ± 3.2 respectively. Grip strength on the operated side was of 89.5 ± 9.8% of the healthy side, and at least 90.9% of the patients achieved adequate ROM. Conclusion  While volar plates are the standard treatment for intra-articular DRFs, displaced dorsal fragments can impact the outcomes. Mini dorsal incisions may aid in the fixation of UC fragments that are challenging to secure with volar plates, preserving joint health.

Comparative Analysis of Radial Corrective Osteotomy and Sauvé-Kapandji Procedure for Malunited Distal Radius Fractures in Older Adults

PURPOSE

Malunited distal radius fractures frequently occur in the older population, posing a dilemma in selecting ideal management for symptomatic patients. Radial corrective osteotomy (RCO) and the Sauvé-Kapandji procedure (SK) have been used to treat this challenging condition. However, it remains unknown which approach is better for the older population. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of RCO with those of SK for the treatment of symptomatic distal radius malunion in older adults.

METHODS

Thirty-three patients aged ≥60 years, with malunited distal radius fractures, were randomized to be treated with either RCO or SK and followed for a minimum of 2 years. The primary evaluation parameter was grip strength, and secondary outcome parameters were surgical time, range of motion of the wrist, exercise-related wrist pain assessment using visual analog scale scores, radiographic results, patient-reported outcomes evaluated using the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), and Patient-Related Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) scores.

RESULTS

The average follow-up duration was 36.7 ± 10.2 months. The grip strength was significantly higher in the RCO group. The surgical time was shorter in the SK group than in the RCO group. The postoperative wrist range of motion and visual analog scale scores for exercise-related pain alleviation were similar in both groups. The ulnar variance decreased in both groups and was similar when compared with the postoperative images. The DASH and PRWE scores were similar between the RCO and SK groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Radial corrective osteotomy and SK surgeries have similar clinical and functional outcomes in patients aged ≥60 years. Grip strength is higher in the RCO group than in the SK group. However, the operating time to accomplish SK is shorter than RCO.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic II.

Construct validity of the Hand10 questionnaire in patients with hand osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

The Hand10 questionnaire is a short, easy-to-understand, visual questionnaire developed for the functional assessment of upper extremity disorders. It consists of visuals of each item as well as facial expressions that reflect the degree of difficulty during the function. It has been stated that the Hand10 questionnaire is suitable for application in the elderly population due to its stated features.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the validity of the Hand10 questionnaire in hand osteoarthritis, the prevalence of which increases with age.

METHODS

Patients filled the Hand10, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), and Australian/Canadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index (AUSCAN) questionnaires, once. Validity of Hand10 was determined with DASH and AUSCAN questionnaires using Pearson Correlation Coefficient analysis.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were enrolled in the study. The Hand10 score of the patients was 45.15 ± 25.81; DASH score was 76.31 ± 26.37, and AUSCAN score was 32.75 ± 15.58. The analysis revealed that Hand10 scores showed a positive correlation with DASH scores at a "very good" level (r = 0.71; p < 0.001; 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.55, 0.82]) and AUSCAN scores at an "excellent" level (r = 0.76; p < 0.001; 95% CI [0.63, 0.85]).

CONCLUSION

The Hand10 questionnaire is a valid tool in patients with hand OA. This questionnaire, which consists of ten items and includes pictures that have a positive effect on repeatability, is very practical in evaluating hand function in upper extremity disorders, especially in older age individuals.

Health-Related Quality of Life with Six Domains: A Comparison of Healthcare Providers without Chronic Diseases and Participants with Chronic Diseases

Background/Objectives: This study aims to compare the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) between healthcare providers without chronic diseases and participants with chronic diseases presenting with one of the four different primary diagnoses on the health-related quality of life with six domains (HRQ-6D) scale. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study to compare the HRQOL between healthcare providers without chronic diseases and participants with chronic diseases. Data collection was performed from May 2022 to May 2023. Data for the comparison group were taken from healthcare providers without chronic diseases, and for the participant group with chronic diseases, the data were collected from actual patients with one of four types of primary diagnoses who were recruited from specialist cardiology, oncology, psychiatry, and nephrology clinics. All the participants of this study filled in the HRQ-6D. Results: There were 238 (58.6%) healthcare providers without chronic diseases who participated in this study, as well as 41 (10.1%) patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), 48 (11.8%) patients with cancer, and 40 (9.9%) patients who were depressed, and the remaining patients had heart disease. The means (SD) of HRQ-6D scores among healthcare providers without chronic diseases for pain, physical strength, emotion, mobility, self-care, perception of future health, and overall HRQ-6D score were 75.3% (19.8), 74.5% (21.1), 85.6% (18.4%), 93.0% (12.3), 91.6% (13.9), 74.2% (23.3), and 82.4% (13.6), respectively. In comparisons between healthcare providers without chronic diseases and participants with chronic diseases, all mean differences of the overall HRQ-6D score and its domains and dimensions were statistically significant (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The overall score of the HRQ-6D, as well as its domains and dimensions are sensitive in detecting the study participants with chronic diseases from among those without chronic diseases. Therefore, the HRQ-6D is a reliable and valid scale to measure HRQOL. Future studies may use this scale for interventional, observational, and cost-effectiveness studies.

Validation and reliability of Arabic version of Children's Hand-use Experience Questionnaire (CHEQ) for children with hemiparetic cerebral palsy

The aim was to assess validation and reliability of Arabic version of Children's Hand-use Experience Questionnaire (CHEQ) for children with hemiparetic cerebral palsy (HCP). Ninety-nine children aged 6-18 years diagnosed with HCP participated in the study. The CHEQ was used to evaluate the hand-use experiences of children with cerebral palsy (CP). In the expert opinion questionnaire, the average percentage score of agreement on grasp efficacy was 91.5%. The highest percentage (93.3%) was for time taken. Agreement on CHEQ ranged from 91.5 to 93.3% indicating that the content validity of the prototype is supported by the expert ratings. Fitting indices showed that the one-factor structure of the CHEQ has a good and acceptable fit in children with HCP aged 6-18 years. All factor loads of the CHEQ items were greater than 0.7 and significant. Cronbach's alpha coefficient in this study was 0.921, thus showing that the questionnaire had high internal consistency.

Validity and Reliability of Turkish Version of the Munich Wrist Questionnaire in Patients With Wrist Problems

Evidence for the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Munich Wrist Questionnaire (MWQ), a patient reported outcome measurement tool (PROM) was evaluated. A total of 80 patients (54.1 ± 1.4 years, 68 females) with wrist problems were recruited. The MWQ was translated into Turkish (MWQ-TR). Criterion validity with Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) was tested by using Pearson's correlation coefficients. Intraclass correlations coefficient (ICC) was used to analyze the test-retest reliability. There was a moderate correlation (r = -0.49, p < 0.001) between MWQ-TR and DASH, while correlations were strong between MWQ-TR and PRWE (r = 0.69, p < 0.001). Test-retest reliability of MWQ-TR was moderate (ICC = 0.67, 95% CI 0.26-0.84). The MWQ-Turkish version demonstrated evidence for its validity and reliability to evaluate pain, work/daily life activities and function in people with wrist problems in a Turkish population.

Hand therapist use of patient-reported outcomes

BACKGROUND

The use of standardized outcome measures is essential for best clinical practice by hand therapists to determine patient status, progress, and the outcome of interventions. A better understanding of current patient-reported outcome (PRO) use in hand and upper extremity practice is warranted.

PURPOSE

This study sought to understand what outcome measures are being used in clinical practice, how they are being used, and the perceived usefulness of PROs by active members of the American Society of Hand Therapists (ASHT).

STUDY DESIGN

This study employed a cross-sectional design.

METHODS

The web-based survey was distributed through Qualtrics (Qualtrics, Salt Lake City, Utah) to active members of ASHT with an email address on file. The survey consisted of multiple choice and open-ended questions.

RESULTS

A total of 348 members responded to the survey. Seven hundred thirty-two different outcome measures were reported to be used by the hand therapist respondents. The most used outcome measure was QuickDASH by 38% of the respondents. Two hundred seventy-five (88%) indicated that their workplace advocated the use of PROs. Most respondents indicated that there were not constraints preventing the use of a PRO. Few therapists respondents use a psychosocial PRO in clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the hand therapist respondents to our survey use a PRO and discuss the results with their clients. The QuickDASH was the PRO used most often by hand therapists. Only a few hand therapists use a psychosocial tool to measure patient status in clinical practice.

Radially Pedicled In-Situ Split-Thickness Skin Grafts, an Alternative to Distal Split-Thickness Skin Grafts

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to introduce a novel radially pedicled in-situ split-thickness skin graft (STSG). The morbidity, esthetic, and functional outcomes of the radially pedicled in-situ STSG were in comparison with those of the distal STSG.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

SETTING

A single-institution review.

METHODS

Seventy patients with oral cancer who underwent radical surgical resection and simultaneous radial forearm free flap (RFFF) reconstruction from July 2021 to March 2022 were included. De-epithelialized RFFFs and traditional RFFFs were used to repair oral defects of 35 patients in Group A and Group B, respectively, while radially pedicled in-situ STSGs and distal STSGs taken from abdomens were used to repair donor site defects in the above groups, respectively. Patient demographics, wound healing complications, and esthetic and functional outcomes of the forearms were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

No significant difference between Group A and Group B was observed in terms of donor site and recipient site complications. The esthetic outcome was superior in Group A compared to Group B (P = .011). The extension range, sensation, and pinch strength of operated forearms were significantly reduced in both groups after surgery (P < .05), however, intergroup differences were not observed.

CONCLUSION

Taken together, our results suggest that radially pedicled in-situ STSG is an applicable technique for direct closure and better esthetic outcomes in the forearm donor site.

Distal radial fractures in adults: 4 versus 6 weeks of cast immobilisation after closed reduction, a randomised controlled trial

PURPOSE

In this study, we aim to evaluate whether the functional outcome of Distal Radius Fractures (DRFs) could be enhanced by shortening the period of immobilisation from six weeks to four weeks.

METHODS

This study is a single blinded randomised controlled trial. Four week plaster cast immobilisation was compared with six week plaster cast immobilisation in adult patients (older than 18 years) with adequately reduced DRFs. The primary outcome parameters were functional outcome measured by Quick DASH score after 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes were: Quick DASH after three months, 6 months, range of motion, and complications (such as number of re-interventions, secondary displacement, delayed and non-union).

RESULTS

80 patients (16 male and 64 female, mean age, 61.76 years) were included and randomized. 65 patients completed the 1-year follow-up. After 1-year follow up, no significant differences were found between the two groups in the QUICK DASH score (P = 0.55). Moreover, no significant differences in DASH Score after three and six months (P = 0.24, 0.28, respectively). The complication rate among both cohorts was almost similar, (P = 0.51).

CONCLUSION

Reduction in the time of cast immobilisation in patients with DRFs in accepted position reported similar outcomes. Of note, the complication rate in the four and six weeks was also the same. Thus, 4 weeks in cast is a safe immobilisation period. Clinical Trials Number Trial registration number and date of registration for prospectively registered trials at http://ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05012345), on 19/08/2021.

Managing patient expectations about recovery after a distal radius fracture based on patient reported outcomes

INTRODUCTION

PROMs are increasingly used by clinicians to evaluate recovery after distal radius fractures, but can also be used as benchmark data to help patients managing their expectations about recovery after DRF.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The study aimed to determine the general course of patient-reported functional recovery and complaints during 1 year after a DRF, depending on fracture type and age. The study aimed to determine the general course of patient-reported functional recovery and complaints during one year after a DRF, depending on fracture type and age.

METHODS

Retrospectively analyzed PROMs of 326 patients with DRF from a prospective cohort at baseline and at 6, 12, 26 and 52 weeks included PRWHE questionnaire for measuring functional outcome, VAS for pain during movement, and items of the DASH for measuring complaints (tingling, weakness, stiffness) and limitations in work and daily activities. The effect of age and fracture type on outcomes were assessed using repeated measures analysis.

RESULTS

PRWHE scores after one year were on average 5.4 points higher compared to the patients' pre-fracture scores. Patients with type B DRF had significantly better function and less pain than those with types A or C at every time point. After six months, more than 80% of the patients reported mild or no pain. Tingling, weakness or stiffness were reported by 55-60% of the overall cohort after six weeks, while 10-15% had persisting complaints at one year. Older patients reported worse function and more pain, complaints and limitations.

CONCLUSIONS

Functional recovery after a DRF is predictable in time with functional outcome scores after one-year follow-up that are similar to pre-fracture values. Some outcomes after DRF differ between age and fracture type groups.

Development and Validation of a Survey to Measure Patients' Expectations of Wrist Arthritis Surgery

Background  The purpose of this study was to develop and test a patient-derived expectations survey for wrist arthritis surgery. We hypothesized that preoperative patient expectations are higher in people with greater functional impairment and that postoperative fulfilment of patient expectations correlates with functional improvement. Methods  The study was conducted in four phases. Development (n = 22) Preoperatively, patients were asked open-ended questions regarding expectations of surgery. A draft survey was then assembled. Reliability (n = 35) The survey was administered twice preoperatively. Concordance was measured with weighted kappa values and intraclass correlations (ICC). Validity (n = 58) Validity was assessed by comparing responses from the Expectations Survey to the patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE). Responsiveness (n = 18) Responsiveness was calculated by comparing the proportion of expectations fulfilled to PRWE scores 1-year postoperatively. Results   Development Twenty-two distinct items representing the most frequent responses were utilized from the draft survey items of 1,244 expectations volunteered. Reliability Patients had high preoperative expectations of surgery (mean = 76.8); 30% had scores ≥90. Test-retest reliability was high (Cronbach α coefficients = 0.91, 0.93, ICC = 0.86). Endorsement of items = 66 to 100%; and weighted kappa values = 0.39 to 0.96. Validity Patients with greater preoperative expectations (≥63) had more pain, worse function, and worse PRWE scores than those with lower expectations. Responsiveness The proportion of fulfilled expectations was high (mean 0.80, median 0.79), and greater fulfillment (proportion > 0.80, n  = 8) was associated with better postoperative PRWE scores. Conclusion  The patient-derived expectations survey is reliable, valid, responsive, and addresses a spectrum of expectations for patients undergoing surgery for wrist arthritis. Clinical relevance Understanding patient expectations can contribute to customized care given the range of surgical choices for the arthritic wrist.

Delayed Surgical Treatment in Patients with Chronic Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Is Still Effective in the Improvement of Hand Function

Background and Objectives: Severe carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common compression neuropathy in the upper extremities treated conservatively; later, when advanced, CTS is treated mostly surgically. The most prevalent symptoms comprise numbness, as well as sensation loss in the thumb, index, and middle finger, and thenar muscle strength loss, resulting in impaired daily functioning for patients. Data on the results of CTS treatment in patients with delayed surgical intervention are scarce. The aim of this study was to determine the postoperative results of chronic carpal tunnel syndrome treatment in patients with symptoms lasting for at least 5 years. Materials and Methods: A total of 86 patients (69 females, 17 males) with a mean age of 58 years reporting symptoms of CTS for at least 5 years (mean: 8.5 years) were prospectively studied. The average follow-up time was 33 months. All patients underwent the surgical open decompression of the median nerve at the wrist. A preoperative observation was composed of an interview and a clinical examination. The subjects completed the DASH (the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand), PRWE (Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation), and self-report questionnaires. Global grip strength, sensory discrimination, characteristic symptoms of CTS, and thenar muscle atrophy were examined. Postoperatively, clinical and functional examinations were repeated, and patients expressed their opinions by completing a BCTQ (Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire). Results: We found improvements in daily activities and hand function postoperatively. Overall, 88% of patients were satisfied with the outcome of surgery. DASH scores decreased after surgery from 44.82 to 14.12 at p < 0.001. PRWE questionnaire scores decreased from 53.34 to 15.19 at p < 0.001. The mean score of the BCTQ on the scale regarding the severity of symptoms was 1.48 and 1.62 on the scale regarding function after surgery. No significant differences were found in the scores between the male and female groups or between age groups (p > 0.05). A significant increase in global grip strength from 16.61 kg to 21.91 kg was observed postoperatively at p < 0.001. No significant difference was detected in the measurement of sensory discrimination (6.02 vs. 5.44). In most of the examined patients, night numbness and wrist pain subsided after surgery at p < 0.001. Thenar muscle atrophy diminished after surgery at p < 0.001. Conclusions: Most patients were satisfied with the results of CTS surgery regarding the open decompression of the median nerve even after 5 years of ineffective conservative treatment. Significant improvement of the hand function was confirmed in the functional studies.

Patient-reported outcome measures used for hand and wrist disorders: An overview of systematic reviews

BACKGROUND

Multiple options for patient reported outcome measures are available to assess patients with hand, wrist and elbow impairments. This review of systematic reviews (overview) evaluated the evidence on these outcome measures.

METHODS

An electronic search of six databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, ILC, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and LILACS) was performed in September 2019, and updated in August 2022. The search strategy was designed to locate systematic reviews that addressed at least one clinical measurement property of PROMs used for patients with hand and wrist impairment. Two independent reviewers screened the articles and extracted the data. The AMSTAR tool was used to assess the risk of bias in the included articles.

RESULTS

Eleven systematic reviews were included in this overview. A total of 27 outcome assessments were assessed, with DASH, PRWE and MHQ assessed by five, four, and three reviews, respectively. We found high-quality evidence of good to excellent internal consistency (ICC = 0.88-0.97), poor content validity but high construct validity (r > 0.70), moderate- to high-quality evidence for the DASH. The reliability of the PRWE was excellent (ICC >0.80), the convergent validity was excellent (r > 0.75), but poor criterion validity compared to the SF-12. The MHQ also reported excellent reliability (ICC = 0.88-0.96), and good criterion validity (r > 0.70), but poor construct validity (r > 0.38).

CONCLUSION

Clinical decisions around which tool will depend on which psychometric property is most important for the assessment and whether global or specific condition assessment is needed. All of the tools demonstrated at least good reliability; therefore, the clinical decisions will rely on the type of validity for clinical application. The DASH has good construct validity, while the PRWE has good convergent validity, and the MHQ has good criterion validity.

Assessment of handgrip strength in healthy african subjects: Establishing age and gender stratified reference values

Background

The handgrip strength assesses hand function in traumatic and non-traumatic upper extremity conditions. It is also a surrogate marker for other systemic diseases unrelated to the upper limb. Various reference values have been established in different world regions, with few studies in our population.

Aim

To determine the average handgrip strength by gender and age categories among healthy subjects in Nigeria.

Materials and Methods

It was a cross-sectional study assessing handgrip strength by age category (ten-year bin width), gender, and handedness in 210 healthy persons aged 10 to 79 in Nigeria. Its relationship with age, height, weight, mid-arm circumference, triceps skinfold thickness, and mid-arm muscle area was evaluated using multiple linear regression.

Results

The mean handgrip strength in the dominant and non-dominant hands was 31.09 kg and 28.45 kg, respectively, P < 0.001. Males have higher values than females in all age categories. The grip strength peaked in the 30-39-year age group in both genders and declined afterward. Age exhibited a nonlinear pattern but had an overall negative relationship, while height was positively related to grip strength in both genders. In contrast, mid-arm circumference and mid-arm muscle area predicted handgrip strength only in males. Triceps skinfold thickness was excluded from the model because of multicollinearity with the mid-arm muscle area, while weight did not predict grip strength in either gender.

Conclusion

The handgrip strength in this study is less than that in western literature. Hence, test interpretation should reference the values from this study.

Functional outcome after digit replantation versus amputation

Background

The success of digit replantation is mainly based on survival rates. The functional outcome as well as the recovery of sensibility are essential parameters for judging the outcome after digit replantation but have been poorly assessed in previous studies.

Patients and methods

Forty-eight patients with 56 complete traumatic digit amputations occurring between 2008 and 2013 returned for a follow-up examination, the earliest being 6 months postoperatively. Each patient’s range of motion, fingertip-to-table distance, fingertip-to-palm distance, grip and pinch strengths, static two-point discrimination (2-PD), and Semmes–Weinstein monofilament (SWM) test level were assessed in order to compare functional outcome and recovery of sensibility between successful replantation (n = 19) and primary or secondary amputation (n = 37). Subjective assessments of the pain level and function of the upper extremity were performed using the numerical rating scale and the DASH score, respectively.

Results

Replanted digits achieved 58% of the median total range of motion of the corresponding uninjured digits. Grip and pinch strength were not significantly different after thumb or finger replantation or amputation. Recovery of sensibility was excellent after replantation, with a median static 2-PD of 5 mm and a reduction of pressure sensibility of two levels of the SWM test compared to the contralateral side. After amputation, the median static 2-PD was also very good, with a median value of 6 mm and a reduction of pressure sensibility of only one level according to the SWM test. There was significantly less pain after replantation at rest (p = 0.012) and under strain (p = 0.012) compared to patients after amputation. No significant differences were observed in the DASH score between the two groups.

Conclusion

Comparable functional results and sensory recovery but significantly less pain at rest and under strain can be expected after digit replantation when compared to digit amputation.

Level of evidence

IV.

Psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in wrist osteoarthritis: test-retest reliability and construct validity

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are frequently used to assess the effects of treatments in patients with wrist osteoarthritis (OA), but their psychometric properties have not been evaluated in this group of patients. Our aim was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS pain at rest, pain on motion without load, and pain on load), the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) questionnaires in patients with wrist OA regarding test-retest reliability and construct validity.

METHODS

The NRS, DASH and PRWE were self-administered by 50 patients (40 men and 10 women, mean age 66 years) in a postal survey on two occasions, two weeks apart. Test-retest reliability was evaluated by Kappa statistics and the Spearman rank correlation coefficients (rho) were calculated to evaluate construct validity.

RESULTS

The Kappa coefficients for DASH, PRWE and NRS pain on motion without load and NRS pain on load were > 0.90, 95% CI ranging from 0.84 to 0.98, while NRS pain at rest was 0.83, 95% CI 0.73-0.92. The construct validity of the PROMs was confirmed by three formulated hypotheses: a higher correlation between PRWE and NRS (rho 0.80-0.91, p < 0.001) was found, compared to DASH and NRS (rho 0.68-0.80, p < 0.001); the NRS pain on motion without load and NRS pain on load correlated more strongly to PRWE and DASH (rho 0.71-0.91, p < 0.001) compared to NRS pain at rest (rho 0.68-0.80) and a high correlation between PRWE and DASH was found (rho 0.86, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The NRS, DASH and PRWE demonstrate excellent test-retest reliability and moderate to high construct validity in patients with wrist OA. These PROMs are highly related, but they also differ. Therefore, they complement each other in ensuring a comprehensive evaluation of perceived disability in wrist OA. As PRWE showed the highest test-retest reliability and the highest relation to the other PROMs, the sole use of the PRWE can be recommended in clinical practice.

Responsiveness and Validity of Weight-Bearing Test for Measuring Loading Capacity in Patients With Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Injury

CONTEXT

Weight-bearing test (WBT) is a noninvasive quantitative test which has been used recently to determine loading capability of the individuals. The aim of this study was to strengthen the evidence for using the WBT test for measuring weight-bearing capacity of the upper-extremity with the specific objective of examining the internal and external responsiveness and concurrent validity of the test in patients with triangular fibrocartilage complex injury.

DESIGN

Single-group repeated measures.

METHODS

Internal responsiveness was assessed using effect size statistics. The correlation coefficient was used to examine external responsiveness by testing 5 hypotheses regarding predefined correlations between the changes in the measurements. Concurrent validity was evaluated by analyzing correlations between the WBT and other measurements. Thirty-one patients with triangular fibrocartilage complex injury were included for the analysis of the concurrent validity. Eighteen patients who completed all measurements at baseline and at 3-month follow-up enrolled for the responsiveness analysis. Measurements included the WBT, pain intensity, grip strength, and upper extremity functional level.

RESULTS

The WBT test was able to detect statistically significant changes in weight-bearing capacity between baseline and follow-up (P = .0001). The effect size of the WBT was large. Three out of 5 hypotheses (60%) were confirmed, a good correlation was found between changes scores of the WBT and grip strength (r = .478; P < .05). There were significant correlations between the WBT and other measurements (r value range from -.401 to .742; P < .05). A higher correlation was found between the WBT and grip strength (r = .742; P = .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The responsiveness and concurrent validity of the WBT test confirmed that it is able to measure change in weight-bearing capacity in patients with triangular fibrocartilage complex injury.

The Dutch language version of the Pain Disability Index (PDI-DLV): psychometric properties in breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Pain after breast cancer surgery is a common and disabling problem. A reliable and valid questionnaire to assess pain-related disability is the Pain Disability Index (0-70). However, properties of the Dutch version (PDI-DLV) have never been investigated in this population.

OBJECTIVE

To assess psychometric properties of the PDI-DLV after breast cancer surgery.

METHODS

For reliability, relative and absolute reliability were calculated with a one-week test-retest interval, as well as internal consistency. Moreover, content and construct validity were examined to evaluate validity.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-three women were included. Relative reliability was good (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.80). Standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change (absolute reliability) were 5.57 and 15.45 points, respectively. The mean difference between two measurements was -1.98 points, with 95% limits of agreement equal to 13.19 and -17.15. The within-subjects coefficient of variation was 59%. Internal consistency was confirmed (α = 0.87). The PDI-DLV was scored as understandable and complete (content validity). Construct validity was supported by confirmation of more than 75% of the tested hypotheses and of the one-factor model.

CONCLUSION

The PDI-DLV is a valid questionnaire to assess pain-related disability 1 year after breast cancer surgery. Although absolute reliability is disputable, its good relative reliability allows evaluating changes between subjects.

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of surgery versus casting for elderly patients with isplaced intra-rticular type C distal adius fractures: protocol of a randomised controlled rial with economic evaluation (the DART study)

INTRODUCTION

Current literature is inconclusive about the optimal treatment of elderly patients with displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures. Cast treatment is less invasive and less expensive than surgical treatment. Nevertheless, surgery is often the preferred treatment for this common type of distal radius fracture. Patients with a non-acceptable position after closed reduction are more likely to benefit from surgery than patients with an acceptable position after closed reduction. Therefore, this study aims to assess non-inferiority of functional outcomes after casting versus surgery in elderly patients with a non-acceptable position following a distal radius fracture.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study is a multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) with a non-inferiority design and an economic evaluation alongside. The population consists of patients aged 65 years and older with a displaced intra-articular distal radius fracture with non-acceptable radiological characteristics following either inadequate reduction or redisplacement after adequate reduction. Patients will be randomised between surgical treatment (open reduction and internal fixation) and non-operative treatment (closed reduction followed by cast treatment). We will use two age strata (65-75 and >75 years of age) and a web-based mixed block randomisation. A total of 154 patients will be enrolled and evaluated with the patient-rated wrist evaluation as the primary outcome at 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes include the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire, quality of life (measured by the EQ-5D), wrist range of motion, grip strength and adverse events. In addition, we will perform a cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis from a societal and healthcare perspective. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, cost-effectiveness planes and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves will be presented.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The Research and Ethics Committee approved this RCT (NL56858.100.16). The results of this study will be reported in a peer-reviewed journal. We will present the results of this study at (inter)national conferences and disseminate the results through guideline committees.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03009890). Dutch Trial Registry (NTR6365).

Below- or above-elbow immobilization in conservative treatment of distal radius fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

There is no consensus regarding the range of immobilization in the conservative treatment of distal radius fractures (DRFs). Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the clinical outcome of patients with DRFs treated conservatively with below- or above-elbow immobilization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, two independent reviewers searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Clinicaltrials.gov and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform in April 2020; a subsequent update search was conducted in April 2021. We identified all randomised controlled trials comparing two immobilization methods in DRFs. The primary outcome measures were the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) or QuickDASH questionnaire scores in the short- and long-term (≤ and >six weeks, respectively) follow-up as well as the treatment failure rate. The secondary outcome measures were radiographic outcome, patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) score, pain score and adverse events. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool version 2. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to evaluate the quality of evidence.

RESULTS

The initial search revealed 1,775 records, and ten studies with 909 participants in total were included. There was no significant difference in DASH score in the short-term follow-up (4.99 lower, 95% confidence interval (CI): 10.45 lower to 0.46 higher; very low certainty) and treatment failure (risk ratio: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.59 to 1.40; low certainty). A clinically irrelevant but significant mean difference (0.83 lower, 95%CI: 1.64 lower to 0.03 lower; low certainty) was found in the DASH score in favour of below-elbow immobilization in the long-term follow-up. The overall risk of bias in DASH scores was high based on the measurement bias. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in secondary outcome measures.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis did not demonstrate clinically meaningful difference between below- and above-elbow immobilization in terms of DASH score both in the short- and long-term follow-ups. However, overall certainty of evidence was considered very low, based on the very serious risk of bias, inconsistency and imprecision. Hence, there is a need for further higher quality research.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN000040134 (4/14/2020).

The Association Between Psychological Factors and Outcomes After Distal Radius Fracture

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to identify psychological factors associated with pain intensity and disability following distal radius fracture.

METHODS

We prospectively followed 216 adult patients with distal radius fracture for 9 months. Demographics, injury and treatment details, and psychological measures (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score [HADS], Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-Civilian, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, Illness Perception Questionnaire Brief [IPQB], General Self-Efficacy Scale, and Recovery Locus of Control [RLOC]) were collected at enrollment. Multivariable linear regression was used to identify factors associated with Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) and Likert pain scores.

RESULTS

Higher 10-week DASH scores were associated with increased age, the presence of a nerve pathology, increased HADS Depression subscale scores, increased IPQB scores, and lower RLOC scores. Higher 9-month DASH scores were associated with increased age, increased deprivation scores, increased numbers of medical comorbidities, a greater degree of radial shortening, increased HADS Depression subscale scores, and lower RLOC scores. A higher 10-week pain score was associated with increased deprivation and IPQB scores. A higher pain score at 9 months was associated with an increased number of medical comorbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

Psychosocial factors measured early after fracture are associated with pain and disability up to 9 months after distal radius fracture. Illness perception is a potentially modifiable psychological construct not previously studied in hand conditions. It may provide a suitable target for psychological interventions that could enhance recovery.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic II.

Comparative study of surgical wound closure with nylon interrupted sutures and running subcuticular vicryl rapide suture after open release of the carpal tunnel

BACKGROUND

Surgical decompression of the carpal tunnel is considered the method of choice for its treatment with satisfactory results documented. Various methods and suturing materials have been used for closure of the surgical wound. In the present study, we compared interrupted mattress closure by means of nylon suture to running subcuticular closure with vicryl rapide suture. As far as we know, there is no similar study in the literature.

METHODS

A total of twenty patients were included in the study. Ten of them had their surgical wound closed with 3.0 nylon suture in an interrupted fashion and for the rest, a running subcuticular 3.0 vicryl rapide was used. All patients filled in a questionnaire about VAS perceived pain and a Quick DASH score sheet, preoperatively, at two and six weeks postoperatively. The cosmesis of the scar was assessed using the POSAS v2.0 system at two and six weeks after surgery and overall incidence of infections was noted as well.

RESULTS

There was no statistically important difference between the two groups of patients in regards to postoperative VAS pain levels at two and six weeks. Likewise, no statistically significant difference was evident as far as Quick DASH score, POSAS score and infections were concerned.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the use of running subcuticular vicryl rapide suture is an attractive alternative to interrupted nylon sutures for closure after open carpal tunnel decompression, lacking any significant drawbacks.

LAY SUMMARY

Surgery for carpal tunnel decompression is considered the method of choice for its treatment with documented satisfactory results. Various methods and suturing materials have been used for closure of the surgical wound. In the present study, we compared the use of a non-absorbable suture, placed intermittently to an absorbable continuous intradermal suture. A total of twenty patients were included in the study. Half of them had their wound closed with the absorbable suture and the other half with the non-absorbable suture, as described above. All patients were evaluated as far as pain, scar characteristics, functional outcomes of the operated hand and incidence of infection, at two and six weeks after surgery. After analysis of the data, no significant differences were found between the two groups, suggesting that both of these techniques are equally safe and efficacious.

Safety of Left Subclavian Artery Selective Coverage without Revascularization in Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Type B Aortic Dissections

PURPOSE

Whether to proceed left subclavian artery (LSA) revascularization in patients with LSA coverage due to insufficient proximal landing zone (PLZ) during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) remains controversial.

METHODS

A total of 903 patients who received TEVAR were retrospectively analyzed. LSA could be covered if the PLZ was less than 15 mm accompanied with 1) a dominant or balanced right vertebral artery, 2) a complete circle of Willis, and 3) a left vertebral artery with a diameter ≥3 mm and without severe stenosis.

RESULTS

LSA selective coverage was necessary for 35.0% (316/903) of the patients to extend the PLZ. Patients presented with weakness, pain, cooling and discoloration of the left upper extremity (LUE), and pulselessness of the left brachial artery were more in the LSA-covered group. The ischemia of LUE occurred more often in patients with LSA covered completely than in those with LSA covered partially. Functional arm status showed no significant difference in the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire scores at 12 months postoperative between the LSA-covered group and LSA-uncovered group, or between the LSA-covered completely group and LSA-covered partially group.

CONCLUSION

It was safe to cover the LSA origin without revascularization if the PLZ was less than 15 mm accompanied with careful evaluation (description in method).

Clinical Outcomes of Two-Stage Implantation in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Postinfectious End-Stage Glenohumeral Arthritis in Native Shoulders: A Single-Center Cohort Study with a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

Background

Septic arthritis of the shoulder is a rare but devastating condition that may lead to joint destruction. There are few studies and limited outcome data on shoulder arthroplasty for infected native shoulders with end-stage glenohumeral arthritis (GHA). Hence, this study aimed to demonstrate the clinical outcomes of two-stage implantation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) using an antibiotic spacer in the first stage for this challenging condition.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study on two-stage implantation in RSA in infected shoulders. Patients were diagnosed with end-stage GHA due to primary shoulder sepsis or infection following non-arthroplasty shoulder surgery. Laboratory data, range of motion (ROM), and functional scores including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Constant score, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score were assessed prior to spacer placement and at the latest follow-up. Furthermore, intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded.

Results

In this study, 10 patients with a mean age of 54.8 ± 15.8 years (range, 30-77 years) were included. The mean follow-up period was 37.3 ± 9.1 months (range, 25-56 months). All postoperative ROM measurements and functional scores were improved significantly. Although no reinfection was observed, a total of 5 complications including 2 hematomas, 1 intraoperative humeral fracture, 1 humeral stem loosening, and 1 anterior deltoid dysfunction were observed in 4 patients after a follow-up period of at least 2 years after RSA.

Conclusions

Two-stage implantation in RSA is an effective method for improving the function and controlling the infection in postinfectious end-stage GHA in native shoulders.

Immobilization protocols following trapeziectomy for osteoarthritis of the thumb: 2 weeks versus 4 weeks

We compared the clinical outcomes of post-trapeziectomy protocols according to their duration. The main hypothesis was that there would be no significant difference in postoperative function whether immobilization duration was 2 or 4 weeks. The secondary hypotheses were that there would be no significant difference in postoperative pain, motion, or strength. 40 trapeziectomies were reviewed. Two weeks' postoperative commissural immobilization was systematic. Patients were then divided in two groups. For the first 20 patients (group I), immobilization stopped at 2 weeks. For the next 20 patients (group II) it was replaced by a splint for further 2 weeks. We compared mean pre- and post-operative (10-20 weeks) function (QuickDASH score), pain (visual analog scale - VAS), thumb opposition (Kapandji score) and strength (palmar pinch test) between the two groups. There was no significant difference between groups in postoperative values or in pre- to post-operative progression. The main hypothesis was confirmed: there was no significant difference in the postoperative function whether the immobilization was for 2 or 4 weeks. The secondary hypotheses regarding postoperative pain, motion and strength were also confirmed.

Arthroscopic Lunate Excision Provides Excellent Outcomes for Low-Demand Patients with Advanced Kienböck's Disease

Purpose

To examine the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic lunate excisions for advanced Kienböck's disease.

Methods

Fifteen patients (six men and nine women; mean age: 65 years; range: 48-83 years) with advanced Kienböck's disease, who underwent arthroscopic lunate resection between April 2008 and March 2016, were reviewed clinically and radiographically after a follow-up of >2 years (mean: 29 months; range: 24-60 months). Clinical parameters, such as wrist range of motion, grip strength, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, and patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) score were evaluated. Radiographic parameters included radioscaphoid angle, scaphocapitate angle, carpal height ratio, ulnar-triquetrum distance, and the scaphoid-triquetrum distance. Wilcoxon's signed-rank test was used to compare measurement results.

Results

During the final follow-up, patients exhibited significant improvements, such as 42.9° in wrist range of motion (P = .009), 24.5% of the contralateral side in grip strength (P = .001), 26.2 points in DASH score (P = .002), and 37.8 points in PRWE score (P < .001), compared with the preoperative values. The radioscaphoid and scaphocapitate angles significantly increased by 4.8° (P = .0027) and 3.7° (P = .0012), respectively. The carpal height ratio, ulnar-triquetrum distance, and scaphoid-triquetrum distance significantly decreased by 0.05 (P < .001), 2.6 mm (P < .001), and 1.3 mm (P = .0012), respectively.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that arthroscopic lunate excisions provided excellent postoperative pain relief and functional recovery within 2 years of follow-up. Changes in carpal alignment and stress concentration on the radial side of the carpal bones could occur in the long term; however, arthroscopic lunate excision can be a good surgical option for treating low-demand patients with advanced Kienböck's disease.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Management of extra-articular shaft fractures of the non-thumb metacarpals: plate-screw fixation versus K-wire fixation

Metacarpal fractures are common injuries and comprise nearly 36% to 42% of all fractures in the hand. The majority of these can be managed non-surgically. Operative fixation when needed, can be done by a variety of techniques. In this study, we have compared the outcomes of two techniques, plate-screw fixation and K-wire fixation. We have conducted a prospective, non-randomized, comparative study of patients who presented with extra-articular metacarpal shaft fractures of non-thumb metacarpals over a period of 18 months. 30 patients were enrolled according to the inclusion criteria and were alternately allotted to the plate-screw group and the K-wire group. At admission, patient demographics, clinical features, number of fractures, and fracture patterns were recorded, and radiographs were taken. In the plate-screw group, low-profile plates and screws were used, and in the K-wire group, 1 or 2 K-wires were used for fixation after fracture reduction. Hand mobilization exercises were started within one week in the plate-screw group, while in the K-wire group full mobilization was allowed at 4 weeks post-surgery. The Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score was calculated and compared between the two groups at 6 months and 12 months after surgery. The mean 6-month DASH score in the plate-screw group was 6.3287±2.2453, while it was 17.1627±6.2103 in the K-wire group (p value <0.001). At the end of 1-year follow-up, the mean DASH score in the plate-screw group was 5.1080±1.6637, and in the K-wire group, it was 5.1073±1.9392 (p value =0.848). In conclusion, extra-articular metacarpal shaft fractures of the non-thumb metacarpals treated by plate-screw fixation had significantly better DASH scores and hence better functional outcomes at the end of 6 months. However, at the end of 1 year, the DASH scores in both the groups were almost similar, suggesting similar functional outcomes in the long term.

Evaluating the Impact of Social Deprivation on Mid-Term Outcomes Following Distal Radius Open Reduction Internal Fixation

Purpose

Although baseline biopsychosocial factors are associated with short-term patient-reported outcomes following distal radius fracture open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), their effect on mid-term outcomes is unclear. We aimed to evaluate the effect of social deprivation, previously established as a surrogate for depression, pain interference, and anxiety, on quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) scores >1 year following distal radius ORIF.

Methods

Adult patients (≥18 years) with an isolated distal radius fracture treated with ORIF by orthopedic trauma and hand surgeons at a single tertiary academic center over a 3-year period were included. Outcomes at ≥1 year postoperatively were evaluated using QuickDASH. Age, follow-up duration, area deprivation index (ADI; a measure of social deprivation), subspecialty (hand vs trauma), and postoperative alignment were assessed using linear regression with 95% confidence intervals after bootstrapping and a permutation test for P values to test for their association with the final QuickDASH score.

Results

Follow-up data were obtained for 98 of 220 (44.5%) patients at a mean of 3.1 ± 1.0 years after surgery. Mean age and ADI were 53.2 ± 15.4 years and 26.8 ± 18.7, respectively. Most fractures were intra-articular (67.3%), and 72.4% had acceptable postoperative alignment parameters, as defined by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guidelines. The mean QuickDASH score was 13.0 ± 16.5. There were no significant associations between the final QuickDASH score and any studied factor, including ADI, as determined using univariable analysis. Multivariable analysis showed no association between ADI and the final QuickDASH score, independent of age, sex, treating service, follow-up duration, and fracture alignment or pattern.

Conclusions

At mid-term follow up after distal radius ORIF, ADI did not correlate with QuickDASH scores, and the QuickDASH scores of the patients did not differ from those of the general population. However, our cohort mostly comprised patients with levels of deprivation below the national median. Although studies have shown that the short-term outcomes of distal radius ORIF are influenced by biopsychosocial factors, outcomes at the time of final recovery may not be associated with social deprivation.

Type of study/level of evidence

Prognostic IV.

Patient-reported outcome measures for patients with hand-specific impairments-A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly used to provide evidence for treatment effects and to guide rehabilitation. To our knowledge, no disease-specific PROM exists for the assessment of patients with flexor tendon lesions of the hand. We believe that PROMs used to assess hand function, regardless of diagnosis, contain relevant items for patients with flexor tendon lesions of the hand.

PURPOSE

The aim of our study was to identify and collect items from pre-existing PROMs used by clinical experts to assess the health status and function in patients with reduced hand function.

STUDY DESIGN

A scoping review searching for PROMs with hand-specific content was conducted to ensure face validity. As these items are assumed to have been through an evaluation process by the clinical specialists, they have the advantage and likelihood of being useful.

METHODS

We searched five bibliographic databases. All PROMs with hand-specific content used to assess hand function were considered for inclusion. Questionnaires written in English, Danish, Swedish, and Norwegian were included. An analysis of content redundancy was conducted, and items were grouped according to The World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.

RESULTS

Seventy-three PROMs were included with a total of 1,582 items. The majority of the items were redundant across measurement instruments, and redundant items were consolidated, resulting in 179 nonredundant items. All nonredundant items were classified according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health components.

CONCLUSIONS

This review presents a collection of 179 items ensuring face validity for patients with hand-related disease/injury.

Predictors for Clinical Outcomes Related to Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders in a Healthy Working Population

A wide range of endpoints and methods of analysis can be observed in occupational health studies in the context of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs). Comparison of study results is therefore difficult. We investigated the association between different clinical endpoints and the presence of upper extremity WMSDs in a healthy working population. Furthermore, the influence of socio-demographic, work-related, and individual predictors on different endpoints was examined. Two self-administered questionnaires were distributed to 70 workers and employees. In addition, a standardized physical examination and an industry test were performed in this cross-sectional study. Correlations between WMSDs and clinical endpoints were analyzed with the Spearman method and prediction ellipses. Multiple regression models were used to study the strength of associations with a pre-defined set of potential influencing factors. The prevalence of WMSDs was 56% (39/70). Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score/pain under strain showed the strongest correlations with WMSDs. When analyzing the correlation between WMSDs and pre-selected predictors, none of the predictors could be identified as a risk factor. The DASH score remains a close candidate for best surrogate endpoint for WMSDs detection. Standardized analysis methods could improve the methodological quality of future occupational health studies.

Self-identified functional limitations improve in patients with degenerative wrist arthritis after surgery

STUDY DESIGN

This is a prospective cohort pilot study.

BACKGROUND

Degenerative wrist arthritis leads to pain, loss of strength, mobility, function, and impairments in psychological well-being. Accurate assessment of functional limitations that are unique to the individual is essential for successful treatment that best meets those specific needs.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

To identify and determine if self-identified functional limitations improve in patients who underwent surgery for degenerative wrist arthritis.

METHODS

Patients with degenerative wrist arthritis who were scheduled for surgery were prospectively recruited (n = 14, mean age + SD = 42 + 16, 10 males, 4 females) into a pilot study that measured self-identified functional limitations and outcomes. Inclusion criteria included a diagnosis of scapholunate advanced collapse, scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse, scapholunate interosseous ligament tear, or Kienböck disease. Exclusion criteria included a history of neuromuscular disease or concomitant ipsilateral musculoskeletal injury. Data were collected during two 20-minute sessions, preoperatively and one year postoperatively, utilizing the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation and the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure.

RESULTS

All patients reported significant decreases (P < .001) in total pain (mean change = 17.6, SD = 8.5) and total disability (mean = 17.8, SD = 9.1) on the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation from presurgery to postsurgery, with a large effect size of d > 0.8. Patients also reported significant improvements (P < .001) in mean performance (mean = 3.5, SD = 1.5) and mean satisfaction (mean = 4.0, SD = 2.1) with self-identified activities on the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, with an effect size of d > 0.8.

CONCLUSION

Patients with degenerative wrist arthritis reported significant postoperative improvement in both performance and satisfaction in self-identified activities. Consideration of patient-specified goals can inform both patients and clinicians during the surgical decision-making process and allow for more individualized care.

Using Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire in clinical practice: A systematic review of its measurement properties

INTRODUCTION

Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (CTQ) is widely used for assessing condition-specific impairments in individuals with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) or for assessing outcomes after carpal tunnel surgery (carpal tunnel release [CTR]). A systematic review of its measurement properties can greatly facilitate its evidence-based use in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to systematically locate, appraise, and synthesize the evidence concerning the reliability, responsiveness, validity, minimal detectable change (MDC), and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the CTQ and its scales.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a systematic review of measurement properties.

METHODS

Using predefined keywords, PubMed, CINAHL, PsychInfo, and ProQuest were searched to locate primary studies that assessed measurement properties of the CTQ. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using a standardized tool. Data concerning the measurement properties were extracted and synthesized. The pooled estimates for the indices of test-retest reliability, standard error of measurement, responsiveness, MDC, and MCID were calculated from the included studies.

RESULTS

A total of 34 articles were deemed eligible and included in this review. The methodological quality of these 34 studies was generally good. Most studies suggested that the CTQ and its scales had good test-retest reliability and internal consistency. However, few studies found that the Symptom Severity Scale had more than one factor. The responsiveness of the CTQ and its scales was excellent across the studies. The pooled estimates for the MDC₉₀ and MCID for Symptom Severity Scale/Functional Status Scale were 0.72/0.79 and 1.05/1.13, respectively.

DISCUSSION

The results of this review support the use of CTQ and its scales in assessing conditions-specific impairments in individuals with CTS or after CTR. However, an effort should be made to review and modify the content of the symptom severity scale due to multiple reports challenging its unidimensional structure.

CONCLUSIONS

The totality of evidence emerging from this systematic review suggests that the CTQ and its scales provide reliable and valid estimate of impairments resulting from CTS or after CTR.

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Translated Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation Score

Introduction  The purpose of this study is to perform a cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the translated Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score exclusively for pathologies of the wrist. Materials and Methods  A methodological study of cross-cultural validation of clinical scores was performed through a test-retest reliability analysis, internal consistency, response to change, and criterion validity assessment. Results  The test was applied to 57 patients with 139 surveys. Stability evaluated through Lin's concordance correlation coefficient was 0.98, with 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.97-0.99; Cronbach's alpha was > 0.91; the difference in score was 24.26 (standard deviation: 26.59); the standardized response mean was 0.912; the effect size was 0.924; the Spearman's coefficient between the differences of PRWE and DASH-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand-scores was r  = 0.899, with 95% CI = 0.811-0.947; Spearman's nonparametric correlation test between PRWE and DASH was 0.82, with 95% CI = 0.711-0.890. Conclusions  We successfully validated the Spanish translation of the PRWE scale. It showed valid and reliable interpretation of functional status and response to treatment after distal radius fracture, for Colombian population. Level of Evidence  This is a level II, methodological study for scale validation.

Patient-Perceived Outcomes After Nonoperative Treatment of Distal Radius Fracture in Older Adults

Malunion after distal radius fracture is common in older patients; however, whether patient-perceived outcomes are influenced by radiologic outcome is controversial. This study evaluated patient-perceived outcomes according to radiologic parameters in older patients who underwent nonoperative treatment. The records of 167 patients older than 55 years who had a distal radius fracture were reviewed. All fractures were treated nonoperatively, and average length of follow-up was 7 years. Outcomes were evaluated using numeric rating scales for pain and satisfaction, as well as Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) scores. Radiographs were evaluated for dorsal tilt, radial inclination, and ulnar variance. Fifty-one patients (30%) developed malunion. The pain numeric rating scale score was 0.8 for patients with malunion and 0.4 for patients with acceptable alignment; this difference was not statistically significant. The QuickDASH score was higher for patients with malunion (14.9 vs 11.1 for patients with acceptable alignment); however, this difference was not clinically meaningful. Satisfaction scores were lower for patients with malunion than for patients with acceptable alignment (80.8 vs 92.3). Patients with malunion stated they would choose surgery rather than a cast (13.3% vs 7.2%) if they developed another fracture; this difference was not statistically significant. The subanalysis according to radiologic parameters showed dorsal tilt and ulnar variance affected patient satisfaction but not other outcomes. This study indicated nonoperative treatment in older adults obtained acceptable patient-perceived outcomes despite residual deformity. However, patients whose radiologic parameter exceeded the tolerable range were less satisfied. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(2):e190-e196.].

The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ-Swe) in patients with distal radius fractures-cross-cultural adaptation to Swedish, validation and reliability

Background

The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire—MHQ—is a well-known self-assessment questionnaire, where patients’ own perception in terms of recovery, pain and the ability to return to activities of daily living is assessed. The purpose of the study was to translate and culturally adapt the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire to Swedish and to test the validity and reliability in patients with surgically treated distal radius fractures.

Methods

The cross-cultural adaptation and the translation process were conducted according to predefined guidelines. Seventy-eight patients with surgically treated distal radius fractures completed the translated version of the questionnaire on their six-week follow-up visit.

Results

The translation and cross-cultural adaptation process revealed no major linguistic or cultural issues. The internal consistency of the MHQ-Swe ranged from 0.77 to 0.94 at test 1 and from 0.81 to 0.96 at test 2 for all subscales, which indicates good internal consistency in the subscales. The hand function subscale revealed the lowest results and work performance the highest. The ICCs showed excellent test-retest reliability, ranging from 0.77 to 0.90 on all MHQ subscales and 0.92 on total score. The highest results for the ICC were seen in the satisfaction subscale (ICC = 0.90), while the lowest were seen in the aesthetic subscale (ICC = 0.77). The correlation analysis between the MHQ-Swe, PRWE and VAS showed a generally moderate to high correlation for all the subscales.

Conclusions

The Swedish version of the MHQ, the MHQ-Swe, showed good validity and reliability and it is therefore an appropriate and relevant questionnaire for use in patients with surgically treated distal radius fractures.

Trial registration

FoU i VGR, Projectnumber: 208491, registered December 9, 2015.

A comparison of six outcome measures across the recovery period after distal radius fixation-Which to use and when?

PURPOSE

Many standardized outcome measures exist to measure recovery after surgical fixation of distal radius fractures, however, choosing the optimal instrument is difficult. We evaluated responsiveness, ceiling/floor effects, and criterion validity over multiple time intervals across a 2-year follow-up period for six commonly used instruments.

METHODS

A total of 259 patients who received open reduction and internal fixation for distal radius fractures between 2012 and 2015 were recruited. Patients were administered the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), Shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH), Green and O'Brien score (Cooney modification) (CGNO), Gartland and Werley score (Sarmiento modification) (SGNW), flexion-extension arc (FEArc), and grip fraction test (GripFrac) at 1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Responsiveness was evaluated by calculating standardized response means (SRM) and Cohen's d effect sizes (ES), and by correlating each instrument's change scores against those of QuickDASH and PRWE, which were also used as external comparators to assess criterion validity. Ceiling/floor effects were calculated for all measures at each time point.

RESULTS

SRM (1.5-24 months) were 1.81, 1.77, 1.43, 1.16, 2.23, 2.45 and ES (1.5-24 months) were 1.81, 1.82, 1.95, 1.31, 1.99 and 2.90 for QuickDASH, PRWE, CGNO, SGNW, FEArc, and GripFrac respectively. Spearman correlation coefficients against QuickDASH at 24 months were: 0.809, 0.248, 0.563, 0.285, and 0.318 for PRWE, CGNO, SGNW, FEArc, and GripFrac respectively. Significant (>15% of patients reaching maximum score) ceiling effects were observed before 6 months for PRWE and SGNW.

CONCLUSIONS

Our evidence supports the use of QuickDASH, PRWE, FEArc and GripFrac up to 6 months postsurgery, and QuickDASH and PRWE after 6 months.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Measurement Properties of Outcome Measures Used to Assess Physical Impairments in Patients After Distal Radius Fracture: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

Individuals with distal radius fractures (DRF) may experience difficulty with gripping an object, painful wrist movements, sensorimotor difficulties, and swelling around the wrist and hand. A comprehensive review of the existing evidence concerning the measurement properties of common physical impairment measures can provide a valuable resource to guide hand therapy practice while managing DRF. The primary objective was to locate and assess the quality of literature on the measurement properties for the measures of physical impairment used in individuals with DRF.

METHODS

Two reviewers searched PubMed, CINAHL, and EMBASE. A combination of DRF, measurement properties, and physical impairments were used as keywords, and articles were independently assessed using the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments critical appraisal tool. Primary studies were included if they examined at least 1 of the following: reliability, validity, responsiveness, or indices of true and meaningful changes for measures of physical impairment in the DRF sample. A total of 19 articles were included in this review. The quality of the studies ranged from 46% to 92%. This review suggests that measures such as assessment of grip strength and supination and pronation range of motion (ROM), using various goniometric devices, showed good intrarater and interrater reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness in individuals with DRF.

CONCLUSION

Acceptable reliability and responsiveness were reported in grip and wrist ROM assessments for measuring changes in wrist and hand function after DRF; however, wrist ROM assessed using traditional goniometric techniques were less reliable in individuals with DRF.

IMPACT

This study provides insight into which objective tools might be better suited for measuring outcomes related to DRF.

Outcome Measurement for Distal Radius Fractures

Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are among the most common upper extremity injuries. Multiple medical conditions now are evaluated by standardized outcome sets that enable comparability. Recent international working groups have provided consensus statements for outcomes measurement after DRFs. These statements emphasized the growing importance of patient-reported outcome measures as well as traditional measures, including pain assessment, radiographic alignment, performance, and assessment of complications. A standardized instrument and timeline for measuring outcomes following DRFs offers clinicians, researchers, and health care economists a powerful tool. This article reviews the current evidence and provides recommendations for a DRF standardized outcome set.

The CAST study protocol: a cluster randomized trial assessing the effect of circumferential casting versus plaster splinting on fracture redisplacement in reduced distal radius fractures in adults

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus concerning the optimal casting technique for displaced distal radius fractures (DRFs) following closed reduction. This study evaluates whether a splint or a circumferential cast is most optimal to prevent fracture redisplacement in adult patients with a reduced DRF. Additionally, the cost-effectiveness of both cast types will be calculated.

METHODS/DESIGN

This multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial will compare initial immobilization with a circumferential below-elbow cast versus a below-elbow plaster splint in reduced DRFs. Randomization will take place on hospital-level (cluster, n = 10) with a cross-over point halfway the inclusion of the needed number of patients per hospital. Inclusion criteria comprise adult patients (≥ 18 years) with a primary displaced DRF which is treated conservatively after closed reduction. Multiple trauma patients (Injury Severity Score ≥ 16), concomitant ulnar fractures (except styloid process fractures) and patients with concomitant injury on the ipsilateral arm or inability to complete study forms will be excluded. Primary study outcome is fracture redisplacement of the initial reduced DRF. Secondary outcomes are patient-reported outcomes assessed with the Disability Arm Shoulder Hand score (DASH) and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score (PRWE), comfort of the cast, quality of life assessed with the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, analgesics use, cost-effectiveness and (serious) adverse events occurence. In total, 560 patients will be included and followed for 1 year. The estimated time required for inclusion will be 18 months.

DISCUSSION

The CAST study will provide evidence whether the type of cast immobilization is of influence on fracture redisplacement in distal radius fractures. Extensive follow-up during one year concerning radiographic, functional and patient reported outcomes will give a broad view on DRF recovery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered in the Dutch Trial Registry on January 14th 2020. Registration number: NL8311 .

Cross-cultural translation, adaptation and validation of the Burnt Hand Outcome Tool (BHOT) from English to French Canadian

BACKGROUND

The Burnt Hand Outcome Tool (BHOT) is a comprehensive tool assessing the multiple impacts of hand burn injuries which makes it essential to burn care practice, but is currently only available in English.

OBJECTIVES

To create a French-Canadian cross-cultural adaptation of the BHOT and to assess its content and construct convergent validity.

METHODS

The BHOT was translated and culturally adapted according to evidence-based principles for patient-reported outcome measures. The steps included translation to French (BHOT-F), backward translation, expert committee review, and cognitive debriefing with 5 adult participants. A pre-final version of the BHOT-F was then administered to 39 adult participants with hand burn injuries to assess construct convergent validity using the shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH). Content validity was evaluated based on comments from the expert committee and participant burn survivors.

RESULTS

The BHOT-F was modified during the adaption process to ensure its clarity. The Cronbach's alpha value of 0.935 demonstrates the excellent internal consistency of the BHOT-F. The BHOT-F and the QuickDASH were strongly correlated (p < 0.01). Content validity was deemed satisfactory and recommendations are reported for future research.

CONCLUSIONS

The BHOT-F demonstrates adequate clinimetric properties to be used in clinical practice.

Manual ability in hand surgery patients: Validation of the ABILHAND scale in four diagnostic groups

Background

Patients treated in hand surgery (HS) belong to different demographic groups and have varying impairments related to different pathologies. HS outcomes are measured to assess treatment results, complication risks and intervention reliability. A one-dimensional and linear measure would allow for unbiased comparisons of manual ability between patients and different treatment effects.

Objective

To adapt the ABILHAND questionnaire through Rasch analysis for specific use in HS patients and to examine its validity.

Methods

A preliminary 90-item questionnaire was presented to 216 patients representing the diagnoses most frequently encountered in HS, including distal radius fracture (n = 74), basal thumb arthritis (n = 66), carpal tunnel syndrome (n = 53), and heavy wrist surgery (n = 23). Patients were assessed during the early recovery and in the late follow-up period (0–3 months, 3–6 months and >6 months), leading to a total of 305 assessments. They rated their perceived difficulty with queried activities as impossible, difficult, or easy. Responses were analyzed using the RUMM2030 software. Items were refined based on item-patient targeting, fit statistics, differential item functioning, local independence and item redundancy. Patients also completed the QuickDASH, 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12) and a numerical pain scale.

Results

The rating scale Rasch model was used to select 23 mostly bimanual items on a 3-level scale, which constitute a unidimensional, linear measure of manual ability with good reliability across all included diagnostic groups (Person-Separation Index = 0.90). The resulting scale was found to be invariant across demographic and clinical subgroups and over time. ABILHAND-HS patient measures correlated significantly (p<0.001) with the QuickDASH (r = -0.77), SF-12 Physical Component Summary (r = 0.56), SF-12 Mental Component Summary (r = 0.31), and pain scale (r = -0.49).

Conclusion

ABILHAND-HS is a robust person-centered measure of manual ability in HS patients.