Comparison of range of motion after standard and high-flexion posterior stabilised total knee replacement

Polyethylene Components in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Overview of Fixed Bearing Design Options

The articular design of a polyethylene insert influences the kinematics and overall function of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Standard symmetric posterior-stabilized and cruciate-retaining polyethylene designs have a long track record of high patient satisfaction and longevity in TKA. However, the number and variety of polyethylene inserts and articulations have continued to evolve in an attempt to better replicate native knee kinematics or provide additional constraint. Ultracongruent polyethylene designs have been touted as increasing stability while maintaining the benefits of cruciate-retaining knees. Medial pivot and lateral/dual pivot polyethylene designs were introduced to mimic more normal knee kinematics with regard to femoral rollback. Further, with increasing recognition of knee instability as a cause for persistent symptoms and revision TKA, the utilization of midlevel constraint polyethylene inserts has been increasing, with multiple implant companies offering an insert design with increased constraint for use with a primary femoral component. In this rapidly evolving arena in with a myriad of options available, surgeons should be knowledgeable about the design concepts and their applicable uses for specific patient scenarios. Future research is needed to better understand whether a particular type or design of polyethylene insert and articulation leads to improved patient reported outcomes, improved replication of knee kinematics, and long-term durable implant survivorship.

Is Achieving High Flexion Necessary for Satisfaction after Total Knee Arthroplasty in Indian Patients?

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a very successful operation for the treatment of end-stage arthritis of the knee joint. In spite of improvement in surgical technique, implant design, postoperative pain management, and rehabilitation, some patients are not satisfied with the outcome of the surgery. It is believed that high-flexion (H-F) activities such as cross-legged sitting and squatting are necessary for satisfaction after TKA in Indian patients due to cultural and social reasons. This has led to the development and marketing of implant designs allowing H-F after TKA without strong evidence in the literature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We carried out a retrospective study to determine the level of satisfaction in 74 patients operated for 120 TKA over a 5 year period. This was determined on the basis of a satisfaction questionnaire which included questions to assess satisfaction regarding pain relief and ability to perform routine daily activities and high knee flexion activities such as squatting and cross-legged sitting.

RESULTS

Out of a total of 74 patients, 69 patients were overall satisfied with their TKA. Out of these, only 5 patients could squat or sit in a cross-legged position. Majority of the patients were satisfied with the pain relief and improvement in their capacity to work provided by TKA.

CONCLUSIONS

Ability to perform H-F activities after TKA is not a necessary prerequisite for satisfaction in Indian patients. Implant designs allowing H-F should be used in a selected group of patients with good preoperative knee flexion and specific requirements.

Retrospective comparison of functional and radiological outcome, between two contemporary high flexion knee designs

Introduction: Patient satisfaction after total knee replacement (TKR) depends on the amount of pain relief and the functional activities achieved. An important criterion of good functional outcome is the amount of flexion achieved and whether the patient can manage high flexion activities. In order to increase the amount of safe flexion, various implant designs have been developed. This study aims to compare the outcome after TKR using two contemporary high flexion knee designs: Sigma CR150 High Flex Knee prosthesis (Depuy, Warsaw, Indiana) and NexGen High Flex Knee prosthesis (Zimmer, Warsaw, Indiana).

Material: A retrospective study was conducted with 100 cases of each design and their functional and radiological outcome was assessed after two years of follow-up.

Results: The two groups had comparable results in terms of subjective satisfaction, range of motion achieved and radiological outcome. Depuy group fared better than Zimmer in terms of functional outcome (modified Oxford knee score).

Conclusion: Depuy group was found to have fared better than Zimmer in terms of functional outcome. However, it is very difficult to rate one design above the other based on our small sample size and short duration of follow-up.

Posterior Stabilized Polyethylene Inserts in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrieval Study Comparing Conventional to High-Flexion Designs

BACKGROUND

High-flex (HF) total knee arthroplasties are modified posterior-stabilized (PS) implants designed to accommodate greater flexion.

METHODS

We examined differences between HF and PS retrieved tibial inserts with regard to polyethylene surface damage. Twenty HF inserts from each of 3 manufacturers were matched using patient demographics with 20 PS inserts from the same manufacturers. Ranges of motion between matched patients were not different.

RESULTS

Based on subjective damage scores, no differences were detected between HF and PS groups. Differences were found, however, among manufacturers, consistent with design approaches taken for PS and HF implants.

CONCLUSION

In our series, high flexion did not influence damage, although this was likely influenced by the fact that few HF patients in our study had larger range of motions than their PS counterparts.

High-Flexion Total Knee Arthroplasty Using NexGen LPS-Flex System: Minimum 5-year Follow-up Results

PURPOSE

This study is to report clinical and radiological results of high-flexion total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using NexGen LPS-flex system at a minimum 5-year follow-up, and to analyze the implant survivorship based on the results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 80 patients (118 knees) who underwent patellar preserving TKA using NexGen LPS-flex implant between February 2007 and February 2008 and could be followed for minimum 5 years were reviewed. The range of motion (ROM), hip-knee-ankle angle, Knee Society Knee score (KSKS), and Knee Society Function score (KSFS) were assessed preoperatively and at the last follow-up and analyzed. Implant position of the femoral and tibial components on the immediate postoperative and last follow-up X-rays were compared.

RESULTS

The mean ROM was 110.2°±14.5° (range, 60° to 140°) preoperatively and 132.4°±5.2° (range, 90° to 145°) at the last follow-up. KSKS was 36.9°±6.4° preoperatively and 94.2°±3.2° at the last follow-up. KSFS was 30.5°±5.7° preoperatively and 93.7°±4.1° at the last follow-up. There was no statistically significant change in the implant position measured as α, β, γ, and δ angles at the last follow-up compared to the immediate postoperative values. Radiolucent lines were observed in 13 knees (11%) on the last follow-up X-rays. Revision TKA was performed due to aseptic implant loosening in 1 knee (0.84%), and the survival rate at the 5th postoperative year was 99.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical and radiological outcomes of high-flexion TKA using NexGen LPS-Flex implant design were satisfactory with 99.2% implant survival rate after 5 years of protected activities of daily living.

Knee Flexion and Daily Activities in Patients following Total Knee Replacement: A Comparison with ISO Standard 14243

Walking is only one of many daily activities performed by patients following total knee replacement (TKR). The purpose of this study was to examine the hypotheses (a) that subject activity characteristics are correlated with knee flexion range of motion (ROM) and (b) that there is a significant difference between the subject's flexion/extension excursion throughout the day and the ISO specified input for knee wear testing. In order to characterize activity, the number of walking and stair stepping cycles, the time spent with dynamic and stationary activities, the number of activity sequences, and the knee flexion/extension excursion of 32 TKR subjects were collected during daily activity. Flexion/extension profiles were compared with the ISO 14243 simulator input profile using a level crossing classification algorithm. Subjects took an average of 3102 (range: 343–5857) walking cycles including 65 (range: 0–319) stair stepping cycles. Active and passive ROMs were positively correlated with stair walking time, stair step counts, and stair walking sequences. Simulated knee motion according to ISO showed significantly fewer level crossings at the flexion angles 20–40° and beyond 50° than those measured with the monitor. This suggests that implant wear testing protocols should contain more cycles and a variety of activities requiring higher knee flexion angles with incorporated resting/transition periods to account for the many activity sequences.

Comparison of High-Flexion and Conventional Implants in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis

Background

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether high-flexion prostheses are superior to conventional prostheses after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Material/Methods

We searched the PubMed and Embase databases for randomized trials and cohort studies comparing high-flexion with conventional knee implants. The heterogeneity across studies was examined by I² and Cochran’s Q-tests. Then the overall weighted mean differences of range of motion (ROM) and knee functional scores were evaluated.

Results

A total of 16 trials involving 2643 knees met our inclusion criteria. The results revealed that high-flexion implants were superior to conventional implants in the improvement of range of motion (weighted mean difference, 2.92; 95% CI, 1.63–4.22; p<0.0001). The clear advantage of high-flex PS (posterior stabilized) as well as high-flex CR (cruciate retaining) implants was found in ROM when compared to PS implants (2.73; 95% CI, 1.27–4.20; p=0.0003) and CR implants (3.24; 95% CI, 0.28–6.20; p=0.003), respectively. However, there was no difference in Knee Society Scores (0.42; 95% CI, −0.60–1.43; p=0.42), Knee Society function (0.37; 95% CI, −1.48–2.22; p=0.70) and Hospital for Special Surgery scores (0.26; 95% CI, −0.47–1.00; p=0.48) between high-flexion and conventional groups.

Conclusions

The current meta-analysis revealed that high-flexion implants were superior to conventional implants in the improvement of ROM but not in functional outcome scores.

No clinical benefit of high-flex total knee arthroplasty. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

The application of high-flex prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an area of continuing debate. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane database. 10 trials involving 1230 knee joints were eligible for our meta-analysis. No significant difference was observed between the two designs regarding postoperative range of flexion, clinical scores, quality of life outcomes, or complication rate. Moreover, the advantage of high-flex implants for patients with high preoperative range remained not statistically significant and high-flex design in NexGen system showed a marginal improvement in the postoperative range of flexion. Based on current findings, high-flex prosthesis did not appear to confer any benefit as compared to standard prosthesis.

Is range of motion after cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty influenced by prosthesis design? A prospective randomized trial

Improvement in knee flexion is a major expectation for many patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). One hundred and twenty two patients were randomized to receive a cruciate-retaining standard or high-flexion TKA. Range of motion (ROM) and functional outcomes were assessed. The high flexion implants had a greater intraoperative ROM than standard implants. The mean flexion preoperatively, intraoperatively and at the one year follow-up was 107.4°, 123.0° and 108.9° in the standard group and 109.9°, 129.1° and 109.7° in the high-flexion TKA group. These differences were not significant preoperatively and at follow-up, but intraoperatively (P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis preoperative knee flexion was the only significant factor influencing knee flexion at follow-up. No differences in the Knee Society Score or SF 36 were observed.

Patellar clunk syndrome in fixed-bearing posterior-stabilised versus cruciate-substituting prostheses

PURPOSE

To compare the outcome of fixed-bearing posterior-stabilised versus cruciate-substituting prostheses in 46 patients who underwent primary bilateral total knee replacement (TKR).

METHODS

Records of 35 women and 11 men aged 54 to 78 (mean, 67) years who underwent primary bilateral TKR for osteoarthritis (n=44) and rheumatoid arthritis (n=2) were retrospectively reviewed. A fixed-bearing posterior-stabilised prosthesis (Zimmer NexGen Legacy flex [LPS-Flex]) was used in one knee, and a fixed-bearing cruciate-substituting prosthesis (Depuy Press Fit Condylar Sigma CS [PFC CS]) was used in the contralateral knee. The mean time interval between the 2 operations was 34 (range, 4-60) months. All operations were performed by the same group of surgeons using standardised techniques. The medial parapatellar approach was used, and the patella was resurfaced. Rehabilitation was also standardised. Outcome measures included the pre- and post-operative active range of movement and the American Knee Society Score. Postoperative complications were documented.

RESULTS

At one year, the mean fixed flexion contracture, maximum flexion, and American Knee Society scores in knees with PFC CS and LPS-Flex prostheses were comparable. Three knees with the PFC CS prosthesis developed the patellar clunk syndrome, compared to none with the LPS-Flex prosthesis (p=0.24). The onset of the patellar clunk syndrome was around one year after surgery. Despite this, the axial alignment and rotation of the femoral and tibial components were good.

CONCLUSION

Both prostheses produce good clinical outcome. The PFC CS prosthesis is more likely to be associated with the patellar clunk syndrome.

High-flexion prosthesis improves function of TKA in Asian patients without decreasing early survivorship

BACKGROUND

Two previous studies recently raised the possibility of a high risk of early femoral components loosening with high-flexion (HF) prostheses in Asian populations and suggested that the high failure rate of HF TKAs was associated with HF ability. However, these findings are controversial given other studies reporting a low incidence of aseptic failures in HF prostheses.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We therefore determined (1) the rate of achieving postoperative HF after HF TKA; (2) whether the aseptic loosening rate of HF prostheses is high; and (3) whether the survivorship was worsened in patients who achieved postoperative deep knee flexion in our cohort of Korean patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 488 patients who had 698 primary TKAs using the NexGen(®) Legacy Posterior-Stabilized Flex system implanted from 2003 to 2010. There were 40 men and 448 women with a mean age of 68 years. We obtained Hospital for Special Surgery scores, maximal flexion, and radiographs. The minimum followup for functional and radiographic evaluations was 2 years (median, 4.8 years; range, 2-8.7 years). We performed a survival analysis on all patients for aseptic loosening.

RESULTS

Three hundred sixty knees (52%) could achieve ≥ 135° maximum flexion. Six of the 698 knees (0.9%) developed aseptic loosening (three femoral and three tibial). The survival at 5 years for aseptic loosening was 99.1%. The overall survival for aseptic failure did not differ between knees that achieved HF and those that did not.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed a low incidence of early aseptic loosening of HF designs in this series. Our findings suggest HF TKAs have high survival in Asian patients at 5 years although half of the patients attained maximum flexion more than 135° postoperatively.

Brief followup report: Does high-flexion total knee arthroplasty allow deep flexion safely in Asian patients?

BACKGROUND

The long-term survivorship of TKA in Asian countries is comparable to that in Western countries. High-flexion TKA designs were introduced to improve flexion after TKA. However, several studies suggest high-flexion designs are at greater risk of femoral component loosening compared with conventional TKA designs. We previously reported a revision rate of 21% at 11 to 45 months; this report is intended as a followup to that study.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

Do implant survival and function decrease with time and do high-flexion activities increase the risk of premature failure?

METHODS

We prospectively followed 72 Nexgen LPS-flex fixed TKAs in 47 patients implanted by a single surgeon between March 2003 and September 2004. We determined the probability of survival using revision as an end point and compared survival between those who could and those who could not perform high-flexion activities. Minimum followup was 0.9 years (median, 6.5 years; range, 0.9-8.6 years).

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients (33 knees) underwent revision for aseptic loosening of the femoral component at a mean of 4 years (range, 1-8 years). The probability of revision-free survival for aseptic loosening was 67% and 52% at 5 and 8 years, respectively. Eight-year cumulative survivorship was lower in patients capable of squatting, kneeling, or sitting crosslegged (31% compared with 78%). There were no differences in the pre- and postoperative mean Hospital for Special Surgery scores and maximum knee flexion degrees whether or not high-flexion activities could be achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall midterm high-flexion TKA survival in our Asian cohort was lower than that of conventional and other high-flexion designs. This unusually high rate of femoral component loosening was associated with postoperative high-flexion activities.

Effect of implant design on knee flexion

From March 2006 to August 2008, 93 subjects (186 knees) underwent simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty performed by eight surgeons at North American centers. This randomized study was conducted to determine whether non-weight-bearing passive flexion was superior for knees receiving a posterior stabilized high flexion device compared to a posterior stabilized standard device in the contra-lateral knee. Weight-bearing single leg active flexion was one secondary endpoint. Follow-up compliance was 92.5%. Results show small, but significant superiority in the motion metrics for the high flexion device compared to the standard device 12 months after surgery, especially for a subgroup of patients with pre-operative flexion less than 120° in both knees. Thus, the ideal candidate for the high flexion device may be one with lesser pre-operative flexion.

Early clinical results of a high-flexion, posterior-stabilized, mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a US investigational device exemption trial

Between May 2001 and June 2004, 388 total knee arthroplasty cases were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, multicenter investigational device exemption trial. Patients received either the investigational high-flexion mobile-bearing knee or a fixed-bearing control. At 2 to 4 years of follow-up, results in 293 patients with degenerative joint disease were compared using Knee Society Assessment and Function scores, radiographic results, complications analysis, and survival estimates. The mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing groups demonstrated similar, significant improvement over preoperative assessments in Knee Scores, maximum flexion, and range of motion. One mobile-bearing arthroplasty required revision. Radiographic results were unremarkable, and implant-related complications were rare in both groups. At this early follow-up, the investigational high-flexion mobile-bearing knee and its fixed-bearing counterpart demonstrated comparable, effective performance.

High-flexion vs conventional prostheses total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis

Whether high-flexion prostheses are superior to conventional prostheses after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. Therefore, this meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the effects of these 2 different designs. After a comprehensive search, 11 trials with 1204 knees were eligible for data extraction and pooled analysis. The results demonstrated that there were no differences in range of motion of high-flexion posterior-stabilized vs standard posterior-stabilized TKA (weighted mean improvement, 0.93°; 95% confidence intervals, -0.75° to 2.60°; P = .28), range of motion of high-flexion cruciate-retaining vs cruciate-retaining TKA (2.06°; 0.06°-4.17°; P = .06), weight-bearing flexion (2.05°; 0.99°-5.08°; P = .19), Knee Society Scores (1.59 points; 0.42-3.60 points; P = .12), and Hospital for Special Surgery Scores (0.84 points; 0.37-2.04 points; P = .17) with at least 1-year follow-up. No infection, loosening, and osteolysis were found. The current evidences cannot confirm that high-flexion prostheses are superior to conventional prostheses.

High-flexion total knee arthroplasty improves flexion of stiff knees

PURPOSE

High-flexion knee prosthesis designs are generally thought to be of benefit only in patients with a satisfactory preoperative flexion angle. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether high-flexion designs were indeed worthless in osteoarthritis patients with severe preoperative flexion limitation.

METHODS

The postoperative maximum flexion was compared in osteoarthritis patients with a preoperative maximum flexion of 100° or less, using LPS and LPS-flex implants (NexGen®; Zimmer, Warsaw, IN) in total knee arthroplasties. Data on 39 knees in the LPS group and 41 in the LPS-flex group, with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up, were reviewed retrospectively, focused on the postoperative maximum flexion.

RESULTS

Two years after operation, the LPS-flex group had a mean postoperative maximum flexion of 131±10° (range, 105-140°), which was significantly higher than the 121±12° (range, 95-140°) in the LPS group (P<0.001). In the LPS-flex group, about half of the knees (n=18, 44%) could achieve a maximum flexion of 140° postoperatively, but in the LPS group only five knees (13%) achieved a maximum flexion of 140°.

CONCLUSION

Despite a different period of the operation between groups, this study suggested that osteoarthritis patients with severe preoperative flexion limitation could achieve more postoperative gain in flexion when a high-flexion prosthesis was used, compared to the flexion obtained using a standard prosthesis.

Do high flexion posterior stabilised total knee arthroplasty designs increase knee flexion? A meta analysis

PURPOSE

This systematic literature review analysed the change in range of knee flexion from pre-operative values, following conventional posterior stabilised (PS) and high-flexion (H-F) PS total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

We calculated the weighted mean differences of pre- and postoperative flexion using meta-analysis with random effect modelling. Eighteen studies met our inclusion criteria. These data included a total of 2,104 PS knees that received conventional implants and 518 knees that received H-F implants.

RESULTS

The pooled gain in flexion was 4.70° in the conventional group (p <0.0001) and 4.81° in the H-F group (p = 0.0008). In the subgroup analysis, the Western patient group showed significant difference in the gain of flexion with both implants. In contrast, no significant gain in flexion was observed in the Asian patient group.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that improvement of preoperative flexion after TKA using current H-F PS prostheses is similar to that of conventional PS prostheses.

Does the new generation of high-flex knee prostheses improve the post-operative range of movement?: a meta-analysis

A new generation of knee prostheses has been introduced with the intention of improving post-operative knee flexion. In order to evaluate whether this goal has been achieved we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. Systematic literature searches were conducted on MEDLINE and EMBASE from their inception to December 2007, and proceedings of scientific meetings were also searched. Only randomised, clinical trials were included in the meta-analysis. The mean difference in the maximum post-operative flexion between the 'high-flex' and conventional types of prosthesis was defined as the primary outcome measure. A total of five relevant articles was identified. Analysis of these trials suggested that no clinically relevant or statistically significant improvement was obtained in flexion with the 'high-flex' prostheses. The weighted mean difference was 2.1° (95% confidence interval -0.2 to +4.3; p = 0.07).

Range of motion and function are similar in patients undergoing TKA with posterior stabilised and high-flexion inserts

It is debatable whether high-flexion (HF) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs will improve postoperative flexion and function or will diminish the need for manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA). We retrospectively analysed range of motion (ROM), flexion, Knee Society Score (KSS), and rate of MUA in a consecutive group of patients who underwent TKA with a conventional posterior stabilised (PS) insert or an HF insert using identical surgical technique, implant design, and postoperative care. Fifty TKAs with a standard PS insert were matched for patient's age, gender, preoperative ROM, and KSS with 50 TKA performed with an HF insert. The patient's ROM and KSS were evaluated at six weeks, four months, and one year postoperatively. The outcome variables (flexion, ROM, KSS, and manipulation rate) in both groups were compared using the generalised estimating equations method. A second analysis of patients with preoperative flexion ≥120° was performed. The ROM, flexion, and patient-reported KSS was similar in both groups at each time period. The rate of MUA was also similar. Patients with a preoperative ROM of at least 120° showed similar results. Our study found that one year after surgery, patients who underwent TKA with a PS or an HF insert achieved similar flexion, ROM, and function.

2009 Marshall Urist Young Investigator Award: how often do patients with high-flex total knee arthroplasty use high flexion?

Although high-flexion TKA designs aim to safely accommodate deep flexion, it is unknown how often patients use deep flexion outside the laboratory. We used a validated smart-activity monitor to document the prevalence of knee flexion greater than 90 degrees in 20 consecutive patients (21 knees) who had high-flexion TKAs, at a minimum of 2 years' followup. Patients wore the device continuously for a mean of 35.7 +/- 0.5 hours. The 21 knees flexed more than 90 degrees for an average of 10 +/- 3.8 minutes (0.5%). Activities performed with flexion greater than 90 degrees were, on average, 70% in single-limb stance, 12% moving from sitting to standing, 8% walking, 7% moving from standing to reclining, 2% stepping, 0.9% moving from lying to standing, and 0.1% running. Eight knees flexed greater than 120 degrees for an average of 2.2 minutes (range, 0.2-15 minutes), or 0.1% of the testing time. Activities performed with flexion greater than 120 degrees were, on average, 90% in single-limb stance, 6% moving from sitting to standing, 3% walking, 0.6% moving from standing to reclining, 0.3% stepping, and 0.1% moving from lying to standing. Peak flexion used at any time during testing was, on average, 84% +/- 11% of maximum postoperative flexion (125 degrees +/- 12 degrees). These patients rarely used deep flexion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

In vivo knee kinematics during high flexion after a posterior-substituting total knee arthroplasty

The objective of this study was to investigate biomechanics of TKA patients during high flexion. Six patients (seven knees) with a posterior-substituting TKA and weight-bearing flexion >130 degrees were included in the study. The six degree-of-freedom kinematics, tibiofemoral contact, and cam-post contact were measured during a deep knee bend using dual-plane fluoroscopy. The patients achieved average weight-bearing flexion of 139.5 +/- 4.5 degrees. Posterior femoral translation and internal tibial rotation increased steadily beyond 90 degrees flexion, and a sharp increase in varus rotation was noted at maximum flexion. Initial cam-post engagement was observed at 100.3 +/- 6.7 degrees flexion. Five knees had cam-post disengagement before maximum flexion. Lateral femoral condylar lift-off was found in five out of seven knees at maximum flexion, and medial condylar lift-off was found in one knee. Future studies should investigate if the kinematic characteristics of posterior-substituting TKA knees noted in this study are causative factors of high knee flexion.

The effect of leg alignment on the outcome of unicompartmental knee replacement

Varus malalignment after total knee replacement is associated with a poor outcome. Our aim was to determine whether the same was true for medial unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). The anatomical leg alignment was measured prospectively using a long-arm goniometer in 160 knees with an Oxford UKR. Patients were then grouped according to their mechanical leg alignment as neutral (5 degrees to 10 degrees of valgus), mild varus (0 degrees to 4 degrees of valgus) and marked varus (> 0 degrees of varus). The groups were compared at five years in terms of absolute and change in the Oxford Knee score, American Knee Society score and the incidence of radiolucent lines. Post-operatively, 29 (18%) patients had mild varus and 13 (8%) had marked varus. The mean American Knee Society score worsened significantly (p < 0.001) with increasing varus. This difference disappeared if a three-point deduction for each degree of malalignment was removed. No other score deteriorated with increasing varus, and the frequency of occurrence of radiolucent lines was the same in each group. We therefore conclude that after Oxford UKR, about 25% of patients have varus alignment, but that this does not compromise their clinical or radiological outcome. Following UKR the deductions for malalignment in the American Knee Society score are not justified.

High-flexion total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

This study is a systematic literature review of outcomes following total knee arthroplasty with implants specifically designed to enable increased knee flexion. English language comparative studies without date restriction were identified through a computerised literature search and bibliography review. Nine studies met the inclusion criteria representing a total of 399 high-flexion knee arthroplasties in 370 patients. Five studies reported greater flexion or range of motion; however, the methodological rigour was questionable with inadequate blinding, flawed participant selection, short follow-up periods and functional outcomes which lacked sensitivity. There was insufficient evidence of improved range of motion or functional performance after high-flexion knee arthroplasty.

Is extreme flexion of the knee after total knee replacement a prerequisite for patient satisfaction?

The focus of this study was to evaluate the functional result and to specifically ascertain whether the absence of the ability to squat and sit cross-legged altered the patient's satisfaction level after a successful standard total knee replacement. Squatting and sitting cross-legged are common practices in Asia. These activities are not possible following standard total knee replacement. Patients were followed-up for a minimum of 12 months post surgery. Their level of satisfaction was assessed using a Likert scale. The Knee Society Score (KSS) was used to assess range of motion and function of the knee. Twenty-one out of 25 patients were satisfied with the surgical result in spite of an inability to squat. Deep knee flexion may not be an essential prerequisite for patient satisfaction after total knee replacement, even in a population where squatting and sitting cross-legged are part of the normal lifestyle.