Use of internal lengthening nails in post-traumatic sequelae. Int Orthop. 2017;41:1915-1923. [PMID: 28389837 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-017-3466-6]

Breakage of a re-activated PRECICE® nail: A case report

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Distraction osteogenesis using motorized nails have shown promising results. These high-priced nails are regularly removed following successful lengthening sessions. The internal lengthening mechanism inside such nails is presumably intact and perhaps capable of running additional lengthening. Motorized nails are relatively weaker than conventional nails. This case report presented a broken re-activated PRECICE nail which has not been previously reported.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 21-year-old male patient with right short tibia. He has completed an uneventful lengthening session using tibial PRECICE® nail. A residual length discrepancy persisted despite 4 cm length gain. Attempt of re-lengthening was conducted utilizing the pre-implanted PRECICE® nail. The re-lengthening session run smoothly throughout distraction phase. Late in the consolidation phase, partial nail breakage occurred. The patient acknowledged intermittent gentle weightbearing against the physician's recommendations. The broken nail was removed on emergency basis. Cast immobilization with non-weightbearing continued until achievement of full consolidation clinically and radiographically.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Most of commercially available lengthening motorized nails are considered less rigid compared to conventional nails and hence more susceptible to deformation and metal failure. However, nail breakage has been reported in both conventional and lengthening nails. Re-activation of PRECICE nail for additional lengthening session could carry higher risk of breakage.

CONCLUSION

Possibility of nail breakage may be higher in re-activated PRECICE® nails relative to newly implanted PRECICE® nails. More studies are required to evaluate behavior of re-activated lengthening nails. Defective lengthening nails must not be re-activated. The patient compliance is essential for successful re-activation of lengthening nails.

Correction of post-traumatic lower-limb discrepancy with Precice intramedullary lengthening nails: a review of 34 adults with an average follow-up of 2 years

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We report results and complications of gradual bone lengthening for post-traumatic lower-limb length discrepancy (LLD) with Precice intramedullary lengthening nails in 34 adults.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Inclusion criteria were lower-limb lengthening using the Precice nail, posttraumatic etiology, age older than 18 years, and minimum follow-up of 12 months after implantation. 34 patients met the inclusion criteria. Radiological and clinical outcome data were collected.

RESULTS

Precice lengthening was performed in the femur in 28 patients (21 antegrade, 7 retrograde) and in the tibia in 6. Mean patient age at time of surgery was 32 years (18-72). Mean preoperative LLD was 31 mm (20-71). Acute correction of axial or rotational malalignment was performed in 11 segments. At final follow-up (mean 2 years [1.1-3.6]), 33 of 34 nails had been removed. All lengthening sites were healed, and all patients mobilized with full weight-bearing. 14 adverse events occurred in 11 patients and were categorized as problems (n = 5), obstacles (n = 3), and complications (n = 6). Unplanned surgery was necessary in 7 patients, 3 of whom did not complete treatment with Precice.

INTERPRETATION

Correction of posttraumatic LLD with or without axial malalignment using Precice intramedullary lengthening nails is associated with a low number of complications and good functional outcome. However, one-fifth of patients in this series needed further unplanned surgery for revision of obstacles or complications.

[Paramedical care related to the implantation of a motorized spinal lengthening nail]

The Fitbone® system is one of the most recent motorized bone lengthening techniques. It allows a precise control of the extension while reducing pain and complications. It requires special assistance from the paramedical team, before and after the procedure, as it may cause adjustment problems in some patients.

The STRYDE limb lengthening nail is susceptible to mechanically assisted crevice corrosion: an analysis of 23 retrieved implants

Background and purpose - We noted several adverse events in patients in whom the first version of the STRYDE limb-lengthening nail (NuVasive Specialized Orthopaedics, San Diego, CA) had been implanted. Pain, osteolysis, periosteal reactions, and cortical hypertrophy at the nail junction were noted. Here, we present the analysis of 23 retrieved STRYDE implants.Materials and methods - We undertook visual inspection of the retrieved nails and screws, mechanical evaluation of the junction, micro-CT analyses, microscopic inspection of the bushing, screws, screw holes, and separated parts of the implants. Positive material identification (PMI) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) were used to analyze the chemical composition. The hardness of the material was also investigated.Results - 20/23 retrieved nails had visible signs of corrosion, i.e., discoloration at the telescopic junction. Micro-CT verified corrosion attacks in 12/12 scanned bushings. Corrosion, predominantly mechanically assisted crevice corrosion, was observed at the locking screws and screw holes in 20/23 nails. Biological material inside the nail was observed in addition to oozing from the junction of 2 nails during hardware removal, which was experimentally reproducible. Notably, the mechanical construction of the bushing changed from PRECICE P2 to STRYDE nails.Interpretation - STRYDE nails are not hermetically sealed, and liquid can pass the bushing. Biodur 108 itself is corrosion resistant; however, mechanically assisted crevice corrosion of the bushing, locking screws, and screw holes may be aggravated due to manufacturing aiming for increased strength and hardness of the alloy.Observing several adverse events, we recently published a nationwide cross-sectional analysis of all 30 STRYDE limb- lengthening nails (NuVasive, Specialized Orthopedics, San Diego, CA) that were implanted in Denmark (Rölfing et al. 2021a). 27/30 STRYDE nails have now been removed and we present data from metallurgical analysis of 23 of the retrieved implants.

Limb lengthening with PRECICE magnetic nail in pediatric patients: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Limb lengthening techniques play an increasingly important role in the pediatric orthopedic field. The principles of the osteogenesis distraction bonded traditionally with external fixators; however, the recent deployment of fully implantable systems has been able to overcome severities related to external fixators. The PRECICE® is an implantable limb lengthening intramedullary nail system that is remotely controlled and magnetically driven.

AIM

To review the current literature available on this matter in order to assess the PRECICE clinical and radiological outcomes and its possible complications in a population of pediatric patients undergoing limb lengthening.

METHODS

Only five studies met the inclusion criteria and were consequently included in the review for a total of 131 patients and 135 femurs. The clinical and radiological outcomes of interest were: the main lengthening obtained, the distraction rate, the period of time to full weight bearing, the consolidation index, and the Association for the Study and Application of Methods of Ilizarov score.

RESULTS

In conclusion, data collected from the articles under investigation were comparable with the exception of the consolidation index. Unfortunately, the study population was too small and the patients' follow-up was too short to make definitive conclusions.

CONCLUSION

This review shows that the PRECICE Nail System is still a therapeutic challenge in limb lengthening for pediatric orthopedic surgeons; however, careful pre-operative planning and an accurate surgical technique could allow the correction of more complex deformities with a low rate of complications.

Management of twenty centimeter segmental bone defect of femoral shaft secondary to infected non-union of fracture using masquelet technique: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Segmental bone loss is a challenging condition to manage, and some of the techniques employed are difficult for patients to tolerate and involve lengthy treatment and rehabilitation times. The Masquelet technique is a two-stage bone grafting technique used to treat segmental bone defects. The technique has primarily been described for bone defects averaging 5.5 cm in length. This technique's advantages include protection against autograft resorption, relative maintenance of graft position, and prevention of soft-tissue interposition. We present a case report of a male who achieved successful bone defect union utilizing the Masquelet technique for a right femoral shaft infected non-union with a resultant 20 cm bone defect.

CASE REPORT

This is a case report of a 28-year old male who presented to our clinic for evaluation and treatment for a segmental bone defect secondary to a right femur fracture with non-union after infection. The patient had been in a motor vehicle collision. Our patient was interested in limb salvage surgery and declined bone transport. Given the significant size of his defect, we opted to treat him utilizing the Masquelet technique. He went on to have a successful union of his defect with associated increased subjective quality of life and functionality.

CONCLUSION

The Masquelet technique is a useful limb salvage treatment for patients with segmental bone defects, including large defects of 20 cm in length.

Bone Lengthening with a Motorized Intramedullary Nail in 34 Patients with Posttraumatic Limb Length Discrepancies

The Fitbone® motorized nail system has been used to correct limb length discrepancies (LLD) for several years. This study focuses on its application in posttraumatic limb lengthening surgery, its outcome and challenges.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective, single center study was conducted between 2010 and 2019 in patients treated with motorized lengthening nails. The inclusion criteria were symptomatic LLD of 20 mm or more. An imaging analysis was done using TraumaCad® software (Brainlab AG, Munich, Germany) to compare frontal alignment angles and limb length discrepancy (LLD) on preoperative and latest follow-up radiographs of the lower limbs.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were included with a mean age of 28.8 ± 9.7 years, a mean follow-up of 27.8 ± 13 months and a mean hospital stay of 4.4 ± 1.7 days. The mean LLD was 44 ± 18 mm in 29 femoral and 32 ± 8 mm in 4 tibial cases, which was reduced to less than 10 mm in 25/34 (74%) patients. The mean healing index was 84.6 ± 62.5 days/cm for femurs and 92 ± 38.6 days/cm for tibias. The mean time to resume full weight-bearing without walking aids was 226 days ± 133. There was no significant difference between preoperative and final follow-up alignment angles and range of motion. The mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) was corrected in the subgroup of 10 LLD patients with varus deformity of the femur (preoperative 95.7° (±5.0) vs. postoperative 91.5° (±3.4), p = 0.008). According to Paley's classification, there were 14 problems, 10 obstacles and 2 complications.

DISCUSSION

Six instances of locking screw pull out, often requiring reoperation, raise the question of whether a more systematic use of blocking screws that provide greater stability might be indicated. Lack of compliance can lead to poor outcomes, patient selection in posttraumatic LLD patients is therefore important.

CONCLUSION

Limb lengthening with a motorized lengthening nail for posttraumatic LLD is a relatively safe and reliable procedure. Full patient compliance is crucial. In-depth knowledge of lengthening and deformity correction techniques is essential to prevent and manage complications.

Medium-term evaluation of leg lengthening by ISKD® intramedullary nail in 28 patients: Should we still use this lengthening system?

INTRODUCTION

Lower-limb lengthening presently uses intramedullary nailing. There are motorized systems and mechanical systems, each with their specific complications. The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of ISKD® mechanical nails (Orthofix Inc., Texas, USA) on 3D EOS® imaging, and also complications and functional impact.

HYPOTHESIS

The study hypothesis was that nail lengthening is effective but should no longer use the ISKD® system, due to the high rate of specific complications.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A single-center retrospective study included 28 patients (14 female, 14 male) undergoing limb-lengthening by ISKD® nail between 2005 and 2018. Mean age was 29 years. Twenty-four procedures were femoral and 4 tibial. Lengthening and consolidation parameters and residual discrepancy were measured on 3D EOS® imaging. Complications and functional scores were collated.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight ISKD® nails were implanted in 28 patients. Mean follow-up was 75 months. Planned lengthening was achieved in 78.5% of cases, for a mean lengthening of 34.5mm. Mean lengthening and consolidation indices were respectively 0.94mm/day and 105 days/cm. Length discrepancy showed significant correction, with improvement in functional scores (p<0.01). The overall complications rate was 67.9%, 76% of which were specific to the ISKD® nail.

DISCUSSION

The present study confirmed that nail lengthening is an indication of choice in lower-limb length discrepancy, but that the ISKD® system should no longer be used, due to an excessive rate of specific complications. Complications are due to deficient control of lengthening rate, not found with new-generation motorized nails, which show much fewer complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective study without control group.

Complications of Limb Lengthening With Motorized Intramedullary Nails

Intramedullary limb lengthening (LL) is now achievable through motorized intramedullary devices. While this technology mitigates some complications of external-fixation-based lengthening, many complications common to all lengthening procedures persist. New challenges and complications exclusive to this newer technology are also presented. The LL surgeon should be aware of and ready to respond to complications involving device malfunctions, poor local bony and soft-tissue biology, patient compliance, neurovascular compromise, joint instability, regenerate problems, and others. While technology will continue to evolve, study of and adherence to foundational principles of LL will minimize risks and optimize patient outcomes.

Functional recovery of daily living and sports activities after cosmetic bilateral tibia lengthening

PURPOSE

The aims of this study were to evaluate the recovery of physical function and to investigate whether there are factors that adversely affect functional recovery after cosmetic bilateral lengthening of the tibia.

METHODS

One hundred twenty-five healthy individuals who had undergone bilateral cosmetic tibia lengthening by the lengthening and then nail (LATN) method, lengthening over intramedullary nail (LON) method or intramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor (ISKD) were included in the study. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the Sports Activity Rating Scale (SARS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form and patient self-reported ability scores.

RESULTS

SARS and IKDC scores decreased at post-operative one year and improved significantly at post-operative two years. SARS and IKDC scores recovered similarly to pre-operative levels. Average patient self-reported ability scores at post-operative two years were 94.6 and 89.9 for daily living and light sports, respectively. However, the average score for moderate-to-strenuous sports was 68.1 and 39 patients (31.2%) recorded below average score for the moderate-to-strenuous sports.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who had undergone bilateral cosmetic tibial lengthening may expect almost full recovery of daily and light sports activities at post-operativetwo years. However, several patients may feel some limitation in moderate-to-strenuous sports activities.

Standards for external fixation application: national survey under the auspices of the German Trauma Society

INTRODUCTION

External fixation is widely accepted as a provisional or sometimes definitive treatment for long-bone fractures. Indications include but are not limited to damage control surgery in poly-traumatized patients as well as provisional bridging to definite treatment with soft tissue at risk. As little is known about surgeon's habits in applying this treatment strategy, we performed a national survey.

METHODS

We utilized the member database of the German Trauma Society (DGU). The questionnaire encompassed 15 questions that addresses topics including participants' position, experience, workplace, and questions regarding specifics of external fixation application in different anatomical regions. Furthermore, we compared differences between trauma centre levels and surgeon-related factors.

RESULTS

The participants predominantly worked in level 1 trauma centres (42.7%) and were employed as attendings (54.7%). There was widespread consensus for planning and intra-operative radiographical control of external fixation. Surgeons appointed at a level I trauma centre preferred significantly more often supra-acetabular pin placement in external fixation of the pelvis rather than the utilization of iliac pins (75.8%, p = 0.0001). Moreover, they were more likely to favor a mini-open approach to insert humeral pins (42.4%, p = 0.003). Overall, blunt dissection and mini-open approaches seemed equally popular (38.2 and 34.1%). Department chairmen indicated more often than their colleagues to follow written pin-care protocols for minimization of infection (16.7%, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Despite the fact that external fixation usage is widespread and well established among trauma surgeons in Germany, there are substantial differences in the method of application.