1
|
Li Z, Guo L, Zhang P, Wang J, Wang X, Yao W. A Systematic Review of Perioperative Complications in en Bloc Resection for Spinal Tumors. Global Spine J 2023; 13:812-822. [PMID: 36000332 DOI: 10.1177/21925682221120644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Systematic review. OBJECTIVE En bloc resection is a major, invasive surgical procedure designed to completely resect a vertebral tumor with a sufficient margin. It is technically demanding and potentially poses risks of perioperative complications. In this systematic review, we investigated the incidence of complications after en bloc resection for spinal tumors. METHODS We screened PubMed and Embase databases for relevant English publications, from 1980 to 2020, using the following terms: spine OR spinal AND en bloc AND tumor. Using a standard PRISMA template, after the initial screening, full-text articles of interest were evaluated. RESULTS Thirty-six studies with 961 patients were included. The overall mean age of patients was 49.6 years, and the mean follow-up time was 33.5 months. There were 560 complications, and an overall complication rate of 58.3% (560/961). The 5 most frequent complications were neurological damage (12.7%), hardware failure (12.1%), dural tear and cerebrospinal fluid leakage (10.6%), wound-related complications (7.6%) and vascular injury and bleeding (7.3%). The complication-related revision rate was 10.7% (103/961). The average incidence of complication-related death was 1.2% (12/961). CONCLUSIONS En bloc resection is a surgical procedure that is very invasive and technically challenging, and the possible risks of perioperative complications should not be neglected. The overall complication rate is high. However, complication-related death was rare. The advantages of surgery should be weighed against the serious perioperative morbidity associated with this technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhehuang Li
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, 377327Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Liangyu Guo
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, 377327Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Peng Zhang
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, 377327Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Jiaqiang Wang
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, 377327Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Xin Wang
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, 377327Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Weitao Yao
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, 377327Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Spiessberger A, Dietz N, Arvind V, Nasim M, Gruter B, Nevzati E, Hofer S, Cho SK. Spondylectomy in the treatment of neoplastic spinal lesions - A retrospective outcome analysis of 582 patients using a patient-level meta-analysis. JOURNAL OF CRANIOVERTEBRAL JUNCTION AND SPINE 2021; 12:107-116. [PMID: 34194155 PMCID: PMC8214243 DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_211_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aims at identifying predictors of postoperative complications, lesion recurrence, and overall survival in patients undergoing en bloc spondylectomy (EBS) for spinal tumors. For this purpose a systematic review of the literature was conducted and patient-level data extracted. Linear-regression models were calculated to predict postoperative complications, lesion recurrence and overall survival based on age, tumor etiology, surgical approach, mode of resection (extra- vs. intralesional), tumor extension, and number of levels treated. A total of 582 patients were identified from the literature: 45% of females, median age 46 years (5-78); most common etiologies were: sarcoma (46%), metastases (31%), chordoma (11%); surgical approach was anterior (2.5%), combined (45%), and posterior (52.4%); 68.5% underwent EBS; average levels resected were 1.6 (1-6); average survival was 2.6 years; Complication rate was 17.7%. The following significant correlations were found: postoperative complications and resection mode (Odds ratio [OR] 1.35) as well as number of levels treated (OR 1.35); tumor recurrence and resection mode (OR 0.78); 5-year survival and age (OR 0.79), tumor grade (OR 0.65), tumor stage at diagnosis (OR 0.79), and resection mode (OR 1.68). EBS was shown to improve survival, decreases recurrence rates but also has a higher complication rate. Interestingly, the complication rate was not influenced by tumor extension or tumor etiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Spiessberger
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine - Mount Sinai Hospital, NY, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Hofstra School of Medicine, North Shore University Hospital, NY, USA
| | - Nicholas Dietz
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Varun Arvind
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine - Mount Sinai Hospital, NY, USA
| | - Mansoor Nasim
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra Northwell, NY, USA
| | - Basil Gruter
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Edin Nevzati
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Silvia Hofer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Samuel K Cho
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine - Mount Sinai Hospital, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tang X, Cai Z, Wang R, Ji T, Guo W. En bloc resection and reconstruction of a huge chondrosarcoma involving multilevel upper thoracic spine and chest wall: case report. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2021; 22:348. [PMID: 33845805 PMCID: PMC8042902 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04208-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2020] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background En bloc resection of malignant tumors involving upper thoracic spine is technically difficult. We surgically treated a patient with grade 2 chondrosarcoma involving T1–5, left upper thoracic cavity, and chest wall. Case presentation A 37 years old, male patient was referred to our hospital for a huge lump involved left shoulder and chest wall. In order to achieve satisfied surgical margins, anterior approach, posterior approach, and lateral approach were carried out sequentially. After en bloc tumor resection, the upper thoracic spine was reconstructed with a 3D-printed modular vertebral prosthesis, and the huge chest wall defect was repaired by a methyl methacrylate layer between 2 pieces of polypropylene mesh. Postoperatively, the patient suffered from pneumonia and neurological deterioration which fully recovered eventfully. At 24 months after operation, the vertebral prosthesis and internal fixation were intact; there was no tumor local recurrence, and the patient was alive with stable pulmonary metastases. Conclusion This case report describes resection of a huge chondrosarcoma involving not only multilevel upper thoracic spine, but also entire left upper thoracic cavity and chest wall. Although with complications, en bloc tumor resection with combined surgical approach and effective reconstructions could improve oncologic and functional prognosis in carefully selected spinal tumor patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaodong Tang
- Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Zhenyu Cai
- Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Ruifeng Wang
- Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Tao Ji
- Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Wei Guo
- Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mericli AF, Murariu D, Nemir S, Rhines LD, Walsh G, Adelman DM, Baumann DP, Butler CE. Soft-Tissue Reconstruction after Composite Vertebrectomy and Chest Wall Resection for Spinal Tumors. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145:1275-1286. [PMID: 32332552 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000006792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oncologic resections involving both the spine and chest wall commonly require immediate soft-tissue reconstruction. The authors hypothesized that reconstructions of composite resections involving both the thoracic spine and chest wall would have a higher complication rate than reconstructions for resections limited to the thoracic spine alone. METHODS The authors performed a retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients who underwent a thoracic vertebrectomy and soft-tissue reconstruction from 2002 to 2017. Patients were divided into two groups: those whose defect was limited to the thoracic spine and those who required a composite resection involving the chest wall. RESULTS One hundred patients were included. Composite resection patients had larger defects, as indicated by a greater incidence of multilevel vertebrectomies (70.2 percent versus 17 percent; p = 0.001). Thoracic spine patients were older (58.2 ± 10.4 years versus 48.6 ± 13.9 years; p < 0.001) and had a greater incidence of metastatic disease (88.7 percent versus 38.3 percent; p = 0.001). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses demonstrated that composite resections were not significantly associated with a higher rate of surgical, medical, or overall complications. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of composite resection subgroup demonstrated that flap separation of the spinal cord from the intrapleural space was protective against complications (OR, 0.22; 95 percent CI, 0.05 to 0.81; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Despite the large defect size in composite resection patients, there was no increase in complications compared to thoracic spine patients. In composite resection patients, separating the exposed spinal cord from the intrapleural space with well-vascularized soft tissue was protective against complications. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Risk, II.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander F Mericli
- From the Departments of Plastic Surgery, Neurosurgery, and Thoracic Surgery, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center; and the Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital
| | - Daniel Murariu
- From the Departments of Plastic Surgery, Neurosurgery, and Thoracic Surgery, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center; and the Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital
| | - Stephanie Nemir
- From the Departments of Plastic Surgery, Neurosurgery, and Thoracic Surgery, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center; and the Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital
| | - Laurence D Rhines
- From the Departments of Plastic Surgery, Neurosurgery, and Thoracic Surgery, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center; and the Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital
| | - Garrett Walsh
- From the Departments of Plastic Surgery, Neurosurgery, and Thoracic Surgery, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center; and the Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital
| | - David M Adelman
- From the Departments of Plastic Surgery, Neurosurgery, and Thoracic Surgery, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center; and the Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital
| | - Donald P Baumann
- From the Departments of Plastic Surgery, Neurosurgery, and Thoracic Surgery, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center; and the Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital
| | - Charles E Butler
- From the Departments of Plastic Surgery, Neurosurgery, and Thoracic Surgery, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center; and the Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital
| |
Collapse
|