Outcomes of distal femur fractures treated with the Synthes 4.5 mm VA-LCP Curved Condylar Plate

A retrospective cohort analysis of failure and potential causes after osteosynthesis of femoral fractures with VA-LCP Condylar plate 4.5/5.0, Depuy Synthes

Background

Since 2014, the VA-LCP Condylar Plate 4.5/5.0, Depuy Synthes, has been the preferred implant for these injuries at our institution, however, speculations have been made whether it is more prone to failure compared to other implants. Thus, the aim of the study was to describe the cohort treated with the VA-LCP Condylar Plate 4.5/5.0, Depuy Synthes, at our department from 2014 to 2020, including the number of failures. Secondary, whether specific outcome measures were significantly overrepresented in the failure group.

Methods

Patients were identified through the hospital database, and demographic data was extracted from patient files. X-rays were evaluated for injury type, osteosynthesis characteristics, and whether the construct failed during follow-up. Thanks to the national patient record database a minimum of patients was lost to follow-up.

Results

After exclusion 159 patients (165 osteosyntheses, descriptive part) and 108 patients (112 osteosyntheses, subgroup analysis) were eligible for inclusion. The VA-LCP Condylar Plate 4.5/5.0, Depuy Synthes, was used for most AO-type fractures and inserted as both neutralization, buttress, and bridging plates. Overall failure was seen in 8 % of osteosyntheses. Significantly more failures were seen in patients with increased Body Mass Index (BMI) (24 vs. 32, p = 0,046) and those treated for a periprosthetic fractures (41 % vs. 89 %, p = 0,005). We did not see an association between failure and plate length, bridge span, screw density or the degree of medial support.

Conclusion

The VA-LCP Condylar Plate 4.5/5.0, Depuy Synthes is a versatile plate with failure rates comparable to previously reported studies. This study confirmed that elevated BMI may be a risk factor for failure, while other previously reported risk factors were not associated with failure in this study.

A novel anatomical locked medial femoral condyle plate: a biomechanical study

BACKGROUND

Fixation with a distal lateral femoral plate is a standard approach in treating osteoporotic or comminuted supracondylar femur fractures. However, in clinical practice, this method may prove inadequate, necessitating the application of a plate on the medial side of the distal femur. The aim of this study is to perform a biomechanical evaluation of the newly manufactured anatomically locked plate applied to the distal medial femoral condyle.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The plate underwent 2 biomechanical tests by simulating an AO/OTA 33A3 type supracondylar fracture model on synthetic femur bones. The samples were divided into three groups. Fracture fixations were carried out on the medial side using the distal femur medial anatomical locking plate (DFMALP) in group A samples, on the lateral side using the distal femur lateral anatomical locking plate in group B samples, and on both sides in group C samples.

RESULTS

In the axial compression test, stability was preserved 23% more in group C than in group B. During the cyclic axial compression test, total displacement was 21% less in group C than in group B. Group A was collapsed at early cycle degrees.

CONCLUSION

In our study, it was observed that the application of DFMALP in conjunction with the lateral plate in AO/OTA 33A3 fragmented supracondylar femur fractures significantly enhanced biomechanical fracture stability.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

This is a Level 2 prospective, randomized controlled study.

Retrograde intramedullary nailing or locked plating for stabilisation of distal femoral fractures? A comparative study of 193 patients

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of distal femoral fracture fixation of two different methods, lateral locking plate (LP) or an Intra-medullary nail (IMN), in patients managed in our institution. More specifically, to assess: (a) if there was a difference in functional outcomes between the LP and IMN groups; (b) whether the rate of complications was different between the two groups.

METHODS

Between January 2009 and December 2018 adult patients with distal femoral fractures managed in our unit with either LP or IMN for extra and intra-articular fractures were eligible to participate. Demographic details, fracture type, procedures performed, time to union, complications and functional scores (Oxford Knee Score) were recorded and analysed. The mean follow up was 4 years (12-120 months).

RESULTS

Out of 193 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 93 received an IMN whereas 100 patients were treated with LP. Mean age was 64.2 (18-99) and 70.1 (18-100) for the IMN and LP groups respectively. Overall, the two groups had similar demographics and there was no significant difference in the type of fractures sustained (p > 0.05). The Oxford Knee Score was highest for patients fixed with LP, mean 37.3 (6-48, SD 7.3) versus 28.4 (3-48, SD 14.4), (p =  < 0.02) compared to the IMN group. In terms of complications, the rate of non-union was higher in the LP group 8.6% versus 4% in those patients treated with an IMN, p value < 0.01.

CONCLUSION

While the rate of non-union was higher in the LP group and the functional results were superior in the plating group.

DISTAL FEMORAL FRACTURES FROM HIGH-ENERGY TRAUMA: A RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW OF COMPLICATION RATE AND RISK FACTORS

Objective

Determine complications' incidence and risk factors in high-energy distal femur fractures fixed with a lateral locked plate.

Methods

Forty-seven patients were included; 87.2% were male, and the average age was 38.9. The main radiographic parameters collected were distal lateral femoral angle (DFA), distal posterior femoral angle (DPLF), comminution length, plate length, screw working length, bone loss, and medial contact after reduction and plate-bone contact, location of callus formation, and implant failure. The complications recorded were nonunion, implant failure, and infection.

Results

Complex C2 and C3 fractures accounted for 85.1% of cases. Open fractures accounted for 63.8% of cases. The mean AFDL and AFDP were 79.8 4.0 and 79.3 6.0, respectively. The average total proximal and distal working lengths were 133.3 42.7, 60.4 33.4, and 29.5 21.8 mm, respectively. The infection rate was 29.8%, and the only risk factor was open fracture (p = 0.005). The nonunion rate was 19.1%, with longer working length (p = 0.035) and higher PDFA (p = 0.001) as risk factors. The site of callus formation also influenced pseudoarthrosis (p = 0.034).

Conclusion

High-energy distal femoral fractures have a higher incidence of pseudoarthrosis and infection. Nonunion has greater working length, greater AFDL, and absence of callus formation on the medial and posterior sides as risk factors. The risk factor for infection was an open fracture. Level of Evidence III; Retrospective Cohort Study .

Distal femoral fractures: A comparison between single lateral plate fixation and a combined femoral nail and plate fixation

OBJECTIVES

Distal femoral fractures occur in patients with osteoporotic bone and also as a consequence of high energy trauma. The recognised treatment options include closed or open reduction of the fracture and fixation using a locking plate or a femoral nail. Both these fixation modalities have some drawbacks. There is a risk of metalwork failure with single lateral locking plates and limited distal fixation with intramedullary nails. Since January 2018, we started using augmented fixation of distal femoral fractures using a combination of a retrograde femoral nail and a lateral locking plate. This study compares the outcomes of single lateral femoral plating (SLP) and combined nail-plate fixation (NPF).

METHODS

This is a single centre retrospective case control study including all patients who sustained distal femoral fractures (OTA 33-A2, 33-A3, 33-C, 33-V3B and 33-V3D) over the study period. Outcomes for SLP were compared to NPF. The principal outcome measure was fracture union. Secondary outcome measures were reoperation rate, mortality and post-operative weight bearing status.

RESULTS

67 distal femoral fractures were included in the study. 19 patients had peri‑prosthetic fractures. 40 were treated by SLP, 27 were managed with NPF.  23 (58%) patients in the SLP group were given instructions to non-weight bear or Toe touch weight bear for 6 weeks post-surgery compared to 1 (4%) in the NPF group (p = 0.000004). 7 (18%) patients treated with SLP had metalwork failure due to a non-union compared to none treated with NPF (p = 0.04). 11 fractures in the SLP group failed to unite compared to no non-unions in the NPF group (p = 0.01). These differences were magnified when assessing older (>50 years old) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Augmented fixation of distal femoral fractures using a nail plate fixation provided significantly higher union and enabled early weightbearing compared to single plate fixation. We recommend nail plate fixation for the treatment of distal femoral fractures, particularly in osteoporotic fractures.

Treatment of distal femur fractures with VA-LCP condylar plate: A single trauma centre experience

INTRODUCTION

Given the recent criticisms in the literature regarding Synthes Variable Angle Locking Compression Condylar Plate (VA-LCP), the purpose of this study was to evaluate functional outcome, fracture healing, and complications of distal femoral intra-articular fractures using this device.

METHODS

Patients with distal femoral fractures treated with 4.5 mm VA-LCP Curved Condylar Plate were included in this retrospective study. Follow-ups were at 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year. For the clinical and functional assessment of the knee, WOMAC, Koos Knee Survey, the Knee Score Society and the SF-12 questionnaire were used. Radiographically we assessed the fracture healing and the angles of the operated limb compared to the healthy contralateral limb. Complications have also been described.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients with distal femoral fractures were included in the study. The mean follow-up was 8 months. Most cases (57%) reported a type 33-A fracture. Radiological healing was achieved in 33 cases; the mean time required to heal was 13 weeks. Three patients had an early postoperative complication and four cases had a late complication. Five cases required additional surgical procedures. Most patients (47.2%) achieved a complete flexion of 130° or more. WOMAC mean value 27.4%, KSS mean value 77.6 for the clinical part and 60 for the functional part, KOOS mean score 60.1, SF-12 mean score 46.1 for MCS and 35.5 for PCS.

DISCUSSION

The results of this retrospective study suggest that VA-LCP Curved Condylar Plates have a good functional outcome and fracture healing similar to other standard distal femoral locking plates. VA technology allows greater versatility in fractures internal fixation regardless of the plate design. Fixation devices or Prosthesis implants previously placed may be avoided, as in periprosthetic fractures. Moreover, we have not recorded any early mechanical damage.

CONCLUSIONS

Osteosynthesis with Synthes 4.5 mm VA-LCP Curved Condylar Plate demonstrated to have no early mechanical failure rate with good clinical and radiological results.

Clinical outcomes of revision with retrograde intermedullary nailing for failed plating of distal femoral fractures: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

To assess the feasibility and effectiveness of retrograde intramedullary nail (RIN) revision surgeries for locking compression plate (LCP) failure in distal femoral fractures.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 13 patients who suffered from metalwork failures after they initially underwent open reduction and LCP fixation. In patients who eventually underwent RIN revision from January 2014 to December 2016, range of motion (ROM) and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) scores obtained before surgery and at the final follow-up time were analysed.

RESULTS

The average operative time was 155 minutes (range, 120-210 minutes), and the average blood loss volume was 650 ml (range, 200-1350 ml). There were two cases of complications (15.38%): one was calf muscle vein thrombosis, and the other was a superficial infection. No deep tissue infection or deep vein thrombosis was observed post-operatively. The average follow-up time was 16 months (range, 12-24 months). All fractures healed in a mean of 6.5 months (range, 4-12 months), and one patient underwent an additional bone graft surgery that did not involve a bone graft during the RIN revision operation (this eventually healed at 12 months post-operatively). The mean ROM before the operation was 86.92 ± 12.34°. At the final follow-up, the mean ROM was 112.69 ± 9.27°. There was a significant difference between pre-operative and post-operative ROM (P < 0.01). The mean HSS score improved significantly from 38.85 ± 9.62 points pre-operatively to 79.62 ± 5.42 points post-operatively. There was a significant difference between pre-operative and post-operative HSS scores (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

RIN revision surgery achieved excellent clinical results in patients with LCP failure.

Management of neglected distal femur epiphyseal fracture-separation

INTRODUCTION

Neglected epiphyseal fracture-separations of the distal femur are rare. Still reported in developing countries, they lead to therapeutic issues. The objective of the study is to describe their characteristics and to propose treatment options.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten years of ongoing study was held in our orthopedics department. All patients with a neglected epiphyseal fracture-separations of the distal femur after a knee trauma were included in the study. Pre-operative and post-operative data were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 13 cases of neglected traumatic epiphyseal fracture-separations of the distal femur were found among 8616 in-patients of the department. It was mainly boys (9M/4F) around 16 years that were received 14 weeks after knee trauma. Most of the injuries were an AO-type 33-E/2.1 (Simple Salter-Harris' type II) (n=12) distal femur malunion (n=10). Associated complications were cutaneous opening (n=7), superficial infection (n=4), deep infection (n=4). Fractures were management surgically (n=12) by an open osteoclasis procedure (n=9), debridement (n=7) and a thigh amputation (n=1). The outcome was better if an open osteoclasis procedure was early performed in closed distal femur mal-union with a complementary rehabilitation program.

CONCLUSION

Specialized trauma care facilities must be increased, and trauma education programs must be undertaken to avoid neglected epiphyseal fracture-separations of the distal femur in developing countries.

Functional outcome of open distal femoral fractures managed with lateral locking plates

PURPOSE

This prospective study evaluated the functional outcome and union rates of open distal femoral fractures managed with anatomic lateral locking plates.

METHODS

Thirty-four patients with open distal femur fractures with mean age of 40.8 years (range 20-65 years) were included in the study. Patients with Gustilo-Anderson grade IIIC fractures and those managed with non-locking modalities were excluded. In total, 70.6% (n = 24) of the fractures were Type IIIA and 55.9% (n = 19) were AO/OTA Type C3 fractures. In 23.5% (n = 8) patients, knee spanning external fixator was applied initially before definitive fixation. Patients were followed up for a mean period of 11.6 months (range 8-22.5 months). Functional outcome was evaluated using Sanders Score.

RESULTS

In the primary plating group, 69.2% (n = 18) fractures united at an average of 27 weeks (range 21-40 weeks), while eight patients had non-union and required bone grafting. All eight patients with external fixator underwent lateral locked plating with bone grafting and united at an average time of 39.6 weeks (range 31-50 weeks). There were two cases each of infection and screw failure. The final mean Sanders Score was 30.1 (range19-40) with 73.5% (n = 25) patients having good to excellent functional outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Lateral locking plates offer excellent stability to allow fracture union in open distal femoral fractures. A proactive approach to identify and manage potential healing difficulties is advisable to promote bone healing.